Effect of Foliar Application of Glutamine on Growth, Physiological Characteristics and Protein Content of Different Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Varieties

A
Ayyub J. Abdl-Rhmaan Al-Bayaty1
R
Rekzan Mazen Muhi2
E
Eabdallah Yasin Ali3
A
Ali Hussein Raheem4,*
1Department of Biology, College of Education for Women, Tikrit University, Salah Al-Din, Iraq.
2Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Salah Al-Din, Iraq.
3Department of Biology, College of Education for Women, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.
4Department of Forestry Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.

Background: Glutamic acid plays an important role by increasing the plant’s resistance to climate change and tolerance to unfavourable conditions such as high temperature, water stress, salinity and snow. It also acts as a strong chelating agent for trace elements and environmentally friendly fertilisers.

Methods: An experiment was conducted in plastic pots during the spring 2023 season in Kirkuk governorate, Iraq, to evaluate the effects of sorghum plant varieties (Rabih, Khair and Inkhath) under different doses of foliar application of glutamine (0, 40, 80 and 100 mg L-1) on growth, physiological characteristics and protein percent in grains. This experiment was designed using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. 

Result: The Inkhath variety significantly required fewer days to reach 50% flowering: 62.10 days. Also, it was significantly superior in plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, plant leaf number and flag leaf area, reaching 115.23 cm, 55.50 SPAD, 10.59 leaves plant-1 and 368.82 cm2, respectively. The concentration of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid was significantly the earliest at 50% flowering with the highest plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, leaf number, flag leaf area and grain protein percentage, reaching 58.31 days, 116.22 cm, 56.53 SPAD, 10.44 leaves plant-1, 391.68 cm2 and 14.36%, respectively. The interaction between Inkhath variety and spraying with 100 mg glutamic acid was significantly the earliest in 50% flowering with the highest means in plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, plant leaf number and flag leaf area, reaching 55.60 days, 121.67 cm, 58.00 SPAD, 11.06 leaves plant-1 and 450.06 cm2, respectively, as well as the interaction between Rabih variety with 100 mg glutamic acid was significantly recorded highest grain protein percentage 14.88 %. The Inkhath sorghum variety showed a high response to a high spraying rate of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, which improved growth, physiological traits and grain protein percentage.

Sorghum plants belonging to the Poaceae family, in terms of cultivated area and production, ranked fifth among cereal crops worldwide after wheat, barley, rice and maize (Al-Atwi, 2023; Mufumbo et al., 2023). It is grown in tropical and subtropical regions (FAO, 2021). Sorghum grains serve as an important source of food for both humans and livestock. In many regions, sorghum flour is blended with wheat flour at proportions of up to 50% for the preparation of various food products. In developed countries, particularly United States, approximately 90% of sorghum production is utilized in the food processing industry, including the manufacture of starch and other value-added products. Sorghum grains are nutritionally rich, containing approximately 12% protein, 70% carbohydrates and 3% fat and are also a good source of B-complex vitamins (Rana, 2013). It is also commonly used in preparing poultry feed because it contains a high amount of protein (Maaruf and Raheem, 2024; Li et al., 2025). It also contributes to meeting the need for green fodder in summer in Iraq (Hadi, 2020). This plant is also characterized by its tolerance to environmental conditions that are not suitable for its growth, such as drought, high temperatures and soil salinity (Saleh et al., 2026; Zakka et al., 2026). It has recently been used in the production of biofuel, where it now ranks second after corn (Abood et al., 2017; Al-Bayaty and Raheem, 2026). In industry, it is used as a basic material in the manufacture of dyes and candles (Sharif et al., 2024).
       
Amino acids play an important role in stimulating photosynthesis in plants by acting as mediators in the Krebs cycle, through which complex sugars are oxidised into simple compounds, resulting in carbon dioxide and water and generating energy in the form of ATP (Jaff and Medan, 2024). Glutamic acid plays an important role by entering into the storage of the chlorophyll molecule and working to increase the rate of photosynthesis in the plant and increase the biomass of the vegetative part and the root, as well as increase the resistance of the plant to climate changes and increase tolerance to unfavourable conditions such as high temperature, water stress, salinity and snow (Kumar et al., 2026). It also works as a strong chelating material for trace elements.
       
Although the sorghum plant is widely cultivated in Iraq as green fodder for animals, the crop is not at the required level due to the use of non-modern varieties and genotypes, primitive agricultural techniques and lack of farmers’ familiarity with modern fertilizers produced in the world. So this study was conducted to test modern varieties of sorghum and use of materials other than fertilizers that known as environmental pollutants, as well as the use of environmentally friendly and safe fertilizer technology.
This study was conducted during spring agricultural season of 2023 in Kirkuk governorate, Iraq. The soil taken from the River basin was air-dried and placed in plastic pots with a diameter of 0.3 m and a height of 0.4 m, amounting to 15 kg of soil per pot, after being sieved through a 2 mm sieve. After the soil in pots was watered, there was a long day left to get rid of the voids. Experiment was conducted in factorial completely randomized block design with three replications. Treatments comprised of three varieties of sorghum (Rabih, Khair and Inkhath) as one factor and  four glutamic acid concentrations (0, 40, 80 and 100 mg L-1) Foliar spray of glutamine was done at  four weeks after planting and four weeks after the first spray. 
       
The data were collected on the No. days to 50% flowering based on the appearance of 50% of the anthers in the plant inflorescence. Plant height (cm) was measured from the soil surface to the end of the inflorescence. Total chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter at the 75% flowering stage on 5 leaves per plant. No. Leaves plant-1 were counted for each plant. Flag leaf area (cm2) was measured when plants reached the 50% flowering stage according to Liang et al., (1973): length × maximum width × 0.75. Protein percentage in grains (%) was calculated as nitrogen percentage × 6.25 (Bremner and Mulvaney, 1982). The collected data was analyzed using the Minitab statistical software program (Minitab V-16.1, 2010) for analysis of variance and Duncan’s test at a probability level of 0.05 was used to compare treatment means. 
No. of days to 50% flowering (Day)
 
It is clear from the results of Table (1) that the varieties recorded significant effect on day to 50% flowering. Rabih variety recorded the longest days to reach this stages compared to Inkhath variety. The genetic differences among the varieties may have resulted differences in flowering times. The early variety may be more profitable than late varieties and requires higher collection temperatures to reach the flowering stage (Al-Aatwi, 2023). Similar results were observed by Raheem and Ali (2025) and Ahmadifauzan et al., (2026). It is also evident from Table 1 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid reduced the time to 50% flowering as  compared  to  control. This might have happened due to Amino acids regulate the date of flowering by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis and plant physiological responses and reducing inhibitory activity, causing the plant to transition from vegetative growth to flowering (Al-Fahad and AL-Janabi, 2025). The significant effect on days to 50% flowering was shown by the interaction effect between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations. The interaction between Rabih variety and control treatment recorded the longest days to reach this stage.

Table 1: No. of days to 50% flowering (Day) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Plant height (cm)
 
The results in Table 2 clearly show that the Inkhath variety plants were significantly taller than the other varieties’ plants. The variation among sorghum varieties in plant height is attributed to their genetic nature and their different responses to environmental conditions reflected in vegetative growth, including plant height. These results are in line with previous findings which reported that varieties significantly affect plant height (Abas et al., 2025; Mouhamad and Fadhil, 2025; Taha et al., 2025). It is also evident from Table 2 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid resulted in the tallest plants compared to the control. This might have been attributed to amino acids producing several plant hormones, including auxins (IAA), which increase apical dominance and stimulate the elongation of plant cells, increasing vegetative growth, stimulating cell division and accelerating stem elongation (Abd Al-Aziz, 2010). Turfan and Turan (2023) reported a similar effect of glutamic acid in increasing garlic (Allium sativum L.) plants. Plant height was significantly affected by the interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations; the Inkhath variety, sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, had the tallest plants. 

Table 2: Plant height (cm) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Total chlorophyll content in leaves (SPAD-Reading)
 
The data in Table 3 show that the varieties differed significantly in leaf total chlorophyll content. Inkhath variety recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll content compared to the other varieties. Al-Bayaty and Raheem (2026) reached similar results in maize. It is also evident from Table 3 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll content compared to the control. Glutamic acid encourages proline synthesis, which plays an important role in osmotic regulation of the cells and the protection of pigment systems during photosynthesis (AL-Bayati and Salih, 2021). Then, lead to an increase in the total chlorophyll content of plant leaves. This leads to an increase in the plant’s biological activity, as cell division and development and the effectiveness of the enzymatic system increase (Habeeb, 2022). Al-Fahad and Al-Janabi (2025) found a significant effect of amino acids on increasing total chlorophyll content of sorghum plant leaves. The interaction between varieties and foliar spray of glutamic acid significantly affected leaf chlorophyll content, with the highest SPAD reading when the Inkhath variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 of glutamic acid. 

Table 3: Leaves chlorophyll content (SPAD-Reading) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
No. of leaves plant-1
 
The results in Table 4 confirm that the Inkhath variety recorded significantly more leaves per plant compared to other varieties. This result came from differences in effect among varieties on plant height (Table 2). These results agreed with those obtained by Ali et al., (2025), Begna (2025) and Kusumawardana et al., (2025). It is also evident from Table 4 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid resulted in more leaf number compared to the control. This might have resulted in a reflection of glutamic acid’s effect on plant height (Table 2). The interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations significantly affected the number of plant leaves. The Inkhath variety sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded a higher plant leaf number.   

Table 4: No. of leaves plant-1 as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.

  
       
Flag leaf area (cm²)
 
The different varieties showed a significant effect on the flag leaf area of sorghum plants (Table 5). The Inkhath variety had the highest value of flag leaf area compared to the Rabih and Khair varieties. Raheem et al., (2023) noted a significant impact of maize varieties on leaf area index and leaf area ratio; Ahmadifauzan et al., (2026) reported that sorghum varieties differed significantly in plant flag leaf area. It is also evident from Table 5 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded the highest flag leaf area compared to the control. Spraying the vegetative parts with glutamic acid might have led to an increase in cell division and elongation, enhancing their activity and increasing their size, which reflected positively on the flag leaf area. Abas et al., (2025) found that sorghum plants sprayed with an amino acid significantly increased plant leaf area compared to the control. The interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations significantly affected flag leaf area; the highest value was recorded when the Inkhath variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 of glutamic acid.

Table 5: Flag leaf area (cm2) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Protein percentage (%) in grains
 
Fig 1 shows no significant differences among varieties in their effect on the sorghum grain protein content. The values were 13.30, 13.20 and 13.34% for the varieties Rabih, Khair and Inkhath, respectively. Fig 1 shows a significant effect of glutamic acid concentrations on grain protein content. A high value was recorded for foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, reaching 14.36%, compared to the control, which was 11.79%. Spraying amino acids on plant leaves improves physiological characteristics directly involved in nitrogen assimilation, through their ammonium (NH4+) contents. Amino acids and their derivatives stimulated the synthesis of chlorophyll, protein and phytohormones, as there is an increase in the percentage of protein (Noroozlo et al., 2019). Islam et al., (2024) reported a significant effect of glutamic acid spraying on increasing grain protein percentage in maize. The interaction between sorghum varieties and concentrations of glutamic acid showed a significant effect on sorghum grain protein content. A high value of 14.03% was recorded when the Rabih variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid.  

Fig 1: Grain protein content (%) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.

It concludes that the sorghum varieties varied significantly, with the Inkhath variety significantly excelling. Foliar spray of glutamic acid had a stimulating effect on growth, physiological characteristics and grain protein content at a high level of 100 mg L-1. The spraying of glutamic acid, as a growth stimulant, had practical implications for sorghum crop growth, improved plant growth through higher leaf chlorophyll content and promoted grain quality via increasing crude protein.
This study was supported by the Tikrit and Kirkuk University, Iraq.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Experiment on plants, not animals.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abas, S.A., Abdulhamed, Z.A., Saleh, B.H. and Abood, N.M. (2025). Impact of genotypic variation and arginine spraying on sorghum growth and productivity. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 25(2): 28-38. https://doi.org/ 10.25130/tjas.25.2.3

  2. Abdel Aziz, N.G., Mazher, A.A.M. and Farahat, M.M. (2010). Response of vegetative growth and chemical constituents of Thuja orientalis L. plant to foliar application of different amino acids at Nubari. Journal of American Science. 6(3): 295-301.

  3. Abood, N.M., AL-Hadeethi, M.A. and Saleh, B.H. (2017). Effect of bio fertilizer concentrations on the qualitative and quantitative traits of three cultivars of sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Anbar journal of Agricultural Sciences. 15(2): 430-442.

  4. Ahmadifauzan, I., Wirnas, D., Trikoesoemaningtyas, Sutjahjo, S.H. (2026). Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm with variations in Fe and Zn contents and their correlation with grain yield. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 58(2): 591-603. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao 2026.58.2.10.

  5. Al-Atwi, M.R. (2023). Response of cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) to spraying with different concentrations of salicylic acid. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, Al- Muthana University, Iraq.

  6. Al-Bayati, M.Y.I. and Salih, Z.K. (2021). Production of Dianthus caryophyllus L. cultivar (Haytor white) as cut flowers using day-extension treatment and mulching. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.  910: 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/910/012068.

  7. Al-Bayaty, A.J.A. and Raheem, A.H. (2026). Physiological effect of adding concentrations of humic acid on growth and protein percentage of Zea mays L. plant genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 60(4): 539- 544. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-1026.

  8. Al-Fahad, A.Ch. and AL-Janabi, Y.A. (2025). Effect of seed stimulation with the amino acid tryptophan and yeast on seed emergence, growth and sorghum crop. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 25(4): 284-297. https://doi.org/ 10.25130/tjas.25.4.23

  9. Ali, A.H., Sharif, Y.O.N.A., Raheem, A.H., Hussein, A.A.K. and Al- Mafarji, T.R.T. (2025). The effect of phosphorus levels on growth and yield components in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-771.

  10. Begna, T. (2025). Phenotypic variability analysis of key sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench] genotypes under dry lowland areas. Reproduction and Breeding. 5(2): 79- 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. repbre.2025.03.007

  11. Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1982). Nitrogen -Total. In: Methods of soil analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition,  [Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney D.R. (Eds.)]  Number 9 (Part 2) in the series Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin USA 1982. pp. 595-624.

  12. FAO, (2021). Quarterly Bulletin of Statistic. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Rome, Italy.

  13. Habeeb, R.S.B. (2022). Effect of Nano Zinc and Amino Acid Glutamic on Growth, Chemical Content and Active Sabstances of Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Mentha Piperita L. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, University of Tikrit, Iraq.

  14. Hadi, Z.S. (2020). Seed stimulation effect by gibberellic acid, mineral and nano calcium on germination, emergence and seedling characteristics in Sorghum. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

  15. Islam, M.M., Hassan, M.U., Ishfaq, M., Ripa, F.A., Nadeem, F., Ahmad, Z., Xu, J., Ning, P. and Li, X. (2024). Foliar glutamine application improves grain yield and nutritional quality of field-grown maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid ZD958. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator. 43: 624-637. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00344-023-11121-w.

  16. Jaff, A.A. and Medan, R.A. (2024). Effect of organic fertilizers and amino acids on the vegetative growth of young pomegranate trees Punica granatum L. cv. “Wonderful”. Plant Science Today. 11(3): 377-382. https://doi.org/ 10.14719/ pst.3588.

  17. Kumar, K., Banerjee, S., Malik, A., Tiwari, N., Bhusal, P., Kalotra, N.K., Singh, H. and Barthwal, S. (2026). Foliar application of glutamic acid enhances drought tolerance in poplar by coordinating physiological, molecular and phyllosphere microbial responses. Discover Plants. 3: 118. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00560-w.

  18. Kusumawardana, A., Ilyas, S., Abdul Qadir, Trikoesoemaningtyas and Human, S. (2025). Variability of agronomic characters and seed quality of 12 sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) genotypes. Biodiversitas. 26(2): 628-635. https://doi.org/ 10.13057/biodiv/d260210.

  19. Li, F., Yan, H., Wang, Z., Liu, T., Fan, G., Ren, Y., Zhang, Y., Ren, G., Zhu, W., Jiang, Y., Li, H., Huang, Y., Song, G., Li, M., Deng, Z., Su, D., Meng, F., Gao, F., Han, F., Yan, P., Li, J. and Li, G. (2025). Interpretation of genotype-environment- nitrogen management interactions in the early maturing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) region of China. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 19: Article 101600. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101600.

  20. Liang, G.H., Chu, C.C., Reddi, N.S., Lin, S.S. and Dayton, A.D. (1973). Leaf blade areas of grain sorghum varieties and hybrids. Agronomy Journal. 65(3): 456-459. https:// doi.org/10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500030030x.

  21. Maaruf, N.S.X. and Raheem, A.H. (2024). The effect of phosphorus fertilizer types and varieties on growth and yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Kirkuk University Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 15(4): 237-250. https:// doi.org/10.58928/ku24.15420.

  22. Minitab, (2010). Minitab Statistical Software (Version 16.1) [Computer software]. State College, PA, USA.

  23. Mouhamad, O.H. and Fadhil, A.H. (2025). Effect of ethephon and planting distances on growth and yield of three sorghum cultivars. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia. 54(4): 5218-5232. https://doi.org/10.48047/wv0ha334.

  24. Mufumbo, R., Chakrabarty, S., Nyine, M., Windpassinger, S.M., Mulumba, J.W., Baguma, Y., Odong, L.T., Frisch, M. and Snowdon, R.J. (2023). Genomics based assembly of a Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench core collection in the Uganda national genebank as a genetic resource for sustainable sorghum breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 70: 1439-1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10722-022-01513-4.

  25. Noroozlo, Y.A., Souri, M.K. and Delshad, M. (2019). Stimulation effects of foliar applied glycine and glutamine amino acids on lettuce growth. Open Agriculture. 4(1): 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0016.

  26. Raheem, A.H. and Ali, A.H. (2025). Impact of nanophosphorus on growth duration, development and biological yield of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 38(2): 55-71. https://doi.org/ 10.37077/25200860.2025.38.2.04 .

  27. Raheem, A.H., Ashraa Kalee, H.H.H. and Taha, A.A. (2023). The yield performance of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under different planting times. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences. 11(4): 657-664. https://doi.org/ 10.22194/JGIAS/23.1129. 

  28. Rana, D.S., Singh, B., Gupta, K. Dhaka, A.K. and Arya. S. (2013). Response of fodder sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench] to zinc and iron. Forage Research. 39(1): 45-47.

  29. Saleh, A.A., Sharif, Y.O.N.A. and Raheem, A.H. (2026). Abscisic acid exogenous spraying to improve sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes for tolerance to abiotic stress. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 49(2): 863-879. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.49.2.20. 

  30. Sharif, Y.O.N.A., Madab, D.S. and Hindi, H.A. (2024). Estimation of path analysis and genetic parameters for sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench] varieties in different environments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1371: Article 052035. https:// doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/5/052035.

  31. Taha, A.A., Raheem, A.H. and Ali, A.H. (2025). Agronomic indices assessment for horse bean (Vicia faba L.) based on seed stimulation by gibberellin and varieties. Agricultural Science Digest. 45(2): 234-239. doi: 10.18805/Ag.DF- 699.

  32. Turfan, N. and Turan, B. (2023). Effects of glutamic acid applications on the yield and growth parameters in garlic (Allium sativum L.) cultivation. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi. 27(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranzi raat.1176239.

  33. Zakka, T., Musa, A., Yashim, S.M., Hassan, M.R., Aruna, U.L. and Sadiq, A. (2026). Growth parameters of two sorghum variety as influenced by nitrogen level and planting density in Shika, Zaria. Fudma Journal of Animal Production and Environmental Science. 2(1): 109-116. https:// doi.org/10.33003/japes.2026.v2i1.109-116. 

Effect of Foliar Application of Glutamine on Growth, Physiological Characteristics and Protein Content of Different Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Varieties

A
Ayyub J. Abdl-Rhmaan Al-Bayaty1
R
Rekzan Mazen Muhi2
E
Eabdallah Yasin Ali3
A
Ali Hussein Raheem4,*
1Department of Biology, College of Education for Women, Tikrit University, Salah Al-Din, Iraq.
2Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Salah Al-Din, Iraq.
3Department of Biology, College of Education for Women, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.
4Department of Forestry Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq.

Background: Glutamic acid plays an important role by increasing the plant’s resistance to climate change and tolerance to unfavourable conditions such as high temperature, water stress, salinity and snow. It also acts as a strong chelating agent for trace elements and environmentally friendly fertilisers.

Methods: An experiment was conducted in plastic pots during the spring 2023 season in Kirkuk governorate, Iraq, to evaluate the effects of sorghum plant varieties (Rabih, Khair and Inkhath) under different doses of foliar application of glutamine (0, 40, 80 and 100 mg L-1) on growth, physiological characteristics and protein percent in grains. This experiment was designed using a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. 

Result: The Inkhath variety significantly required fewer days to reach 50% flowering: 62.10 days. Also, it was significantly superior in plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, plant leaf number and flag leaf area, reaching 115.23 cm, 55.50 SPAD, 10.59 leaves plant-1 and 368.82 cm2, respectively. The concentration of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid was significantly the earliest at 50% flowering with the highest plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, leaf number, flag leaf area and grain protein percentage, reaching 58.31 days, 116.22 cm, 56.53 SPAD, 10.44 leaves plant-1, 391.68 cm2 and 14.36%, respectively. The interaction between Inkhath variety and spraying with 100 mg glutamic acid was significantly the earliest in 50% flowering with the highest means in plant height, leaf chlorophyll content, plant leaf number and flag leaf area, reaching 55.60 days, 121.67 cm, 58.00 SPAD, 11.06 leaves plant-1 and 450.06 cm2, respectively, as well as the interaction between Rabih variety with 100 mg glutamic acid was significantly recorded highest grain protein percentage 14.88 %. The Inkhath sorghum variety showed a high response to a high spraying rate of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, which improved growth, physiological traits and grain protein percentage.

Sorghum plants belonging to the Poaceae family, in terms of cultivated area and production, ranked fifth among cereal crops worldwide after wheat, barley, rice and maize (Al-Atwi, 2023; Mufumbo et al., 2023). It is grown in tropical and subtropical regions (FAO, 2021). Sorghum grains serve as an important source of food for both humans and livestock. In many regions, sorghum flour is blended with wheat flour at proportions of up to 50% for the preparation of various food products. In developed countries, particularly United States, approximately 90% of sorghum production is utilized in the food processing industry, including the manufacture of starch and other value-added products. Sorghum grains are nutritionally rich, containing approximately 12% protein, 70% carbohydrates and 3% fat and are also a good source of B-complex vitamins (Rana, 2013). It is also commonly used in preparing poultry feed because it contains a high amount of protein (Maaruf and Raheem, 2024; Li et al., 2025). It also contributes to meeting the need for green fodder in summer in Iraq (Hadi, 2020). This plant is also characterized by its tolerance to environmental conditions that are not suitable for its growth, such as drought, high temperatures and soil salinity (Saleh et al., 2026; Zakka et al., 2026). It has recently been used in the production of biofuel, where it now ranks second after corn (Abood et al., 2017; Al-Bayaty and Raheem, 2026). In industry, it is used as a basic material in the manufacture of dyes and candles (Sharif et al., 2024).
       
Amino acids play an important role in stimulating photosynthesis in plants by acting as mediators in the Krebs cycle, through which complex sugars are oxidised into simple compounds, resulting in carbon dioxide and water and generating energy in the form of ATP (Jaff and Medan, 2024). Glutamic acid plays an important role by entering into the storage of the chlorophyll molecule and working to increase the rate of photosynthesis in the plant and increase the biomass of the vegetative part and the root, as well as increase the resistance of the plant to climate changes and increase tolerance to unfavourable conditions such as high temperature, water stress, salinity and snow (Kumar et al., 2026). It also works as a strong chelating material for trace elements.
       
Although the sorghum plant is widely cultivated in Iraq as green fodder for animals, the crop is not at the required level due to the use of non-modern varieties and genotypes, primitive agricultural techniques and lack of farmers’ familiarity with modern fertilizers produced in the world. So this study was conducted to test modern varieties of sorghum and use of materials other than fertilizers that known as environmental pollutants, as well as the use of environmentally friendly and safe fertilizer technology.
This study was conducted during spring agricultural season of 2023 in Kirkuk governorate, Iraq. The soil taken from the River basin was air-dried and placed in plastic pots with a diameter of 0.3 m and a height of 0.4 m, amounting to 15 kg of soil per pot, after being sieved through a 2 mm sieve. After the soil in pots was watered, there was a long day left to get rid of the voids. Experiment was conducted in factorial completely randomized block design with three replications. Treatments comprised of three varieties of sorghum (Rabih, Khair and Inkhath) as one factor and  four glutamic acid concentrations (0, 40, 80 and 100 mg L-1) Foliar spray of glutamine was done at  four weeks after planting and four weeks after the first spray. 
       
The data were collected on the No. days to 50% flowering based on the appearance of 50% of the anthers in the plant inflorescence. Plant height (cm) was measured from the soil surface to the end of the inflorescence. Total chlorophyll content was measured using a SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter at the 75% flowering stage on 5 leaves per plant. No. Leaves plant-1 were counted for each plant. Flag leaf area (cm2) was measured when plants reached the 50% flowering stage according to Liang et al., (1973): length × maximum width × 0.75. Protein percentage in grains (%) was calculated as nitrogen percentage × 6.25 (Bremner and Mulvaney, 1982). The collected data was analyzed using the Minitab statistical software program (Minitab V-16.1, 2010) for analysis of variance and Duncan’s test at a probability level of 0.05 was used to compare treatment means. 
No. of days to 50% flowering (Day)
 
It is clear from the results of Table (1) that the varieties recorded significant effect on day to 50% flowering. Rabih variety recorded the longest days to reach this stages compared to Inkhath variety. The genetic differences among the varieties may have resulted differences in flowering times. The early variety may be more profitable than late varieties and requires higher collection temperatures to reach the flowering stage (Al-Aatwi, 2023). Similar results were observed by Raheem and Ali (2025) and Ahmadifauzan et al., (2026). It is also evident from Table 1 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid reduced the time to 50% flowering as  compared  to  control. This might have happened due to Amino acids regulate the date of flowering by increasing the efficiency of photosynthesis and plant physiological responses and reducing inhibitory activity, causing the plant to transition from vegetative growth to flowering (Al-Fahad and AL-Janabi, 2025). The significant effect on days to 50% flowering was shown by the interaction effect between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations. The interaction between Rabih variety and control treatment recorded the longest days to reach this stage.

Table 1: No. of days to 50% flowering (Day) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Plant height (cm)
 
The results in Table 2 clearly show that the Inkhath variety plants were significantly taller than the other varieties’ plants. The variation among sorghum varieties in plant height is attributed to their genetic nature and their different responses to environmental conditions reflected in vegetative growth, including plant height. These results are in line with previous findings which reported that varieties significantly affect plant height (Abas et al., 2025; Mouhamad and Fadhil, 2025; Taha et al., 2025). It is also evident from Table 2 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid resulted in the tallest plants compared to the control. This might have been attributed to amino acids producing several plant hormones, including auxins (IAA), which increase apical dominance and stimulate the elongation of plant cells, increasing vegetative growth, stimulating cell division and accelerating stem elongation (Abd Al-Aziz, 2010). Turfan and Turan (2023) reported a similar effect of glutamic acid in increasing garlic (Allium sativum L.) plants. Plant height was significantly affected by the interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations; the Inkhath variety, sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, had the tallest plants. 

Table 2: Plant height (cm) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Total chlorophyll content in leaves (SPAD-Reading)
 
The data in Table 3 show that the varieties differed significantly in leaf total chlorophyll content. Inkhath variety recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll content compared to the other varieties. Al-Bayaty and Raheem (2026) reached similar results in maize. It is also evident from Table 3 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded the highest leaf chlorophyll content compared to the control. Glutamic acid encourages proline synthesis, which plays an important role in osmotic regulation of the cells and the protection of pigment systems during photosynthesis (AL-Bayati and Salih, 2021). Then, lead to an increase in the total chlorophyll content of plant leaves. This leads to an increase in the plant’s biological activity, as cell division and development and the effectiveness of the enzymatic system increase (Habeeb, 2022). Al-Fahad and Al-Janabi (2025) found a significant effect of amino acids on increasing total chlorophyll content of sorghum plant leaves. The interaction between varieties and foliar spray of glutamic acid significantly affected leaf chlorophyll content, with the highest SPAD reading when the Inkhath variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 of glutamic acid. 

Table 3: Leaves chlorophyll content (SPAD-Reading) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
No. of leaves plant-1
 
The results in Table 4 confirm that the Inkhath variety recorded significantly more leaves per plant compared to other varieties. This result came from differences in effect among varieties on plant height (Table 2). These results agreed with those obtained by Ali et al., (2025), Begna (2025) and Kusumawardana et al., (2025). It is also evident from Table 4 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid resulted in more leaf number compared to the control. This might have resulted in a reflection of glutamic acid’s effect on plant height (Table 2). The interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations significantly affected the number of plant leaves. The Inkhath variety sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded a higher plant leaf number.   

Table 4: No. of leaves plant-1 as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.

  
       
Flag leaf area (cm²)
 
The different varieties showed a significant effect on the flag leaf area of sorghum plants (Table 5). The Inkhath variety had the highest value of flag leaf area compared to the Rabih and Khair varieties. Raheem et al., (2023) noted a significant impact of maize varieties on leaf area index and leaf area ratio; Ahmadifauzan et al., (2026) reported that sorghum varieties differed significantly in plant flag leaf area. It is also evident from Table 5 that foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid recorded the highest flag leaf area compared to the control. Spraying the vegetative parts with glutamic acid might have led to an increase in cell division and elongation, enhancing their activity and increasing their size, which reflected positively on the flag leaf area. Abas et al., (2025) found that sorghum plants sprayed with an amino acid significantly increased plant leaf area compared to the control. The interaction between sorghum varieties and glutamic acid concentrations significantly affected flag leaf area; the highest value was recorded when the Inkhath variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 of glutamic acid.

Table 5: Flag leaf area (cm2) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.


 
Protein percentage (%) in grains
 
Fig 1 shows no significant differences among varieties in their effect on the sorghum grain protein content. The values were 13.30, 13.20 and 13.34% for the varieties Rabih, Khair and Inkhath, respectively. Fig 1 shows a significant effect of glutamic acid concentrations on grain protein content. A high value was recorded for foliar spray of 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid, reaching 14.36%, compared to the control, which was 11.79%. Spraying amino acids on plant leaves improves physiological characteristics directly involved in nitrogen assimilation, through their ammonium (NH4+) contents. Amino acids and their derivatives stimulated the synthesis of chlorophyll, protein and phytohormones, as there is an increase in the percentage of protein (Noroozlo et al., 2019). Islam et al., (2024) reported a significant effect of glutamic acid spraying on increasing grain protein percentage in maize. The interaction between sorghum varieties and concentrations of glutamic acid showed a significant effect on sorghum grain protein content. A high value of 14.03% was recorded when the Rabih variety was sprayed with 100 mg L-1 glutamic acid.  

Fig 1: Grain protein content (%) as affected by varieties, glutamic acid and interaction.

It concludes that the sorghum varieties varied significantly, with the Inkhath variety significantly excelling. Foliar spray of glutamic acid had a stimulating effect on growth, physiological characteristics and grain protein content at a high level of 100 mg L-1. The spraying of glutamic acid, as a growth stimulant, had practical implications for sorghum crop growth, improved plant growth through higher leaf chlorophyll content and promoted grain quality via increasing crude protein.
This study was supported by the Tikrit and Kirkuk University, Iraq.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Experiment on plants, not animals.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abas, S.A., Abdulhamed, Z.A., Saleh, B.H. and Abood, N.M. (2025). Impact of genotypic variation and arginine spraying on sorghum growth and productivity. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 25(2): 28-38. https://doi.org/ 10.25130/tjas.25.2.3

  2. Abdel Aziz, N.G., Mazher, A.A.M. and Farahat, M.M. (2010). Response of vegetative growth and chemical constituents of Thuja orientalis L. plant to foliar application of different amino acids at Nubari. Journal of American Science. 6(3): 295-301.

  3. Abood, N.M., AL-Hadeethi, M.A. and Saleh, B.H. (2017). Effect of bio fertilizer concentrations on the qualitative and quantitative traits of three cultivars of sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Anbar journal of Agricultural Sciences. 15(2): 430-442.

  4. Ahmadifauzan, I., Wirnas, D., Trikoesoemaningtyas, Sutjahjo, S.H. (2026). Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm with variations in Fe and Zn contents and their correlation with grain yield. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics. 58(2): 591-603. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao 2026.58.2.10.

  5. Al-Atwi, M.R. (2023). Response of cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) to spraying with different concentrations of salicylic acid. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, Al- Muthana University, Iraq.

  6. Al-Bayati, M.Y.I. and Salih, Z.K. (2021). Production of Dianthus caryophyllus L. cultivar (Haytor white) as cut flowers using day-extension treatment and mulching. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.  910: 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/910/012068.

  7. Al-Bayaty, A.J.A. and Raheem, A.H. (2026). Physiological effect of adding concentrations of humic acid on growth and protein percentage of Zea mays L. plant genotypes. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 60(4): 539- 544. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.AF-1026.

  8. Al-Fahad, A.Ch. and AL-Janabi, Y.A. (2025). Effect of seed stimulation with the amino acid tryptophan and yeast on seed emergence, growth and sorghum crop. Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 25(4): 284-297. https://doi.org/ 10.25130/tjas.25.4.23

  9. Ali, A.H., Sharif, Y.O.N.A., Raheem, A.H., Hussein, A.A.K. and Al- Mafarji, T.R.T. (2025). The effect of phosphorus levels on growth and yield components in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 1-6. doi: 10.18805/ag.DF-771.

  10. Begna, T. (2025). Phenotypic variability analysis of key sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench] genotypes under dry lowland areas. Reproduction and Breeding. 5(2): 79- 87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. repbre.2025.03.007

  11. Bremner, J.M. and Mulvaney, C.S. (1982). Nitrogen -Total. In: Methods of soil analysis Part 2 Chemical and Microbiological Properties Second Edition,  [Page, A.L., Miller, R.H. and Keeney D.R. (Eds.)]  Number 9 (Part 2) in the series Agronomy. Madison, Wisconsin USA 1982. pp. 595-624.

  12. FAO, (2021). Quarterly Bulletin of Statistic. Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations. Rome, Italy.

  13. Habeeb, R.S.B. (2022). Effect of Nano Zinc and Amino Acid Glutamic on Growth, Chemical Content and Active Sabstances of Rosmarinus officinalis L. and Mentha Piperita L. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, University of Tikrit, Iraq.

  14. Hadi, Z.S. (2020). Seed stimulation effect by gibberellic acid, mineral and nano calcium on germination, emergence and seedling characteristics in Sorghum. M.Sc. Theses, College of Agriculture, University of Kerbala, Iraq.

  15. Islam, M.M., Hassan, M.U., Ishfaq, M., Ripa, F.A., Nadeem, F., Ahmad, Z., Xu, J., Ning, P. and Li, X. (2024). Foliar glutamine application improves grain yield and nutritional quality of field-grown maize (Zea mays L.) hybrid ZD958. Journal of Plant Growth Regulator. 43: 624-637. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00344-023-11121-w.

  16. Jaff, A.A. and Medan, R.A. (2024). Effect of organic fertilizers and amino acids on the vegetative growth of young pomegranate trees Punica granatum L. cv. “Wonderful”. Plant Science Today. 11(3): 377-382. https://doi.org/ 10.14719/ pst.3588.

  17. Kumar, K., Banerjee, S., Malik, A., Tiwari, N., Bhusal, P., Kalotra, N.K., Singh, H. and Barthwal, S. (2026). Foliar application of glutamic acid enhances drought tolerance in poplar by coordinating physiological, molecular and phyllosphere microbial responses. Discover Plants. 3: 118. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00560-w.

  18. Kusumawardana, A., Ilyas, S., Abdul Qadir, Trikoesoemaningtyas and Human, S. (2025). Variability of agronomic characters and seed quality of 12 sorghum (Sorghum bicolour) genotypes. Biodiversitas. 26(2): 628-635. https://doi.org/ 10.13057/biodiv/d260210.

  19. Li, F., Yan, H., Wang, Z., Liu, T., Fan, G., Ren, Y., Zhang, Y., Ren, G., Zhu, W., Jiang, Y., Li, H., Huang, Y., Song, G., Li, M., Deng, Z., Su, D., Meng, F., Gao, F., Han, F., Yan, P., Li, J. and Li, G. (2025). Interpretation of genotype-environment- nitrogen management interactions in the early maturing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) region of China. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 19: Article 101600. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101600.

  20. Liang, G.H., Chu, C.C., Reddi, N.S., Lin, S.S. and Dayton, A.D. (1973). Leaf blade areas of grain sorghum varieties and hybrids. Agronomy Journal. 65(3): 456-459. https:// doi.org/10.2134/agronj1973.00021962006500030030x.

  21. Maaruf, N.S.X. and Raheem, A.H. (2024). The effect of phosphorus fertilizer types and varieties on growth and yield of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Kirkuk University Journal for Agricultural Sciences. 15(4): 237-250. https:// doi.org/10.58928/ku24.15420.

  22. Minitab, (2010). Minitab Statistical Software (Version 16.1) [Computer software]. State College, PA, USA.

  23. Mouhamad, O.H. and Fadhil, A.H. (2025). Effect of ethephon and planting distances on growth and yield of three sorghum cultivars. Cuestiones de Fisioterapia. 54(4): 5218-5232. https://doi.org/10.48047/wv0ha334.

  24. Mufumbo, R., Chakrabarty, S., Nyine, M., Windpassinger, S.M., Mulumba, J.W., Baguma, Y., Odong, L.T., Frisch, M. and Snowdon, R.J. (2023). Genomics based assembly of a Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench core collection in the Uganda national genebank as a genetic resource for sustainable sorghum breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 70: 1439-1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10722-022-01513-4.

  25. Noroozlo, Y.A., Souri, M.K. and Delshad, M. (2019). Stimulation effects of foliar applied glycine and glutamine amino acids on lettuce growth. Open Agriculture. 4(1): 164-172. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0016.

  26. Raheem, A.H. and Ali, A.H. (2025). Impact of nanophosphorus on growth duration, development and biological yield of chickpea cultivars (Cicer arietinum L.). Basrah Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 38(2): 55-71. https://doi.org/ 10.37077/25200860.2025.38.2.04 .

  27. Raheem, A.H., Ashraa Kalee, H.H.H. and Taha, A.A. (2023). The yield performance of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under different planting times. Journal of Global Innovations in Agricultural Sciences. 11(4): 657-664. https://doi.org/ 10.22194/JGIAS/23.1129. 

  28. Rana, D.S., Singh, B., Gupta, K. Dhaka, A.K. and Arya. S. (2013). Response of fodder sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench] to zinc and iron. Forage Research. 39(1): 45-47.

  29. Saleh, A.A., Sharif, Y.O.N.A. and Raheem, A.H. (2026). Abscisic acid exogenous spraying to improve sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] genotypes for tolerance to abiotic stress. Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science. 49(2): 863-879. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjtas.49.2.20. 

  30. Sharif, Y.O.N.A., Madab, D.S. and Hindi, H.A. (2024). Estimation of path analysis and genetic parameters for sorghum [Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench] varieties in different environments. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 1371: Article 052035. https:// doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1371/5/052035.

  31. Taha, A.A., Raheem, A.H. and Ali, A.H. (2025). Agronomic indices assessment for horse bean (Vicia faba L.) based on seed stimulation by gibberellin and varieties. Agricultural Science Digest. 45(2): 234-239. doi: 10.18805/Ag.DF- 699.

  32. Turfan, N. and Turan, B. (2023). Effects of glutamic acid applications on the yield and growth parameters in garlic (Allium sativum L.) cultivation. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi. 27(1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranzi raat.1176239.

  33. Zakka, T., Musa, A., Yashim, S.M., Hassan, M.R., Aruna, U.L. and Sadiq, A. (2026). Growth parameters of two sorghum variety as influenced by nitrogen level and planting density in Shika, Zaria. Fudma Journal of Animal Production and Environmental Science. 2(1): 109-116. https:// doi.org/10.33003/japes.2026.v2i1.109-116. 
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)