Seasonal population dynamics of L. boeticus
Larval counts of
L.
boeticus on cowpea increased progressively from the third week after sowing, peaked between Weeks 5 and 7 and declined as pod-filling advanced under all cropping systems. The maximum mean egg density was 3.5 eggs plant
-1 in sole cowpea at Week 6, while the maximum mean larval density was 3.4 larvae plant
-1 in sole cowpea at Week 6. The highest larval peak was recorded in sole cowpea (T
1), whereas peaks were markedly lower in all intercropped treatments, particularly in T
3 (1:1) and T
5 (1:2). A similar temporal pattern, associated with the peak availability of floral buds and tender pods, has been reported in previous studies from Iraq (
Al-Karboli and Al-Janabi 2017). The concurrent rise in maximum temperature and decline in relative humidity over the sampling period (Table 1) were consistent with conditions known to favour
L.
boeticus activity (
Al-Karboli and Al-Janabi 2017;
CABI 2023).
The lower larval peaks observed under intercropping are consistent with the host-dilution hypothesis, whereby the physical presence of cucumber plants reduces the effective cowpea density per unit area and impairs the host-finding ability of gravid female
L.
boeticus. This mechanism, together with canopy-mediated disruption of visual and olfactory host-location cues, has been widely invoked to explain pest suppression in legume-based intercropping systems (
Trenbath 1993;
Mushi et al., 2020; Hassan, 2009;
Masvaya et al., 2017; Dingha et al., 2021; Coulibaly et al., 2024).
Severity of infestation and damage indices
Cropping system had a significant effect on all measured damage indices (ANOVA, p<0.05; Table 2). Sole cowpea (T
1) recorded the highest mean larval density (4.1 larvae plant
-1), pod infestation (48.0%), holes per pod (2.3) and proportion of damaged seeds (30.0%). Under the tested field-management conditions, all intercropping treatments significantly reduced these indices relative to T
1 (DMRT, p≤0.05), while no significant differences were detected among intercropping treatments (T
3, T
4, T
5). Mean larval density declined to 2.7, 3.0 and 2.4 larvae plant
-1 in T
3, T
4 and T
5, respectively, while pod infestation fell to 34.0%, 37.0% and 31.0%.
The reductions in pod infestation and seed damage under intercropping (Table 2) indicate meaningful mitigation of economic losses attributable to
L.
boeticus. Comparable reductions in pest density and feeding damage have been reported in cowpea-based intercropping systems with cereals and other companion crops
(Dingha et al., 2021; Coulibaly et al., 2024). Among intercropping arrangements, T
5 (1:2) produced the lowest pod infestation and seed damage, suggesting that a higher proportion of cucumber in the canopy amplifies the host-dilution and host-finding disruption effects on
L.
boeticus. The absence of significant differences among T
3, T
4 and T
5 indicates that any cowpea-cucumber arrangement confers substantial pest suppression relative to sole cowpea.
Crop yields and land equivalent ratio
Sole cowpea (T
1) produced the highest grain yield (2,300 kg ha
-1), which declined significantly to 1,900, 2,100 and 1,750 kg ha
-1 in T
3, T
4 and T
5, respectively (DMRT, p≤0.05; Table 3). Sole cucumber (T‚ ) produced the highest fruit yield (25.0 t ha
-1), which was reduced to 18.0, 15.0 and 20.0 t ha
-1 in T
3, T
4 and T
5, respectively. The lowest cucumber yield in T
4 (2:1) is attributable to the dominant proportion of cowpea rows, which reduced the cucumber area and intensified interspecific competition for resources. These yield reductions under intercropping are expected consequences of interspecific competition for light, water and nutrients
(Mushi et al., 2020; Hassan, 2009;
Masvaya et al., 2017).
Despite lower individual crop yields, all intercropping systems achieved total LER values of 1.51-1.56 (Fig 1), indicating that 51-56% more land under sole cropping would be required to achieve the same combined output. These LER values are consistent with those reported for comparable legume-based intercrops in semi-arid environments (
Trenbath 1993;
Dingha et al., 2021; Coulibaly et al., 2024). From a management perspective, T
5 (1:2) achieved the greatest pest suppression and the highest LER (1.56) but the lowest cowpea grain yield (1,750 kg ha
-1), while T
3 (1:1) offered intermediate pest suppression, an LER of 1.55 and better cowpea yield retention (1,900 kg ha
-1). The preferred system depends on whether the farmer prioritizes pest suppression and overall system efficiency (T
5) or a more balanced retention of cowpea grain yield (T
3).
Relationship between weather factors and L. boeticus infestation
Pearson correlation analysis revealed a strong positive association between mean larval density and pod infestation (r = 0.82, p≤0.01; Table 4). Moderate positive correlations were detected between maximum temperature and both larval density (r = 0.69, p≤0.05) and pod infestation (r = 0.71, p≤0.05). Relative humidity was negatively correlated with both larval density (r = -0.63, p≤0.05) and pod infestation (r = -0.66, p≤0.05). These associations should be interpreted as exploratory, given the small sample size (n = 10 weekly periods) and the potential for temporal autocorrelation to inflate correlation estimates. Nevertheless, the directional patterns are consistent with published ecological accounts of
L.
boeticus (
Al-Karboli and Al-Janabi, 2017;
Dingha et al., 2021; Khidher, 2024) and confirm that warmer, drier conditions during flowering and pod-filling favour higher pest activity.
Methodological limitation related to pesticide use
A methodological limitation of the present study is the single cucumber-targeted deltamethrin application made at Week 6 in cucumber-containing treatments. Although the insecticide was not applied directly to cowpea rows and was used uniformly across all cucumber-containing treatments, deltamethrin is a pyrethroid insecticide that can affect insects through direct contact or ingestion (
National Pesticide Information Center (NPIC) 2010). Therefore, a possible indirect effect through spray drift or altered arthropod activity cannot be completely excluded. For this reason, the reduction in
L.
boeticus infestation in intercropped plots should be interpreted as the combined outcome of the intercropping system under practical IPM field-management conditions, rather than as a purely pesticide-free intercropping effect. Future experiments should include an additional factorial treatment structure with sprayed and unsprayed intercropping plots, or completely exclude insecticides, to isolate the independent contribution of crop arrangement to
L.
boeticus suppression.