Morpho-molecular Characterization of Agroathelia rolfsii Causing Basal Stem Rot Disease of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in the Semi-deciduous Forest and Transitional Zone of Ghana

M
Maxwell Kwodane1
A
Abdulai Muntala2,*
J
Joseph Adomako1
K
Kwadwo Gyasi Santo2
F
Frank Ankomah-Boamah2
Y
Yükselbaba Utku3
S
Shadrack Asomah2
S
Shadrack Kwaku Debrah2
K
Kwasi Haruna2
1CSIR-Crop Research Institute, Plant Pathology Unit, Fumesua, Ghana.
2Department of Horticulture and Crop Production, School of Agriculture and Technology, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Dormaa-Ahenkro, Ghana.
3Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Background: Stem rot disease, caused by Agroathelia rolfsii (soil-borne) has increasingly become a threat to cowpea cultivation. This study, carried out in the 2023 and 2024 farming seasons, aimed to isolate and identify causal pathogen(s) of Basal stem rot from cowpea-growing districts in nine farmers’ fields within Ejisu-Juaben, Ejura-Sekyedumase and kwadaso municipalities in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana.

Methods: Fungal pathogens were isolated from infected cowpea plants exhibiting symptoms of Basal stem rot. The pathogen was identified as A. rolfsii using morphological and phylogenetic studies of the sequenced internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region.

Result: All isolates from kwadaso and ejura municipalities exhibited a pure white mycelia colour, compared to isolates from Ejisu municipality that had a dull white mycelia colouration with clamp connections. All isolates formed fluffy textured mycelia in culture. No significant variations (P = 0.736) were observed in the isolate’s radial growth after the first 48 hours and 72 hours (P = 0.736) and the number of days it took to form sclerotia. The isolates differed significantly (P<0.001) in the number of sclerotia produced per plate, with a mean of 183.11. The sequenced amplicon of the PCR identified the pathogen as Agroathelia rolfsii.

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) serves as a multipurpose dietary staple across several Sahelian nations, supplying sustenance for humans and livestock while serving as a vital source of revenue for farmers and grain merchants, particularly in tropical regions. The crop is primarily cultivated for its dried grains; approximately one-quarter of the harvest is either consumed directly by farming households or sold as fresh green pods in local markets (Kebede, 2020).
       
The grain makes up over 80% of Ghana’s cowpea production, mostly in the savannah regions (Egbadzor et al., 2013). According to FAOSTAT (2021), the total cultivated area of cowpea was about 149,102 (ha), total production of almost 202,735 tons with a yield (hg/ha) of 13,597 in Ghana. Although cowpea seed yields vary greatly, they are the lowest in the world, averaging 310 kg/ha (Ofosu-Budu  et al., 2008). Despite its significance, cowpea production is limited by several factors. In Ghana, pests and diseases, inadequate soil fertility, as well as drought, are the main obstacles to cowpea production (ICRISAT, 2013). Diseases can infect cowpea at several stages, including emergence, vegetative and reproductive phases, resulting in significant plant damage and thus leading to yield loss or total production failure.
       
Agroathelia rolfsii
(= Sclerotium rolfsii) has been recognized as a significant soil-borne fungus responsible for basal stem rot disease in cowpea globally. The pathogen is recognized as a cosmopolitan parasite residing in soil and is extensively distributed, especially in warm, humid climates (Adandonon et al., 2004). It is reported to infect tomato plants and many other crops, including common bean, soybean, potato, lentil, sesame, chili, brinjal and widely distributed in tropics, sub tropics and warm regions (Paparu et al., 2020; Babu and Deepika, 2022). The pathogen survives the winter and persists as sclerotia in soil and on infected plants or residues for an extended duration.
       
Historically, morphological and cultural characteristics have been used to identify Sclerotium at the genus level. Nevertheless, the delimitation of Sclerotium to the species level is the extent of these identification methods. A. rolfsii is separated from two of the most related species, A. delphinii and A. coffeicola, by sclerotial morphology and growth, occasionally developing morphology that is inseparable at high temperatures (Paul et al., 2023). Furthermore, when cultivated in the medium, isolates of A. rolfsii from various hosts and geographic regions usually display varying morphological traits (Paparu et al., 2020; Paul et al., 2017). However, morphology-based species delimitation is still insufficient for species-level Sclerotium resolution. Agroathelia identification problems have been successfully resolved by sequencing conserved sections or genes, such as the ITS-region, using the sequences to inform phylogenetic analysis (Paul et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2010). The development of successful management techniques to control the disease depends on the accurate identification of pathogens through both morphological and molecular investigation (Paul et al., 2017). Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate and identify, via morphology and molecular analysis, the pathogen(s) associated with cowpea basal stem rot disease in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana.
Study area
 
This research was carried out in the Ejisu-Juaben, Ejura-Sekyedumase and Kwadaso Municipalities within the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana from 2023 to 2024. Ejisu-Juaben Municipality lies within Latitudes 1°15'N and 1°45'N and Longitude 6°15'W and 7°00'W. Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality is located within Longitudes 1°5W and 1°39 W and Latitudes 7°9N and 7°36N. Kwadaso municipality lies within Latitude 6°41'41"N and Longitude 1°39'16"W. All the study areas experience a bimodal rainfall pattern. A non-probability convenience sampling strategy was utilized in selecting 9 farmers’ fields in each study area (Ejisu-Juaben municipality, Ejura-Sekyedumase municipality and kwadaso municipality). A simple random sampling technique was applied to obtain a total of 45 infected cowpea plants exhibiting symptoms of basal stem rot.
 
Sample collection
 
A non-probability convenience sampling technique was employed to select farmers’ fields and a simple random method was employed to sample infected cowpea plants with the typical symptoms of basal stem rot (leaves, stems and roots) in the selected municipalities during the 2023-2024 farming seasons (Fig 1). The disease samples were sent to the crop research institute (CSIR-CRI), Plant Pathology Laboratory in Fumesua, Ghana, where the fungus was subsequently cultured and morphologically identified.

Fig 1: Signs and symptoms of stem rot disease observed on cowpea.


 
Inoculum preparation and incubation    
                                      

A modified procedure by Tanimu et al., (2018) was used to prepare potato dextrose agar (PDA) as the culturing medium. Sclerotia and mycelia were obtained from the infected cowpea tissues sampled in Ejusu, Kwadaso and Ejura municipalities. The sclerotia were dried and stored in Petri dishes incubated at 30°C. A sterilized scalpel was used to cut tissues of about 5 mm from infected stems and roots. The tissues were surface sterilized in 5% NaOCl for 3 minutes, rinsed in 3 exchanges of sterile distilled water, dried on sterile filter paper and placed on PDA. The plates were incubated at room temperature (28±2°C) for 4 to 7 days depending on the appearance of fruiting bodies.
       
Plates were incubated under Near Ultra Violet (NUV) light provided by a 4ft fluorescent tube (Philips, TLD 36 W/80). To maximize induction of sporulation and promote equal distribution of light radiation, shelves in the incubation room were supplied with two 4ft fluorescent tubes hanging horizontally, 20 cm from each other and the plates/dishes placed 40 cm from the tubes. All media plates were sealed with parafilm before incubation.
 
Morphological identification of fungus
 
The stereo binocular microscope (Leica MS5) and the compound microscope (Leica D/M 14/97) were used for fungal identification. Different magnifications of the microscopes were used for the identification of fungal colonies based on the description by Mathur and Kongsdal (2004).
       
Morphological characters studied included mycelial growth rates, colony morphology and pigmentation, presence or absence of septa and conidia dimensions. From one-week-old cultures, 9 mm diameter discs were taken and plated on PDA and incubated at 28°C (Summerell, 2006). The mycelial radial growth was measured daily along perpendicular lines beneath the Petri dish for 7 days (Miyashira et al., 2010). Cultural characteristics (colours, margin, form, elevation presence or absence of septa) were determined visually following Summerell (2006) and Watanabe (2010). The length and width of conidia produced by 5 isolates each were measured using AmScope 3.7.
 
Molecular characterization of fungus
 
Genomic DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis
 
Seven-day-old pure cultures of the isolate were obtained and genomic gDNA was extracted using the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). The A. rolfsii DNA sample was resuspended in 20 µl of Nanopure water in a 0.2 ml PCR tube plus Hotstart Taq polymerase. The nuclear rDNA ITS sections of all isolates were amplified using a pair of universal primer, namely ITS1 (5'-TCCGTAGGT GAACCT GCGGC-3') and ITS4 (5'-TCCTCCGCT TATTGA TATGC-3') (White et al., 1990). Prime PCR machine with a temperature profile of denaturation at 94°C for 3 min (1 cycle), then annealed at 56°C and 58°C for 30 s for ITS primer. Extension at 72°C for 1 min and ended with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min (1 cycle) and 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s. The amplicons were held at 4°C until ready to load onto the gel. The amplified PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis alongside a 100 bp DNA marker on 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR II (Garbeva et al., 2001). The generated DNA bands were observed under UV light and bands were captured with a camera and cleaned up using Qiagen MinElute 96 UF PCR purification with DNA pellet dissolved in 40 µl TE buffer. The isolates were subsequently identified by sequencing (Functional Biosciences Inc, Madison WI, USA).
 
Sequencing of the isolates
 
The purified PCR products were run and analyzed on an AB13730XL DNA analyzer device. Amplified products were sequenced and nucleotides were compared with those in NCBI GenBank. Plate and sequencing procedures were carried out using the Sanger dideoxy chain termination method (Du et al., 2021). Sequence alignment was conducted by comparing the ITS1 and ITS4 sequences with the NCBI sequence database using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) algorithm and corresponding searches were carried out in order to guarantee proper identification. Hits corresponding to A. rolfsii with a per cent identity greater than or equal to 93% were selected and exported as FASTA files (Du et al., 2021). The resulting FASTA file was imported into R and aligned using MSA ClustalW. The A. rolfsii sequences of the isolates were deposited at the GenBank of NCBI, accession numbers were assigned and published on the NCBI website.
 
Phylogenetic tree
 
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA 11. The generated tree file was then imported into FigTree version 1.4.4 for visualization and final editing of the phylogenetic tree.

Morphological characterization
 
A. rolfsii isolates growth rate
 
The morphological identification of the isolated pathogens provides valuable information about the variability among the cowpea stem rot disease isolates from the different locations. Conventional techniques were utilized to study the morphological characteristics of 27 A. rolfsii isolates from Ejisu-Juaben Municipality, Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality and Kwadaso Municipality based on growth rate, colony colour and texture, hyphal diameter, sclerotial shape, colour and distribution (Table 1). Phenotypically, all isolates from Kwadaso and Ejura Municipalities exhibited a pure white mycelia colour, compared to isolates from Ejisu municipality that had a dull white mycelia colouration with clamp connections (Fig 2). The pure white mycelia observed in isolates from Kwadaso and Ejura, compared to the dull white appearance of Ejisu isolates, could indicate genetic or environmental influences on pigment expression, as previously reported in fungal isolates of A. rolfsii (Sarma et al., 2002, Ayyandurai et al., 2022). All isolates formed fluffy textured mycelia in culture within the study locations, typical of basidiomycetes fungi, specifically, A. rolfsii (Paparu et al., 2020; Ayyandurai et al., 2022). Microscopic examination revealed that the mycelium was hyaline and branching, consisting of septate hyphae.

Table 1: Morphological parameters of A. rolfsii isolates in Ghana.



Fig 2: Morphological characteristics of A. rolfsii on PDA 10th DAI Notes: Ejisu (A, B); Ejura (C, D); Kwadaso (E, F) - obverse and reverse of colonies.


       
In Divyashree et al., (2024) considerable variation in total growth and growth rate was observed among isolates that achieved maximum radial growth (93.80 mm) by the 4th DAI. Among them, 4 isolates achieved maximum radial growth (90.00 mm) by the 3rd DAI similar to Srividya et al., (2022), while the remaining isolates reached this growth by the 4th DAI. The remaining isolates were categorized as slow-multiplying isolates. The least growth was observed in the isolate with (51 mm) and considered as the slowest growing isolate among the 10 isolates. Relatively in this study Regarding radial growth, no significant variations (p = 0.736) were observed in the isolates after the first 48 hours of inoculation. The mean radial growth was 58.83 mm, ranging from 56.28 mm to 57.67 mm (Table 2). Moreover, after 72 hours, the isolates did not differ significantly (P = 0.736) in their radial growth and the mean growth rose to 74.83 mm. Isolate Ejura recorded the fastest growth of 75.69 mm, which was 1.15% faster than isolate Ejisu (74.54) and 1.42% faster than isolate Kwadaso (74.27 mm). Radial growth differences observed at 72 hours further support the presence of distinct traits among the isolates. This variation in growth rate aligns with studies by Sarma et al., 2002 and Yaşar and Mert (2019), which demonstrated that A. rolfsii isolates from different environments exhibit differences in colony expansion, often linked to temperature adaptation and substrate utilization efficiency. Similarly, the significantly larger hyphal diameter in Ejisu isolates suggests a more aggressive mycelial expansion, which could influence pathogenicity and host colonization. Also, Vleugels et al., (2013) found a positive correlation between mycelial growth rate and isolate aggressiveness but Lehner et al., (2016) reported no such association. These contradictory findings indicate that mycelial growth rate may not be a reliable marker for aggressiveness of A. rolfsii isolates.

Table 2: Growth rate after inoculation.


       
Similarly, significant variations (P<0.001) were observed in hyphal diameter among the isolates. The average hyphal diameter was 5.211 mm with a fold change of 0.688. Ejisu isolates (5.689 mm) were the largest, followed by Kwadaso (5.289 mm) and Ejura (4.656 mm) isolates, respectively.
 
Characteristics of sclerotia
 
The production of sclerotia is crucial for the survival of pathogens during winter in soil or plant waste (Paul et al., 2023). Variations in the quantity and dimensions of sclerotia across isolates of A. rolfsii have been documented (Le et al., 2012; Narayan et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2014). But in this study, there was no variation with coloration of the sclerotial bodies produced by all isolates. Dark brown, irregularly shaped sclerotia with a smooth, shiny surface were observed. However, in terms of sclerotia distribution, significant variations were observed in the isolates. All isolates in Ejura produced sclerotia all over the Petri dish, while isolates in Kwadaso had sclerotia at the periphery and centre of the mycelia. Isolates in Ejisu exhibited sclerotia only at the periphery of the mycelia. Kumar et al., (2014) indicated in his study cultural and morphological variability A. rolfsii Isolates infecting groundnut that sclerotia were scattered all over the plate singly or joined together, preferably at the periphery and/or centre of the petri plate. Manu et al., (2018) also asserted that, the peripheral region of Petri dish was mostly preferred by most of the A. rolfsii isolates but, isolates like Hiriyur chickpea, Bangalore groundnut, Mandya wheat and Dharwad soybean, sclerotia production was uniformly distributed all over the plate. However, the mandya ragi isolate produced its sclerotia at peripheral and also at the centre of the Petri dish.
       
Adhikari et al., (2022) observed that S. rolfsii isolates which require a longer duration to form sclerotia had a slow mycelial growth rate and had larger sclerotial size than the fast growing isolates. Kokub et al., (2007) and Manu et al., (2018) reported similar results. They found some isolates were comparatively fast growing and produced the higher number of sclerotia than the others. In the present study, no significant variations (P = 0.145) were observed among the isolates in the number of days it took to form sclerotia. On average, isolates took 4.11 days to commence sclerotia formation. Ejura isolates began sclerotia formation at 4.67 DAI, while Ejisu and Kwadaso began at 4.33 and 3.33 days, respectively (Table 3). This results agrees with Manu et al., (2018) when he said that the time required for sclerotial initiation was 4 th day onwards in majority of isolates. Again  et al. (2025) also reported sclerotia formation within a week of inoculation. Since no significant differences were observed in the time taken to initiate sclerotia formation, Ejura isolates displayed a significantly higher count compared to Ejisu and Kwadaso. A higher sclerotia count has been associated with increased pathogen persistence in soil, enhancing its ability to cause reinfections across cropping seasons (Xie and Vallad, 2010; Remesal et al., 2012). Moreover, the unique patterns of sclerotia formation suggest inherent genetic variability or responses to localised environmental conditions.

Table 3: Sclerotia characteristics.


       
Conversely, the isolates differed significantly (P<0.001) in the number of sclerotia produced per plate. The mean number of sclerotia produced was 183.11 sclerotia. Ejura isolates produced the highest number of sclerotia (204), higher than isolates from ejisu and kwadaso by 15.7 and 47 sclerotia, respectively.
       
Sclerotia diameter did not differ significantly (P = 0.063) among the isolates. The average sclerotia diameter was 1.433 mm, while the highest and lowest diameters were 1.53 mm and 1.33 mm, respectively. Although no significant differences were recorded in sclerotia diameter, the overall mean diameter is consistent with reports by Kokub et al., (2007) and Yaşar and Mert (2019) for A. rolfsii isolates from cowpea and other legumes. Manu et al., (2018) said Bangalore groundnut isolate produced bigger sclerotial bodies (2.10 mm) followed by Dharwad soybean isolate (1.90 mm) and Hiriyur onion isolate (1.85 mm), but there was no significant difference between these isolates in his work on Morphological and cultural variability among the A. rolfsii isolates. Continuing, ragi isolates produce different sclerotial diameter with respect to the regions i.e., Bangalore isolate produce bigger sclerotia (1.40 mm) whereas, Tumkur isolate produced smaller sclerotia (1.10 mm). Chickpea isolates of Hiriyur and Bangalore and Hiriyur Cyperus isolate produced similar sized sclerotia (1.10 mm) whereas, Mandya wheat and Dharwad field bean isolates produced 1.20 and 1.30 mm sclerotia respectively. Sulladmath et al., (1977) and Sarma  et al. (2002) reported the variation among the isolates of Agroatheli rolfsii, suggesting that, the variation among isolates depends on soil type, host crop and the environmental factors.
       
Given the observed morphological differences, it is likely that the isolates represent different strains variability of A. rolfsii. This hypothesis can be further validated through molecular characterisation. The variations may have direct implications for disease management, as some strains exhibit greater virulence and fungicide resistance than others.
       
Based on the combined morphological characteristics of white fluffy mycelia, the presence of clamp connections and the production of dark brown sclerotia, these isolates share features consistent with basidiomycete fungi in the order Athelia, particularly Agroatheli rolfsii, a well-documented pathogen associated with stem rot diseases in leguminous crops (Paul et al., 2017; Paparu et al., 2020). This morphological characterisation provides a foundation for molecular identification, which would be essential to confirm the taxonomic identity of these isolates.
 
Molecular characterization
 
Molecular identification of isolates
 
The molecular identification using PCR with the universal ITS primer pair successfully amplified the composite DNA of all the isolates from each of the municipalities (Ejura, ejisu and kwadaso), by producing 600 bp on the gel, thereby confirming the identity of A. rolfsii as the main causal agent of stem end rot of cowpea in the study areas (Fig 3). This is supported by earlier research which has found that when using ITS-1 and ITS-4 primers for S. rolfsii, the ITS region of rDNA amplification typically yields amplicons between 600 and 700 bp (Meena et al., 2023). A phylogenetic study revealed that A. rolfsii isolates identified in this study based on ITS sequences were closely related to a number of isolates, including Agroathelia coffeicola, known to infect other hosts.

Fig 3: Gel showing PCR composite amplified product of A. rolfsii: 4- Kwadaso sample, 5- Ejura sample and 6-Ejisu sample, using ITS1/1TS4 primer, DNA ladder (100 bp).


 
Phylogenetic analysis
 
The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) (Fig 4). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed (Felsenstein, 1985). Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches (Felsenstein, 1985). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method (Kimura,1980) and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. This analysis involved 29 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+ 3rd+Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 591 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA11 (Tamura et al., 2021).

Fig 4: Phylogenetic tree constructed using ITS sequences from A. rolfsii isolates.

The findings in this research offer vital information into the causative agent based on detailed morphological and molecular characterizations, A. rolfsii was consistently identified as the primary causal agent of cowpea stem rot across all the study locations.  This study is significant due to the novel finding and accurate identification of the S. rolfsii species associated with basal stem rot disease in cowpea in Ghana. Consequently, the findings of this investigation, given the employed methodologies, should be considered in the formulation of disease prevention and control strategies. Further research is necessary to ascertain the epidemiology of these fungal diseases and the effects of basal stem rot disease on cowpea productivity and farmers’ income levels in Ghana.
The present study was supported by technicians at the Plant Microbiology and Legumes Division of Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI) Fumesua, Ghana and District Agricultural Directorates (DAD) of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MOFA, GHANA) in Kwadaso, Ejusu-Juabeng and Ejura Sekyeredumase for the support in executing the study.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Adandonon, A., Aveling, T.A. and Tamo, M. (2004). Occurrence and distribution of cowpea damping-off and stem rot associated fungi in benin. Journal of Agricultural Science. 142(5): 561-566.

  2. Adhikari1, P., Shrestha, S.M., Manandhar, H.K. and Marahatta, S.  (2022). Morphology and cross infectivity of Sclerotium rolfsii isolated from different host plants in Nepal. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 23. doi: 10.3126/ aej.v23i1.46926. 

  3. Ayyandurai, M., Akila, R., Manonmani, K. and Mini M.L. (2022). Isolation and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii-inciting stem rot disease in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agricultural Journal. 109(Special): 19-26.

  4. Babu, N.G. and Deepika, S.D. (2022). Survey for the incidence of stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii sacc) of groundnut in Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Science Digest. 42(5): 592-597. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5507.

  5. Divyashree, M.C.P., Anandakumar, J., Punith, G., Anusree, K., Harish, J. and Lakshmeesha R. (2024). Morphological and cultural characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc on chickpea and its management using combined fungicide molecules. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 30(6): 268-76. Article no. JSRR.115809 ISSN: 2320-0227.

  6. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1987).  A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 19: 11-15.

  7. Du, L., Liu, Q., Fan, Z. et al. (2021). Pyfastx: A robust python package for fast random access to sequences from plain and gzipped fasta/q files. Brief Bioinform. 22: bbaa368.

  8. Egbadzor, K.F., Yeboah, M., Offei, S.K., Ofori, K. and Danquah, E.Y. (2013). Farmers’ key production constraints and traits desired in cowpea in Ghana. J. Agric. Ext. Rural. Dev. 5(1): 14-20.

  9. FAO. Production Crops. FAOSTAT Statistics Database. (2021). Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

  10. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39: 783-791.  

  11. Garbeva, P., Van Overbeek, L.S., Van Vuurde, J.W.L. and Van Elsas, J.D. (2001). Analysis of endophytic bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rDNA based PCR fragments. Microbial Ecology. 41(4): 369-383.

  12. ICRISAT. Bulletin of the Tropical Legumes Project 22. 2013. http:// www. icrisat. org/tropical- legumes II/pdfs/ TL- II- December- 22. pdf.

  13. Jamja, T., Bora, S., Tabing, R., Basar, E. and Kotoky, U. (2025). Incidence, symptomology, morpho-molecular characterization of Agroathelia rolfsii (Sclerotium rolfsii): The causal agent of basal rot in chabaud carnation. India Journal of Agricultural research. 60(1): 123-129. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6399.

  14. Kebede, E. (2020). Grain legumes production and productivity in Ethiopian smallholder agricultural system, contribution to livelihoods and the way forward. Cogent Food and Agriculture. 6(1): 1722353.

  15. Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 16: 111-120.

  16. Kokub, D., Azam, F., Hassan, A., Ansar, M., Asad, M.J. and Khanum, A. (2007). Comparative growth, morphological and molecular characterization of indigenous Sclerotium rolfsii strains isolated from different locations of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 39(5): 1849-1866.

  17. Kumar, M.R., Madhavi Santhoshi, M.V., Krishna, T.G. and Reddy, K.R. (2014). Cultural and morphological variability Sclerotium rolfsii isolates infecting groundnut and its reaction to some fungicidal. Nt. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 3(10): 553-561.

  18. Le, C.N., Mendes, R., Kruijt, M. and Raaijmakers, J.M. (2012). Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Sclerotium rolfsii in groundnut fields in central Vietnam. Plant Disease. 96: 389-397.

  19. Lehner, M.S., Lima, R.C., Carneiro, J.E.S., Paula J´unior, T.J., Vieira, R.F. and Mizubuti, E.S.G. (2016). Similar aggressiveness of phenotypically and genotypically distinct isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 100: 360-366.

  20. Manu, T.G., Nagaraja, A. and Sv, M. (2018). Morphological and cultural variability among the Sclerotium rolfsii isolates. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7: 904- 907.

  21. Mathur, S.B. and Kongsdal, O. (2004). Common Laboratory Seed Healthy Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi. 2nd Edition, International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Bassersdorf.

  22. Meena, P.N., Meena, A.K. and Ram, C. (2023). Morphological and molecular diversity in Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., infecting groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Discov Agriculture. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-023-00003-0.

  23. Miyashira, C.H., Tanigushi, D.G., Gugliotta, A.M. and Santos, D.Y.A.C.D. (2010). Comparison of radial growth rate of the mutualistic fungus of Atta sexdens rubropilosa forel in two culture media. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 41: 506-511.

  24. Narayan, C.P., Hwang, E., Nam, S., Lee, H., Lee, J., Yu, G., Kang, Y., Lee, K., Go, S. and Yang, J. (2017). Phylogenetic placement and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii (teleomorph: Athelia rolfsii) associated with blight disease of ipomoea batatas in Korea. Microbiology. 45: 129-138.

  25. Ofosu-Budu, K.G., Obeng-Ofori, D., Afreh-Nuamah, K. and Annobill, R. (2008). Effect of phospho-compost on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 40(2): 169-176.

  26. Paparu, P., Acur, A., Kato, F., Acam, C., Nakibuule, J., Nkuboye, A. et al. (2020). Morphological and pathogenic characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii, the causal agent of southern blight disease on common bean in Uganda. Plant Disease.  104(8): 2130-2137.

  27. Paul, S.K., Gupta, D.R., Mahapatra, C.K., Rani, K. and Islam, T. (2023). Morpho-molecular, cultural and pathological characterization of Athelia rolfsii causing southern blight disease on common bean. Heliyon. 9: e16136 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16136.

  28. Paul, N.C., Hwang, E.J., Nam, S.S., Lee, H. U Lee, J.S. Yu, G.D. et al. (2017). Phylogenetic placement and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii (Teleomorph: Athelia rolfsii) associated with blight disease of Ipomoea batatas in Korea. Mycobiology. 45: 129-138. https://doi.org/ 10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.3.129.

  29. Remesal, E., Jordán-Ramírez, R., Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. and Navas- Cortés, J.A. (2012). Mycelial compatibility groups and pathogenic diversity in Sclerotium rolfsii populations from sugar beet crops in Mediterranean-type climate regions. Plant Pathology. 61(4): 739-753.

  30. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). The Neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 4: 406-425.

  31. Sarma, B.K., Singh, U.P. and Singh, K.P. (2002). Variability in Indian isolates of Sclerotium rolfsii. Mycologia. 94(6): 1051-1058.

  32. Srividya, P.V., Ahamed, L.M., Ramana, J.V. and Ahammed, K.S. (2022). Studies on diversity of Sclerotium rolfsii causing collar rot in chichpea using morphological and molecular markers. Legume Research. 45(1): 82-89. doi: 10.18805/LR-4199.

  33. Summerell, B.A. and Leslie, J.F. (2006). Fusarium laboratory workshops-A recent history. Mycotoxin Research. 22(2): 73-74.

  34. Tanimu, M.U., Mohammed, I.U., Muhammad, A. and Kwaifa, N.M.N.M.  (2018). Response of cowpea varieties to basal stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) disease in Southern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Agricultural Research and Technology: Open Access Journal. 15(4). doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.15.555963.

  35. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. (2021). MEGA 11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120.

  36. Vleugels, T., Baert, J. and van Bockstaele, E. (2013). Morphological and pathogenic characterization of genetically diverse Sclerotinia isolates from European red clover crops (Trifolium pratense L.). J. Phytopathol. 161: 254-262.

  37. Yaşar, İ. and Mert, F. (2019). Mycelial compatible groups of the Sclerotium rolfsii isolates and comparison of morphological and pathogenic characters. The Journal of Turkish Phytopathology. 48(1): 1-7.

  38. Watanabe, M., Tsutsumi, F., Lee, K. I., Sugita Konishi, Y., Kumagai, S., Takatori, K. and Konuma, H. (2010). Enumeration of fungi in fruits by the most probable number method. Journal of Food Science. 75(9): M564-M567.

  39. White, T. j., Bruns, T., Lee, S. and Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols. [Innis, M.A., Fand, D.H.G., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J. (Eds)], A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, San Diego. pp 315- 322.

  40. Xie, C., Huang, C.H. and Vallad, G.E. (2014). Mycelial compatibility and pathogenic diversity among Sclerotium rolfsii isolates in the southern United States. Plant Disease. 98: 1685-1694.

  41. Xie, C. and Vallad, G. (2010). Integrated Management of Southern Blight in Vegetable Production: PP272/PP272, 3/2010. EDIS, 2010(3).

  42. Xu, Z., Harrington, T.C., Gleason, M.L. and Batzer, J.C. (2010). Phylogenetic placement of plant pathogenic sclerotium species among telemorph genera. Mycologia. 102: 337- 346. https://doi.org/10.3852/08-189.

Morpho-molecular Characterization of Agroathelia rolfsii Causing Basal Stem Rot Disease of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in the Semi-deciduous Forest and Transitional Zone of Ghana

M
Maxwell Kwodane1
A
Abdulai Muntala2,*
J
Joseph Adomako1
K
Kwadwo Gyasi Santo2
F
Frank Ankomah-Boamah2
Y
Yükselbaba Utku3
S
Shadrack Asomah2
S
Shadrack Kwaku Debrah2
K
Kwasi Haruna2
1CSIR-Crop Research Institute, Plant Pathology Unit, Fumesua, Ghana.
2Department of Horticulture and Crop Production, School of Agriculture and Technology, University of Energy and Natural Resources, Dormaa-Ahenkro, Ghana.
3Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.

Background: Stem rot disease, caused by Agroathelia rolfsii (soil-borne) has increasingly become a threat to cowpea cultivation. This study, carried out in the 2023 and 2024 farming seasons, aimed to isolate and identify causal pathogen(s) of Basal stem rot from cowpea-growing districts in nine farmers’ fields within Ejisu-Juaben, Ejura-Sekyedumase and kwadaso municipalities in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana.

Methods: Fungal pathogens were isolated from infected cowpea plants exhibiting symptoms of Basal stem rot. The pathogen was identified as A. rolfsii using morphological and phylogenetic studies of the sequenced internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region.

Result: All isolates from kwadaso and ejura municipalities exhibited a pure white mycelia colour, compared to isolates from Ejisu municipality that had a dull white mycelia colouration with clamp connections. All isolates formed fluffy textured mycelia in culture. No significant variations (P = 0.736) were observed in the isolate’s radial growth after the first 48 hours and 72 hours (P = 0.736) and the number of days it took to form sclerotia. The isolates differed significantly (P<0.001) in the number of sclerotia produced per plate, with a mean of 183.11. The sequenced amplicon of the PCR identified the pathogen as Agroathelia rolfsii.

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) serves as a multipurpose dietary staple across several Sahelian nations, supplying sustenance for humans and livestock while serving as a vital source of revenue for farmers and grain merchants, particularly in tropical regions. The crop is primarily cultivated for its dried grains; approximately one-quarter of the harvest is either consumed directly by farming households or sold as fresh green pods in local markets (Kebede, 2020).
       
The grain makes up over 80% of Ghana’s cowpea production, mostly in the savannah regions (Egbadzor et al., 2013). According to FAOSTAT (2021), the total cultivated area of cowpea was about 149,102 (ha), total production of almost 202,735 tons with a yield (hg/ha) of 13,597 in Ghana. Although cowpea seed yields vary greatly, they are the lowest in the world, averaging 310 kg/ha (Ofosu-Budu  et al., 2008). Despite its significance, cowpea production is limited by several factors. In Ghana, pests and diseases, inadequate soil fertility, as well as drought, are the main obstacles to cowpea production (ICRISAT, 2013). Diseases can infect cowpea at several stages, including emergence, vegetative and reproductive phases, resulting in significant plant damage and thus leading to yield loss or total production failure.
       
Agroathelia rolfsii
(= Sclerotium rolfsii) has been recognized as a significant soil-borne fungus responsible for basal stem rot disease in cowpea globally. The pathogen is recognized as a cosmopolitan parasite residing in soil and is extensively distributed, especially in warm, humid climates (Adandonon et al., 2004). It is reported to infect tomato plants and many other crops, including common bean, soybean, potato, lentil, sesame, chili, brinjal and widely distributed in tropics, sub tropics and warm regions (Paparu et al., 2020; Babu and Deepika, 2022). The pathogen survives the winter and persists as sclerotia in soil and on infected plants or residues for an extended duration.
       
Historically, morphological and cultural characteristics have been used to identify Sclerotium at the genus level. Nevertheless, the delimitation of Sclerotium to the species level is the extent of these identification methods. A. rolfsii is separated from two of the most related species, A. delphinii and A. coffeicola, by sclerotial morphology and growth, occasionally developing morphology that is inseparable at high temperatures (Paul et al., 2023). Furthermore, when cultivated in the medium, isolates of A. rolfsii from various hosts and geographic regions usually display varying morphological traits (Paparu et al., 2020; Paul et al., 2017). However, morphology-based species delimitation is still insufficient for species-level Sclerotium resolution. Agroathelia identification problems have been successfully resolved by sequencing conserved sections or genes, such as the ITS-region, using the sequences to inform phylogenetic analysis (Paul et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2010). The development of successful management techniques to control the disease depends on the accurate identification of pathogens through both morphological and molecular investigation (Paul et al., 2017). Therefore, the aim of this study was to isolate and identify, via morphology and molecular analysis, the pathogen(s) associated with cowpea basal stem rot disease in the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana.
Study area
 
This research was carried out in the Ejisu-Juaben, Ejura-Sekyedumase and Kwadaso Municipalities within the semi-deciduous forest zone of Ghana from 2023 to 2024. Ejisu-Juaben Municipality lies within Latitudes 1°15'N and 1°45'N and Longitude 6°15'W and 7°00'W. Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality is located within Longitudes 1°5W and 1°39 W and Latitudes 7°9N and 7°36N. Kwadaso municipality lies within Latitude 6°41'41"N and Longitude 1°39'16"W. All the study areas experience a bimodal rainfall pattern. A non-probability convenience sampling strategy was utilized in selecting 9 farmers’ fields in each study area (Ejisu-Juaben municipality, Ejura-Sekyedumase municipality and kwadaso municipality). A simple random sampling technique was applied to obtain a total of 45 infected cowpea plants exhibiting symptoms of basal stem rot.
 
Sample collection
 
A non-probability convenience sampling technique was employed to select farmers’ fields and a simple random method was employed to sample infected cowpea plants with the typical symptoms of basal stem rot (leaves, stems and roots) in the selected municipalities during the 2023-2024 farming seasons (Fig 1). The disease samples were sent to the crop research institute (CSIR-CRI), Plant Pathology Laboratory in Fumesua, Ghana, where the fungus was subsequently cultured and morphologically identified.

Fig 1: Signs and symptoms of stem rot disease observed on cowpea.


 
Inoculum preparation and incubation    
                                      

A modified procedure by Tanimu et al., (2018) was used to prepare potato dextrose agar (PDA) as the culturing medium. Sclerotia and mycelia were obtained from the infected cowpea tissues sampled in Ejusu, Kwadaso and Ejura municipalities. The sclerotia were dried and stored in Petri dishes incubated at 30°C. A sterilized scalpel was used to cut tissues of about 5 mm from infected stems and roots. The tissues were surface sterilized in 5% NaOCl for 3 minutes, rinsed in 3 exchanges of sterile distilled water, dried on sterile filter paper and placed on PDA. The plates were incubated at room temperature (28±2°C) for 4 to 7 days depending on the appearance of fruiting bodies.
       
Plates were incubated under Near Ultra Violet (NUV) light provided by a 4ft fluorescent tube (Philips, TLD 36 W/80). To maximize induction of sporulation and promote equal distribution of light radiation, shelves in the incubation room were supplied with two 4ft fluorescent tubes hanging horizontally, 20 cm from each other and the plates/dishes placed 40 cm from the tubes. All media plates were sealed with parafilm before incubation.
 
Morphological identification of fungus
 
The stereo binocular microscope (Leica MS5) and the compound microscope (Leica D/M 14/97) were used for fungal identification. Different magnifications of the microscopes were used for the identification of fungal colonies based on the description by Mathur and Kongsdal (2004).
       
Morphological characters studied included mycelial growth rates, colony morphology and pigmentation, presence or absence of septa and conidia dimensions. From one-week-old cultures, 9 mm diameter discs were taken and plated on PDA and incubated at 28°C (Summerell, 2006). The mycelial radial growth was measured daily along perpendicular lines beneath the Petri dish for 7 days (Miyashira et al., 2010). Cultural characteristics (colours, margin, form, elevation presence or absence of septa) were determined visually following Summerell (2006) and Watanabe (2010). The length and width of conidia produced by 5 isolates each were measured using AmScope 3.7.
 
Molecular characterization of fungus
 
Genomic DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction and gel electrophoresis
 
Seven-day-old pure cultures of the isolate were obtained and genomic gDNA was extracted using the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). The A. rolfsii DNA sample was resuspended in 20 µl of Nanopure water in a 0.2 ml PCR tube plus Hotstart Taq polymerase. The nuclear rDNA ITS sections of all isolates were amplified using a pair of universal primer, namely ITS1 (5'-TCCGTAGGT GAACCT GCGGC-3') and ITS4 (5'-TCCTCCGCT TATTGA TATGC-3') (White et al., 1990). Prime PCR machine with a temperature profile of denaturation at 94°C for 3 min (1 cycle), then annealed at 56°C and 58°C for 30 s for ITS primer. Extension at 72°C for 1 min and ended with a final extension at 72°C for 7 min (1 cycle) and 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 s. The amplicons were held at 4°C until ready to load onto the gel. The amplified PCR products were subjected to gel electrophoresis alongside a 100 bp DNA marker on 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR II (Garbeva et al., 2001). The generated DNA bands were observed under UV light and bands were captured with a camera and cleaned up using Qiagen MinElute 96 UF PCR purification with DNA pellet dissolved in 40 µl TE buffer. The isolates were subsequently identified by sequencing (Functional Biosciences Inc, Madison WI, USA).
 
Sequencing of the isolates
 
The purified PCR products were run and analyzed on an AB13730XL DNA analyzer device. Amplified products were sequenced and nucleotides were compared with those in NCBI GenBank. Plate and sequencing procedures were carried out using the Sanger dideoxy chain termination method (Du et al., 2021). Sequence alignment was conducted by comparing the ITS1 and ITS4 sequences with the NCBI sequence database using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) algorithm and corresponding searches were carried out in order to guarantee proper identification. Hits corresponding to A. rolfsii with a per cent identity greater than or equal to 93% were selected and exported as FASTA files (Du et al., 2021). The resulting FASTA file was imported into R and aligned using MSA ClustalW. The A. rolfsii sequences of the isolates were deposited at the GenBank of NCBI, accession numbers were assigned and published on the NCBI website.
 
Phylogenetic tree
 
Phylogenetic analyses were performed using MEGA 11. The generated tree file was then imported into FigTree version 1.4.4 for visualization and final editing of the phylogenetic tree.

Morphological characterization
 
A. rolfsii isolates growth rate
 
The morphological identification of the isolated pathogens provides valuable information about the variability among the cowpea stem rot disease isolates from the different locations. Conventional techniques were utilized to study the morphological characteristics of 27 A. rolfsii isolates from Ejisu-Juaben Municipality, Ejura-Sekyedumase Municipality and Kwadaso Municipality based on growth rate, colony colour and texture, hyphal diameter, sclerotial shape, colour and distribution (Table 1). Phenotypically, all isolates from Kwadaso and Ejura Municipalities exhibited a pure white mycelia colour, compared to isolates from Ejisu municipality that had a dull white mycelia colouration with clamp connections (Fig 2). The pure white mycelia observed in isolates from Kwadaso and Ejura, compared to the dull white appearance of Ejisu isolates, could indicate genetic or environmental influences on pigment expression, as previously reported in fungal isolates of A. rolfsii (Sarma et al., 2002, Ayyandurai et al., 2022). All isolates formed fluffy textured mycelia in culture within the study locations, typical of basidiomycetes fungi, specifically, A. rolfsii (Paparu et al., 2020; Ayyandurai et al., 2022). Microscopic examination revealed that the mycelium was hyaline and branching, consisting of septate hyphae.

Table 1: Morphological parameters of A. rolfsii isolates in Ghana.



Fig 2: Morphological characteristics of A. rolfsii on PDA 10th DAI Notes: Ejisu (A, B); Ejura (C, D); Kwadaso (E, F) - obverse and reverse of colonies.


       
In Divyashree et al., (2024) considerable variation in total growth and growth rate was observed among isolates that achieved maximum radial growth (93.80 mm) by the 4th DAI. Among them, 4 isolates achieved maximum radial growth (90.00 mm) by the 3rd DAI similar to Srividya et al., (2022), while the remaining isolates reached this growth by the 4th DAI. The remaining isolates were categorized as slow-multiplying isolates. The least growth was observed in the isolate with (51 mm) and considered as the slowest growing isolate among the 10 isolates. Relatively in this study Regarding radial growth, no significant variations (p = 0.736) were observed in the isolates after the first 48 hours of inoculation. The mean radial growth was 58.83 mm, ranging from 56.28 mm to 57.67 mm (Table 2). Moreover, after 72 hours, the isolates did not differ significantly (P = 0.736) in their radial growth and the mean growth rose to 74.83 mm. Isolate Ejura recorded the fastest growth of 75.69 mm, which was 1.15% faster than isolate Ejisu (74.54) and 1.42% faster than isolate Kwadaso (74.27 mm). Radial growth differences observed at 72 hours further support the presence of distinct traits among the isolates. This variation in growth rate aligns with studies by Sarma et al., 2002 and Yaşar and Mert (2019), which demonstrated that A. rolfsii isolates from different environments exhibit differences in colony expansion, often linked to temperature adaptation and substrate utilization efficiency. Similarly, the significantly larger hyphal diameter in Ejisu isolates suggests a more aggressive mycelial expansion, which could influence pathogenicity and host colonization. Also, Vleugels et al., (2013) found a positive correlation between mycelial growth rate and isolate aggressiveness but Lehner et al., (2016) reported no such association. These contradictory findings indicate that mycelial growth rate may not be a reliable marker for aggressiveness of A. rolfsii isolates.

Table 2: Growth rate after inoculation.


       
Similarly, significant variations (P<0.001) were observed in hyphal diameter among the isolates. The average hyphal diameter was 5.211 mm with a fold change of 0.688. Ejisu isolates (5.689 mm) were the largest, followed by Kwadaso (5.289 mm) and Ejura (4.656 mm) isolates, respectively.
 
Characteristics of sclerotia
 
The production of sclerotia is crucial for the survival of pathogens during winter in soil or plant waste (Paul et al., 2023). Variations in the quantity and dimensions of sclerotia across isolates of A. rolfsii have been documented (Le et al., 2012; Narayan et al., 2017; Xie et al., 2014). But in this study, there was no variation with coloration of the sclerotial bodies produced by all isolates. Dark brown, irregularly shaped sclerotia with a smooth, shiny surface were observed. However, in terms of sclerotia distribution, significant variations were observed in the isolates. All isolates in Ejura produced sclerotia all over the Petri dish, while isolates in Kwadaso had sclerotia at the periphery and centre of the mycelia. Isolates in Ejisu exhibited sclerotia only at the periphery of the mycelia. Kumar et al., (2014) indicated in his study cultural and morphological variability A. rolfsii Isolates infecting groundnut that sclerotia were scattered all over the plate singly or joined together, preferably at the periphery and/or centre of the petri plate. Manu et al., (2018) also asserted that, the peripheral region of Petri dish was mostly preferred by most of the A. rolfsii isolates but, isolates like Hiriyur chickpea, Bangalore groundnut, Mandya wheat and Dharwad soybean, sclerotia production was uniformly distributed all over the plate. However, the mandya ragi isolate produced its sclerotia at peripheral and also at the centre of the Petri dish.
       
Adhikari et al., (2022) observed that S. rolfsii isolates which require a longer duration to form sclerotia had a slow mycelial growth rate and had larger sclerotial size than the fast growing isolates. Kokub et al., (2007) and Manu et al., (2018) reported similar results. They found some isolates were comparatively fast growing and produced the higher number of sclerotia than the others. In the present study, no significant variations (P = 0.145) were observed among the isolates in the number of days it took to form sclerotia. On average, isolates took 4.11 days to commence sclerotia formation. Ejura isolates began sclerotia formation at 4.67 DAI, while Ejisu and Kwadaso began at 4.33 and 3.33 days, respectively (Table 3). This results agrees with Manu et al., (2018) when he said that the time required for sclerotial initiation was 4 th day onwards in majority of isolates. Again  et al. (2025) also reported sclerotia formation within a week of inoculation. Since no significant differences were observed in the time taken to initiate sclerotia formation, Ejura isolates displayed a significantly higher count compared to Ejisu and Kwadaso. A higher sclerotia count has been associated with increased pathogen persistence in soil, enhancing its ability to cause reinfections across cropping seasons (Xie and Vallad, 2010; Remesal et al., 2012). Moreover, the unique patterns of sclerotia formation suggest inherent genetic variability or responses to localised environmental conditions.

Table 3: Sclerotia characteristics.


       
Conversely, the isolates differed significantly (P<0.001) in the number of sclerotia produced per plate. The mean number of sclerotia produced was 183.11 sclerotia. Ejura isolates produced the highest number of sclerotia (204), higher than isolates from ejisu and kwadaso by 15.7 and 47 sclerotia, respectively.
       
Sclerotia diameter did not differ significantly (P = 0.063) among the isolates. The average sclerotia diameter was 1.433 mm, while the highest and lowest diameters were 1.53 mm and 1.33 mm, respectively. Although no significant differences were recorded in sclerotia diameter, the overall mean diameter is consistent with reports by Kokub et al., (2007) and Yaşar and Mert (2019) for A. rolfsii isolates from cowpea and other legumes. Manu et al., (2018) said Bangalore groundnut isolate produced bigger sclerotial bodies (2.10 mm) followed by Dharwad soybean isolate (1.90 mm) and Hiriyur onion isolate (1.85 mm), but there was no significant difference between these isolates in his work on Morphological and cultural variability among the A. rolfsii isolates. Continuing, ragi isolates produce different sclerotial diameter with respect to the regions i.e., Bangalore isolate produce bigger sclerotia (1.40 mm) whereas, Tumkur isolate produced smaller sclerotia (1.10 mm). Chickpea isolates of Hiriyur and Bangalore and Hiriyur Cyperus isolate produced similar sized sclerotia (1.10 mm) whereas, Mandya wheat and Dharwad field bean isolates produced 1.20 and 1.30 mm sclerotia respectively. Sulladmath et al., (1977) and Sarma  et al. (2002) reported the variation among the isolates of Agroatheli rolfsii, suggesting that, the variation among isolates depends on soil type, host crop and the environmental factors.
       
Given the observed morphological differences, it is likely that the isolates represent different strains variability of A. rolfsii. This hypothesis can be further validated through molecular characterisation. The variations may have direct implications for disease management, as some strains exhibit greater virulence and fungicide resistance than others.
       
Based on the combined morphological characteristics of white fluffy mycelia, the presence of clamp connections and the production of dark brown sclerotia, these isolates share features consistent with basidiomycete fungi in the order Athelia, particularly Agroatheli rolfsii, a well-documented pathogen associated with stem rot diseases in leguminous crops (Paul et al., 2017; Paparu et al., 2020). This morphological characterisation provides a foundation for molecular identification, which would be essential to confirm the taxonomic identity of these isolates.
 
Molecular characterization
 
Molecular identification of isolates
 
The molecular identification using PCR with the universal ITS primer pair successfully amplified the composite DNA of all the isolates from each of the municipalities (Ejura, ejisu and kwadaso), by producing 600 bp on the gel, thereby confirming the identity of A. rolfsii as the main causal agent of stem end rot of cowpea in the study areas (Fig 3). This is supported by earlier research which has found that when using ITS-1 and ITS-4 primers for S. rolfsii, the ITS region of rDNA amplification typically yields amplicons between 600 and 700 bp (Meena et al., 2023). A phylogenetic study revealed that A. rolfsii isolates identified in this study based on ITS sequences were closely related to a number of isolates, including Agroathelia coffeicola, known to infect other hosts.

Fig 3: Gel showing PCR composite amplified product of A. rolfsii: 4- Kwadaso sample, 5- Ejura sample and 6-Ejisu sample, using ITS1/1TS4 primer, DNA ladder (100 bp).


 
Phylogenetic analysis
 
The evolutionary history was inferred using the Neighbor-Joining method (Saitou and Nei, 1987) (Fig 4). The bootstrap consensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates is taken to represent the evolutionary history of the taxa analysed (Felsenstein, 1985). Branches corresponding to partitions reproduced in less than 50% bootstrap replicates are collapsed. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) is shown next to the branches (Felsenstein, 1985). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Kimura 2-parameter method (Kimura,1980) and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. This analysis involved 29 nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were 1st+2nd+ 3rd+Noncoding. All ambiguous positions were removed for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There were a total of 591 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA11 (Tamura et al., 2021).

Fig 4: Phylogenetic tree constructed using ITS sequences from A. rolfsii isolates.

The findings in this research offer vital information into the causative agent based on detailed morphological and molecular characterizations, A. rolfsii was consistently identified as the primary causal agent of cowpea stem rot across all the study locations.  This study is significant due to the novel finding and accurate identification of the S. rolfsii species associated with basal stem rot disease in cowpea in Ghana. Consequently, the findings of this investigation, given the employed methodologies, should be considered in the formulation of disease prevention and control strategies. Further research is necessary to ascertain the epidemiology of these fungal diseases and the effects of basal stem rot disease on cowpea productivity and farmers’ income levels in Ghana.
The present study was supported by technicians at the Plant Microbiology and Legumes Division of Crops Research Institute (CSIR-CRI) Fumesua, Ghana and District Agricultural Directorates (DAD) of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MOFA, GHANA) in Kwadaso, Ejusu-Juabeng and Ejura Sekyeredumase for the support in executing the study.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Adandonon, A., Aveling, T.A. and Tamo, M. (2004). Occurrence and distribution of cowpea damping-off and stem rot associated fungi in benin. Journal of Agricultural Science. 142(5): 561-566.

  2. Adhikari1, P., Shrestha, S.M., Manandhar, H.K. and Marahatta, S.  (2022). Morphology and cross infectivity of Sclerotium rolfsii isolated from different host plants in Nepal. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 23. doi: 10.3126/ aej.v23i1.46926. 

  3. Ayyandurai, M., Akila, R., Manonmani, K. and Mini M.L. (2022). Isolation and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii-inciting stem rot disease in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Madras Agricultural Journal. 109(Special): 19-26.

  4. Babu, N.G. and Deepika, S.D. (2022). Survey for the incidence of stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii sacc) of groundnut in Andhra Pradesh. Agricultural Science Digest. 42(5): 592-597. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-5507.

  5. Divyashree, M.C.P., Anandakumar, J., Punith, G., Anusree, K., Harish, J. and Lakshmeesha R. (2024). Morphological and cultural characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc on chickpea and its management using combined fungicide molecules. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports. 30(6): 268-76. Article no. JSRR.115809 ISSN: 2320-0227.

  6. Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1987).  A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemical Bulletin. 19: 11-15.

  7. Du, L., Liu, Q., Fan, Z. et al. (2021). Pyfastx: A robust python package for fast random access to sequences from plain and gzipped fasta/q files. Brief Bioinform. 22: bbaa368.

  8. Egbadzor, K.F., Yeboah, M., Offei, S.K., Ofori, K. and Danquah, E.Y. (2013). Farmers’ key production constraints and traits desired in cowpea in Ghana. J. Agric. Ext. Rural. Dev. 5(1): 14-20.

  9. FAO. Production Crops. FAOSTAT Statistics Database. (2021). Available from: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC.

  10. Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution. 39: 783-791.  

  11. Garbeva, P., Van Overbeek, L.S., Van Vuurde, J.W.L. and Van Elsas, J.D. (2001). Analysis of endophytic bacterial communities of potato by plating and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of 16S rDNA based PCR fragments. Microbial Ecology. 41(4): 369-383.

  12. ICRISAT. Bulletin of the Tropical Legumes Project 22. 2013. http:// www. icrisat. org/tropical- legumes II/pdfs/ TL- II- December- 22. pdf.

  13. Jamja, T., Bora, S., Tabing, R., Basar, E. and Kotoky, U. (2025). Incidence, symptomology, morpho-molecular characterization of Agroathelia rolfsii (Sclerotium rolfsii): The causal agent of basal rot in chabaud carnation. India Journal of Agricultural research. 60(1): 123-129. doi: 10.18805/ IJARe.A-6399.

  14. Kebede, E. (2020). Grain legumes production and productivity in Ethiopian smallholder agricultural system, contribution to livelihoods and the way forward. Cogent Food and Agriculture. 6(1): 1722353.

  15. Kimura, M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution. 16: 111-120.

  16. Kokub, D., Azam, F., Hassan, A., Ansar, M., Asad, M.J. and Khanum, A. (2007). Comparative growth, morphological and molecular characterization of indigenous Sclerotium rolfsii strains isolated from different locations of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 39(5): 1849-1866.

  17. Kumar, M.R., Madhavi Santhoshi, M.V., Krishna, T.G. and Reddy, K.R. (2014). Cultural and morphological variability Sclerotium rolfsii isolates infecting groundnut and its reaction to some fungicidal. Nt. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 3(10): 553-561.

  18. Le, C.N., Mendes, R., Kruijt, M. and Raaijmakers, J.M. (2012). Genetic and phenotypic diversity of Sclerotium rolfsii in groundnut fields in central Vietnam. Plant Disease. 96: 389-397.

  19. Lehner, M.S., Lima, R.C., Carneiro, J.E.S., Paula J´unior, T.J., Vieira, R.F. and Mizubuti, E.S.G. (2016). Similar aggressiveness of phenotypically and genotypically distinct isolates of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Plant Dis. 100: 360-366.

  20. Manu, T.G., Nagaraja, A. and Sv, M. (2018). Morphological and cultural variability among the Sclerotium rolfsii isolates. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 7: 904- 907.

  21. Mathur, S.B. and Kongsdal, O. (2004). Common Laboratory Seed Healthy Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi. 2nd Edition, International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Bassersdorf.

  22. Meena, P.N., Meena, A.K. and Ram, C. (2023). Morphological and molecular diversity in Sclerotium rolfsii Sacc., infecting groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Discov Agriculture. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-023-00003-0.

  23. Miyashira, C.H., Tanigushi, D.G., Gugliotta, A.M. and Santos, D.Y.A.C.D. (2010). Comparison of radial growth rate of the mutualistic fungus of Atta sexdens rubropilosa forel in two culture media. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 41: 506-511.

  24. Narayan, C.P., Hwang, E., Nam, S., Lee, H., Lee, J., Yu, G., Kang, Y., Lee, K., Go, S. and Yang, J. (2017). Phylogenetic placement and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii (teleomorph: Athelia rolfsii) associated with blight disease of ipomoea batatas in Korea. Microbiology. 45: 129-138.

  25. Ofosu-Budu, K.G., Obeng-Ofori, D., Afreh-Nuamah, K. and Annobill, R. (2008). Effect of phospho-compost on growth and yield of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 40(2): 169-176.

  26. Paparu, P., Acur, A., Kato, F., Acam, C., Nakibuule, J., Nkuboye, A. et al. (2020). Morphological and pathogenic characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii, the causal agent of southern blight disease on common bean in Uganda. Plant Disease.  104(8): 2130-2137.

  27. Paul, S.K., Gupta, D.R., Mahapatra, C.K., Rani, K. and Islam, T. (2023). Morpho-molecular, cultural and pathological characterization of Athelia rolfsii causing southern blight disease on common bean. Heliyon. 9: e16136 https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16136.

  28. Paul, N.C., Hwang, E.J., Nam, S.S., Lee, H. U Lee, J.S. Yu, G.D. et al. (2017). Phylogenetic placement and morphological characterization of Sclerotium rolfsii (Teleomorph: Athelia rolfsii) associated with blight disease of Ipomoea batatas in Korea. Mycobiology. 45: 129-138. https://doi.org/ 10.5941/MYCO.2017.45.3.129.

  29. Remesal, E., Jordán-Ramírez, R., Jiménez-Díaz, R.M. and Navas- Cortés, J.A. (2012). Mycelial compatibility groups and pathogenic diversity in Sclerotium rolfsii populations from sugar beet crops in Mediterranean-type climate regions. Plant Pathology. 61(4): 739-753.

  30. Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987). The Neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 4: 406-425.

  31. Sarma, B.K., Singh, U.P. and Singh, K.P. (2002). Variability in Indian isolates of Sclerotium rolfsii. Mycologia. 94(6): 1051-1058.

  32. Srividya, P.V., Ahamed, L.M., Ramana, J.V. and Ahammed, K.S. (2022). Studies on diversity of Sclerotium rolfsii causing collar rot in chichpea using morphological and molecular markers. Legume Research. 45(1): 82-89. doi: 10.18805/LR-4199.

  33. Summerell, B.A. and Leslie, J.F. (2006). Fusarium laboratory workshops-A recent history. Mycotoxin Research. 22(2): 73-74.

  34. Tanimu, M.U., Mohammed, I.U., Muhammad, A. and Kwaifa, N.M.N.M.  (2018). Response of cowpea varieties to basal stem rot (Sclerotium rolfsii) disease in Southern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria. Agricultural Research and Technology: Open Access Journal. 15(4). doi.org/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.15.555963.

  35. Tamura, K., Stecher, G. and Kumar, S. (2021). MEGA 11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120.

  36. Vleugels, T., Baert, J. and van Bockstaele, E. (2013). Morphological and pathogenic characterization of genetically diverse Sclerotinia isolates from European red clover crops (Trifolium pratense L.). J. Phytopathol. 161: 254-262.

  37. Yaşar, İ. and Mert, F. (2019). Mycelial compatible groups of the Sclerotium rolfsii isolates and comparison of morphological and pathogenic characters. The Journal of Turkish Phytopathology. 48(1): 1-7.

  38. Watanabe, M., Tsutsumi, F., Lee, K. I., Sugita Konishi, Y., Kumagai, S., Takatori, K. and Konuma, H. (2010). Enumeration of fungi in fruits by the most probable number method. Journal of Food Science. 75(9): M564-M567.

  39. White, T. j., Bruns, T., Lee, S. and Taylor, J. (1990). Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics. In: PCR Protocols. [Innis, M.A., Fand, D.H.G., Sninsky, J.J., White, T.J. (Eds)], A Guide to Methods and Applications, Academic Press, San Diego. pp 315- 322.

  40. Xie, C., Huang, C.H. and Vallad, G.E. (2014). Mycelial compatibility and pathogenic diversity among Sclerotium rolfsii isolates in the southern United States. Plant Disease. 98: 1685-1694.

  41. Xie, C. and Vallad, G. (2010). Integrated Management of Southern Blight in Vegetable Production: PP272/PP272, 3/2010. EDIS, 2010(3).

  42. Xu, Z., Harrington, T.C., Gleason, M.L. and Batzer, J.C. (2010). Phylogenetic placement of plant pathogenic sclerotium species among telemorph genera. Mycologia. 102: 337- 346. https://doi.org/10.3852/08-189.
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)