Preliminary of nutrients properties
The comparison of the nutrients content in vermicompost, treated POME sludge and other organic fertilizers properties were shown in Table 3. The pH value in vermicompost was quite high or alkaline compared to the TPS and the other organic fertilizers. A few nutrients did not show too much differences such as total N, P, K and Mg content in the vermicompost and TPS organic fertilizer.
Selected soil physicochemical properties
The addition of vermicompost and treated POME sludge showed that there was a significant effect (p<0.05) on (A) total porosity, (B) bulk density and (C) aggregate stability and (D) hydraulic conductivity (Fig 1). In Fig 1A shows that vermicompost, T3 (68.08%) had the highest mean value of total porosity compared to the control (47.25%). Organic matter is lighter and more porous than an equivalent amount of solid soil which indicated low bulk density. Soil treated with 2 kg (0.85 g/cm3) of vermicompost showed the lowest value of bulk density (Fig 1B). The same result exhibited by
Zainal, (2014). Low bulk density strengthened the soil aggregate formation (
Odey, 2018). This statement proved that after treated with T3 (76.86%) the soil aggregate formation showed the highest value in Fig 1C compared to the control (53.24%).
In Fig 1D, the increased of hydraulic conductivity at 8.79 cm/h after application of treatment with T3. High values indicated that the soil treated with vermicompost became more permeable to water to pass through the pore spaces. According to Table 4, vermicompost treatment was categorized in the moderate rapid class. Hence, the addition of vermicompost explained the increased of Ks due to the total soil porosity and soil aggregates stability (Fig 1A and 1C). Soil structure played a vital role in the hydraulic conductivity, either high or low (Mohd
Nizar et al., 2018).
Fig 2 shows that vermicompost and TPS was significantly different (p<0.05) in (A) pH, (B) total nitrogen, (C) available phosphorus and (D) exchangeable potassium. Soil mixed with vermicompost treatment indicated the pH value was 6.5 compared to T1 (5.05) (Fig 2A). The differencein pH compared with the different treatments explained by the chemical content of the wastes, which contributed to the effect on mineralization processes and other intermediate compounds during the vermicomposting
(Lim et al., 2015). The organic treatment improved the soil pH within the range of nutrients availability for plant uptake. Remaining macronutrients in the soil achieved the highest amount of nitrogen (0.3%) after being treated with 2 kg of vermicompost (Fig 2B). Fig 2C and 2D showed that there was no difference of available phosphorus and potassium in vermicompost and TPS at all rates of application. Vermicompost and TPS were able to retain adequate water and nutrients. Similar results highlighted that high rate of macronutrients produced high production of grain maize
(Tajul et al., 2013).
Crop growth performance
Photosynthesis rate showed the highest photosynthesis rate, 25.33 µmol m
-2s
-1 in T3 while control (15.57 µmol m
-2s
-1) with the lowest rate (Fig 3A). From the findings of
Mahmud et al., (2019), the application of vermicompost presented positive effects on the total chlorophyll content. As the plant production in vermicompost treatment increased, the total chlorophyll content also increased and led to a higher rate of photosynthesis.
Referring to Fig 3B, stomata conductance highlighted significantly different (p<0.05) in T3 (1.31 mol m
-²s
-¹) than T1 as the control (0.5 mol m
-²s
-¹) due to the water content was sufficient in the soil, the guard cell turgor increased, leading to a rise in the stomata pore openings. The physiological maturity phase of the maize showed that vermicompost and TPS performed more effectively than the control because of a complete mineralization processes and the incorporation of the organic amendments that already occurred
(Dalorima et al., 2018).
Transpiration occurred while the stomata opened for the CO
2 and O
2 passage to enable the process of photosynthesis. In Fig 3C, T2 showed that the transpiration rate was low in vermicompost (1.11 m
-2s
-1) compared to the TPS and control treatment which might reflect to the photosynthesis effect of the maize. The high stomataconductance of the maize plant in Fig 3B clearly explained its low transpiration rate.
Fig 4 showed that there was a significant difference (p<0.05) in dry matter production (A) and root weight density (B) in T2 and T3 compared to the lowest value shown in T1. High values of macronutrients in vermicompost (Table 3) acts as a plant growth regulator that stimulated positive effects on crop performance (
Canatoy, 2018). Hence, the application of vermicompost showed the highest root weight density. Fig 5C showed the root samples from all treatments after harvesting. The increased of root weight density in vermicompost was high compared to the TPS treatment, which due to the nutrients’ availability. The application of organic amendments was one of the main reasons in providing nutrients to increase the plant vegetative growth and enhanced the condition of the kernel, loosen the soil and improved the passage of air entry for the root movement
(Abaszadeh et al., 2016).