Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Spatial Chlorophyll Estimation from Rice Field using Drone-derived Spectral Indices

R. Tamilmounika1, D. Muthumanickam1,*, S. Pazhanivelan2, K.P. Ragunath2, R. Kumaraperumal1, A.P. Sivamurugan2, R. Raja3
1Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Centre for Water and Geospatial Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
3ICAR-Central Institute for Cotton Research, Regional Research Station, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: Precision farming has significantly advanced the agricultural sector by enabling real-time canopy monitoring and crop condition evaluation, thus facilitating precise management strategies to enhance yields. This study investigated the use of drone-derived vegetation indices (VIs) for assessing spatial variability in crop conditions, offering a more cost effective and practical alternative to satellite data. 

Methods: The field experiment was conducted during the Kuruvai season (July - November 2023) on a short-duration rice variety CO 55. Several vegetation indices viz., BGI, CI, EVI, GNDVI, MCARI, MSAVI, NDRE and NDVI were calculated to predict chlorophyll content and correlated with the measured SPAD values. 

Result: The results showed that indices like MCARI, GNDVI, and NDVI had strong positive correlations with SPAD values, with MCARI exhibiting the highest correlation (R = 0.914) and an R² value of 0.836. The findings underscore the effectiveness of using drone-derived indices for precise chlorophyll estimation, which is crucial for variable rate fertilizer application in precision agriculture.

Precision farming has revolutionized the agricultural sector in recent years, real-time canopy monitoring and crop condition evaluation aid in developing precise management strategies that boost yields (Cuaran et al., 2021). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), sometimes referred to as drones (dynamic remotely operated navigation equipment) fitted with multispectral and hyperspectral sensors have been used to derive these vegetation indices (Rani et al., 2019). It can gather data about the spatial variability of crop conditions in the field with temporal dimensions and serve as a more affordable and useful substitute for satellite remote sensing in agriculture to track vegetation status (Tahir et al., 2018). It gives more accurate and efficient assessment of spatial variability in crop conditions.
       
Vegetation Indices (VIs) are the ratio of difference between the reflectance of different spectral bands. The spectral bands consist of blue (440-510 nm), green (520-590 nm), red (630–685 nm), red edge (690-730 nm) and near-infrared (760-850 nm) (Marang et al., 2021). Nigon et al., (2015) stated that the physiological characteristics of a crop could be retrieved using the absorption and reflectance characteristics. VIs are useful tools for crop health monitoring, nutrient, water status, pest infestations and projecting crop yield, and productivity (De Castro et al., 2021). 
       
Chlorophyll content in crops is a vital indicator of plant health, vigour and predicts the final crop yield (Na et al., 2024). Chlorophyll levels indirectly reflect the crop nitrogen status, ultimately influencing crop productivity. Healthy green vegetation strongly absorbs the visible light especially in the red spectrum, due to chlorophyll content. The highest red absorption occurs between 660 and 680 nm, a range that tends to saturate at low chlorophyll levels and reflect in the near-infrared region, due to the internal structure of the leaves. Traditional methods of measuring chlorophyll content using SPAD (Soil Plant Analysis Development) meters are destructive, time-consuming, and spatially inaccurate. In this context, the drone-based derived indices provide detailed spatial chlorophyll content analysis. Vegetation indices such as NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) (Rouse et al., 1974, Minh et al., 2022), GNDVI (Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) (Gitelson et al., 1996), SAVI (Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index) (Huete, 1988), NDRE (Normalized Difference Red Edge Index), Transformed Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI) (Baret and Guyot 1991), Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (MSAVI) (Qi et al., 1994), Difference Vegetation Index (DVI), Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI), Chlorophyll Index Green (CIG), Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (CVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) (Janarth et al., 2024), Leaf Chlorophyll Index (CI) and Triangular greenness index (TGI) predicted the crop chlorophyll content efficiently. The use of these indices aims to detect subtle changes in nitrogen content and deficiencies, which is crucial for precision agriculture. It enhances the estimation of crop biomass and nitrogen content estimation, providing a more efficient and comprehensive approach. Yang et al., (2017) stated that hyperspectral imaging became a common method of retrieving crop water content, leaf nitrogen concentration, chlorophyll content, LAI and other physical and chemical parameters. In precision agriculture, the spatial chlorophyll map helps in decision-making with variable rates of fertilizer applications. This research aimed to estimate the chlorophyll content of rice crops at a spatial level using drone-derived indices and to validate the vegetation indices with in situ data.
Study location
 
The field experiment was conducted in the Kuruvai (July- November, 2023) at Agricultural Research Station, Bhavanisagar, Tamil Nadu.  Short duration rice variety CO 55 (110-115 days) was grown during the season. The experimental site is located at 11.29'N latitude and 77.08' E longitude, with an altitude of 256 and belongs to the Western agro-climatic zone of Tamil Nadu (Fig 1).
 

Fig 1: Location of the study area.


 
Image acquisition
 
DJI Phantom 4 drone was used to acquire multispectral images during the maximum tillering stage. Drone specifications are given in Table 1. It captures images in the spectral bands viz., Blue: 450 nm, Green: 560 nm, Red: 650 nm, Red Edge: 730 nm, Near-Infrared: 840 nm. A flight mission was carried out during active tillering stage on September 2023 under a clear sky between 11 AM to 12 noon.
 

Table 1: Specifications of DJI Phantom 4 drone.


 
Ground data collection
 
The ground data on SPAD chlorophyll was collected for 15 points during the maximum tillering stage of the crop as when drone images were captured to validate the vegetation index. The atLEAF CHL PLUS handheld chlorophyll (SPAD) meter was used to measure the light transmittance ratio at 640 nm and 940 nm wavelengths.
 
Processing of drone image and generation of vegetation indices
 
The multispectral images were processed using Pix4D mapper software. The data processing includes geo-referencing, point cloud densification, generation of Digital Surface Model (DSM), ortho-mosaic and generation of indices. The vegetation indices were calculated from processed images using the Raster calculator tool in ArcGIS 10.8 software. Indices like BGI, CI, CVI, GNDVI, MCARI, MSAVI, NDRE and NDVI were used in predicting SPAD chlorophyll values. Based on ground truth coordinates, the spectral information from different vegetation indices were extracted (Table 2).
 

Table 2: Vegetation indices and their formula.


 
Statistical analysis
 
Pearson correlation analysis (R) was carried out to find the best vegetation index by correlating with ground truth data and the coefficient of determination for predicting the model accuracy. The regression (R2) values were calculated for vegetation indices (independent variable) and ground truth data (dependent variable) to assess the best line of fit. The Root Mean Squared Error(RMSE) was used to measure the average difference between te predicted value and observed value.
 




The multispectral images acquired during maximum tillering stage of rice for calculating chlorophyll, have strong positive correlation with ground data. Indices like BGI, CI, CVI, GNDVI, MCARI, MSAVI, NDRE and NDVI were used to calculate chlorophyll (Fig 2). The vegetation indices and SPAD values for the 15 points are given in Table 3. These indices were used to detect the greenness and chlorophyll contents of crops. Indices values extracted were positively correlated with chlorophyll content positive and linear correlation between different VIs and ground-truth chlorophyll data. The correlation between different indices and ground chlorophyll data was given in Fig 3. The field SPAD values measured from the field ranged from 33.80 to 49.20 with mean value of 42.47. The range of values for different VIs was as follows: BGI from 0.3071 to 0.4269, CI from 0.3782 to 0.7588, EVI from 0.0121 to 0.0171, GNDVI from 0.6441 to 0.8196, MCARI from 0.0219 to 0.0399, MSAVI from 0.5148 to 0.5216, NDRE from 0.1605 to 0.2751, NDVI from 0.8315 to 0.8942. The lowest values indicate the non-photosynthetic materials and bare soil background.
 

Fig 2: Vegetation index map generated.


 

Table 3: Ground truth SPAD value and vegetation indices value for geo-tagged points.



Fig 3: Relationship between BGI, CI, EVI, GNDVI, MCARI, MSAVI, NDVI, NDRE with SPAD chlorophyll readings.


       
The regression equation and RMSE values of different vegetation indices are given in Table 4. Among all the indices, MCARI has the highest positive correlation (0.914) with SPAD values measured from the field. MCARI has R2 and RMSE value of 0.836 and 1.74, respectively. GNDVI has higher positive correlation (R = 0.905), R2 value of 0.820 and RMSE of 1.82. NDVI had a positive correlation coefficient R = 0.866 and recorded R2 value of 0.75 and RMSE of 2.15. Higher R2 value indicates higher chlorophyll content (healthy vegetation), while lower values indicate low chlorophyll content (stressed vegetation). The lower positive correlation coefficient (R = 0.788) was recorded with NDRE, having R2 value of 0.622 and RMSE of 2.64.
 

Table 4: Regression equation of different vegetation indices.


       
The high R2 value (0.836) for MCARI suggests that this index is particularly effective in capturing variations in chlorophyll content, thus serving as a robust indicator of crop health. Similarly, GNDVI and NDVI exhibited strong positive correlations with SPAD values, further emphasizing their utility in quantifying chlorophyll content and assessing the overall health status of rice crops. Vegetation indices sensitive to chlorophyll particularly indices using green and red wavelengths performed better in the prediction of chlorophyll. Baloloy et al., (2018) study shown that GNDVI predicted chlorophyll content well as compared to other indices. These chlorophyll-sensitive indices serve as indirect proxies to crop biochemistry (Gitelson et al., 2006; Shanmugapriya et al., 2022), when compared to red and blue wavelengths, red edge wavelengths have more into the leaf cell structure. Hence, to estimate chlorophyll concentration the spectral indices containing these bands in the later regions would be more accurate (Yao et al., 2014). As a result, MCARI and crop chlorophyll content have a stronger correlation than the other indices. Shanmugapriya et al., (2022) also suggested that MCARI was the best index to predict chlorophyll content as it has both red and red edge bands and is more specific for detecting vegetation status. This is consistent with Raper and Varco (2015) finding that VIs specific to chlorophyll is a better fit for predicting chlorophyll content. VIs have the potential to predict N deficiency using readings from the SPAD (Pagola et al., 2009) as these indices employ the same wavebands (650 and 940nm) used in SPAD meter. Yuhao et al., (2020) correlated the SPAD values with NDVI, NDRE, SAVI and OSAVI indices and found high correlation in NDRE.
       
The chlorophyll map for the field was created using the regression equation of the highly correlated vegetation index (MCARI) given in Fig 4. The range of the SPAD value was ranges from 23.37 to 53.48. When the ground-truth SPAD data were used to assess the regression equation’s accuracy, the R2 value was 0.803 (Fig 5). A higher chlorophyll status indicates that the crop is in a healthy state, whereas a lower status indicates that it is under stress. The precise estimation of the chlorophyll content of crops can be useful in the application of N fertilizer dose.
 

Fig 4: Chlorophyll map of the study area.


 

Fig 5: Accuracy assessment between observed and predicted SPAD values.

The efficacy of using drone-derived vegetation indices for accurately estimating the chlorophyll content of rice crops provides valuable insights for precision agriculture. The field experiment highlighted the utility of various VIs, including NDVI, GNDVI and MCARI, in predicting chlorophyll content. Among these indices, MCARI exhibited the highest correlation with ground truth SPAD values (R = 0.914) and an R² value of 0.836, making it a particularly robust indicator of crop health. The high correlation between drone-derived indices and ground truth data underscores the potential of these indices to serve as reliable proxies for crop chlorophyll content and overall health. The spatial chlorophyll maps generated from these indices can significantly enhance decision-making in precision agriculture, particularly in the variable rate application of fertilizers. This approach not only optimizes nutrient management but also supports sustainable agricultural practices by ensuring efficient resource utilization.
We thank, Department of Remote Sensing and GIS, Centre for Water and Geospatial Studies, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore for providing financial assistance for conducting this research.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Baloloy, A.B., Blanco, A.C., Candido, C.G., Argamosa, R.J.L., Dumalag, J.B.L.C., Dimapilis, L.L.C. and Paringit, E. C. (2018). Estimation of mangrove forest aboveground biomass using multispectral bands, vegetation indices and biophysical variables derived from optical satellite imageries: Rapideye, planetscope and sentinel-2. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 4: 29-36.

  2. Baret, F. and Guyot, G. (1991). Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment. 35: 161-173.

  3. Cuaran, J., and Leon, J. (2021). Crop monitoring using unmanned aerial vehicles: A review. Agricultural Reviews. 42: 121- 132.

  4. De Castro, A.I., Shi, Y., Maja, J.M. and Peña, J.M. (2021). UAVs for vegetation monitoring: Overview and recent scientific contributions. Remote Sensing. 13: 2139.

  5. Gitelson, A.A., Kaufman, Y.J. and Merzlyak, M.N. (1996). Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment. 58: 289-298.

  6. Gitelson, A.A., Viña, A., Verma, S.B., Rundquist, D.C., Arkebauer, T.J., Keydan, G. and Suyker, A.E. (2006). Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 111: 1-13.

  7. Huete A. (1988). A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of Environment. 25: 295-300.

  8. Janarth, S., Jagadeeswaran, R., Pazhanivelan, S. (2024). Assessment of Agricultural Drought in Tamil Nadu using Remote Sensing Techniques. Agricultural Science Digest. 1-9. doi 10.18805/ag.D-6007 

  9. Marang, I.J., Filippi, P., Weaver, T.B., Evans, B.J., Whelan, B.M., Bishop, T.F. and Roth, G. (2021). Machine learning optimized hyperspectral remote sensing retrieves cotton nitrogen status. Remote Sensing. 13: 1428.

  10. Minh, V.Q., Hien, T.T., Diep, N.T.H., Huong, H.T.T., and Diem, P.K. (2022). Temporal and spatial delineation the rice growing stages for cropping calendar estimation in the southern of vietnam using remote sensing. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 56: 268-275. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-660.

  11. Na, I.S., Lee, S., Alamri, A.M., and AlQahtani, S.A. (2024). Remote sensing and aI-based monitoring of legume crop health and growth. Legume Research: An International Journal. 47: 1179-1184. doi: 10.18805/LRF-795.

  12. Nigon, T.J., Mulla, D.J., Rosen, C.J., Cohen, Y., Alchanatis, V., Knight, J. and Rud, R. (2015). Hyperspectral aerial imagery for detecting nitrogen stress in two potato cultivars. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 112: 36-46.

  13. Pagola, M., Ortiz, R., Irigoyen, I., Bustince, H., Barrenechea, E., Aparicio-Tejo, P. and Lasa, B. (2009). New method to assess barley nitrogen nutrition status based on image colour analysis: Comparison with SPAD-502. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 65: 213-218.

  14. Qi, J., Chehbouni, A., Huete, A.R., Kerr, Y.H. and Sorooshian, S. (1994). A modified soil adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment. 48: 119-126.

  15. Rani, A., Chaudhary, A., Sinha, N., Mohanty, M. and Chaudhary, R. (2019). Drone: The Green Technology for Future Agriculture. In book: Harit Dhara Magazine.

  16. Raper, T.B. and Varco, J.J. (2015). Canopy-scale wavelength and vegetative index sensitivities to cotton growth parameters and nitrogen status. Precision Agriculture. 16: 62-76.

  17. Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W. and Harlan, J.C. (1974). Monitoring the Vernal Advancement of Retrogradation of Natural Vegetation. Performances from the Accumulation of Large Swath Satellite Data. Remote Sensing of Environment. 70: 293-306.

  18. Shanmugapriya, P., Latha, K.R., Pazhanivelan, S., Kumaraperumal, R., Karthikeyan, G. and Sudarmanian, N.S. (2022). Spatial prediction of leaf chlorophyll content in cotton crop using drone-derived spectral indices. Current Science. 123: 1473-1480.

  19. Tahir, M.N., Naqvi, S.Z.A., Lan, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Afzal, M. and Amir, S. (2018). Real time estimation of chlorophyll content based on vegetation indices derived from multispectral UAV in the Kinnow orchard. International Journal of Precision Agricultural Aviation. 1: 25-31.

  20. Yang, G., Liu, J., Zhao, C., Li, Z., Huang, Y., Yu, H. and Yang, H. (2017). Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing for field- based crop phenotyping: current status and perspectives. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8: 1-26.

  21. Yao, X., Zhao, B., Tian, Y. C., Liu, X. J., Ni, J., Cao, W. X. and Zhu, Y. (2014). Using leaf dry matter to quantify the critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter wheat cultivated in eastern China. Field Crops Research. 159: 33-42.

  22. Yuhao, A., Che’Ya, N.N., Roslin, N.A. and Ismail, M.R. (2020). Rice Chlorophyll Content Monitoring using Vegetation Indices from Multispectral Aerial Imagery. Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology. 28: 779-795.

Editorial Board

View all (0)