Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorT. Mohapatra

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Impact of Various Types of Mulch Materials on Plant Growth, Yield and Quality Attributes of Kinnow Mandarin

Chander Bhan1, Shri Kishan Bairwa1, Dasharath Prasad1, Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava2, Seema Chawla1, Pradeep Kumar1
1Agricultural Research Station, Swami Keshwanand Rajasthan Agricultural University, Sriganganagar-335 001, Rajasthan, India
2Banda University of Agriculture and Technology, Banda-210 001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Background: Among Citrus fruits, Kinnow mandarin is one of the significantly important fruit crops commercially grown in North-Western parts of India. However, due to climate change scarcity of water and soil degradation are the challenging problems, which can cause economic loss to growers. Thus, use of mulching is the one of the appropriate practice for sustainable fruit production. 

Methods: The experiment consisted of six different types of mulch materials including inorganic and organic mulches like polyethylene (bicolour), bio-mulch (dried local weeds/grasses), mustard straw mulch, sugarcane trash mulch, control (no mulching+no weeding) and hand weeding were applied under Kinnow mandarin trees. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications.

Result: The findings of the study revealed that maximum canopy volume (5.62 m3), number of fruits (485.30 tree-1), fruit yield (95.44 kg tree-1) fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, total soluble solids, ascorbic acid and juice content (6.51 cm, 8.07 cm, 196.74 g, 12.47°Brix, 46.89 mg/100 ml and 51.37%, respectively) with minimum peel thickness (2.10 mm) and acidity (1.03%) were recorded with bicolour polyethylene mulch followed by sugarcane trash mulch and were the lowest in control. The highest B:C ratio of 2.49 was obtained from the bicolour polyethylene mulch followed by sugarcane trash mulch (2.45) as compared to control (1.96).
Kinnow mandarin is a hydrid between ‘King’ (Citrus nobilis Lour.) and ‘Willow Leaf’ (Citrus deliciosa Tan.) of family Rutaceae developed at the University of California Research Centre, Riverside, USA by Dr. H.B. Frost in 1935 and introduced in India in 1959. Among citrus group, it is one of the important fruit crops commercially grown in North-Western parts of India (Arora et al., 2018). Kinnow mandarin has become the most popular among citrus growers of North Western parts of India because of higher yield potential and is adapted under arid and semi-arid climatic conditions of Punjab, Rajasthan, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh (Kumar et al., 2015). Consumers prefer Kinnow mandarin due to its attractive colour, high juice content, distinctive flavour and rich in vitamin C, vitamin B and b-carotene (Mahajan et al., 2018). Canal water is the major source of irrigation in majority of Kinnow mandarin growing areas. In most of these areas, available ground water has poor quality (brackish to saline) which is detrimental to the plant growth.  In present climate change scenario, water scarcity poses greater risk of yield reduction and economic losses to Kinnow growers. Therefore, cost effective techniques are needed to improve water use efficacy in these regions.
      
Mulching is a promising agronomic practice in which covering the soil surface with a thin layer of either organic (crop residues, dried weeds etc.) or inorganic (polyethylene) materials is practiced to conserve soil moisture and soil health thereby, plant growth and yield (Jordán et al., 2011). Several researchers studied the effect of various mulching materials such as dead organic mulch (Hammermeister, 2016), crop residue mulch (Budianta et al., 2018), horticultural fabric and corn straw mulches (Liao et al., 2021), plastic film, biodegradable paper and bio-based film mulches (Zhang et al., 2019), polyethylene, paddy straw and rice husk mulches (Lalruatsangi and Hazarika 2018 polyethylene mulch (Bhandari et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2019) under fruit tree canopy. Mulching plays significant role in suppression of weeds (Hammermeister, 2016; Sharma and Sharma, 2019), enhanced water use efficiency (El-Naggar et al., 2018, Singh et al., 2017; Suo et al., 2019), improved soil health (Budianta et al., 2018), reduce soil erosion and maintain soil temperature (Sarkar et al., 2019). It is an effective practice that enhance fruit yield and improve fruit quality in acid lime (Lalruatsangi and Hazarika 2018) and citrus (Kuniga et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2019; Xuemei et al., 2017). Therefore, this study was conducted with the objective to assess the impact of various mulch materials on plant growth, yield and fruit quality of Kinnow mandarin under drip irrigated condition.
A field trial was conducted at experimental Kinnow orchard of the ICAR-AICRP on Fruits, Department of Horticulture, Agricultural Research Station (SK Rajasthan Agricultural University), Sriganganagar during 2017 to 2019. Kinnow mandarin trees budded on Rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush.) rootstock having uniform vigour and age with spacing of 6 × 6 m were selected. All the experimental trees were maintained under similar agronomical practices and irrigated through drip irrigation on alternate days. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and single tree as treatment unit and the data were collected on various parameters. Six different types of mulch materials including inorganic and organic mulches viz.,  polyethylene (bicolour) 100 µ, bio-mulch (dried local weed grasses) (5 cm thickness), mustard straw mulch (5 cm thickness), sugarcane trash mulch (5 cm thickness), control (no mulching + no weeding) and hand weeding were applied (Fig 1). The mulches were applied after fertilization in month of February. Organic mulches were applied every year and polythene mulch was retained for all three years.

Fig 1: Various mulches used under tree canopy of Kinnow mandarin.



The canopy volume was calculated based on the formulae (Westwood, 1978)

 
 
Where,
H = height of the tree.
W = width (width was minor axis while height was major axis).
 
       
Fully ripen fruits at golden orange colour stage were harvested during mid-January. Total number of fruits tree-1 were counted and yield was recorded by weighing the fruits. 10 fruits tree-1 were randomly collected and sent to fruit laboratory for further physico-chemical analysis. In laboratory, the fruits were washed with tap water to remove dirt followed by air drying. Average fruit weight was calculated by weighing ten fruits on digital weighing balance. The transverse diameter (length) and longitudinal diameter (width) and peel thickness of fruits from each experimental tree were measured with the help of vernier caliper. Juice content of fruit was extracted separately for each replication and weighed. The average juice percentage was calculated based on the formulae.
 
TSS (°Brix) of juice was measured by using hand refractometer. Total titratable acidity and ascorbic acid content were estimated through standard techniques (AOAC, 2000). All the common cost concepts of agricultural economics were used to interpret the results. To analysis of common cost of cultivation the variable and fixed inputs used in cultivation of Kinnow mandarin were included. The additional cost of each treatment was calculated based on the price of mulch material for each tree separately. Then total cost of cultivation was calculated by addition of common cost of cultivation and additional cost of treatment. Gross return was obtained by multiplying the yield per hectare with the prevailing wholesale price of Kinnow mandarin in local market. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications and data were analyzed statistically by analysis of variances as one-way ANOVA. Significance was tested using F-test at a 5% level of probability (P<0.05). The standard error of the mean (SEm±), the critical difference (CD) at 5% level of probability (P< 0.05) were worked out for the study of each parameter by Gomez and Gomez (1984).
Growth and yield
 
Data presented in Table 1 showed that various mulch materials enhanced the plant growth and yield of Kinnow mandarin as compared to control. A maximum canopy volume (5.62 m3) was recorded with sugarcane trash mulch followed by bicolour polyethylene mulch (5.48 m3). Maximum number of fruits (485.30 tree-1) and yield (95.44 kg tree-1) was recorded with bicolour polyethylene mulch followed by sugarcane trash mulch (480.31 tree-1 and 91.80 kg tree-1, respectively). These two treatments were at par for all growth and yield parameters but significantly superior over control. The lowest canopy volume (3.91 m3) and yield (60.90 kg tree-1) was recorded in control. Canopy structure of tree can directly affect light interception and the potency of light energy utilization. Optimum canopy structure is base of perfecting photosynthetic efficiency and achieving higher fruits yield. The increase in canopy volume of the plant was due to increased availability of soil moisture, nutrients and moderate evaporation from soil surface (Lalruatsangi and Hazarika 2018), enhanced the soil organic carbon contents and its active fractions in the soil (Gu et al., 2017) or might be due to better hydrothermal conditions provided by mulch as confirmed by Kaur and Mahal (2017). Improvement in canopy volume and yield of Kinnow mandarin might be due to fact that the bicolour polyethylene mulch and sugarcane trash mulch maximized nutrient uptake, enhanced water use efficiency and improved soil health. Reduced evaporation losses and modified infiltration capacity and optimized soil temperature were responsible for enhanced water availability in mulching treatments. In control, more weed infestation resulted in higher moisture loss from the soil surface and competition for nutrients may be accountable to minimized these parameters. These findings were in agreement with the results of Liao et al., (2021) in apple, Bhandari et al., (2017) in litchi and Jamir and Dutta (2020), Kumar et al., (2015), Kuniga et al., (2018), Lalruatsangi and Hazarika (2018), Liu et al., (2012), Wang et al., (2019), Xuemei et al., (2017) in citrus fruits. Further, strong and significant correlation between canopy volume and yield in Kinnow has been reported by Rattan et al., (2020) which confirmed the greater canopy volume and yield due to mulching in present findings.

Table 1: Impact of various mulches on growth and yield of Kinnow mandarin (Three years pooled data-2017-19).


 
Physico-chemical characterization of Kinnow mandarin
 
The data presented in Table 1 and 2 revealed that various mulches significantly increased the fruit quality parameters viz., fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, total soluble solids (TSS), ascorbic acid and juice content while reduced the peel thickness and acidity of Kinnow mandarin fruits. An average maximum fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, TSS, ascorbic acid and juice content (6.51 cm, 8.07 cm, 196.74 g, 12.47°Brix, 46.89 mg/100 ml and 51.37%, respectively) and minimum peel thickness and acidity (2.10 mm and 1.03%, respectively) were recorded in the bicolour polyethylene mulch followed by sugarcane trash mulch. In sugarcane trash mulch applied trees, fruit length (6.42 cm), fruit width (7.61 cm), fruit weight (191.36 g), TSS (11.98 °Brix), ascorbic acid (46.52 mg/100 ml) and juice content (49.90%) were recorded with peel thickness and acidity (2.15 mm and  1.05% respectively). Both the above mentioned treatments were at par to each other in all parameters except fruit width. The minimum fruit length, fruit width, fruit weight, TSS, ascorbic acid and juice content (5.28 cm, 6.38 cm, 166.09 g, 8.33 °Brix, 33.45 mg/100 ml and 40.96% respectively) with maximum peel thickness and acidity (3.67 mm and 1.31% respectively) were recorded in control treatment. The changes in physico-chemical quality attributes of Kinnow mandarin fruits might be due to the appropriate availability of nutrients and soil moisture content continuously during the growth and development period of fruits. While in control, severe weed infestation competed for nutrients and soil moisture. The fluctuation in soil moisture and temperature were also the major cause of poor fruit quality.

Table 2: Impact of various mulches on physicochemical attributes of Kinnow mandarin fruits (Three years pooled data - 2017-19).


       
The superiority of plastic mulch and sugarcane trash over other mulches could be due to these mulches are completely or more efficiently impermeable to water. Thus, these mulches consequently regulate direct evaporation of soil moisture and reduce the water losses soil erosion more significantly over the surface. These findings were in close conformity with the results of Bhandari et al., (2017) in litchi, Bhattacharjee et al., (2020), Das and Dutta (2018) in mango, Shen et al., (2019) in apple, Bhanukar et al., (2015) in Kinnow mandarin, Lalruatsangi and Hazarika (2018) in acid lime and Liu et al., (2012), Shimazaki and Nesumi (2016), Wang et al., (2019) in citrus fruits.
 
Economics of technology
 
The economics of various mulching treatments was worked out and presented in Table 3. The cost of each treatment was calculated based on the price of mulch material for each tree separately. The income was calculated according to the saleable market mean price of the fruits. The highest B:C ratio 2.49 with net profit (Rs. 1,58,370.00 ha-1) was obtained from the bicolour polyethylene mulch followed by sugarcane trash mulch (B:C ratio 2.45) as compared to control (BC ratio 1.96). The bicolour polythene mulch gave an additional income of Rs. 75,620.00 as compared to control. More or less similar findings have been reported by Bons et al., (2018), Kumar et al., (2014) in Kinnow mandarin, Bhattacharjee et al., (2020) in guava and Lalruatsangi and Hazarikaand (2018) in acid lime. Although the initial effect of polythene mulching on plant growth and yield is positive, its residual impact needs to be worked for plant growth yield and economics.

Table 3: Impact of various mulches on economics of Kinnow mandarin production.

Based on the findings of this study, either bicolour polyethylene mulch or organic mulch (sugarcane trash) have significant impact on plant growth, yield and physico-chemical attributes of Kinnow mandarin with the higher returns as compared to control treatment. Organic and inorganic mulches showed positive effects on growth and quality attributes due to enhanced water use efficiency and improved soil moisture conservation resulted into improved physico-chemical properties of soil providing congenial environment to the root zone of the tree. While in control, lower soil moisture regimes, more weed infestation resulted in higher moisture loss from the soil surface and competition for nutrients minimized these parameters. The technology (organic sugarcane trash mulch) will also be helpful for crop residue management and organic Kinnow mandarin production.
Authors are grateful to ICAR-AICRP on Fruits and Zonal Director Research, Agricultural Research Station, SKRAU, Sriganganagar for providing necessary facilities during the course of investigation.
None.

  1. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis, (2000). 17th Edition, The Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD, USA. 

  2. Arora, S., Mohanpuria, P., Sidhu, G.S., Yadav, I.S., Kumar, V. (2018). Cloning and characterization of limonoid glucosyl transferase from Kinnow mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Food Technology and Biotechnology. 56: 228-237. 

  3. Bhandari, A., Sharma, A., Wali, V.K., Kour, D. (2017). Effect of mulching and irrigation interval on fruit quality and yield of litchi cv. Dehradun. Indian Journal of Horticulture. 74: 510-514. 

  4. Bhanukar, M., Sindhu, S.S., Preeti, Prince (2015). Effect of various mulches on growth, yield and quality of Kinnow. The Bioscan. 10: 1379-1382. 

  5. Bhattacharjee, A., Saha, T. and Debnath, S. (2020). Use of leguminous cover crop and banana bio-mat mulch for quality production of guava cv. Sardar (L-49). J. Crop Weed. 16(2): 100-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.22271/09746315.2020.v16.i2.1321.   

  6. Bons, H.K., Rattanpal, H.S. Brar, A.S. (2018). Influence of different mulches on growth and productivity of Kinnow mandarin. Agricultural Research Journal. 55: 765-767. 

  7. Budianta, D., Wiralaga, A.Y.A., Lestari, W. (2018). Changes in some soil chemical properties of Ultisol applied by mulch from empty fruit bunches in an oil palm plantation. Journal of Tropical Soils. 15: 111-118. 

  8. Das, K. and Dutta, P. (2018). Effects of mulching on soil properties and post harvest quality of mango cv. Himsagar grown in new alluvial zone of West Bengal. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology. 11(2): 259-264. 

  9. El-Naggar, Y.I., Eid, T.A., Ali, S.A.M. (2018). Effects of mulching soil on water consumption, yield, fruit quality and water use efficiency. Journal of Plant Production. 9: 1003-1012. 

  10. Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agriculture Research. John Willey and Sons, NY.

  11. Gu, C., Liu, Y., Mohamed, I., Zhang, R., Wang, X., Nie, X., Jiang, M., Brooks, M., Chen, F., Li, Z. (2017). Correction: Dynamic changes of soil surface organic carbon under different mulching practices in citrus orchards on sloping land. PLoS ONE. 12(4): e0175600. 

  12. Hammermeister, A.M. (2016). Organic weed management in perennial fruits. Scientia Horticulture. 208: 28-42. 

  13. Jamir, A. and Dutta, M. (2020). Effect of mulching on important soil physico-chemical properties of Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco) orchard under mid-hill region of Nagaland.  Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 9(5): 2854-2858. 

  14. Jordán, A., Zavala, L.M., Muñoz-Rojas, M. (2011). Mulching, Effects on Soil Physical Properties. In: Glinski, J., J.´Horabik, J. Lipiec, (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Agrophysics. Springer, Dordrecht, p. 492-496.

  15. Kaur, J. and Mahal, S.S. (2017). Influence of paddy straw mulch on crop productivity and economics of bed and flat sown wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different irrigation schedules. Journal of Environmental Biology. 38(2): 243-250. 

  16. Kumar, V., Bhat, A.K., Sharma, V., Gupta, N., Sohan, P., Singh, V.B. (2015). Effect of different mulches on soil moisture, growth and yield of Eureka Lemon (Citrus limon Burm) under rainfed condition. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development. 30: 83-88. 

  17. Kumar, V., Singh, V.B., Sohan, P., Khajuria, S. (2014). Effect of various mulches on soil moisture content, soil properties, growth and yield of Kinnow under rainfed condition. International Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 225-229. 

  18. Kuniga, T., Hoshi, N., Kita, M. (2018). Effect of reflective mulching sheets on citrus tree growth. In: XXI International Congress on Plastics in Agriculture: Agriculture, Plastics and Environment. 1252: p 265-270. 

  19. Lalruatsangi, E. and Hazarika, B.N. (2018). Effect of various mulching materials on crop production and soil health in acid lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle). International Journal of Agriculture Environment and Biotechnology. 11(2): 311-317. 

  20. Liao, Y., Cao, H.X., Xue, W.K., Liu, X. (2021). Effects of the combination of mulching and deficit irrigation on the soil water and heat, growth and productivity of apples. Agricultural Water Management. 243: 106482. 

  21. Liu, Y., Tao, Y., Wan, K.Y., Zhang, G.S., Liu, D.B., Xiong, G.Y., Chen, F. (2012). Runoff and nutrient losses in citrus orchards on sloping land subjected to different surface mulching practices in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area of China.  Agricultural Water Management. 110: 34-40. 

  22. Mahajan, B.V.C., Kapoor, S., Tandon, R. (2018). Transformation in Physico-chemical and bioactive constituents in variable grades of Kinnow mandarin during different stages of maturity. Nutrition and Food Science International Journal. 6: 555679. 

  23. Rattan, C.S., Singh, S.K., Badhan, B.S. (2020). Influence of tree age on vegetative growth, leaf nutrient content and yield of Kinnow trees. Plant Archives. 20(2): 5257-5262.

  24. Sarkar, T., Perween, T., Datta, P. (2019). Assessing the effect of geotextile mulch on yield and physico-chemical qualities of litchi - A new technical approach. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8: 1984-1989. 

  25. Sharma, S. and Sharma, D.P. (2019). Weed management in stone fruit nectarine orchard with inorganic mulches and herbicides. Indian Journal of Weed Sciences. 51: 45-49. 

  26. Shen, P., Wang, W., Li, T., Liao, Y., Li, Y., Wen, X. (2019). Effects of different mulching measures on soil properties, bacterial community, fruit yield and quality of Luochuan apple orchard in Shaanxi Province. Acta Horticulturae Sinica. 46(5): 817-831. 

  27. Shimazaki, M. and Nesumi, H. (2016). A method for high-quality citrus production using drip fertigation and plastic sheet mulching. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly. 50(4): 301-306. 

  28. Singh, A., Burman, U., Saxena, A., Meghwal, P.R. (2017). Interactive effects of micronutrients, kaolin and mulching under drip irrigation system in managing fruit cracking of pomegranate (Punica granatum). In: IV International Symposium on Pomegranate and Minor Mediterranean Fruits. 1254: p. 213-218. 

  29. Suo, G.D., Xie, Y.S., Zhang, Y., Luo, X. (2019). Long-term effects of different surface mulching techniques on soil water and fruit yield in an apple orchard on the Loess Plateau of China. Scientia Horticulturae. 246: 643-651. 

  30. Wang, Y., Fu, X., He, W., Chen, Q., Wang, X. (2019). Effect of plastic film mulching on fruit quality of Citrus grandis cv. ‘Hongroumiyou’ and ‘Sanhongmiyou’. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences. 358: 022030. 

  31. Westwood, M.N. (1978). Temperate Zone Pomology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco. p: 248. 

  32. Xuemei, J., Qiong, Y., Ya, W., Yanmei, L., Yongqiang, Z., Rangjin, X., Shaolan, H., Lie, D., Shilai, Y., Qiang, L., Yanyan, M. (2017). Effects of DuPont Tyvek® non-woven material mulching on fruit quality and chlorophyll fluorescence in Wanzhou Rose Orange. Scientia Horticulturae. 219: 31-36. 

  33. Zhang, X., You, S., Tian, Y., Li, J. (2019). Comparison of plastic film, biodegradable paper and bio-based film mulching for summer tomato production: Soil properties, plant growth, fruit yield and fruit quality. Scientia Horticulturae. 249: 38-48. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)