Chief EditorT. Mohapatra
Print ISSN 0367-8245
Online ISSN 0976-058X
NAAS Rating 5.20
Full Research Article
Crop Diversification of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) based Cropping System for High Resource Use Efficiency
First Online 30-03-2022|
Background: Cotton production is labour intensive in almost all the developing countries where it is picked by hand. However, due to acute labour shortage in recent times, mechanized harvesting is gaining momentum. Mechanized harvesting requires the application of defoliants, which reduces the cost of labour used for picking cotton and maximum cotton can be picked in a single pick (one picking) and providing timely sowing of next crop. So, farmers can get benefit of two crops instead of one single long duration cotton crop. Researchers have conducted various studies on defoliation in cotton using different chemicals and different defoliation methods. However, in India their usage could not be exploited much due to their limited availability.
Methods: A field experiment entitled “Studies on defoliants in high density planting cotton-greengram sequence” was conducted during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 on clay soils at Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla. Crop diversification of cotton with pulses (Greengram) is an alternative cropping system for monocropping of cotton to get higher returns and high land use efficiency.
Result: Total cotton equivalent yield was highest with dropp ultra @ 250 ml ha-1 (D1) which was on par with Etherel @ 3000 ppm (D3) in 2018 and in pooled data. 80% boll opening recorded maximum total cotton equivalent yield, which was on par with node above cracked boll. Land use efficiency and production use efficiency were highest in late sown (80% boll opening) plots. The highest net returns and returns per rupee investment were noticed with application of defoliant dropp ultra @ 250 ml ha-1 (D1) and at 80% boll opening.
- Buttar, G.S. and Singh, S. (2013). Effect of Ethrel dose and time of application on growth, yield and duration of Bt cotton in semi arid region of Punjab. Journal of Cotton Research and Development. 27(1): 60-62.
- Du Ming-Wei., Renxiao Ming., Tian Xiao-Li., Duan Liu-Sheng., Zhang Ming-Cai, Tan Wei-Ming and Li Zhao-Hu. (2013). Evaluation of harvest aid chemicals for the cotton-winter wheat double cropping system. Journal of Integrative Agriculutre. 12(2): 273-282.
- Foote, W., Edmistein, K., Wells, R. and Jordan, D. (2015). Defoliant effects on cover crop germination, cover crop growth and subsequent cotton development. The Journal of Cotton Science. 19: 258-267.
- Gomez, A.K. and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons.
- Mrunalini, K., Sree Rekha, M., Murthy, V.R.K. and Jayalalitha, K. (2019). Impact of harvest-aid defoliants on yield and economics of high-density cotton. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(1): 116-119.
- Rajni Deol, J.S. and Brar, A.S. (2011). Effect of chemical defoliation on boll opening percentage, yield and quality parameters of Bt cotton. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 56(1):74-77.
- Tomar, S.S. and Tiwari, A.S., (1990). Production potential and economics of different crop sequence. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 35(1): 30-35.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.