Growth Performance of Sunflower in Karnataka State
The growth pattern in terms of area, production and yield of sunflower for division-wise, district-wise and for the state as a whole pertaining to the period I (1975 to 1995), period II (1996 to 2016) and whole period were computed by using the CAGR analysis.
Growth performance of sunflower area
The growth rates of area, production and yield of sunflower is presented in the Table 1. It is observed that the area under sunflower in the state exhibited a significantly very high positive growth rate during the period I (27.10%) as compared to the period II (-3.71%). The growth rate of sunflower in area during the period I exhibited a positive trend and the same was very high in Kolar (46.47%) district followed by Chickmangalur, Hassa and Bijapur districts. It is observed that all the districts in the state have witnessed a significantly positive and high growth rate during the period I than compared to period II. Table 1 clearly indicates that all the division’s
viz., Bangalore, Mysore, Belgaum and Gulbarga divisions witnessed a significantly positive growth (27.03%, 31.22%, 34% and 26.23%, respectively) in sunflower area during period I than compared to period II. The mixed trend was observed in whole period. The results are in line with the findings of Singh and Dhaliwal (1993) at all India level; Addisu (2000) and Nethrayini (2013) at state level. The rapid expansion of crop area under this crop during 1975’s or pre-WTO might be due to its important features like short duration, photo insensitiveness and adoption to a wide range of soils and climatic condition (Netrayini, 2013). In Karnataka, sunflower area expanded during 1900’s and 2000’s by replacing crops peal millet and cotton and partly from increase in cropping intensity as stated
(Girish et al., 2012).
Growth performance of sunflower production
The state level production (Table 2) of sunflower witnessed a significantly positive and very high growth rate during the period I (22.89%) than compared to the period II (-2.39%). Table 2 indicated that all the districts significantly witnessed a negative growth in production of sunflower except Shivamogga (12.34%), Belgaum (0.72%) and Raichur (0.68%) districts during the period II as compared to the period I. Table 2 clearly indicates that all the divisions
viz., Bangalore, Mysore, Belgaum and Gulbarga witnessed a significantly positive growth (21.73%, 27.77%, 26.65% and 22.89%, respectively) in production of the sunflower during period II than compared to period I. The study showed that all the districts and divisions are exhibited significantly positive growth in sunflower production during the period I than compared to the period II. The results are in line with Pradeep Kumar (2015).
Growth performance of sunflower yield
Table 3 indicated that the state level yield of the sunflower witnessed a significantly positive and very high growth rate during the period II (53.46%) and whole period (26.81%) than compared to the period I (-3.64%). Table 3 indicates that all the districts witnessed a significantly positive and very high growth rate in the yield of sunflower during the period II than compared to period I and whole period. Table 3 clearly indicates that in the divisions
viz., Bangalore, Belgaum and Gulbarga witnessed a significantly positive and very high growth rate (60.86%, 55.36% and 52.95%,respectively) in the yield of the sunflower during period II, while during the same period, the Mysore division witnessed a very high growth rate but non-significant in nature. During period II, the annual growth rate of sunflower yield was found to be higher than compared area and production. The higher growth in sunflower yield during period II may be due to lower instability in yield of sunflower and also better technological performance emerged from the TMO during post-WTO period.
The high growth rate in yield is due to change in mean yield of the crop than compared to change in mean area and interaction effect. The growth trends of sunflower (Fig 1) indicate that growth rate of area and production of sunflower were found to be decreased but yield of sunflower drastically increased during period II. This confirmed from the instability analysis of the study. The study concludes that positive trend in growth rates of area, production sunflower during period I across the districts and divisions could be due to government initiatives in the form of TMO as well as price and marketing support for oilseed growers
(Girish et al., 2012).
Instability of sunflower in Karnataka state
Instability is one of the important decision tools that capture the degree of uncertainty and risks involved in farm production and adversely affect farmer’s decisions to adopt modern technologies and investment in farming. Ramesh Chand and Raju (2009) opined that instability in production also affects price stability and can cause consumers and low income earners become vulnerable to market situations. Growth and instability of area and yield have a direct effect on growth and instability of production. Therefore instability of the sunflower was analysed during the study periods by using CDI Index which takes in to account coefficient of variation and adjusted R Squire.
Inter-districts instability in area, production and yield of sunflower
The instability of area, production and yield of sunflower were presented in Table 4. The results witnessed that the magnitude of instability at state level in sunflower area was marginally increased during period II (41.66%) when compared to the period I (34.53%). The degree of instability marginally declined in sunflower area in all the districts of the state except Shivamogga, Mysore, Mandya, Hassan and Chickmangalur districts during the period II. Table 4 showed that the production of sunflower in Karnataka has witnessed a higher instability during the period II (43.43%) than compared to the period I (31.46%). The instability of sunflower production in Tumkur, Chitradurga, Shivamogga, Mysore, Mandya, Hassan, Chickmangalore, Dharwad and Belgaum districts were found to be higher during the period II. The degree of instability in yield of sunflower was reduced (16.47%) during the period II when compared to the period I. The magnitude of the instability was declined in all districts in state except Kolar and Tumkur districts were witnessed a marginally higher instability during the period II than compared to the period I. During period II, the level of instability in some districts of state in area, production and yield of sunflower was higher than compared to the period I. The results are in line with Pradeep Kumar (2015) who observed that the level of instability higher in area in Salem, Dharmapuri, Coimbatore, Periyar, Madurai, Nilgiris and Kanniyakumari districts during post reform period than compared to pre reform period.
Inter-divisional instability in area, production and yield of sunflower
Table 4 also indicated the division-wise instability of sunflower area, production and yield. The result showed that the degree of instability in area was reduced in Bangalore (39.40%) and Belgaum (42.65%) divisions during the period II when compared to period I, while in the same period instability was increased in Mysore and Gulbarga division. The level of instability was increased in sunflower production, whereas declined trend for sunflower yield in all four divisions of state during period II when compared to the period I. The results are in corroboration with the studies conducted by Pradeep Kumar (2015). The degree of instability was higher in area and production of sunflower during period II. The results are in corroboration with the studies conducted by Ramarao (2003).