Banner
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Current IssueEditorial BoardOnline First Articles
Indian Journal of
Agricultural Research
Print ISSN: 0367-8245
Online ISSN: 0976-058X
NASS Rating
5.60
SJR
0.217
CiteScore
0.595

Chief Editor:
V. Geethalakshmi
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Coimbatore, INDIA
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...

Research Article

Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 53 issue 4 (august 2019) : 458-462

Field screening of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes for resistance against Urdbean Leaf Crinkle Virus

A. Sravika, J.S. Kennedy, D. Rajabaskar, E. Rajeswari
1Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore-641 003, Tamil Nadu, India.
Cite article:- Sravika A., Kennedy J.S., Rajabaskar D., Rajeswari E. (2019). Field screening of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes for resistance against Urdbean Leaf Crinkle Virus. Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 53(4): 458-462. doi: 10.18805/IJARe.A-5184.

ABSTRACT

In the current study one hundred and seven greengram genotypes screened at Department of Pulses, TNAU, Coimbatore using AICRP pest susceptibility scale. It was observed that RME-16-3, RME-16-12, MLT-GG R-16-007, MLT-GG R-16-009, COGG 1319 (rabi-greengram) were highly resistant (HR) to Urdbean Leaf Crinkle Virus (ULCV). None of the greengram genotype is highly resistant in kharif season. Resistance in each case were associated with lower incidence, lower spread and milder symptoms relative to the susceptible cultivars. KEM 16-1, KEM 16-8, KEM 16-20, KME -33, MLT- GG K-16-01, MLT- GG K-16-05 (kharif-greengram) and RME-16-10, MLT-GG R-16-008 (rabi-greengram) were highly susceptible (HS). In susceptible cultivars of greengram, the disease is characterized by enlargement of trifoliate leaves and crinkling of the leaf lamina. However, severity of the symptoms varies in different cultivars. Early infected greengram plants showed complete sterility. The affected plants become stunted and gave a bushy appearance and no pods were formed in severely affected plants. Better understanding of resistance of genotypes will help in improvement of varieties resistant to viral diseases will certainly brighten the prospects of plant virus control in the coming decades.

REFERENCES

  1. Anonymous (2012) FAO Bulletin of Statistics. Statistics Division of Economics and Social Department. 2:54.
  2. Bashir, M., Ahmad Z. and Ghafoor, A. (2005). Sources of genetic resistance in mungbean and blackgram against Urdbean leaf crinkle virus (ULCV). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 37: 47-51.
  3. Iqbal, S. M., Ghafoor, A., Zubair, M. and Malik, B.A. (1991). Reaction of urdbean cultivars against leaf crinkle virus disease. Journal of Agricultural Research (Pakistan).
  4. Kadian, O.P. (1982). Yield loss in mung bean and urd bean due to leaf crinkle disease. Indian Phytopathology. 35(4): 642-644.
  5. Kolte, S.J. and Nene, Y.L. (1972). Studies on symptoms and mode of transmission of the leaf crinkle virus of urd bean (Phaseolus mungo). Indian Phytopathology. 25(3): 401-404.
  6. Nageswara Rao, G. V. (2002). Studies on leaf crinkle disease of [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Ph. D Thesis, Acharya N. G. Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad.
  7. Vijay Kumar, S. (1993). Studies on blackgram leaf crinkle virus. M Sc (Ag.) Thesis, Andhra Pradesh Agricultural University, Hyderabad, pp 120. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)