Indian Journal of Agricultural Research

  • Chief EditorV. Geethalakshmi

  • Print ISSN 0367-8245

  • Online ISSN 0976-058X

  • NAAS Rating 5.60

  • SJR 0.293

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Indian Journal of Agricultural Research, volume 51 issue 4 (august 2017) : 396-398

Genetic analysis for morphological, physiological, yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

G. Bhargavi, V. Satyanarayana Rao, K. L Narasimha Rao
1<p>Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Agricultural College,&nbsp;Bapatla -&nbsp;522 101, &nbsp;Andhra Pradesh. India</p>
Cite article:- Bhargavi G., Rao Satyanarayana V., Rao Narasimha L K. (2017). Genetic analysis for morphological, physiological, yield and yield attributes in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) . Indian Journal of Agricultural Research. 51(4): 396-398. doi: 10.18805/ijare.v51i04.8431.

Twenty Spanish bunch groundnut genotypes were evaluated for genetic parameters of 19 characters of morphological, physiological, yield and yield attributes over three seasons viz., Late Kharif (2012), Rabi (2012-13) and Summer (2013). The pooled data over three environments revealed that the genotype JL 24 showed lowest mean value for days to maturity, highest mean value for SCMR at 40 DAS and SCMR at 50 DAS. The genotype Abhaya showed highest mean value for pod yield per hectare and oil yield per hectare. Results indicated that PCV estimates were higher than those of GCV for all the characters studied indicating the influence of environment in varying degrees on all the characters. The results revealed that highest GCV was observed for pod yield per plant. Moderate heritability accompanied with high genetic advance as per cent of mean was recorded for pod yield per plant, pod yield per hectare (q), kernel yield per plant (g), kernel yield per hectare (q) and oil yield per hectare (q) indicating the preponderance of additive gene action which may be exploited through simple selection procedures.


  1. Burton, G.N. (1952). Quantitative inheritance in grasses. Proceedings of Sixth International Grassland Congress. 1: 277-283.

  2. John, K., Reddy, P.R., Reddy, P.H., Sudhakar, P and Reddy, N.P.E. (2011). Genetic analysis for water use efficiency traits, yield and yield attributes in groundnut. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2(3): 357-366.

  3. John, K., Vasanthi, R.P and Venkateswarlu, O. (2009). Studies on variability and character association in Spanish bunch groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Research. 32(1): 65-69.

  4. John, K., Reddy, P.R., Reddy, P.H., Sudhakar, P and Reddy, N.P.E. (2011a). Genetic analysis for water use efficiency traits, yield and yield attributes in groundnut. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 2(3): 357-366.

  5. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in Soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 314-318.

  6. Krishnamurthy, D., Kenchanagoudar, P.V.,Keerthi, C.M and Prashant babu, H. (2015). Groundnut under organic farming: genetic variability and association studies for yield, quality and disease resistance in recombinant inbred lines. Legume Research, 38(5):626-630.

  7. Lush, J.L. (1940). Intra-sire correlation on regression off-spring on dams as a method of estimating heritability of characters. Proceedings of American Society of Animal Production. 33: 292-301.

  8. Nandini, C., Savithramma, D.L and Naresh Babu, N. (2011). Genetic variability analysis for surrogate traits of water use efficiency in F8 recombinant inbred lines of the cross NRCG 12568 x NRCG 1236 in groundnut. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 2(4): 555-558.

  9. Narasimhulu, R., Kenchanagoudar, P.V and Gowda M.V.C. (2012). Study of genetic variability and correlations in selected groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 3(1): 355-357.

  10. Prasanna, R.A., Sekhar, R.M., Raja, R.K and Naik, K.S.S. (2012). Variability and genetic association studies of yield, physiological and confectionery traits in 28 F2 crosses in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Journal of Research ANGRAU. 40(2): 107-111.

  11. Sadasivam, S and Manickam, A. 1992. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited. New Delhi. 10-11.

  12. Thakur, S.B., Ghimire, S.K., Pandey, M.P., Shrestha and Mishra, B. (2011). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of pod yield component traits of groundnut. Journal of International Agriculture and Animal Science. 32: 133-141.

  13. Thirumala, R.V., Bhanu, D., Murthy, K.G.K and Bharathi D. (2012). Genetic variability and association among the various characters in groundnut. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 3(3): 337- 341. 

  14. Thirumala, R.V. (2016). Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis under drought in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Legume Research, 39(2):319-322.

  15. Vishnuvardhan, R.P., Vasanthi, K., Hariprasad Reddy, K and Bhaskar Reddy, B.V. (2012). Genetic variability studies for yield attributes and resistance to foliar diseases in groundnut. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology. 3(1): 390-393.

  16. Venkateshmurthy, H.S. (2005). Studies on genetic variability and stability analysis in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). M.Sc. Thesis. UAS, Banglore, India.

  17. Zaman, M.A., Tuhina, K.M., Ullah, M.Z., Moniruzzam, M and Alam, K.H. (2011). Genetic variability and path analysis of groundnut. The Agriculturist. 9(1): 29-36.

Editorial Board

View all (0)