Best blending combination
Out of these four combinations, first one we have selected one of suitable and best combination from each combination basis on organoleptic evaluation by panel of semi trained judges on 9-point hedonic scale. Thereafter, we have been found one best treatment from each given combinations (Table 1) and that after we studied of their storability and evaluate quality attributes and shelf life of those four treatments and finally, we have been found only one treatment out of those four treatments in terms of good quality attributes and shelf life. The organoleptic evaluation showed significant differences among the various mandarin–strawberry and spice-herb cordial formulations. The most preferred formulation was D-T3 (55% mandarin + 40% strawberry + 5% tamarind) with a score of 8.33, followed by A-T3 (8.30), C-T2 (8.20) and B-T2 (8.12). The higher preference for these formulations might be due to the balanced mix of mandarin and strawberry with the flavoring ingredients, creating a desirable taste and flavor. Similarly,
Kesavanath et al., (2015) found that a mix of 70% starfruit juice and 30% sweet orange juice was the best for cordial development.
Patil (2021) reviewed the best cordial formulation using kiwi, guava and mint in the ratio of 8g:18g:3g, respectively whereas,
Said and Jena (2025) revealed that the treatment T2 comprised chayote with mandarin at 1:1 ratio was best for beverage formulation.
Total soluble solids (%)
The Total Soluble Solids (TSS) in Table 2 significantly increased gradually during storage (18.55 to 26.39°C) across all treatments, with the smallest increase observed in D-T3 (55% mandarin + 40% strawberry + 5% tamarind), rising from 30.00 to 30.87% over 150 days, followed by A-T3. Consequently, D-T3 demonstrated comparatively better TSS stability than the other formulations. The increase in TSS during storage is attributed to the hydrolysis of sugars from polysaccharides to mono and disaccharides. Similar findings were reported by
Meera et al., (2021) in pineapple and passionfruit based probiotic drink,
Bhagat et al., (2025) in blended syrup from mandarin and passionfruit and by
Lather et al., (2026) in a fruit-herbs blended beverage.
Acidity (%)
An acidity of blended cordial consistently significantly increased across all treatments in Table 3 at room temperature (18.55 to 26.39°C), with D-T3 exhibiting the smallest rise (1.50 to 1.86%) by 150 days, followed closely by A-T3. This indicates that D-T3 maintains superior acidity stability compared to other formulations. The increase in acidity is likely due to the production of organic acids and the breakdown of pectic compounds (
Conn and Stumf, 1976).
Abeywickrama and Jayasooriya (2010) also observed a similar acidity increase in kirala-based cordial and
Pavithra and Mini (2023) reported comparable findings in Dragon Fruit (
Hylocereus undatus) based blended RTS beverage.
Vitamin C (mg/100ml)
The vitamin C content in all blended cordial combinations slowly significantly dwindled over the 150 days of storage (18.55 to 26.39°C) mentioned in Table 4. By the end of this period, DT
3 emerged as the best performing treatment, retaining the highest vitamin C content at 21.90 mg/100 ml, with AT
3 trailing closely at 21.64 mg/100 ml. This decline in vitamin C can be chalked up to the oxidation of ascorbic acid into dehydroascorbic acid, a process fueled by oxygen trapped within the containers and the product’s own molecular nooks and crannies. Throughout the storage, DT
3 demonstrated a notably superior ability to hold onto its vitamin C. In a similar vein,
Harendra et al., (2026) observed a decrease in vitamin C from 59.66 to 58.78 mg/100 mL during the storage of an RTS drink concocted from aonla, rangpur lime and ginger blends. A downward trend was also noted by
Rehman et al., (2020) in the ascorbic acid levels of RTS prepared from olive and mandarin blends. Similarly,
Begum and Premakumar (2021) reported comparable findings in a functional beverage based on bitter gourd.
pH
The pH of all blended cordial combinations showed a significant gradual decrease over 150 days of storage (18.55 to 26.39°C) mentioned in Table 5. Initially, AT
3 recorded the highest pH (3.54), while BT
2 had the lowest (3.42). After 150 days of storage, DT
3 maintained the highest pH (3.27) followed by AT
3, whereas BT
2 recorded the lowest value (3.12). The gradual decline in pH might be attributed to the increase in acidity during storage.
Khalid et al., (2019) observed similar results, noting a reduction in pH from 4.66 to 3.82 in strawberry and date blended RTS drink, while
Rani et al., (2018) reported similar findings in mandarin and strawberry mixed fruit juice.
Total sugars
Over 150 days of storage, the total sugars content in all the blended cordial combinations went up quite a bit mentioned in Table 6. Out of all the combinations, DT
3 showed a pretty steady and favorable increase in total sugars, going from 26.63% on day one to 27.00% by day 150. This suggests that DT
3 has better storage stability, making it the top choice among the treatments we looked at.
Harendra et al., (2026) saw similar at ambient condition (18.55 to 26.39°C) results with a blended RTS made from aonla, rangpur lime and ginger whereas,
Verma (2025) noticed the same with guava-based blended squash.
Organoleptic quality
The organoleptic scores of all blended cordial formulations significantly declined gradually during 150 days of storage showed in Table 7. DT
3 retained the highest sensory acceptability
, decreasing from 8.33 to 7.88 followed by AT
3 (8.30 to 7.26). The comparatively better sensory retention in DT
3 might be attributed to its favourable flavour and taste balance and reduced development of undesirable off-flavours and colour changes during storage. Similar declines in sensory quality during storage have been reported by
Bharati et al., (2023) in sweet orange, guava and ginger RTS and
Lather et al., (2026) in a fruit-herb blended beverage.
Microbial count (log10 CFU/mL)
Over the course of 150 days, the microbial count in all blended cordial combinations gradually increased mentioned in Table 8. Among them, DT
3 stood out as the greater microbial stability, with its count inching up from 1.22 to 1.60 log
10 CFU/mL, marking it as the most resilient blend. This gradual increase in microbial presence could be attributed to the waning power of preservatives and the inviting conditions for microbial proliferation over time.
Malik et al., (2022) observed a similar trend in lemon cordial.
Browning index (OD)
As the days passed, the browning index in all cordial combinations also crept upward mentioned in Table 9, a subtle testament to the unfolding drama of non-enzymatic browning. Yet, DT
3 once again proved its mettle, with its browning index rising modestly from 0.08 to 0.18 OD at 440 nm, showcasing superior color stability. The increase in browning might be associated with ascorbic acid degradation, sugar degradation and Maillard-type reactions during storage. This pattern of browning (OD at 440 nm) during the storage of fruit beverages echoes the findings of
Buvé et al. (2021) and
Koca et al., (2003).