Sustainable Antibiotic-free Strategies- Current Trends, Challenges and Possibilities in Poultry Farming: A Review

S
Sakshi Rathore1,*
R
Rajni Arora1
1Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Bikaner-334 001, Rajasthan, India.
  • Submitted24-06-2025|

  • Accepted27-04-2026|

  • First Online 09-06-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/BKAP865

Antibiotics are a class of drugs used to treat bacterial infections. The use of antibiotics in poultry farming is a widespread practice aimed at improving bird health, preventing infections and promoting growth and productivity. However, the excessive and unregulated use of antibiotics in the poultry industry has become a major public health concern due to the increasing risk of antibiotic resistance. The use of antibiotic free strategies is a useful practice aimed at improving poultry health, productivity and welfare of birds by minimizing and eliminating use of antibiotics. These approaches include the use of probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, synbiotics, feed enzymes, vitamins and minerals, vaccines, antimicrobial peptides, phytobiotics and immunomodulators as alternatives to conventional antibiotics.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major threat to global public health and sustainable development. According to recent estimates, bacterial AMR directly caused approximately 1.27 million deaths worldwide in 2019 and was associated with nearly 4.95 million deaths overall. The excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents in human healthcare, animal husbandry and agriculture is considered a primary factor contributing to the rise of drug-resistant microorganisms. Beyond its impact on mortality and morbidity, AMR also imposes a considerable economic burden. The World Bank projects that by 2050, AMR may lead to an additional US$ 1 trillion in healthcare expenditures, while annual global gross domestic product (GDP) losses could range from US$ 1 trillion to US$ 3.4 trillion by 2030 (World Health Organization, 2023).
       
At the 79th UN general assembly high-level Meeting on AMR, held on September 26, 2024, in New York under the theme “Investing in the present and securing our future together: Accelerating multi-sectoral global, regional and national actions to address antimicrobial resistance”, world leaders endorsed a political declaration with firm targets. These include slashing the estimated 4.95 million annual human deaths tied to bacterial AMR by 10% by 2030, ensuring 70% of global antibiotics come from low-AMR-risk categories and strengthening surveillance of antimicrobial use and resistance across sectors. Meanwhile, FAO, WHO, UNEP and WOAH pledged support through a One Health approach, providing guidance and monitoring via an updated global AMR action plan by 2026.
 
Highlights
 
• This article will serve as a valuable source of information for the antibiotic resistance in poultry industry.
• This article will help to study the alternative strategies for the antibiotic resistance in poultry farming.
• It will give significant insight of healthy poultry production and animal welfare.
• This article will help promote public health by reducing the dependence on antibiotics in poultry production.
 
Antibiotics and it’s use in poultry farming
 
Antibiotics serve as medications specifically designed to treat and prevent bacterial infections. Antibiotics have a number of uses in poultry farming, including.
1. For growth promotion-sub therapeutic doses (Most commonly used).
2. For disease prevention (Prophylaxis).
3. For disease treatment (Muhammad et al., 2020).
       
A study by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) found that common antibiotics used in poultry farming are oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline and doxycycline, which are all tetracyclines; Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are fluoroquinolones and neomycin is an aminoglycoside (Sahu and Saxena, 2014). 
  
Antibiotic resistance
 
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), antibiotic resistance refers to the capacity of bacterial populations to withstand the effects of antimicrobial agents even at inhibitory concentrations. The transmission of resistant bacteria from poultry products to humans can potentially occur through the handling or consumption of meat contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms.
       
The global demand for poultry meat has been steadily rising, leading to continuous expansion of the poultry industry (Jabbar and Rehman, 2023; Shahbazi et al., 2022). Poultry meat and eggs are considered cost-effective protein sources, providing a higher proportion of protein per unit of human consumption compared to cow milk, mutton, pork and beef (Otte and Pica-Ciamarra, 2010). Despite these nutritional and economic advantages, recent studies reporting the presence of antibiotics and other xenobiotic residues in meat products have raised concerns regarding the perception of poultry meat as a safe and healthy food source (Sahu and Saxena, 2014); (Raghav et al., 2022).
       
Current estimates indicate that antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) are associated with approximately 700,000 deaths worldwide annually and this figure is projected to rise to nearly 10 million deaths per year by 2050 (Vikesland et al., 2017). Recent evidence also suggests that resistant bacteria may be transmitted from mothers to newborns, potentially resulting in neonatal sepsis, which remains a leading cause of infant mortality in low- and middle-income countries (Carvalho et al., 2022). Consequently, monitoring antibiotic residues in foods derived from animals is essential for ensuring food safety and supporting the principles of the “One Health” approach aimed at protecting both human and animal health.
 
Case study on the detection of antibiotic residues in poultry in Chhattisgarh
 
The presence of antibiotic residues in chicken meat represents a potential risk to consumer health and can also have adverse economic implications for the poultry sector, including restrictions on exports.
       
A study was designed to evaluate the occurrence of antibiotic residues in retail chicken meat collected from different agro-climatic regions of Chhattisgarh, India and to estimate associated human health risks using monte carlo simulation. A total of 336 chicken meat samples were analyzed, out of which 147 samples (43.7%) tested positive for antibiotic residues, while 60 samples (17.8%) exceeded the maximum residue limits (MRLs).
 
Research on elevated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry farm environments in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh (Chandrakar et al., 2023) />  
In this study, researchers from the NGOs Toxics Link and World Animal Protection collected a total of 14 samples of poultry litter and groundwater from six poultry farms. Out of these, 11 samples showed a concerning presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) associated with 15 clinically important antibiotics, including glycopeptides and macrolides.
       
The findings were linked to widespread and often indiscriminate use of antibiotics by poultry farmers, largely driven by limited awareness of their consequences, as reported in surveys conducted by Toxics Link. Although the Bureau of Indian Standards has advised against the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry feed, these substances are still available in the market and continue to be used in poultry production.
       
Furthermore, colistin-an antibiotic considered a last-resort treatment for multidrug-resistant infections and banned for use in food-producing animals by the Union Ministry of Health in 2019-remains accessible for sale through online platforms.
       
India contributes approximately 3% of the worldwide use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals. With the country increasingly intensifying livestock and poultry production to address food security challenges, concerns are rising that the poultry sector may become a significant hotspot for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.
       
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), drug-resistant infections are responsible for at least 700,000 deaths annually, including over 200,000 deaths caused by multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
 
Causes of antibiotic resistance
 
Antibiotic resistance is driven by several factors, including insufficient awareness, excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics, their application as growth promoters, lack of regulatory control, low cost and easy availability.
       
When antibiotics are administered to food-producing animals at sub-therapeutic levels, susceptible bacteria are eliminated, while those with resistant traits survive. These resistant organisms then multiply and gradually dominate the microbial population. Resistance can further spread through genetic mutations or plasmid-mediated gene transfer, allowing resistant traits to be passed on to future generations as well as to other bacterial species.
(Catry et al., 2003).
       
Humans may be exposed to resistant bacteria through the handling or consumption of contaminated meat products (Van den Bogaard and Stobberingh, 2000). After entering the body, these bacteria can colonize the gastrointestinal tract and transfer resistance genes to other members of the normal gut microbiota, thereby complicating the effective treatment of bacterial infections (Stanton, 2013).
       
In intensive poultry production systems, antibiotics are commonly applied in several ways, including incorporation of low-dose antibiotics in feed, therapeutic use for treating infections and prophylactic use for disease prevention.
       
This leads to formation of Antibiotics resistant bacteria in poultry which then passes on to human beings through consumption of eggs and meat. Also, these antibiotics are passed into the faeces and litter material through which it reaches to surface water which further contaminates crops, vegetables and fruits. Through this indirect way they again reach to human beings. Antibiotics resistant bacteria are also transferred to poultry farmers during handling (Kumar et al., 2019).
 
Aim and objectives
 
This review aims to critically assess the current patterns of antibiotic usage and the status of antimicrobial resistance in poultry production systems. It further explores the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, benefits and limitations of antibiotic-free alternatives. In addition, the review discusses the practical challenges associated with their implementation in field conditions and outlines future directions for achieving sustainable poultry production within a One Health approach.
 
Methodology
 
This review was carried out to compile and analyze existing evidence on antibiotic usage, antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic-free alternatives in poultry production. A systematic and comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science.
       
Peer-reviewed journal articles, reports from international agencies and relevant review papers published from 2000 to 2024 were included in the analysis. The search strategy incorporated keywords such as “antibiotic resistance in poultry,” “antibiotic alternatives,” “poultry probiotics,” “phytobiotics,” “organic acids,” and “bacteriophages in poultry production.”
       
Studies addressing poultry health, production performance, food safety and strategies for mitigating antimicrobial resistance were considered, whereas non-English publications and studies not relevant to the topic were excluded. The selected literature was then critically evaluated and synthesized to present a comprehensive overview of antibiotic-free approaches in poultry farming.
 
Antibiotic-free strategies
 
Opportunities in antibiotic-free production
 
Antibiotic-free poultry production offers several advantages across the production chain. For consumers, it ensures improved food quality and safety. For producers, it supports optimal performance and healthier poultry flocks. From an animal welfare perspective, it promotes better health outcomes and contributes to long-term sustainability in poultry farming.
 
Characteristics of an ideal alternative
 
An effective substitute for antibiotics should meet several important criteria. It should not promote antimicrobial resistance or disrupt the normal gut microflora. It must not reduce feed palatability and should be capable of inhibiting or eliminating pathogenic microorganisms. Additionally, it should be non-toxic and free from adverse effects on birds.
       
The ideal alternative should also be environmentally safe, easily degradable and stable within feed and the gastrointestinal tract. It should enhance growth performance and feed conversion efficiency while being easily eliminated from the body or leaving only minimal short-term residues.
 
Alternative strategies to antibiotics (antibiotic-free approaches)
 
1). Probiotics
 
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), probiotics are defined as live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, provide health benefits to the host. Common probiotic organisms include Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Bifidobacterium species and Escherichia coli. In addition, yeast and fungal strains such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae are also utilized as probiotic agents.
 
Advantages of probiotics
 
Probiotics contribute to improved gut health, reduce the spread of infections and mortality and enhance feed conversion efficiency. They also support better weight gain and growth rates in poultry. Furthermore, they stimulate digestive enzyme activity, improving nutrient absorption and enhance vaccine efficacy. Probiotics assist in the rapid detoxification of mycotoxins and leave no harmful residues in animal products.
 
Benefits of probiotics
 
Probiotics help in modulating the gut microbiota by establishing a healthy intestinal microbial balance (Dhama et al., 2008). They also act through competitive exclusion by occupying binding sites in the gastrointestinal tract and producing antimicrobial substances that inhibit pathogen growth.
       
In addition, probiotics produce antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins, which are effective against pathogens including Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli. They also enhance immune responses by increasing immunoglobulin production, activating macrophages and lymphocytes and stimulating interferon production (Yang, 2009).
       
Moreover, probiotics strengthen intestinal barrier function by adhering to the gut mucosa, thereby forming a protective barrier against pathogen invasion and contributing to improved overall immunity.
 
2). Prebiotics
 
Prebiotics are non-digestible feed components that benefit the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of a limited number of beneficial bacteria in the colon, thereby improving gut health by serving as a nutrient source for these microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract.
 
Commonly used prebiotics include
 
Gluco-oligosaccharides (GOS), which are found in legumes and dairy products; fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), present in fruits, vegetables and cereals; mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS), derived from yeast and certain plants; stachyose and oligochitosan (Jiang et al., 2006).
 
Functions of prebiotics
 
Prebiotics help modify the gastrointestinal microflora by encouraging the growth of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. They also stimulate immune responses, reduce the risk of pathogen invasion and colon cancer and improve gut health by enhancing enzymatic activity in the digestive system. In addition, their use can ultimately contribute to reduced production costs (Peric et al., 2009).
 
3). Synbiotics
 
Synbiotics are formulations that combine probiotics and prebiotics, designed to improve the survival and activity of beneficial microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), thereby promoting overall gut health. Commonly used synbiotic combinations include lactitol with Lactobacillus species, as well as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) with Bifidobacterium species (Yang et al., 2009). In general, synbiotics involve the use of prebiotics to support and enhance the growth of probiotic organisms.
 
4). Function
 
Synbiotics promote growth performance in broiler chickens by improving intestinal structure and enhancing nutrient absorption, which ultimately leads to better overall production efficiency (Awad et al., 2008; Hassanpour et al., 2013).
 
Organic acids
 
Historically, organic acids have been utilized as natural food preservatives and hygiene enhancers due to their ability to inhibit microbial growth and improve the freshness and shelf life of food products (Sadarao et al., 2025). Their antimicrobial properties also make them effective alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. Organic acids are weak acids that can suppress or prevent the proliferation and colonization of pathogenic bacteria in the intestinal tract of birds.
 
Functions of organic acids
 
Organic acids exhibit broad antibacterial activity against various pathogenic microorganisms. They can penetrate bacterial cell walls and, once inside the cell, dissociate into their conjugate base forms, leading to a reduction in intracellular pH. This acidic internal environment disrupts cellular functions and inhibits bacterial growth (Mani-Lopez  et al., 2012).
       
Additionally, organic acids help lower gut pH and enhance nutrient utilization in poultry diets.
 
Examples of organic acids
 
Sorbic acid disrupts membrane proteins and increases bacterial cell permeability (Abdelrahman, 2016). Propionic acid is effective in inhibiting feed-borne molds and preventing mycotoxin production (Zha and Cohen, 2014). Oxalic acid, commonly found in plant sources, can influence calcium availability, particularly in laying hens (Jadhav et al., 2015).
 
Benefits of organic acids
 
Organic acids reduce pathogen colonization along the intestinal lining, thereby protecting epithelial cells. They also promote epithelial cell proliferation, accelerate intestinal healing, improve villus height and enhance nutrient absorption capacity. These properties make organic acids useful in reducing microbial loads, including pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli.
 
5). Feed enzymes, vitamins and minerals
 
Feed enzymes are added to poultry diets to break down complex feed components such as phytate, xylan and other non-starch polysaccharides. This enhances nutrient availability, improves feed digestibility and supports better growth performance and gut health. Commonly used enzymes include phytase, xylanase and other glycanase complexes.
       
Phytase is the most widely used single enzyme, which hydrolyzes phytate into inositol and inorganic phosphate. This process releases phosphorus from cereal grains, allowing more efficient utilization of this essential and costly mineral in poultry nutrition. In addition, enzymes that degrade fiber and starch, such as xylanase and β-glucanase, improve feed conversion ratio, nutrient absorption, growth performance and also help reduce issues like wet litter.
 
Benefits of enzymes
 
Feed enzymes support overall health and growth, improve nutrient utilization and help reduce feed costs in poultry production.
 
6). Vitamins and minerals
 
Vitamins are organic micronutrients required for essential physiological functions such as immune response, energy metabolism and cellular repair. Minerals, on the other hand, are inorganic elements that support key biological processes including bone formation, fluid balance and muscle function. Together, vitamins and minerals play a significant role in improving feed efficiency, immune status and overall productivity in poultry.
 
Important vitamins and their functions
 
Vitamin C acts as an antioxidant, helps reduce heat stress (particularly during summer conditions), enhances feed intake and improves metabolic efficiency (Sahin et al., 2003). Vitamin E supports better feed conversion ratio, growth performance and overall productivity in poultry. Vitamins A and D are important for strengthening immunity and promoting growth. The B-complex vitamins contribute to improved digestibility, nutrient utilization, growth and overall performance.

Important minerals and their functions
 
Calcium and phosphorus are essential for proper growth and skeletal development. Zinc and selenium function as antioxidants, helping to reduce stress while enhancing immune response and disease resistance. Magnesium plays a role in muscle development and function. Other essential minerals include sodium, potassium, iron, copper, manganese and iodine, all of which contribute to various metabolic and physiological processes necessary for healthy poultry growth and production.
 
7). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)
 
Antimicrobial peptides, also referred to as host defense peptides, are short amino acid chains typically consisting of around 30-60 residues and are present in all forms of living organisms. These peptides exhibit both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities and can act against bacteria, fungi and viruses primarily by targeting and disrupting microbial cell membranes (Li et al., 2012; Parachin et al., 2012).
       
AMPs have been shown to enhance growth performance, stimulate immune cell activity, improve intestinal structure and increase beneficial gut microbiota populations such as Lactobacillus spp. (Daneshmand et al., 2019). Due to these properties, they are considered promising natural feed additives capable of replacing therapeutic antibiotics and antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production, with potential to help control antimicrobial-resistant strains within flocks.
       
Since most AMPs act by targeting pathogen cell membranes, the likelihood of resistance development is relatively low, as structural changes in microbial membranes occur slowly over evolutionary time (Lee et al., 2016).
       
Experimental in vitro studies have also demonstrated that peptides derived from chicken leukocytes significantly inhibit the growth of Candida albicans, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes (Harwig et al., 1994).
 
8). Phytobiotics
 
Phytobiotics are bioactive compounds derived from plants that are incorporated into animal feed to enhance health and promote growth. These substances consist of plant secondary metabolites such as phenols, flavonoids, tannins, saponins and essential oils. They are widely used as natural alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters, particularly in monogastric animals such as poultry and pigs (Khaksar et al., 2012; Karangiya et al., 2016). Phytobiotics possess a range of biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiprotozoal effects.
 
Benefits of phytobiotics
 
Growth promotion
 
Supplementation with plant-based additives such as garlic at around 3% has been shown to improve growth performance in broiler chickens (Elagib et al., 2013). Other spices, including black pepper and cinnamon, also contribute to enhanced growth in poultry.

Antimicrobial effects
 
Tannins exhibit strong anticoccidial activity in chickens. Garlic, through its active compound allicin, can penetrate bacterial cell membranes and interfere with essential enzymes, thereby disrupting microbial cellular processes.
 
Antioxidant activity
 
Turmeric is widely recognized for its antioxidant properties.
 
Improved feed efficiency
 
Essential oils stimulate the secretion of digestive enzymes from the pancreas and liver, including trypsin, amylase and bile, which enhances feed digestibility and overall feed efficiency (Gopi et al., 2014).
 
Immunomodulatory effects
 
Various plant-derived compounds such as neem, ashwagandha, flavonoids, lectins, polysaccharides, peptides, tannins and garlic contribute to improved immune responses in poultry.
 
9). Immunomodulators
 
Immunomodulators, also known as immunostimulants, are substances that regulate or modify the immune system’s response to improve disease resistance and overall immunity. These compounds include a wide range of natural and synthetic agents.
 
Types of immunomodulators include
 
1. Mineral-based compounds such as selenium and zinc.
2. Vitamins including A, E and C.
3. Amino acids such as arginine and leucine.
4. Plant-derived polysaccharides like astragalus polysaccharide and algal polysaccharides.
5. Oligosaccharides including mannan oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides.
6. Microbial preparations such as BCG vaccine and Lactobacillus species.
7. Bacterial extracts including â-glucans, peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides.
8. Biological molecules (cytokines) such as interferons, transfer factors, interleukins and immunoglobulins.
       
These immunomodulatory agents play an important role in enhancing immune function and improving resistance to infections in poultry production systems.
 
10). Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics
 
Vaccination represents an important alternative strategy to antibiotics in poultry production by providing a preventive approach for controlling infectious diseases without contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Vaccines offer protection against specific pathogens, thereby decreasing the reliance on antibiotic treatments and supporting improved growth performance and flock health.
 
Benefits of vaccines
 
Vaccines provide preventive protection against disease outbreaks, reduce the development and spread of antibiotic resistance, enable targeted control of specific infections and improve overall animal welfare.
 
Common poultry vaccines are available for:
 
• Marek’s disease.
• Newcastle disease (Ranikhet disease).
• Infectious bursal disease (IBD/gumboro disease).
• Infectious bronchitis.
 
11). Bacteriophages, endolysins and lysozymes
 
Bacteriophages are highly specific viruses that infect and destroy bacteria by producing enzymes known as endolysins, which ultimately lead to bacterial cell lysis. They are considered safe alternatives to antibiotics because they do not affect animal or plant cells. Although bacteriophages are unlikely to fully replace antibiotics, they hold significant potential in managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.
       
Endolysins and lysozymes are types of hydrolytic enzymes derived from various sources, including bacteriophages, animals, plants, bacteria and insects and they differ in their specificity toward target bacteria. These enzymes break down peptidoglycan, a key structural component of the bacterial cell wall, resulting in bacterial cell destruction.
 
Comparative evaluation and field challenges
 
Although a variety of antibiotic alternatives have demonstrated encouraging outcomes, their overall effectiveness is often influenced by farm management practices, environmental conditions and the genetic background of the birds.
       
Probiotics and prebiotics are known to enhance gut health and immune function; however, their performance may be inconsistent due to strain-specific effects and issues related to storage stability. Organic acids are effective in reducing enteric pathogens, but their efficiency can vary depending on diet composition and the buffering capacity of feed.
       
Phytobiotics provide antimicrobial and antioxidant benefits, yet challenges such as variability in plant constituents and lack of standardized dosing limit their consistent application. Antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages offer high target specificity and a low risk of resistance development; nevertheless, their large-scale commercial use is constrained by production costs and limited regulatory approval.
       
Vaccination remains the most dependable preventive strategy, but it cannot fully substitute antibiotics in situations where farm hygiene, management and biosecurity practices are inadequate. Therefore, a comprehensive approach combining nutrition, vaccination, biosecurity and effective management is essential for successful antibiotic-free poultry production.
 
Integrated approach
 
Evidence indicates that no single alternative is sufficient to completely replace antibiotics across all poultry production systems. Instead, an integrated strategy that combines feed additives, improved housing conditions, strict hygiene, vaccination programs and precision nutrition offers the most sustainable way to reduce antimicrobial use while maintaining productivity.
The growing global concern over antimicrobial resistance highlights the urgent need to shift toward antibiotic-free poultry production systems. Various alternatives such as probiotics, phytobiotics, organic acids and vaccines show considerable potential in supporting gut health, immunity and overall performance.
       
However, differences in efficacy, economic constraints and practical challenges in field implementation limit their widespread adoption. Future research should focus on optimizing combination strategies, exploring host-microbiome interactions and developing cost-effective delivery methods.
       
In addition, stronger farm management practices and supportive policy frameworks will be crucial for the successful implementation of antibiotic-free systems. This transition is essential for promoting sustainable poultry production and improving public health outcomes within a One Health framework.
 
Author’s contribution
 
Sakshi Rathore wrote the article under the guidance of Rajni Arora.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

  1. Abdelrahman, W. (2016) Effective strategies in the control of antibiotic resistance in poultry. International Hatchery Practice. 30: 13-15.

  2. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Nitsch, S., Pasteiner, S., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Böhm, J. (2008). Effects of dietary inclusion of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic on the intestinal glucose absorption of broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7(7): 688-691.

  3. Catry, B., Laevens, H., Devriese, L.A., Opsomer, G. and De Kruif, A. (2003). Antimicrobial resistance in livestock. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 26(2): 81-93.

  4. Chandrakar, C., Shakya, S., Patyal, A., Bhonsle, D. and Pandey, A.K. (2023). Detection of antibiotic residues in chicken meat from different agro-climatic zones of Chhattisgarh, India by HPLC-PDA and human exposure assessment and risk characterization. Food Control. 148: 109667.

  5. Daneshmand, A., Kermanshahi, H., Sekhavati, M.H., Javadmanesh, A. and Ahmadian, M. (2019). Antimicrobial peptide, cLF36, affects performance and intestinal morphology, microflora, junctional proteins and immune cells in broilers challenged with E. coli. Scientific Reports. 9(1): 14176.

  6. De Carvalho, F.M., Valiatti, T.B., Santos, F.F., Silveira, A.C.D.O., Guimarães, A.P.C., Gerber, A.L. and Gales, A.C. (2022). Exploring the bacteriome and resistome of humans and food-producing animals in Brazil. Microbiology Spectrum.  10(5): e00565-22.

  7. Dhama, K., Mahendran, M., Tomar, S. and Chauhan, R.S. (2008). Beneficial effects of probiotics and prebiotics in livestock and poultry: The current perspectives. Intas Polivet.  9(1): 1-12. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/ publication/drug-resistant-infections-a-threat-to-our- economic-future.

  8. Elagib, H.A., Abbas, S.A. and Elamin, K.M. (2013). Effect of different natural feed additives compared to antibiotic on performance of broiler chicks under high temperature. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2(11): 139-144.

  9. Gopi, M., Karthik, K., Manjunathachar, H.V., Tamilmahan, P., Kesavan, M., Dashprakash, M. and Purushothaman, M.R. (2014). Essential oils as a feed additive in poultry nutrition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2(1): 1-7.

  10. Hamed, D.M. and Hassan, A.M.A. (2013) Acids supplementation to drinking water and their effects on Japanese quails experimentally challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Zoological Research. 3: 15-22.

  11. Harwig, S.S., Swiderek, K.M., Kokryakov, V.N., Tan, L., Lee, T.D., Panyutich, E.A. and Lehrer, R.I. (1994). Gallinacins: Cysteine- rich antimicrobial peptides of chicken leukocytes. FEBS Letters. 342(3): 281-285.

  12. Hassanpour, H., Moghaddam, A.Z., Khosravi, M. and Mayahi, M. (2013). Effects of synbiotic on the intestinal morphology and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. Livestock  Science. 153(1-3): 116-122. https://www.who.int/news/ item/26-09-2024-world-leaders-commit-to-decisive-action- on-antimicrobial-resistance.

  13. Jabbar, A., Rehman, K., Jabri, T., Kanwal, T., Perveen, S., Rashid, M.A. and Shah, M.R. (2023). Improving curcumin bactericidal potential against multi-drug resistant bacteria via its loading in polydopamine coated zinc-based metal-organic frameworks. Drug Delivery. 30(1): 2159587.

  14. Jadhav, K., Sharma, K.S., Katoch, S., Sharma, V.K. and Mane, B.G. (2015). Probiotics in broiler poultry feeds: A review. Journal of Animal Nutrition and Physiology. 1: 4-16.

  15. Jiang, H.Q., Gong, L.M., Ma, Y.X., He, Y.H., Li, D.F. and Zhai, H.X. (2006). Effect of stachyose supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and caecal fermentation characteristics in broilers. British Poultry Science. 47(4): 516-522.

  16. Karangiya, V.K., Savsani, H.H., Patil, S.S., Garg, D.D., Murthy, K.S., Ribadiya, N.K. and Vekariya, S.J. (2016). Effect of dietary supplementation of garlic, ginger and their combination on feed intake, growth performance and economics in commercial broilers. Veterinary World. 9(3): 245.

  17. Khaksar, V., Golian, A. and Kermanshahi, H. (2012). Immune response and ileal microflora in broilers fed wheat-based diet with or without enzyme Endofeed W and supplementation of thyme essential oil or probiotic PrimaLac? African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(81): 14716.

  18. Kumar, S. and Gupta, R. (2019). Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry in Haryana. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(7): 918- 925. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3602.

  19. Lee, T.H., Hall, K.N. and Aguilar, M.I. (2016). Antimicrobial peptide structure and mechanism of action: A focus on the role of membrane structure. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 16(1): 25-39.

  20. Li, Y., Xiang, Q., Zhang, Q., Huang, Y. and Su, Z. (2012). Overview on the recent study of antimicrobial peptides: Origins, functions, relative mechanisms and application. Peptides37(2): 207-221.

  21. Mani-Lopez, E., García, H.S. and López-Malo, A. (2012). Organic acids as antimicrobials to control salmonella in meat and poultry products. Food Research International. 45: 713-721.

  22. Muhammad, J., Khan, S., Su, J.Q., Hesham, A.E.L., Ditta, A., Nawab, J. and Ali, A. (2020). Antibiotics in poultry manure and their associated health issues: A systematic review. Journal  of Soils and Sediments. 20: 486-497.

  23. Otte, J. and Pica-Ciamarra, U. (2021). Emerging infectious zoonotic diseases: The neglected role of food animals. One Health. 13: 100323.

  24. Parachin, N.S., Mulder, K.C., Viana, A.A.B., Dias, S.C. and Franco, O.L. (2012). Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides. Peptides. 38(2): 446-456.

  25. Peric, L., Žikiæ, D. and Lukiæ, M. (2009). Application of alternative growth promoters in broiler production. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 25(5-6-1): 387-397.

  26. Raghav, H., Jadav, K., Jogi, J., Yadav, U. and Rajput, N. (2022). Occurrence of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus sp. in faecal samples of wild birds. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 36(4): 320-325. doi: 10.18805/BKAP386.

  27. Sadarao, L.B., Shelke, M.V., Das, P. and Chanthirasekaran, R. (2025). Evaluation of a commercially available organic acid blend and sanitizer products on broiler breeders’ performance and economics. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 40(2): 200-205. doi: 10.18805/BKAP832.

  28. Sahin, K. and Kucuk, O. (2003). Heat stress and dietary vitamin supplementation of poultry diets. CABI Reviews. doi: 10.1079/cabireviews20033127283.

  29. Sahu, R. and Saxena, P. (2014). Antibiotics in chicken meat. Centre for Science and Environment.

  30. Shahbazi, G., Shayegh, J., Ghazaei, S., Movassagh, G.M.H. and Hanifian, S. (2022). Prevalence, Virulence Factor and Antibiotics Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella spp. From Poultry Products in Ardabil Province.

  31. Stanton, T.B. (2013). A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends in Microbiology. 21(3): 111-113.

  32. van den Bogaard, A.E. and Stobberingh, E.E. (2000). Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics: links between animals and humans. International journal of Antimicrobial Agents.  14(4): 327-335.

  33. Vikesland, P.J., Pruden, A., Alvarez, P.J., Aga, D., Burgmann, H., Li, X.D. and Zhu, Y.G. (2017). Toward a comprehensive strategy to mitigate dissemination of environmental sources of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51: 13061-13069.

  34. Yang, Y., Iji, P.A. and Choct, M. (2009). Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: A review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 65(1): 97-114.

  35. Zha, C. and Cohen, A.C. (2014). Effects of anti-fungal compounds on feeding behavior and nutritional ecology of tobacco budworm and painted lady butterfly larvae. Entomol. Ornithol. Herpetol. 3(120): 2161-0983.

Sustainable Antibiotic-free Strategies- Current Trends, Challenges and Possibilities in Poultry Farming: A Review

S
Sakshi Rathore1,*
R
Rajni Arora1
1Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Rajasthan University of Veterinary and Animal Science, Bikaner-334 001, Rajasthan, India.
  • Submitted24-06-2025|

  • Accepted27-04-2026|

  • First Online 09-06-2026|

  • doi 10.18805/BKAP865

Antibiotics are a class of drugs used to treat bacterial infections. The use of antibiotics in poultry farming is a widespread practice aimed at improving bird health, preventing infections and promoting growth and productivity. However, the excessive and unregulated use of antibiotics in the poultry industry has become a major public health concern due to the increasing risk of antibiotic resistance. The use of antibiotic free strategies is a useful practice aimed at improving poultry health, productivity and welfare of birds by minimizing and eliminating use of antibiotics. These approaches include the use of probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, synbiotics, feed enzymes, vitamins and minerals, vaccines, antimicrobial peptides, phytobiotics and immunomodulators as alternatives to conventional antibiotics.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as a major threat to global public health and sustainable development. According to recent estimates, bacterial AMR directly caused approximately 1.27 million deaths worldwide in 2019 and was associated with nearly 4.95 million deaths overall. The excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents in human healthcare, animal husbandry and agriculture is considered a primary factor contributing to the rise of drug-resistant microorganisms. Beyond its impact on mortality and morbidity, AMR also imposes a considerable economic burden. The World Bank projects that by 2050, AMR may lead to an additional US$ 1 trillion in healthcare expenditures, while annual global gross domestic product (GDP) losses could range from US$ 1 trillion to US$ 3.4 trillion by 2030 (World Health Organization, 2023).
       
At the 79th UN general assembly high-level Meeting on AMR, held on September 26, 2024, in New York under the theme “Investing in the present and securing our future together: Accelerating multi-sectoral global, regional and national actions to address antimicrobial resistance”, world leaders endorsed a political declaration with firm targets. These include slashing the estimated 4.95 million annual human deaths tied to bacterial AMR by 10% by 2030, ensuring 70% of global antibiotics come from low-AMR-risk categories and strengthening surveillance of antimicrobial use and resistance across sectors. Meanwhile, FAO, WHO, UNEP and WOAH pledged support through a One Health approach, providing guidance and monitoring via an updated global AMR action plan by 2026.
 
Highlights
 
• This article will serve as a valuable source of information for the antibiotic resistance in poultry industry.
• This article will help to study the alternative strategies for the antibiotic resistance in poultry farming.
• It will give significant insight of healthy poultry production and animal welfare.
• This article will help promote public health by reducing the dependence on antibiotics in poultry production.
 
Antibiotics and it’s use in poultry farming
 
Antibiotics serve as medications specifically designed to treat and prevent bacterial infections. Antibiotics have a number of uses in poultry farming, including.
1. For growth promotion-sub therapeutic doses (Most commonly used).
2. For disease prevention (Prophylaxis).
3. For disease treatment (Muhammad et al., 2020).
       
A study by the Centre for Science and Environment (CSE) found that common antibiotics used in poultry farming are oxytetracycline, tetracycline, chlortetracycline and doxycycline, which are all tetracyclines; Enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin are fluoroquinolones and neomycin is an aminoglycoside (Sahu and Saxena, 2014). 
  
Antibiotic resistance
 
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), antibiotic resistance refers to the capacity of bacterial populations to withstand the effects of antimicrobial agents even at inhibitory concentrations. The transmission of resistant bacteria from poultry products to humans can potentially occur through the handling or consumption of meat contaminated with pathogenic microorganisms.
       
The global demand for poultry meat has been steadily rising, leading to continuous expansion of the poultry industry (Jabbar and Rehman, 2023; Shahbazi et al., 2022). Poultry meat and eggs are considered cost-effective protein sources, providing a higher proportion of protein per unit of human consumption compared to cow milk, mutton, pork and beef (Otte and Pica-Ciamarra, 2010). Despite these nutritional and economic advantages, recent studies reporting the presence of antibiotics and other xenobiotic residues in meat products have raised concerns regarding the perception of poultry meat as a safe and healthy food source (Sahu and Saxena, 2014); (Raghav et al., 2022).
       
Current estimates indicate that antibiotic-resistant bacteria (ARB) are associated with approximately 700,000 deaths worldwide annually and this figure is projected to rise to nearly 10 million deaths per year by 2050 (Vikesland et al., 2017). Recent evidence also suggests that resistant bacteria may be transmitted from mothers to newborns, potentially resulting in neonatal sepsis, which remains a leading cause of infant mortality in low- and middle-income countries (Carvalho et al., 2022). Consequently, monitoring antibiotic residues in foods derived from animals is essential for ensuring food safety and supporting the principles of the “One Health” approach aimed at protecting both human and animal health.
 
Case study on the detection of antibiotic residues in poultry in Chhattisgarh
 
The presence of antibiotic residues in chicken meat represents a potential risk to consumer health and can also have adverse economic implications for the poultry sector, including restrictions on exports.
       
A study was designed to evaluate the occurrence of antibiotic residues in retail chicken meat collected from different agro-climatic regions of Chhattisgarh, India and to estimate associated human health risks using monte carlo simulation. A total of 336 chicken meat samples were analyzed, out of which 147 samples (43.7%) tested positive for antibiotic residues, while 60 samples (17.8%) exceeded the maximum residue limits (MRLs).
 
Research on elevated antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in poultry farm environments in Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh (Chandrakar et al., 2023) />  
In this study, researchers from the NGOs Toxics Link and World Animal Protection collected a total of 14 samples of poultry litter and groundwater from six poultry farms. Out of these, 11 samples showed a concerning presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) associated with 15 clinically important antibiotics, including glycopeptides and macrolides.
       
The findings were linked to widespread and often indiscriminate use of antibiotics by poultry farmers, largely driven by limited awareness of their consequences, as reported in surveys conducted by Toxics Link. Although the Bureau of Indian Standards has advised against the use of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs) in poultry feed, these substances are still available in the market and continue to be used in poultry production.
       
Furthermore, colistin-an antibiotic considered a last-resort treatment for multidrug-resistant infections and banned for use in food-producing animals by the Union Ministry of Health in 2019-remains accessible for sale through online platforms.
       
India contributes approximately 3% of the worldwide use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals. With the country increasingly intensifying livestock and poultry production to address food security challenges, concerns are rising that the poultry sector may become a significant hotspot for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance.
       
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), drug-resistant infections are responsible for at least 700,000 deaths annually, including over 200,000 deaths caused by multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
 
Causes of antibiotic resistance
 
Antibiotic resistance is driven by several factors, including insufficient awareness, excessive and inappropriate use of antibiotics, their application as growth promoters, lack of regulatory control, low cost and easy availability.
       
When antibiotics are administered to food-producing animals at sub-therapeutic levels, susceptible bacteria are eliminated, while those with resistant traits survive. These resistant organisms then multiply and gradually dominate the microbial population. Resistance can further spread through genetic mutations or plasmid-mediated gene transfer, allowing resistant traits to be passed on to future generations as well as to other bacterial species.
(Catry et al., 2003).
       
Humans may be exposed to resistant bacteria through the handling or consumption of contaminated meat products (Van den Bogaard and Stobberingh, 2000). After entering the body, these bacteria can colonize the gastrointestinal tract and transfer resistance genes to other members of the normal gut microbiota, thereby complicating the effective treatment of bacterial infections (Stanton, 2013).
       
In intensive poultry production systems, antibiotics are commonly applied in several ways, including incorporation of low-dose antibiotics in feed, therapeutic use for treating infections and prophylactic use for disease prevention.
       
This leads to formation of Antibiotics resistant bacteria in poultry which then passes on to human beings through consumption of eggs and meat. Also, these antibiotics are passed into the faeces and litter material through which it reaches to surface water which further contaminates crops, vegetables and fruits. Through this indirect way they again reach to human beings. Antibiotics resistant bacteria are also transferred to poultry farmers during handling (Kumar et al., 2019).
 
Aim and objectives
 
This review aims to critically assess the current patterns of antibiotic usage and the status of antimicrobial resistance in poultry production systems. It further explores the effectiveness, underlying mechanisms, benefits and limitations of antibiotic-free alternatives. In addition, the review discusses the practical challenges associated with their implementation in field conditions and outlines future directions for achieving sustainable poultry production within a One Health approach.
 
Methodology
 
This review was carried out to compile and analyze existing evidence on antibiotic usage, antimicrobial resistance and antibiotic-free alternatives in poultry production. A systematic and comprehensive search of the literature was conducted using major electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Web of Science.
       
Peer-reviewed journal articles, reports from international agencies and relevant review papers published from 2000 to 2024 were included in the analysis. The search strategy incorporated keywords such as “antibiotic resistance in poultry,” “antibiotic alternatives,” “poultry probiotics,” “phytobiotics,” “organic acids,” and “bacteriophages in poultry production.”
       
Studies addressing poultry health, production performance, food safety and strategies for mitigating antimicrobial resistance were considered, whereas non-English publications and studies not relevant to the topic were excluded. The selected literature was then critically evaluated and synthesized to present a comprehensive overview of antibiotic-free approaches in poultry farming.
 
Antibiotic-free strategies
 
Opportunities in antibiotic-free production
 
Antibiotic-free poultry production offers several advantages across the production chain. For consumers, it ensures improved food quality and safety. For producers, it supports optimal performance and healthier poultry flocks. From an animal welfare perspective, it promotes better health outcomes and contributes to long-term sustainability in poultry farming.
 
Characteristics of an ideal alternative
 
An effective substitute for antibiotics should meet several important criteria. It should not promote antimicrobial resistance or disrupt the normal gut microflora. It must not reduce feed palatability and should be capable of inhibiting or eliminating pathogenic microorganisms. Additionally, it should be non-toxic and free from adverse effects on birds.
       
The ideal alternative should also be environmentally safe, easily degradable and stable within feed and the gastrointestinal tract. It should enhance growth performance and feed conversion efficiency while being easily eliminated from the body or leaving only minimal short-term residues.
 
Alternative strategies to antibiotics (antibiotic-free approaches)
 
1). Probiotics
 
According to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), probiotics are defined as live microorganisms which, when administered in adequate amounts, provide health benefits to the host. Common probiotic organisms include Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, Bacillus, Clostridium, Bifidobacterium species and Escherichia coli. In addition, yeast and fungal strains such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Aspergillus oryzae are also utilized as probiotic agents.
 
Advantages of probiotics
 
Probiotics contribute to improved gut health, reduce the spread of infections and mortality and enhance feed conversion efficiency. They also support better weight gain and growth rates in poultry. Furthermore, they stimulate digestive enzyme activity, improving nutrient absorption and enhance vaccine efficacy. Probiotics assist in the rapid detoxification of mycotoxins and leave no harmful residues in animal products.
 
Benefits of probiotics
 
Probiotics help in modulating the gut microbiota by establishing a healthy intestinal microbial balance (Dhama et al., 2008). They also act through competitive exclusion by occupying binding sites in the gastrointestinal tract and producing antimicrobial substances that inhibit pathogen growth.
       
In addition, probiotics produce antimicrobial compounds such as bacteriocins, which are effective against pathogens including Clostridium perfringens, Salmonella, Campylobacter and Escherichia coli. They also enhance immune responses by increasing immunoglobulin production, activating macrophages and lymphocytes and stimulating interferon production (Yang, 2009).
       
Moreover, probiotics strengthen intestinal barrier function by adhering to the gut mucosa, thereby forming a protective barrier against pathogen invasion and contributing to improved overall immunity.
 
2). Prebiotics
 
Prebiotics are non-digestible feed components that benefit the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of a limited number of beneficial bacteria in the colon, thereby improving gut health by serving as a nutrient source for these microorganisms in the gastrointestinal tract.
 
Commonly used prebiotics include
 
Gluco-oligosaccharides (GOS), which are found in legumes and dairy products; fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), present in fruits, vegetables and cereals; mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS), derived from yeast and certain plants; stachyose and oligochitosan (Jiang et al., 2006).
 
Functions of prebiotics
 
Prebiotics help modify the gastrointestinal microflora by encouraging the growth of beneficial bacteria such as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium. They also stimulate immune responses, reduce the risk of pathogen invasion and colon cancer and improve gut health by enhancing enzymatic activity in the digestive system. In addition, their use can ultimately contribute to reduced production costs (Peric et al., 2009).
 
3). Synbiotics
 
Synbiotics are formulations that combine probiotics and prebiotics, designed to improve the survival and activity of beneficial microorganisms within the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), thereby promoting overall gut health. Commonly used synbiotic combinations include lactitol with Lactobacillus species, as well as fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS) with Bifidobacterium species (Yang et al., 2009). In general, synbiotics involve the use of prebiotics to support and enhance the growth of probiotic organisms.
 
4). Function
 
Synbiotics promote growth performance in broiler chickens by improving intestinal structure and enhancing nutrient absorption, which ultimately leads to better overall production efficiency (Awad et al., 2008; Hassanpour et al., 2013).
 
Organic acids
 
Historically, organic acids have been utilized as natural food preservatives and hygiene enhancers due to their ability to inhibit microbial growth and improve the freshness and shelf life of food products (Sadarao et al., 2025). Their antimicrobial properties also make them effective alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production. Organic acids are weak acids that can suppress or prevent the proliferation and colonization of pathogenic bacteria in the intestinal tract of birds.
 
Functions of organic acids
 
Organic acids exhibit broad antibacterial activity against various pathogenic microorganisms. They can penetrate bacterial cell walls and, once inside the cell, dissociate into their conjugate base forms, leading to a reduction in intracellular pH. This acidic internal environment disrupts cellular functions and inhibits bacterial growth (Mani-Lopez  et al., 2012).
       
Additionally, organic acids help lower gut pH and enhance nutrient utilization in poultry diets.
 
Examples of organic acids
 
Sorbic acid disrupts membrane proteins and increases bacterial cell permeability (Abdelrahman, 2016). Propionic acid is effective in inhibiting feed-borne molds and preventing mycotoxin production (Zha and Cohen, 2014). Oxalic acid, commonly found in plant sources, can influence calcium availability, particularly in laying hens (Jadhav et al., 2015).
 
Benefits of organic acids
 
Organic acids reduce pathogen colonization along the intestinal lining, thereby protecting epithelial cells. They also promote epithelial cell proliferation, accelerate intestinal healing, improve villus height and enhance nutrient absorption capacity. These properties make organic acids useful in reducing microbial loads, including pathogens such as Salmonella and Escherichia coli.
 
5). Feed enzymes, vitamins and minerals
 
Feed enzymes are added to poultry diets to break down complex feed components such as phytate, xylan and other non-starch polysaccharides. This enhances nutrient availability, improves feed digestibility and supports better growth performance and gut health. Commonly used enzymes include phytase, xylanase and other glycanase complexes.
       
Phytase is the most widely used single enzyme, which hydrolyzes phytate into inositol and inorganic phosphate. This process releases phosphorus from cereal grains, allowing more efficient utilization of this essential and costly mineral in poultry nutrition. In addition, enzymes that degrade fiber and starch, such as xylanase and β-glucanase, improve feed conversion ratio, nutrient absorption, growth performance and also help reduce issues like wet litter.
 
Benefits of enzymes
 
Feed enzymes support overall health and growth, improve nutrient utilization and help reduce feed costs in poultry production.
 
6). Vitamins and minerals
 
Vitamins are organic micronutrients required for essential physiological functions such as immune response, energy metabolism and cellular repair. Minerals, on the other hand, are inorganic elements that support key biological processes including bone formation, fluid balance and muscle function. Together, vitamins and minerals play a significant role in improving feed efficiency, immune status and overall productivity in poultry.
 
Important vitamins and their functions
 
Vitamin C acts as an antioxidant, helps reduce heat stress (particularly during summer conditions), enhances feed intake and improves metabolic efficiency (Sahin et al., 2003). Vitamin E supports better feed conversion ratio, growth performance and overall productivity in poultry. Vitamins A and D are important for strengthening immunity and promoting growth. The B-complex vitamins contribute to improved digestibility, nutrient utilization, growth and overall performance.

Important minerals and their functions
 
Calcium and phosphorus are essential for proper growth and skeletal development. Zinc and selenium function as antioxidants, helping to reduce stress while enhancing immune response and disease resistance. Magnesium plays a role in muscle development and function. Other essential minerals include sodium, potassium, iron, copper, manganese and iodine, all of which contribute to various metabolic and physiological processes necessary for healthy poultry growth and production.
 
7). Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)
 
Antimicrobial peptides, also referred to as host defense peptides, are short amino acid chains typically consisting of around 30-60 residues and are present in all forms of living organisms. These peptides exhibit both antimicrobial and immunomodulatory activities and can act against bacteria, fungi and viruses primarily by targeting and disrupting microbial cell membranes (Li et al., 2012; Parachin et al., 2012).
       
AMPs have been shown to enhance growth performance, stimulate immune cell activity, improve intestinal structure and increase beneficial gut microbiota populations such as Lactobacillus spp. (Daneshmand et al., 2019). Due to these properties, they are considered promising natural feed additives capable of replacing therapeutic antibiotics and antibiotic growth promoters in poultry production, with potential to help control antimicrobial-resistant strains within flocks.
       
Since most AMPs act by targeting pathogen cell membranes, the likelihood of resistance development is relatively low, as structural changes in microbial membranes occur slowly over evolutionary time (Lee et al., 2016).
       
Experimental in vitro studies have also demonstrated that peptides derived from chicken leukocytes significantly inhibit the growth of Candida albicans, Escherichia coli and Listeria monocytogenes (Harwig et al., 1994).
 
8). Phytobiotics
 
Phytobiotics are bioactive compounds derived from plants that are incorporated into animal feed to enhance health and promote growth. These substances consist of plant secondary metabolites such as phenols, flavonoids, tannins, saponins and essential oils. They are widely used as natural alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters, particularly in monogastric animals such as poultry and pigs (Khaksar et al., 2012; Karangiya et al., 2016). Phytobiotics possess a range of biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal and antiprotozoal effects.
 
Benefits of phytobiotics
 
Growth promotion
 
Supplementation with plant-based additives such as garlic at around 3% has been shown to improve growth performance in broiler chickens (Elagib et al., 2013). Other spices, including black pepper and cinnamon, also contribute to enhanced growth in poultry.

Antimicrobial effects
 
Tannins exhibit strong anticoccidial activity in chickens. Garlic, through its active compound allicin, can penetrate bacterial cell membranes and interfere with essential enzymes, thereby disrupting microbial cellular processes.
 
Antioxidant activity
 
Turmeric is widely recognized for its antioxidant properties.
 
Improved feed efficiency
 
Essential oils stimulate the secretion of digestive enzymes from the pancreas and liver, including trypsin, amylase and bile, which enhances feed digestibility and overall feed efficiency (Gopi et al., 2014).
 
Immunomodulatory effects
 
Various plant-derived compounds such as neem, ashwagandha, flavonoids, lectins, polysaccharides, peptides, tannins and garlic contribute to improved immune responses in poultry.
 
9). Immunomodulators
 
Immunomodulators, also known as immunostimulants, are substances that regulate or modify the immune system’s response to improve disease resistance and overall immunity. These compounds include a wide range of natural and synthetic agents.
 
Types of immunomodulators include
 
1. Mineral-based compounds such as selenium and zinc.
2. Vitamins including A, E and C.
3. Amino acids such as arginine and leucine.
4. Plant-derived polysaccharides like astragalus polysaccharide and algal polysaccharides.
5. Oligosaccharides including mannan oligosaccharides and fructo-oligosaccharides.
6. Microbial preparations such as BCG vaccine and Lactobacillus species.
7. Bacterial extracts including â-glucans, peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharides.
8. Biological molecules (cytokines) such as interferons, transfer factors, interleukins and immunoglobulins.
       
These immunomodulatory agents play an important role in enhancing immune function and improving resistance to infections in poultry production systems.
 
10). Vaccines as alternatives to antibiotics
 
Vaccination represents an important alternative strategy to antibiotics in poultry production by providing a preventive approach for controlling infectious diseases without contributing to antimicrobial resistance. Vaccines offer protection against specific pathogens, thereby decreasing the reliance on antibiotic treatments and supporting improved growth performance and flock health.
 
Benefits of vaccines
 
Vaccines provide preventive protection against disease outbreaks, reduce the development and spread of antibiotic resistance, enable targeted control of specific infections and improve overall animal welfare.
 
Common poultry vaccines are available for:
 
• Marek’s disease.
• Newcastle disease (Ranikhet disease).
• Infectious bursal disease (IBD/gumboro disease).
• Infectious bronchitis.
 
11). Bacteriophages, endolysins and lysozymes
 
Bacteriophages are highly specific viruses that infect and destroy bacteria by producing enzymes known as endolysins, which ultimately lead to bacterial cell lysis. They are considered safe alternatives to antibiotics because they do not affect animal or plant cells. Although bacteriophages are unlikely to fully replace antibiotics, they hold significant potential in managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria.
       
Endolysins and lysozymes are types of hydrolytic enzymes derived from various sources, including bacteriophages, animals, plants, bacteria and insects and they differ in their specificity toward target bacteria. These enzymes break down peptidoglycan, a key structural component of the bacterial cell wall, resulting in bacterial cell destruction.
 
Comparative evaluation and field challenges
 
Although a variety of antibiotic alternatives have demonstrated encouraging outcomes, their overall effectiveness is often influenced by farm management practices, environmental conditions and the genetic background of the birds.
       
Probiotics and prebiotics are known to enhance gut health and immune function; however, their performance may be inconsistent due to strain-specific effects and issues related to storage stability. Organic acids are effective in reducing enteric pathogens, but their efficiency can vary depending on diet composition and the buffering capacity of feed.
       
Phytobiotics provide antimicrobial and antioxidant benefits, yet challenges such as variability in plant constituents and lack of standardized dosing limit their consistent application. Antimicrobial peptides and bacteriophages offer high target specificity and a low risk of resistance development; nevertheless, their large-scale commercial use is constrained by production costs and limited regulatory approval.
       
Vaccination remains the most dependable preventive strategy, but it cannot fully substitute antibiotics in situations where farm hygiene, management and biosecurity practices are inadequate. Therefore, a comprehensive approach combining nutrition, vaccination, biosecurity and effective management is essential for successful antibiotic-free poultry production.
 
Integrated approach
 
Evidence indicates that no single alternative is sufficient to completely replace antibiotics across all poultry production systems. Instead, an integrated strategy that combines feed additives, improved housing conditions, strict hygiene, vaccination programs and precision nutrition offers the most sustainable way to reduce antimicrobial use while maintaining productivity.
The growing global concern over antimicrobial resistance highlights the urgent need to shift toward antibiotic-free poultry production systems. Various alternatives such as probiotics, phytobiotics, organic acids and vaccines show considerable potential in supporting gut health, immunity and overall performance.
       
However, differences in efficacy, economic constraints and practical challenges in field implementation limit their widespread adoption. Future research should focus on optimizing combination strategies, exploring host-microbiome interactions and developing cost-effective delivery methods.
       
In addition, stronger farm management practices and supportive policy frameworks will be crucial for the successful implementation of antibiotic-free systems. This transition is essential for promoting sustainable poultry production and improving public health outcomes within a One Health framework.
 
Author’s contribution
 
Sakshi Rathore wrote the article under the guidance of Rajni Arora.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this study.

  1. Abdelrahman, W. (2016) Effective strategies in the control of antibiotic resistance in poultry. International Hatchery Practice. 30: 13-15.

  2. Awad, W.A., Ghareeb, K., Nitsch, S., Pasteiner, S., Abdel-Raheem, S. and Böhm, J. (2008). Effects of dietary inclusion of prebiotic, probiotic and synbiotic on the intestinal glucose absorption of broiler chickens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 7(7): 688-691.

  3. Catry, B., Laevens, H., Devriese, L.A., Opsomer, G. and De Kruif, A. (2003). Antimicrobial resistance in livestock. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 26(2): 81-93.

  4. Chandrakar, C., Shakya, S., Patyal, A., Bhonsle, D. and Pandey, A.K. (2023). Detection of antibiotic residues in chicken meat from different agro-climatic zones of Chhattisgarh, India by HPLC-PDA and human exposure assessment and risk characterization. Food Control. 148: 109667.

  5. Daneshmand, A., Kermanshahi, H., Sekhavati, M.H., Javadmanesh, A. and Ahmadian, M. (2019). Antimicrobial peptide, cLF36, affects performance and intestinal morphology, microflora, junctional proteins and immune cells in broilers challenged with E. coli. Scientific Reports. 9(1): 14176.

  6. De Carvalho, F.M., Valiatti, T.B., Santos, F.F., Silveira, A.C.D.O., Guimarães, A.P.C., Gerber, A.L. and Gales, A.C. (2022). Exploring the bacteriome and resistome of humans and food-producing animals in Brazil. Microbiology Spectrum.  10(5): e00565-22.

  7. Dhama, K., Mahendran, M., Tomar, S. and Chauhan, R.S. (2008). Beneficial effects of probiotics and prebiotics in livestock and poultry: The current perspectives. Intas Polivet.  9(1): 1-12. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/ publication/drug-resistant-infections-a-threat-to-our- economic-future.

  8. Elagib, H.A., Abbas, S.A. and Elamin, K.M. (2013). Effect of different natural feed additives compared to antibiotic on performance of broiler chicks under high temperature. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci. 2(11): 139-144.

  9. Gopi, M., Karthik, K., Manjunathachar, H.V., Tamilmahan, P., Kesavan, M., Dashprakash, M. and Purushothaman, M.R. (2014). Essential oils as a feed additive in poultry nutrition. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2(1): 1-7.

  10. Hamed, D.M. and Hassan, A.M.A. (2013) Acids supplementation to drinking water and their effects on Japanese quails experimentally challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Zoological Research. 3: 15-22.

  11. Harwig, S.S., Swiderek, K.M., Kokryakov, V.N., Tan, L., Lee, T.D., Panyutich, E.A. and Lehrer, R.I. (1994). Gallinacins: Cysteine- rich antimicrobial peptides of chicken leukocytes. FEBS Letters. 342(3): 281-285.

  12. Hassanpour, H., Moghaddam, A.Z., Khosravi, M. and Mayahi, M. (2013). Effects of synbiotic on the intestinal morphology and humoral immune response in broiler chickens. Livestock  Science. 153(1-3): 116-122. https://www.who.int/news/ item/26-09-2024-world-leaders-commit-to-decisive-action- on-antimicrobial-resistance.

  13. Jabbar, A., Rehman, K., Jabri, T., Kanwal, T., Perveen, S., Rashid, M.A. and Shah, M.R. (2023). Improving curcumin bactericidal potential against multi-drug resistant bacteria via its loading in polydopamine coated zinc-based metal-organic frameworks. Drug Delivery. 30(1): 2159587.

  14. Jadhav, K., Sharma, K.S., Katoch, S., Sharma, V.K. and Mane, B.G. (2015). Probiotics in broiler poultry feeds: A review. Journal of Animal Nutrition and Physiology. 1: 4-16.

  15. Jiang, H.Q., Gong, L.M., Ma, Y.X., He, Y.H., Li, D.F. and Zhai, H.X. (2006). Effect of stachyose supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and caecal fermentation characteristics in broilers. British Poultry Science. 47(4): 516-522.

  16. Karangiya, V.K., Savsani, H.H., Patil, S.S., Garg, D.D., Murthy, K.S., Ribadiya, N.K. and Vekariya, S.J. (2016). Effect of dietary supplementation of garlic, ginger and their combination on feed intake, growth performance and economics in commercial broilers. Veterinary World. 9(3): 245.

  17. Khaksar, V., Golian, A. and Kermanshahi, H. (2012). Immune response and ileal microflora in broilers fed wheat-based diet with or without enzyme Endofeed W and supplementation of thyme essential oil or probiotic PrimaLac? African Journal of Biotechnology. 11(81): 14716.

  18. Kumar, S. and Gupta, R. (2019). Risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolates from poultry in Haryana. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(7): 918- 925. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3602.

  19. Lee, T.H., Hall, K.N. and Aguilar, M.I. (2016). Antimicrobial peptide structure and mechanism of action: A focus on the role of membrane structure. Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. 16(1): 25-39.

  20. Li, Y., Xiang, Q., Zhang, Q., Huang, Y. and Su, Z. (2012). Overview on the recent study of antimicrobial peptides: Origins, functions, relative mechanisms and application. Peptides37(2): 207-221.

  21. Mani-Lopez, E., García, H.S. and López-Malo, A. (2012). Organic acids as antimicrobials to control salmonella in meat and poultry products. Food Research International. 45: 713-721.

  22. Muhammad, J., Khan, S., Su, J.Q., Hesham, A.E.L., Ditta, A., Nawab, J. and Ali, A. (2020). Antibiotics in poultry manure and their associated health issues: A systematic review. Journal  of Soils and Sediments. 20: 486-497.

  23. Otte, J. and Pica-Ciamarra, U. (2021). Emerging infectious zoonotic diseases: The neglected role of food animals. One Health. 13: 100323.

  24. Parachin, N.S., Mulder, K.C., Viana, A.A.B., Dias, S.C. and Franco, O.L. (2012). Expression systems for heterologous production of antimicrobial peptides. Peptides. 38(2): 446-456.

  25. Peric, L., Žikiæ, D. and Lukiæ, M. (2009). Application of alternative growth promoters in broiler production. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 25(5-6-1): 387-397.

  26. Raghav, H., Jadav, K., Jogi, J., Yadav, U. and Rajput, N. (2022). Occurrence of antimicrobial resistant Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus sp. in faecal samples of wild birds. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 36(4): 320-325. doi: 10.18805/BKAP386.

  27. Sadarao, L.B., Shelke, M.V., Das, P. and Chanthirasekaran, R. (2025). Evaluation of a commercially available organic acid blend and sanitizer products on broiler breeders’ performance and economics. Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika. 40(2): 200-205. doi: 10.18805/BKAP832.

  28. Sahin, K. and Kucuk, O. (2003). Heat stress and dietary vitamin supplementation of poultry diets. CABI Reviews. doi: 10.1079/cabireviews20033127283.

  29. Sahu, R. and Saxena, P. (2014). Antibiotics in chicken meat. Centre for Science and Environment.

  30. Shahbazi, G., Shayegh, J., Ghazaei, S., Movassagh, G.M.H. and Hanifian, S. (2022). Prevalence, Virulence Factor and Antibiotics Susceptibility Patterns of Salmonella spp. From Poultry Products in Ardabil Province.

  31. Stanton, T.B. (2013). A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends in Microbiology. 21(3): 111-113.

  32. van den Bogaard, A.E. and Stobberingh, E.E. (2000). Epidemiology of resistance to antibiotics: links between animals and humans. International journal of Antimicrobial Agents.  14(4): 327-335.

  33. Vikesland, P.J., Pruden, A., Alvarez, P.J., Aga, D., Burgmann, H., Li, X.D. and Zhu, Y.G. (2017). Toward a comprehensive strategy to mitigate dissemination of environmental sources of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51: 13061-13069.

  34. Yang, Y., Iji, P.A. and Choct, M. (2009). Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: A review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World’s Poultry Science Journal. 65(1): 97-114.

  35. Zha, C. and Cohen, A.C. (2014). Effects of anti-fungal compounds on feeding behavior and nutritional ecology of tobacco budworm and painted lady butterfly larvae. Entomol. Ornithol. Herpetol. 3(120): 2161-0983.
In this Article
Published In
Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika

Editorial Board

View all (0)