Grain-filling duration
Atonic concentration significantly affected grain-filling duration during both growing seasons (Table 2). Increasing the concentration of Atonic progressively prolonged the grain-filling period, with the highest values recorded at 7.5 mL L
-1, whereas the control treatment showed the shortest duration. Grain filling lasted longer during the autumn season than during the spring season.
No significant influence of spraying stage alone was observed on grain-filling duration. However, the interaction between Atonic concentration and application stage was significant. The combination of 7.5 mL L
-1 applied at the end of vegetative growth (S1) and booting stage (S2) produced the longest grain-filling period, while the control treatment sprayed at 50% flowering resulted in the shortest duration.
Thousand-grain weight
Thousand-grain weight increased significantly with increasing Atonic concentration in both seasons (Table 3). Plants treated with 7.5 mL L
-1 produced the heaviest grains, whereas untreated plants produced the lowest grain weight.
Application stage significantly influenced this trait. Foliar sprays applied at the end of vegetative growth (S1) and at the booting stage (S2) produced higher 1000-grain weight compared to application at 50% flowering (S3). There was no significant interaction between concentration and spraying stage.
Number of grains per head
Atonic application significantly increased the number of grains per head (Table 4). The highest values were obtained with 7.5 mL L
-1, while the control treatment consistently produced the lowest grain number.
Spraying at S1 and S2 resulted in significantly more grains than spraying at S3. A significant interaction between concentration and spraying stage was observed only during the autumn season, where the combination of 7.5 mL L
-1 and S1 produced the highest grain number.
Grain yield
Grain yield increased significantly with increasing Atonic concentration during both growing seasons (Table 5). The highest grain yield was obtained with 7.5 mL L
-1, although it was statistically comparable with 5.0 mL L
-1 during the spring season. Untreated plants consistently produced the lowest grain yield.
Although spraying stage alone had no significant effect on grain yield, earlier applications tended to produce greater yields than spraying at 50% flowering. The interaction between Atonic concentration and spraying stage indicated that the combination of 7.5 mL L
-1 and S1 produced the maximum grain yield.
Harvest index
Harvest index was significantly influenced by Atonic concentration in both seasons (Table 6). The highest harvest index was obtained with 5.0 mL L
-1, although it did not differ significantly from 7.5 mL L
-1.
Spraying stage significantly affected harvest index during the autumn season only, with S1 producing higher values than S3.
A significant interaction between concentration and spraying stage was detected in both seasons, indicating that treatment response depended on the combination of concentration and application timing.
This study demonstrates that foliar application of Atonic significantly improves the yield components and grain productivity of
Sorghum bicolor under ambient conditions. The response of sorghum plants varied according to both Atonic concentration and application stage, indicating that the effectiveness of plant growth regulators depends on the applied dose and the physiological status of the plant at the time of treatment.
The increase in grain-filling duration observed with increasing Atonic concentration may be associated with improved photosynthetic activity and delayed degradation of chlorophyll during the reproductive stage. Nitrophenolate-based biostimulants have been reported to stimulate physiological processes related to chlorophyll maintenance, carbon assimilation and metabolic activity, which may prolong the period of assimilate production and enhance grain development
(Przybysz et al., 2014). In addition, the role of growth regulators in maintaining chlorophyll content and improving enzymatic activity during late plant development has been reported in cereal and field crops
(Djanaguiraman et al., 2005). Therefore, the extended grain-filling period observed in Atonic-treated plants may have resulted from prolonged leaf activity and improved assimilate supply to developing grains.
The longer grain-filling duration recorded during the autumn season compared with the spring season may be related to differences in environmental conditions, particularly temperature during the grain development period. High temperatures during reproductive growth accelerate respiration, reduce photosynthetic efficiency and shorten the duration of effective grain filling, consequently limiting dry matter accumulation in grains (
Tashiro and Wardlaw, 1990). The environmental variation between seasons may therefore explain the differences observed in grain-filling duration between the two experiments.
The increase in 1000-grain weight following Atonic application indicates improved grain filling and greater accumulation of dry matter in kernels. This improvement may be attributed to enhanced source–sink relationships, where increased photosynthetic production in vegetative organs contributes to greater translocation of assimilates toward reproductive organs. Similar effects of plant growth regulators and biostimulants on improving grain weight have been reported in cereal crops through enhanced physiological activity and assimilate partitioning (
Mazban, 2017)
(Kocira et al., 2015) (
Al-Mafarji et al., 2026a).
The increase in grain number per head under higher Atonic concentrations may be explained by improved plant vigor, reproductive development and enhanced availability of assimilates during the flowering and grain-setting periods. Adequate assimilate supply during reproductive growth increases pollen viability, fertilization efficiency and grain establishment. Similar improvements in grain number following application of growth regulators have been reported in maize and other field crops (
Księżak, 2008)
(Hasan et al., 2026).
The significant improvement in grain yield resulting from Atonic application was mainly associated with the combined increase in grain number per head and 1000-grain weight. Grain yield represents the final outcome of interactions among genetic potential, environmental conditions and crop management practices. Any treatment that improves photosynthesis, nutrient utilization and assimilate movement toward grains can contribute to increased final yield (
Elsahookie, 2002). Previous studies have also demonstrated positive effects of Atonic and other growth regulators on grain productivity of cereal crops, including wheat, maize and sorghum (
Al-Issawi, 2022;
Farahat, 2002;
Al-Mafarji et al., 2026b).
The superior performance of plants treated with 5.0- and 7.5-mL L
-1 Atonic suggests that these concentrations provided adequate stimulation of physiological processes without causing excessive hormonal effects. Although the highest concentration produced the greatest values for several traits, the similarity between 5.0- and 7.5-mL L
-1 for some parameters indicates that the intermediate concentration may provide an economically suitable option for practical production systems.
The effect of application stage demonstrated that spraying during the end of vegetative growth and booting stages generally resulted in better performance compared with spraying at 50% flowering. This response may be attributed to the importance of these stages in determining plant biomass production, reproductive structure development and grain potential. Late application at flowering may be less effective because several yield-determining processes, such as spikelet formation and grain establishment, have already occurred.
The significant interaction between Atonic concentration and application stage indicates that the effectiveness of Atonic depends on the synchronization between concentration and plant developmental stage. Similar interactions between growth regulator concentration and application timing have been reported in field crops, confirming that optimum responses require appropriate management of both factors (
Al-Issawi, 2022;
Ali et al., 2022).
Harvest index increased following Atonic application, particularly at 5.0- and 7.5-mL L
-1. This indicates that Atonic improved the efficiency of dry matter partitioning toward grain production rather than only increasing vegetative biomass. Harvest index reflects the ability of plants to allocate photosynthetic products to economically important organs and increases in this parameter indicate improved crop productivity (
Elsahookie, 2002). Similar increases in harvest index following application of growth regulators and biostimulants have been reported in field crops (
Al-Issawi, 2022) (
Hamdan, 2006).
Findings indicate that Atonic application increased sorghum productivity by improving physiological performance, grain formation and assimilate partitioning. However, since the experimental was conducted at a single site over two growing seasons, additional studies across multiple environments and years are needed to verify the consistency of these responses and to identify the most economically optimal application rate.