Agricultural Science Digest

  • Chief EditorArvind kumar

  • Print ISSN 0253-150X

  • Online ISSN 0976-0547

  • NAAS Rating 5.52

  • SJR 0.156

Frequency :
Bi-monthly (February, April, June, August, October and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Agricultural Science Digest, volume 38 issue 3 (september 2018) : 221-224

Morphological characterization of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landraces using DUS descriptor

L.N. Chavan, S.M. Patil, V.K. Kauthale, A.D. Nalawade
1BAIF Development Research Foundation, Pune-411 058, Maharashtra, India.
Cite article:- Chavan L.N., Patil S.M., Kauthale V.K., Nalawade A.D. (2018). Morphological characterization of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landraces using DUS descriptor. Agricultural Science Digest. 38(3): 221-224. doi: 10.18805/ag.D-4790.
Sorghum landraces collected from Dhadgaon and Akkalkua block of Nandurbar district were studied to assess the diversity among these landraces.  An experiment was conducted at village level in-situ conservation center during kharif season of 2016 and 2017. Morphological characterization of 13 landraces of sorghum was undertaken for 25 characters as per DUS guidelines. Traits such as anthocyanin coloured coleoptiles (53.85 %), white coloured leaf midrib (38.46 %), yellow colouration on stigma (84.62 %), grayed orange coloured dry anther (53.85 %), yellow white colour of glumes (30.77 %), semi-compact density of panicle (53.85 %) symmetrical type ear (69.2 %) grayed orange coloured seeds (53.85 %) were dominant in studied landraces. The results of present study showed that panicle branch length was most diverse trait (22.93 %), followed by 1000 grain wt. (17.23 %) and stem diameter (19.71 %) whereas leaf width showed the lowest variation (6.16 %) among studied lines. Analysis of variance showed that all the characters were highly significant among the landraces.
  1. Amelework, B., Shimelis, H., Tongoona, P. Laing, M. and Mengistu, F. (2016). Genetic diversity of lowland sorghum landraces assessed by morphological and microsatellite markers. AJCS 10(3): 291-298.
  2. Anonymous. (2004) National Guidelines for the Conduct of tests for Distinctness, Homogeneity and Stability of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). ITG/03 sorghum, 1-16 (http://agricoop.nic.in/Seed Test guide/).
  3. Bhusal, N., Pahuja, S.K., Vats, A.K., Srivastava, A. and Kumar R. S. (2017). Morphological characterization of forage sorghum genotypes for its various DUS traits. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 9 (2): 912 - 919. 
  4. Durrishahwar, Muhammad, N., Hidayat, R., Ihteramullah, Irfan, A. S., Farhan, A., Syed, M. A. S. and Nasir, M. (2012). Characterization of sorghum germplasm for various morphological and fodder yield parameters. Afr. J. Biotechnol.,11(56): 11952-11959.
  5. Elangovan, M., Prabhakar, Chandra, D. and Reddy, S. (2007). Characterization and Evaluation of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] germplasm from Karnataka, India. National Research Centre for Sorghum Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India. Karnataka Journal for Agricultural Science, 20(4): 840-842. 
  6. Kassahun, T. (2017). Genetic diversity study of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) genotypes, Ethiopia. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Agriculture and Environment, 44- 54 DOI: 10.1515/ausae-2017-0004.
  7. Prajapati, D. P., Pahuja, S.K., Verma N.K. and Chaudhary S. (2018). Morphological Characterization of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Germplasm for DUS Traits. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(2): 2058-2071https://doi.org/10.20546/    ijcmas.2018.702.246.
  8. Singh, A. K. (2017). Revisiting the status of cultivated plant species agro-biodiversity in India: An Overview. Proc. Indian Natn. Sci. Acad. 83:151-174 DOI: 10.16943/ptinsa/2016/v82/48406.
  9. Smith, J.S.C. and Smith, O.S. (1989). The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34:151-161. 
  10. Thangavel, P., Bhatati, A., Natarajan, N. and Evera, T. (2005). Varietal grouping in sorghum by seed and seed-ling morphology and response to chemical testing. Kar-nat. J. Agril. Sci., 18(3): 664-672.
  11. Reddy, V. G., Upadhyaya, H. D. and Gowda, C. L. L. (2006). Current Status of Sorghum Genetic Resources at ICRISAT: Their Sharing and Impacts.2 (1) SAT eJournale journal.icrisat.org. 

Editorial Board

View all (0)