Description of soils
The soils of area were grouped in three soil orders namely Alfisols, Inceptisols and Vertisols. Venkatapur series (moderately deep), a Typic Rhodustalfs cover an area of 464 ha (3.20%) on the hill side slope. Major soils of uplands were grouped into Kodur series (deep), a Vertic Haplustepts which cover an area of 962 ha (6.63%) and Gajulapet series (shallow), a Typic Haplustalfs cover an area of 797 ha (5.49%). Major soils of lowlands (Dharmapur 2 series) is a very deep Aquic Natrustalfs. These three soils are dominant in Mahabubnagar Rural Mandal and cover an area of 1014 ha (7.00%). Kotakadira series (deep), an Aquic Haplustalfs (Table 1) cover an area of 805.0 ha (5.54%).
Sorghum is an important crop in 15 out of the 18 soil series along with the rice and pigeon pea. Sorghum was dominant land use in Telugugudam (TE) series of uplands and Kotakadira (KT) and Potanpalle 3 (PO3) series of lowlands. Telugugudam soils (TE) cover an area of 171 ha (1.18%), Kotakadira soils (KT), an area of 805 ha (5.54%) and Potanpalle 3 soils cover the least area of 121 ha (0.84% of TGA).
Telugugudam series (TE) are spread in Telugugudam, Zamistapur and Allipur villages on very gently (1-3%) to gently (3-5%) sloping uplands at an elevation of 450 to 462 m above mean sea level, subjected to moderate erosion. The thickness of solum ranges from 109 to 124 cm. The A horizon is 13 to 16 cm thick. Its colour is in 5YR and 7.5YR hues, value 3 to 4 and chroma 3 to 4. The texture is sandy loam to loamy sand. The thickness of B horizon ranges from 100 to 108 cm. Its colour is in 2.5YR to 5YR hue, value 3 and chroma 4 (Table 2). The texture is sandy clay. TE series has three phases namely TEbC2, TEcB2 and TEcC2g1.
Kotakadira series (KT) occur in Zamistapur, Kotakadira, Bakalonipalle, Kodur, Ramchandrapur and Gajulapet villages spread over an area of 805 ha on nearly level (0-1 %) to very gently sloping lowlands at an elevation of 330 to 402 m above mean sea level, with 1-3 per cent slopes and subjected to slight to moderate erosion. These soils are moderately well drained with medium permeability. The thickness of solum ranges from 105 to 143 cm. The A horizon is 13 to 20 cm thick. Its colour is in 10 YR hue, value 3 to 4 and chroma 2. The texture is sandy clay to clay. The thickness of B horizon ranges from 80 to 140 cm. Its colour is in 10YR hue, value 3 to 5 and chroma 2 to 6. The texture is sandy clay loam to clay. KT series has four phases (KThB1, KtiA1, KTiB1 and KTmB1).
Soils of Potanpalle 3 series (PO3) cover an area of 121 ha in Potanpalle and Manikonda villages on very gently sloping lowlands at an elevation of 400 to 404 m above mean sea level on very gently sloping lowlands with 1-3 per cent slopes and subjected to slight erosion. These soils are moderately well drained with slow permeability. The thickness of solum ranges from 154 to 155 cm. The A horizon is 18 to 19 cm thick. Its colour is in 10 YR hue, value 3 and chroma 1 to 2. The texture is clay. The thickness of B horizon ranges from 135 to 137 cm. Its colour is in 10 YR hue, value 3 to 5 and chroma 1 to 4. The texture is clay to sandy clay. This series has only one phase (PO3mB1).
The soils of TE series was dark brown (7.5 YR 3.3) in the surface and the redness increased with depth (2.5 YR 3/4 to 4/6). The KT soils were dark gray (2.5 Y 4/1) in the surface and the sub -surface was dark grayish brown. PO3 soils were very dark gray (10 YR 3/1). The dominant colour was dark gray and the soil colour depends on the mineral composition and changes in soil coating
(Schaetzl and Anderson 2005). An increase in clay content was observed with depth from 6.98 in Ap to 40.56 in Bt2 in TE and from 23.19 in Ap to 35.46 in Bt3 in KT soils indicating the process of clay illuviation
(Sarkar et al., 2002). Only TE soils were gravelly and coarse fragments increased with the depth. The surface texture was loamy sand in TE, sandy clay loam in KT and clay in PO3 soils.
The soil pH increased with depth from 6.18 (slightly acidic) at the surface to 6.60 (neutral) in the BC2 horizon (Table 3). The KT and PO3 soils had higher pH (slightly alkaline).The cation exchange capacity (CEC) was higher than 40 cmol (+) per kg of soil in PO3 series, whereas it was relatively low in other two soils (<15 cmol (+) per kg of soil). The low CEC values in TE and KT soils indicate the dominance of low activity clays. In general, CEC followed a similar trend that of clay content in soils. Exchangeable bases were higher in PO3 and exchangeable Na was slightly higher than exchangeable K. Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) was recorded in all the soils; however, it was <8% which does not pose any problem in sorghum farming. It was slightly higher (>5) only in the sub-soils of KT. Base saturation by ammonium acetate was very high (100%) in the KT series compared to the other two soils which could be due to higher Ca+ occupying exchange sites on the colloidal complex
(Sireesha and Naidu, 2013).
The soils of Telugugudam and Kotakadira series were keyed as order Alfisols, whereas Potanpalle 3 series was classified as Vertisols. The soils of Telugugudam series had clay content of 26% and a gravel content of >35% in the control section making it to classify under loamy-skeletal particle-size class. The CEC: clay ratio (0.49) in the soil control section justified its placement under the active CEC class. The soils were keyed out as suborder Ustalfs due to the ustic soil moisture regime and the hue of 2.5 YR and moist value of 3 resulted in classifying the soils under Rhodustalfs great group. At the family level, the TE series is classified as a member of Loamy-skeletal, mixed, active, isohyperthermic Typic Rhodustalfs. Kotakadira series having <60% clay in the control section has been put under fine particle-size group and the CEC:clay ratio was greater than 0.60 indicating superactive CEC class. The presence of redox depletions, with chroma 2 or less and aquic conditions resulted in Aquic Haplustalfs, thus keying out Kotakadira series to Fine,smectitic, superactive, isohyperthermic family of Aquic Haplustalfs. The soils of PO3 series had less than 60% clay in the control section soil resulting in fine textural class and the CEC:clay ratio greater than 0.60 indicating superactive CEC class. The soils were classified under the suborder Usterts due to the ustic soil moisture regime and at the family level, Potanpalle 3 series is a member of Fine-smectitic, superactive, isohyperthermic Typic Haplusterts.
Land suitability evaluation
Land suitability was carried out as per the suitability criteria (Table 4) outlined by
Naidu et al., (2006) for sorghum farming. The study area has a mean temperature of 27°C and rainfall of 530.8 mm during the growing season and LGP of 147 days and hence the prevailing climate in the region is highly suitable for sorghum cultivation.
Out of 66 mapping units, only 4 units were found to be highly suitable for cultivation of sorghum (Table 5, Fig 3) constituting a small area (1.91%). These 4 units were 42 (PO2iC2), 45 (ALiA1), ALiA1 (47) and PO3mB1 (66). Nearly 23.22 per cent of the total area was moderately suitable with limitations of erosion hazards, gravelliness, nutrient availability and texture. The phases namely RAhB2 (18), ZA2hB1 (35), MA2hB1 (37), PO2iB2 (41), KOhB1 (48), KobB2 (49), KOiB1g1(50), KOiB2 (51), KOmB1 (52), KThB1 (53), KTiB1(55), KTmB1 (56), IPhA1 (57), IPhB1 (58), were the moderately suitable lands with limitations of nutrient availability and these occupy 15.68% of the area. The maximum area of 33.99 per cent was marginally suitable area with limitations of gravelliness, nutrient availability, rooting conditions and texture and out of this nearly 14.7 % had limitation of nutrient availability. These phases (mapping units) are VEhE3g2 (4), DH1hC3g1 (9), DH1iC3g1 (10), MA1iB2 (24), MA1mC2 (25), ZA1hC1 (31), ZA1iB1 (32), MA2mB1 (39), ALhB1 (44), IPiB1 (59), DH2iA1 (62), DH2iB1 (63) and DH2mB1 (65). Nearly 1.16 per cent of total area was found unsuitable for the cultivation of sorghum.
It was found that PO3 soils (PO3mB1) were highly suitable (S1). The three phases of TE series,
viz. TEbC2 (20), TEcB2 (21), TEcC2g1(22) were rated as S3 with limitations of texture (t) and nutrient availability (n) denoted as S3tn. The soil phases of Telugugudam were found to be marginally suitable with limitations of texture and nutrient conditions. TEbC2 was loamy sand in texture, which limited its suitability to class S3 along with the lower organic carbon content of 0.19 % and low CEC of 4 cmol (+) per kg of soil. Lower organic carbon in the soil was one of the limiting factors in its suitability for cultivation of sorghum in an agricultural farm in Tanzania
(Kaaya et al., 1994) and in western Ethopia
(Yitbarek et al., 2013). The other two phases had the limitations of sandy texture making them S3 suitability class. Sandy loam and loamy sand soil texture, a CEC lesser than 10 cmol (+) per kg of soil, organic carbon <0.20 per cent are classified under marginally suitable class
(Naidu et al., 2006). Soil texture and organic carbon (OC) were considered in the assessment of land suitability
(Singha and Swain 2020).
Kotakadira series with three phases having CEC in the range of 10-20 cmol (+) per kg of soil have been grouped under the class S2n (moderately suitable) with limitations of nutrient availability. The phase KTiA1 (54) was currently not suitable due to a higher pH of >9. This could be brought under the marginally suitable class by adopting proper soil management to manage the alkalinity and thereby to improve nutrient availability. Application of gypsum may be carried out to ameliorate alkaline condition in the soil
(Karthika et al., 2022).
Potanpalle 3 soils had only one phase (PO3mB1) and this was highly suitable with no limitations for the cultivation of sorghum. The characteristics of these soils such as the clay texture, non-gravelly, moderately well-drained, non-calcareous, deep (100-150 cm), occurring on very gently sloping (1-3%) landscape, resulted in their high suitability. Their higher nutrient status and water retention support the good crop.
Most of the marginally suitable area for sorghum cultivation had limitations of gravelliness and erosion hazards. Gravelliness limits the water retention and nutrient holding capacity. Productivity of the crop is affected by soil slope, gravelliness and effective rooting depth
(Shivaramu 2012). The soil loss and soil erosion need to be managed to avoid further increase in gravel content by adopting proper soil and water conservation measures such as terracing, contour bunding across the slope depending upon slope gradient of hill side slopes (3 to 5%) and uplands (1 to 3% and 3 to 5%) as opined by
Karthika et al., (2021). The limitations of nutrient conditions were mainly due to poor organic carbon content and alkaline soil reaction. Organic material application can improve the soil organic matter content and thereby water and nutrient retention. The basic soil reaction can be managed by the application of gypsum
(Karthika et al., 2021). By adopting proper management strategies productivity of sorghum could be improved for sustained use.