Chlorophyll content (mg/g-1 fresh weight)
The results indicated that treatments with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate, individually and in combination, significantly affected leaf chlorophyll content (mg/g
-1). A silicon oxide concentration of 6 mg/L
-1 resulted in the highest average content of 32.51 mg/g
-1, while a concentration of 3 mg/L
-1 resulted in the lowest average content of 31.13 mg/g
-1. the results showed that a concentration of 100 mg/L
-1 significantly increased chlorophyll content to 33.16 mg/g
-1, while a concentration of 50 mg/L
-1 resulted in the lowest average content of 30.71 mg/g
-1.
The triple interaction between silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate, the interaction A3B1S3 (6) mg L
-1 SiO
2 (0) × mg L
-1 sorbitol × 150 mg L
-1 ZnSO
4 showed the highest chlorophyll content of 34.6511 mg g
-1, while the interaction (3) A2B2S1 mg L
-1 (50) × SiO
2 mg L
-1 sorbitol × (0) g L
-1 ZnSO
4 gave the lowest content of 27.2856 mg g
-1 (Table 1).
Nitrogen content of leaf (%)
The treatments with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate significantly affected the nitrogen content of leaf petioles. The concentration of 6 mg L
-1 gave the highest average silicon content of 2.144 mg g
-1, significantly surpassing the other concentrations, while the lowest value was obtained in the control treatment, with an average of 2.098 mg g
-1 (Table 2).
Sorbitol, at a concentration of 50 mg/L, achieved the highest mean (2.180%) and was significantly superior to the no-spray treatment, which yielded the lowest mean (2.032%). Zinc sulfate also significantly outperformed the other treatments, with a concentration of 75 g/L yielding the highest mean (2.29%), while the no-spray zinc sulfate treatment yielded the lowest mean (1.915%). The results of the three-way interaction between the studied factors showed that the treatment of spraying with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc had the highest nitrogen content at concentrations of 6 mg/L silicon × 0 mg/L sorbitol × 75 g/L zinc (2.773%), which was not significantly different from the 6 mg/L treatment. L
-1 silicon × 100 mg L
-1 sorbitol × 150 g L
-1 zinc) gave 2.713%, while the lowest value was in the no-spray treatment, which amounted to 1.663% (Table 2).
Potassium content of leaf (%)
The results show that treatments with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate affected the potassium content of leaf petioles. The silicon oxide spray treatment at a concentration of 6 mg L
-1 recorded the highest average value of 1.701, while the lowest value was at a concentration of 3 mg L
-1, reaching 1.469. The control treatment did not differ from this, with an average value of 1.529. As for sorbitol, the concentration of 100 mg L
-1 showed the highest average value of 1.640 mg g
-1, while the lowest value was in the control treatment, reaching 1.4996 mg g
-1 (Table 3).
The results also showed that zinc sulfate at a concentration of 75 g L
-1 gave the highest average potassium content of 1.669%, while the lowest value was recorded for the distilled water spray treatment at 1.462% (Table 3).
Boron content in leaf (mg/kg-1 dry matter)
The treatments with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate significantly affected the boron content of the sap. Spraying with silicon oxide at a concentration of 6 mg/L
-1 yielded the highest mean concentration of 33.30, while the lowest value was recorded in the control treatment at 29.95 mg/kg
-1. Regarding the effect of sorbitol, a concentration of 50 mg/L
-1 produced the highest mean concentration of 32.29, while the lowest value was recorded in the no-spray treatment at 30.76. The results also showed that spraying with zinc sulfate at a concentration of 150 g/L
-1 increased the boron content of the juice, with an average of 32.08. This effect was not significantly different at a concentration of 75 g/L
-1, while the lowest value was recorded in the control treatment at 30.87 (Table 4).
The results of the triple interaction between silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate showed a significant effect. Spraying with silicon oxide at a concentration of 6 mg/L, sorbitol at a concentration of 50 mg/L and zinc sulfate at a concentration of 150 g/L resulted in the highest average boron content of the juice, reaching 36.83. Conversely, the lowest value of 20.88 was observed in the no-supplement treatment (no silicon oxide, sorbitol, or zinc sulfate) (Table 4).
Proline content in leaves
The treatments with silicon oxide, sorbitol and zinc sulfate affected the proline content. The lowest value was recorded with silicon oxide spraying at a concentration of 6 mg/L, with an average of 0.877 µg/g dry weight, while the highest value was 0.997 µg/g dry weight at a concentration of 3 mg/L. the effect of sorbitol on proline content, a concentration of 50 mg/L resulted in a decrease in proline content to an average of 0.905 µg/g dry weight, compared to the no-spray treatment which resulted in 0.978 µg/g dry weight. A concentration of 100 mg/L yielded a similar average of 0.920 µg/g dry weight (Table 5).
The treatments with silicon significantly improved the physiological characteristics of plants. This improvement can be attributed to increased leaf area, dry matter accumulation and total leaf chlorophyll content, as well as increased nitrogen, potassium, boron. This demonstrates its role in enhancing the efficiency of photosynthesis, promoting cell elongation and improving cell wall elasticity. Furthermore, silicon has been shown to strengthen cell wall structure and improve nutrient absorption, thus increasing plant growth
(Xu et al., 2023; Bhangare et al., 2020).
The decrease in leaf proline content when sprayed with silicon is due to the reduction of water loss through transpiration. Silicon improves the activity of peroxidase and catalase enzymes, thus reducing proline accumulation (
Marschner, 2012 and
Kavya et al., 2021). The significant increase in physiological yield characteristics resulting from silicon spraying is attributed to its effective role in improving vegetative growth efficiency. This led to an increase in leaf area and dry matter accumulation, as well as higher total chlorophyll content in leaves, nitrogen, potassium, boron.
The increase in silicon spraying results in improved vegetative growth efficiency. These results can be interpreted as indicating that silicon spraying improved light absorption efficiency by increasing cell membrane permeability and reducing the effects of environmental stresses. This, in turn, led to increased photosynthetic efficiency and the production of secondary metabolites. These results are consistent with those reported by
Laane (2018) and
Medan et al., (2026).