Loading...

Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4445    | Article Id: LR-4445 | Page : 1460-1464
Citation :- Effect of Foliar Application of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.).Legume Research.2021.(44):1460-1464
Pochampally Kavya, Shikha Singh, Narreddy Hinduja, Dhananjay Tiwari, Saivasavi Sruthi pochampallykavyareddy@gmail.com
Address : Department of Agronomy, Naini Agriculture Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj-211 007, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Submitted Date : 19-06-2020
Accepted Date : 30-10-2020

Abstract

Background: Greengram (Vigna radiata L.) is one of the most important pulse crops in India. It is a protein rich staple food which contains about 25 percent protein; It belongs to family leguminaceae so it has the capacity to fix atmospheric nitrogen. Soil application of nutrients is often not enough to meet the growing crop demand particularly in short duration crop like greengram. Therefore, it is hypothesized that foliar nutrition in addition to soil application in commensuration with prevailing weather particularly rainfall will go a long way in meeting crop nutrient need and thereby may help in enhancing poductivity. Foliar application of nutrients using water soluble fertilizer is on the possible ways to enhance the productivity of pulses like greengram. The importance of foliar application of micronutrients i.e., Zinc is essential for enzymes that are involved in many metabolic reactions, necessary for chlorophyll production and for starch formation aids in seed formation. Iron is essential for maintainance of chlorophyll and also an essential component of haemoglobin molecule. Manganese has a role of formation of plants naturally occurring antifungal compounds helping to fight disease infection. It is involved in the enzyme the growth may have biological reactions in plant tissue. 
Methods: A field experiment was conducted during Zaid season 2019-2020 at Crop Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj, (U.P.) India. To study the “Effect of foliar applied micronutrient on growth and yield of Greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”. The present investigation was laid out in randomized block design (RBD) consisted of 9 treatments replicated thrice.
Result: The results revealed that the maximum growth attributes such as plant height (42.42 cm), dry matter accumulation (113.39 g/m2) and crop growth rate (1.69 g/m2/day) was recorded with RDF + Fe 0.5% + Zn 0.5% + Mn 0.5% at 30 DAS, whereas maximum number of nodules/plant (11) was recorded with RDF+ Fe 0.5% at 30 DAS. However, higher yield and yield attributes i.e. Number of pods/plant (58.40), Number of grains/pod (9.73), 1000 grain weight (38.38 g), seed yield (1384.33) kg/ha, stover yield (2253.33) kg/ha and harvest index (42.44 %) was recorded with RDF + Fe 0.5% + Zn 0.5% + Mn 0.5% at 30 DAS. Similarly, higher Net returns (Rs 59912/ha) and benefit cost ratio (1.51) was also recorded with RDF + Fe 0.5% + Zn 0.5% + Mn 0.5% at 30 DAS as compared to control (RDF + water spray).

Keywords

Greengram Growth Iron Manganese Yield Zinc

References

  1. Anadhakrishnaveni, S., Palchamy, A. and Mahendran, S. (2004). Effect of foliar spray of nutrients on growth and yield of greengram. Legume Research. 27: 149-50.
  2. Anitha, S., Sreenivasam, E. and Purushothaman, S.M. (2005). Response of cowpea to foliar nutrition of zinc and iron in the oxisols of kerala. Legume Research. 28(4): 294-296. 
  3. Awomi, T.A., Singh, A.K., Kumar, M., Borddoloi, L.J. (2012). Effect of phosphorous molybdenum and cobalt nutrition on yield and quality of mungbean in acidic soils of North east India. Indian J. Hill Farm. 25(2): 22-26.
  4. Basavarajeswari et al. (2008). Expression profiling of zinc transporter genes in tomato grown under different concentrations of zinc. ISSN 10: pp 1252-1255.
  5. Dixit, P.M. and Elamathi, S. (2007). Effect of foliar application of DAP, micronutrients and NAA on growth and yield of green gram. Journal of Legume Research. 30(4): 305-07.
  6. Fard, S.R., Khourgami, A., Rafee, M. and Nasrollahi, H. (2012). Study the effect of zinc spraying and plant density on seed yield and morphological characteristics of greengram. Annals of Biological Research. 3(8): 4166-4171.
  7. Gomez, K.A., Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. John Willey and Sons, 2nd edition. 329.
  8. Habib, M. (2009). Effect of foliar application of Zn and Fe on wheat yield and quality. African Journal of Biotechnology. 8(24): 6795-98.
  9. Jadhav, R.L. and Kulkarni, S.R. (2016). Effect of foliar spray of nutrients on productivity of greengram (Vigna radiata) in North Eastern transitional zone of Karnataka, India. Legume Research. 39(5): 817-819.
  10. Kumawat R.N., Rathore, P.S. and Talwar, H.S. (2005). Effect of sulphur and iron on crop growth attributes in summer green gram. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology. 10(1): 86-89.
  11. Lohry, R. (2007). Micronutrients: Functions, Sources and Application Methods. Indian CCA Conference proceedings, 15 pp.
  12. Manomani V. and Srimathi, P. (2009). Influence of mother crop nutrition on seed and quality of blackgram. Madras Agricultural Journal. 96: 125-128.
  13. Manivannan, V., Thanunathan, K., Imayavaramban, V. and Ramanathan, N. (2002). Effect of foliar application of NPK and chelated micronutrients on rice-fallow urdbean. Legume Research. 25(4): 270-72.
  14. Meena K.K, Meena R.S. and Kumawat S.M (2012). Effect of sulphur and iron fertilization on yield attributes, yield and nutrient uptake of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 83(4): 472-6.
  15. Oosterhuits, D.M. and Weir, L.B. (2010). Foliar fertilization of cotton. Pp: 225-37.
  16. Yadav D.V., Singh K. (2001). Lime induced in iron chlorosis in sugarcane. Nutr. Cyc. Agroecosyst. 16: 119-136.
  17. Yaseen, A., Nour, Abou, El, E.A.A. and Shadeed, S. (2010). Response of wheat foliar spray with urea and micronutrients. Journal of American Sciences. 6: 14-22.

Global Footprints