Background: The result obtained after getting the training programs given by the experts of Krishi Vigyan Kendra to be evaluated by the young students is called evaluation.&nbsp; 
 
Methods: The data used in the present research work has been obtained from the secondary resources. It has been obtained from the introduction of Krishi Vigyan Kendra in the study and a detailed description of the practical application of the relevant persons related to the educational process of young students for short and long periods of time.&nbsp; 
 
Result: For more than 29 years old 97.47% for the content of curriculum and organization, for the trainees above 10 years of age 97.98%, for the knowledge of teaching and 99.43%, for the method of teaching 96.5%, for the teaching resources 96.1%, for the quality of providing 95.96%, for comprehensive evaluation, 97.98%, for scholarly participation, 96.59% for scholarly participation and 96.82% for student participation. Below 29 years of age 97.79% for contributing content to curriculum and institute. 98.53%, for the content and method of teaching, 96.51% for teaching resources, 97.61% for quality of delivery, 96.77% for evaluation method and feedback, 98.04% for teacher evaluation, 98.04% for use of materials, 96.08% 97.79 Pratishat Yuva Prashikshan Aarti Purnatya agreed for the use of that material.

An Analytic Study on the Overview of Age based Trainees for Education Process of Krishi Vigyan Kendra

<div style="text-align:justify">Background: Diversification is a continuous adaptive process whereby household add new ctivities maintain existing one or drop others, thereby maintaining diverse and changing make greater contribution to general livelihood portfolios. Livelihood in rural areas is very erratic and risk hidden. The land-based livelihood of small and marginal farmers is becoming unsustainable in recent times due to continuous flood and decrease in availability of arable land. Diversification activities make greater contribution ta key strategy by which people try to improve the generate cash incomes for poor households and it is a key strategy by which people try to improve their wellbeing. 
Methods: Based on the primary and secondary data, Barbarua Development Block is finally selected for the study. In the block itself three nos Missing community dominated villages and three nos Scheduled Caste dominated villages are selected for the study. Through random sampling, 10 households of each diverse socio economic background are selected from each village. Semi structured schedules are prepared for interviewing the villagers, local village head (Gaon Burah), school teacher, unemployed youth, agricultural labour, landless people and women. 
Result: As the entire survey area is inundated by flood water in every year, a part from farm activities various income generating activities carried out under livelihood diversification. Some households end upon multiple activities. A common pattern is for every poor and the comprehensive well-off households to have most diverse livelihood. Farm income accounts for 54.0 per cent of the total household income coming from off farm activities. It is also revealed that 44 per cent households prefer livelihood diversification due to limited agricultural income. About 22 per cent reported that the availability of non-farm activities encouraged them to adopt non farm activities. Managing livelihood has always been a critical factor or challenge among the poor in everywhere.&nbsp;</div>

An Analytic Study on the Overview of Age based Trainees for Education Process of Krishi Vigyan Kendra

Livelihood Pattern of Riverine Areas of Dibrugarh District and its Prospects of Livelihood Diversification