Results
ANOVA results revealed significant differences (p<0.05 and 0.01) in experimental observations. Salinity stress caused statistically significant differences in all measured characteristics where MDA and CAT showed significance at the 5%, while the others were significant at the 1% level. Experiental treatments had no significant differences in growth attributes and biomass, however, caused significant differences (p<0.01) in CAT and GSH, while it was at the 5% in MDA. Similarly, interaction between salinity and treatment (SxT) caused significant differences in antioxidant response observations in which statistical differences was at the 1% in CAT and GSH, but it was 5% in MDA (Table 3).
The results indicated that PH, RL, SFW, RFW, SWD and RDW were observed at least under 200 mM NaCl conditions while they were the highest without NaCl treatment. Decreases in PH, RL, SFW, RFW, SWD and RDW under 200 mM NaCl conditions over control were calculated by 19.2%, 48.2%, 48.2%, 75.7%, 11.21% and 69.1%, respectively. The lowest CAT (11.821 ng mL
-1), GSH (1.08 ng mL
-1) and MDA (1,10 ng mL
-1) were observed in control plants, whereas the highest CAT (14.68 ng mL
-1), GSH (3.22 ng mL
-1) and MDA (2.02 ng mL
-1) were determined in 200 mM NaCl exposed plants (Fig 1). CAT, GSH and MDA increased by 83.6%, 24.18% and 198.2% with 200 mM NaCl over control. Experimental treatments were not effective on these growth attributes in which PH, RL, SFW, RFW, SWD and RDW varied between 31.2-38.3 cm, 18.17-22.89 cm, 0.488-0.728 g, 0.292-476 g, 0.0686-0.1038 g and 0.0367-0.0560 g, respectively (Table 4).
The lowest GSH (1.25 ng mL
-1) was found in KF58B treated plants, while the highest GSH (2.86 ng mL
-1) was observed with KF58B+
F. mosseae. According to SxT, the lowest GSH (0.37 ng mL
-1) was found in control plants under 100 mM NaCl, while the highest GSH (5.12 ng mL
-1) was found with KF58B+
G. etunicatum under 200 mM NaCl conditions. The lowest CAT (9.531 mL
-1) was observed in KF58B+
G. etunicatum treated plants, while the highest CAT (20.398 ng mL
-1) was found with KF63C+
F. mosseae. Overall, SxT interaction indicated that the lowest CAT (6,983 ng mL
-1) was found with KF58B+
F. mosseae under 200 mM NaCl, whereas the highest CAT (32.770 ng mL
-1) was found in KF63C+
F. mosseae treated plants under 200 mM NaCl conditions. The lowest MDA (1.07 ng mL
-1) was found in KF58B+
G. etunicatum treated plants, while the highest one (2.76 ng mL
-1) was observed in control plants. According to SxT, the lowest MDA (0.78 ng mL
-1) was found in plants treated with KF58B+
G. etunicatum under 100 mM NaCl conditions andthe highest MDA (4.81 ng mL
-1) was found in control plants under 200 mM NaCl conditions (Fig 2).
As a result of the experiment, it was determined that increasing NaCl concentrations in the growth medium adversely affected plant development parameters such as seedling and root length, as well as fresh and dry weights associated with biomass accumulation. It is well known that salt stress has harmful effects on plants at all develop-mental stages, from germination to harvest
(Foti et al., 2018). The primary causes of salinity’s inhibitory effects on germination include the accumulation of toxic ions (Na
+ and Cl
-) and restricted water uptake by seeds. Salinity blocks enzymatic processes that convert endosperm reserves into sugars, thereby preventing proper germination and seedling development (
Dash and Panda, 2001). In addition, Kz
+ ions that required for osmoregulation, cell growth, membrane polarization, enzyme activity and neutralization of negative ions compete with Naz accumulation. Moreover, Na
+ and Cl
-1 enter the cells and cause damage to cell membranes and cytosolic metabolic processes
(Zhu et al., 2019). Consequently, increased salinity stress suppressed plant growth and limited dry matter accumulation. These findings are consistent with previous studies that have shown salinity stress restricts growth and biomass production in wheat (
El Sabagh et al., 2021), canola
(Lone et al., 2022), lentil
(Ceritoglu et al., 2023) and triticale
(Alagoz et al., 2023).
On the other hand, it was observed that antioxidant enzyme activities such as CAT and GSH increased under salt stress along with higher MDA concentrations. Salinity tolerance in plants is closely related to the activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, GPX, APX and GR, as well as non-enzymatic antioxidant compounds
(Gupta et al., 2005). Disruption of electron transport chains causes molecular oxygen to act as an electron acceptor, leading to excessive ROS production under stress conditions. Salt-induced osmotic stress alters plant metabolism and enzymatic activity, resulting in the overproduction of ROS (
Menezes-Benavente et al., 2004).
Reactive oxygen species such as
1O
2, OH-, O
2- and H
2O
2‚ can damage proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and DNA (
Groß et al., 2013). Within chloroplasts, photosystems I and II, ubiquinone andmitochondrial ETC complex III are key sites for ROS generation (
Gill and Tuteja, 2010). For instance, excessive H
2O
2 accumulation leads to the collapse of maize leaf veins due to leakage between neighboring cells under salt stress (
Menezes-Benavente et al., 2004). Plants respond to salt stress with multigenic mechanisms, including osmotic and ionic homeostasis and antioxidant defense systems involving cellular detoxification
(Hasanuzzaman et al., 2021).
PGPB and AMF-based treatments did not show significant effects on plant growth and biomass accumulation during the early seedling stage. It is known that the endosperm reserves of seeds play a major role in early seedling development (
Açıkbaş et al., 2022). Furthermore, microbial materials generally act more slowly but systematically compared to chemical fertilizers. Thus, it is suggested that biological applications may not have made a noticeable contribution to morphological traits within the short time frame of early seedling development in this experiment. However, molecular analyses revealed significant differences caused by PGPB and AMF applications in triticale seedlings under salt stress. The resistance of PGPB to stress is based on the breakdown of ethylene-which rises sharply under stress-into α-ketobutyrate and ammonia
via ACC deaminase activity (
del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda et al., 2020). One of the mechanisms by which AMF promote plant growth is through enhanced nutrient uptake, especially phosphorus. This symbiosis also facilitates the acquisition of nitrogen, sulfur and zinc (
Hodge and Storer, 2015). AMF have also been shown to reduce or prevent nutrient loss from soil through the production of glomalin, a glycoprotein that significantly improves soil aggregation and prevents nutrient loss via denitrification
(He et al., 2020). Additionally, AMF can reduce the harmful effects of soil-borne pathogens and parasites and enhance plant resistance
(Song et al., 2015).
Regarding the effects of PGPB and AMF on plant growth, co-inoculation has often been suggested as a better strategy than single inoculation due to enhanced synergistic effects
(Nacoon et al., 2020). Bacteria have been found to improve AMF germination by disrupting fungal cell envelopes or releasing volatile compounds
(Turrini et al., 2018). Bacillus thuringiensis inoculation in wheat resulted in increases of 38.8% in proline content and 21.4% in soluble sugar content
(Huang et al., 2022). Moreira et al., (2022) reported that co-application of PGPB with AMF (
Rhizoglomus irregularis) resulted in synergistic effect on stress responses in maize under saline conditions.
Sabah et al., (2025) reported that PGPB treatment enhanced AMF root colonization compared to AMF-only treatments.
Yadav et al., (2022) indicated that
Bacillus sp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi consortia enhance wheat nutrient and yield in the second year field trial in which maximum AMF colonization occurred with PGPB+AMF co-inoculation.