Effects of DPR on pH, nitrate, phosphate in soil
The results in Table 1 show that the pH levels and the percentage of PAvailable increased in the soil where DPR was applied compared to those in the soil where DPR was not applied. Similar to the results by
Yang et al., (2012), in this study, the pH was increased up to three units when the acid sandy soil was applied with DPR. In the work of
Suksri (1998), acidic soil was used with dolomite, which also increased the soil pH. According to the study of
Lestari et al., (2016), the higher the rate of dolomite applied to acid sulfate soil, the greater the pH increase. The increase in soil pH might be due to the high pH of DPR application. The percentage of total nitrate in soil was not significantly different in all the treatments. However, the amount of NH
4+ and NO
3- in the soil was higher in all treatments with the application of DPR. According to
Silber et al., (2010), the soil pH affects both the availability and uptake of nutrients by plants and the release of PO
43- and NH
4+ from soil particles
(Zheng et al., 2013).
Effects of DPR on plant height, number of leaves and chlorophyll content in leaves
Plant height was measured at harvest time and DPR application significantly increased (Fig 2). The greatest plant height (mean value of 129.7 cm) was recorded at the treatment of 0.5 t ha
-1 DPR and this was significantly higher than the control and 0.25 t ha
-1 DPR (121.6 and 126.2 cm, respectively). There was no significant difference in plant height when a higher percentage of DPR was applied. The number of leaves on the plant was the highest with a treatment of 1.0 t ha
-1 DPR and when the application of the DPR was lower, the number of leaves per plant was not significantly different. The results were similar to those obtained by
Soeparjono and Kadiyasari (2021) on black soybean,
Suntoro et al., (2018) and
Krismawati et al., (2022) on maize. When DPR was applied to ryegrass, the dry weight increased
(Yang et al., 2012).
The application of DPR was observed to have significant effects on chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll in leaves (Fig 3). However, DPR did not affect the content of chlorophyll a. The total chlorophyll and chlorophyll b were significantly higher than those in the control plants and those treated with 0.25 t ha
-1 DPR. The chlorophyll content increased in corn plants when they were treated with 0.2 t ha
-1 dolomite
(Suntoro et al., 2018). The higher chlorophyll content in leaves treated with DPR might be due to high phosphate uptake in plants (Fig 4). Phosphorus plays a vital role in chlorophyll production and regulation
(Billah et al., 2020).
Effects of DPR on nitrate, phosphate and potassium in stem, leaves and seeds
Nitrate and potassium contents were not significantly different in stem, leaves and seeds in all treatments (Fig 4). These results were inconsistent with the content ammonium and nitrate in the soil (Table 1). The phosphate content significantly differed in the stem when sesame plants were treated with DPR; however, it was not different in leaves and seeds.
Suntoro et al., (2018) found that when corn was treated with dolomite, the phosphate concentration in plant was significant higher but dolomite application did not affect to nitrate and potasium contrations. Similar the study of
Damrongrak et al., (2015) on rubber trees nitrate concentration in leaves was not affected by application of dolomite. According to
Rastija et al., (2014) the availability of potassium in the soil was independent of dolomite application. It might be a reason of the concentration of potassium in sesame plants was not different in all treatments with or without application of DPR.
Effects of DPR on yield components and seeds yield of sesame
Fig 5 shows that the number of pods per plant, pod weight and the number of seeds per pod were statistically significantly different at 5% among all treatments. The number of pods per plant was the highest in the plants treated with 0.5 t ha
-1 DPR (47.0 pods per plant). Similarly, the number of seeds per pod was the highest in plants treated with 0.5 t ha
-1 DPR (140 seeds). In this study, the weight of 1,000 seeds was not affected by the DPR application. The higher number of pods per plant might be the higher phosphate uptake in plants. According to
Kashani et al., (2015), phosphorus is an essential nutrient for flower formation and seed production.
Fig 6 shows that the application of the DPR with an amount of 0.5 t ha
-1 had the highest yield, with 1.61 t ha
-1 and there was a statistically significant difference at 5% compared to the control treatment (1.29 t ha
-1). Significantly, the lowest seed yield was recorded in sesame plants with no DPR treatment and the yield increase rate compared to the control treatment was 24.8%. Similar to the study of
Cahyono et al., (2022) on soybean planted on Alfisols in Jumantono, Karanganyar, Indonesia, the seed yield increased by double with the application of dolomite. There were no significant differences in sesame yield between plants fertilized with 0.5 and 1.0 t ha
-1 DPR. The soybean yield increased when dolomite or phosphate rock was applied in a single form or in combination
(Minardi et al., 2021).
Financial efficiency
Table 2 indicates that the profit from growing the sesame is high (above 18 million VND/ha). Adding DPR increases the cost of labor and DPR. Application of 0.5 and 1.0 t ha
-1 DPR for sesame helped increase yield significantly higher than without application or 0.25 t ha
-1 of DPR. However, the profit of the treatments of 0.25 and 1.0 t ha
-1 DPR was lower than the profit of the control treatment. Application of 0.5 t ha
-1 DPR gave a higher profit than the control treatments (4.5 million VND/ha).