Number of legumes plant-1
As revealed by Duncan’s Multiple Range test (Table 1), Nickel adversely affected the frequency of legume differentiation and development to an extent according to the concentration and induced a substantial reduction in number of legumes. Concentrations ranges from 45 to 90 mg kg
-1 have been found to alter legume number significantly while the lower level did not revealed statistically any clear cut differences from control. Documented data for mean performance, reflecting the role Nickel played in checking legume setting, revealed that maximum (70.570%) effect was by 90 mg kg
-1 and minimum (0.178%) by 25 mg kg
-1 applied Nickel. This reduction accompanying the accelerated level of Nickel was expressed in all the genotypes reaching at the peak when 90 mg kg
-1 Nickel was applied. Although not statistically justified, but to a considerable extent of 5.290% increase in legume number was found when 15 mg kg
-1 Nickel was added to soil for plants of MASH ES-1. Among the genotypes, MASH 88 revealed maximum (9.559) and MASH 80 revealed minimum (7.821) values. MASH 97 differed statistically by a value of 7.761% less than MASH 80.
Number of grains fruit-1
Increasing amount of Nickel appeared to be responsible for gradual reduction in grain development (Table 2). This inhibitory effect of Nickel was statistically clear at concentrations from 45 to 90 mg kg
-1 while reduction in grain number lower than statistical approach was detected and documented by the effect of low concentration. All the genotypes responded in a similar fashion. Nickel concentration of 15 mg kg
-1, when supplied to plants of MASH ES-1, revealed an upset of 4.133% increase over the control plants. Among the genotypes, differences were of non significant extent and MASH 97 revealed maximum (5.864) and MASH 80 revealed minimum (5.649) values.
Total seed yield plant-1 (g)
Nickel supplement in the soil medium had a negative linear relation with yield plants
-1 (Table 3). Detrimental effects of metal were statistically obvious by its concentrations from 45 to 90 mg kg
-1 while the difference from untreated plants were barely detectable by imposition of lower concentration. Nickel rendered the plants less productive at all levels of its application and the effect was in a concentration dependent manner. Maximum effect for reduction (86.241%) was by 60 mg kg
-1 and minimum (2.058%) by 15 mg kg
-1 Nickel. As regard individual genotypic response, maximum effect in all the genotypes was by 60 mg kg
-1 but in MASH 80 the same was conceived by 30 mg kg
-1. On applying 15 mg kg
-1 Nickel to plants of MASH ES-1, the observations were excluded from the ongoing trend and an increase of 9.892% over control in yield was recorded. Among the genotypes, MASH 88 revealed maximum (3.002) value being most productive and MASH 80 revealed minimum (2.496) as the least productive.
Increasing concentration of metal decreased yield attributes (Tables 1-3). Many reports revealed that Ni toxicity significantly decreases the seed numbers, seed weight and total seed yield per plant
(Tripathy et al., 1981). Stress mediated by Ni causes reductions in flowers and fruits density
(Balaguer et al., 2002). As a whole, reductions in total yield of plant can be ascribed to poor plant growth, development and reduced supply of nutrients to the reproductive organs
(Ahmad et al., 2007).
During the growth of plant differentiation of flower and fruit is accompanied by a set of physiological changes in plant. These changes are controlled by a set of internal and external environmental factors including supply of nutrients. Any change in these factors can influence directly the growth and finally the reproductive phase of plant
(Arun et al., 2005). Heavy metal stress creates an imbalance in micro and macronutrient availability to plant. Nutrients levels change may influence the development of floral buds, flowers and fruit
(Hayati et al., 1995).
The reduction in growth and ultimately in yield might also be due to decreased photosynthesis as a consequence of reduction in photosynthetic pigments under metal stress (Fargasova, 2001;
Jose et al., 2017) and sink limitations (Brun and Betts, 1984). Metal toxicity induced senescence of flower and pod may reduce number of viable pods and seeds (Sharma and Dubey, 2005).
Reduction of cytokinin contents by metal might be responsible for growth and finally the yield reduction by inhibition of cell division and cell elongation. This also may cause a decline in nitrate reductase activity
(Bueno et al., 1994). This reduction in nitrate reductase activity might be also due to nutrients limitations
(Andrews et al., 1999; Pilipovic et al., 2019).
Heavy metals accumulations in floral organs effectively alter plant reproductive potential of a floral organ like anther, pistil and nectarines. Heavy metal can negatively affect pollen viability, pollen senescence, pollen germination and pollen tube growth
(Xun et al., 2017; Tuna et_al2002).
Whenever, in the experiment the absence of decline in yield was found, could be attributed to the fact that low level of metal may just be accumulated in roots than in the shoot and the effect is restricted to the root only (Selvam and Wong, 2008).