The analysis of variance (Table 1) related to photosynthetic rate showed that significant differences were found among different treatments and varieties. Responses of varieties to treatment showed non-significant differences separately. IAA treatment caused an increase in photosynthetic rate (23.18%). Low and high lead doses decreased the photosynthetic rate by a value of 24.61 and 55.54% respectively. IAA ameliorated the lead stress so growth was reduced by a value of 17.78 and 27.35% in 10 and 20 mg lead treated plants (Table 2).
The analysis of variance of transpiration rate (Table 1) showed that treatments differed non significantly and separate response of both variety to each treatment differed non significantly. While significant differences were observed between two varieties. Increase in transpiration rate by the application of IAA was (8.02%). Lead toxicity of low and high levels decreased the transpiration rate 2.87 and 14.12% respectively. IAA ameliorates the lead toxicity and metal effects on transpiration rate were reduced to values of 1.73 and 7.28% respectively (Table 3).
The analysis of variance (Table 1) showed that stomatal conductance significantly affected by different treatments. Results revealed that varieties and treatments were differed highly significantly. Separate responses of varieties to treatments revealed non-significant differences. Stomatal conductance was increased by exogenous IAA spray as 1.96%. Low and high lead treatments decreased the stomatal conductance 0.56 and 3.37% respectively. IAA application decreased the harmful effect of lead therefore effects of metal on stomatal conductance were lowered to values of 0.28 and 1.68% respectively (Table 4).
The analysis of variance of sub stomatal CO
2 concentration (Table 1) showed that varieties, treatment response of each variety to treatments differed non significantly. Low and high lead treatments decreased the sub stomatal CO
2 concentration 1.70 and 5.98% respectively. IAA treatment increased the sub stomatal CO
2 concentration (1.70%). IAA alleviated the toxic effect of lead and CO
2 concentration reductions were 0.56 and 3.41% respectively under low and high levels of stresses (Table 5).
Reduction in photosynthetic rate, CO
2 assimilation and transpiration rate might be due to decline in water potential (
Atteya, 2002). Water contents in metal treated plants are decreased (
Poschenrieder et al., 1989) due to increasing resistance in water flow
(Barcelo et al., 1988) or alteration of cell wall properties by metal (
Poschenrieder et al., 1989). Conduction and transport of water is influenced in root by toxic metals (
Barcelo and Poschenreider, 1990). Photosynthetic reduction might be due to chlorophyll decrease by metal.
Hampp et al., (1974) have shown that enzymes of chlorophyll biosynthesis like 6-amino laevulinic acid dehydratase and porphobilinogenase are affected in by metal treatment. Lead is also found to depress the rate of photosynthesis
(Carlson et al., 1975). Decrease in activities of many enzymes of CO
2 fixation
(Barcelo et al., 1988); changes in the thylakoid structure
(Fodor et al., 1996) may contribute to reduction in photosyntheticactivity and growth. Reduction in plant growth perhaps is conducive to Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production as heavy metals toxicity as an efficient generator of toxic ROS inhibits photosynthetic ETC (
Kappus, 1985).
The data related to analysis of variance of stem dry weight (Table 1) showed that varieties, treatments and response of individual variety to every treatment differed non significantly. Foliar application of IAA non significantly increased the stem dry weight in two varieties (8.74%). Low and high lead treatments decreased the stem dry weight by values of 27.01 and 39.57% respectively. The lead toxicity was decreased due to foliar application of IAA and dry weight reductions were by values of 12.88 and 24.75% respectively (Table 6).
The analysis or variance of root dry weight (Table 1) showed that treatments, varieties and separate response of varieties to treatment differed non significantly. Application of IAA increased the root dry weight (8.53%). Low and high lead doses decreased the root dry weight 14.07and 22.61% respectively (Table 7). The analysis of variance of leaf dry weight (Table 1) revealed that varieties, treatments and individual response of all varieties to treatment were different to non significantly degree. Indole Acetic Acid application increased the leaf dry weight upto 4.88% (Table 8). Low and high lead treatments decreased the leaf dry weight 14.09 and 23.35% respectively. Application of IAA alleviated the lead stress. Therefore, leaf dry weight reductions were up to 6.45 and 15.92% respectively (Table 8). Biomass of plant organs decreased due to metal stress (Table 6-8). Such type of findings are reported also by
Ouariti et al., (1997) and
Fengxiang et al., (2003). Plant growth and plant water contents have relations with plant weights and biomass. Decline in biomass might be due to Inhibition of both cell elongation and division by heavy metals
(Arduini et al., 1994) or due to reduction in nitrogen contents
(Andrews et al., 1999). Decrease in dry mass production may also be due to decreased cytokinin as a result of limited nutrients supply (
Van der Werf and Nagel, 1996). Reduced amount of cytokinin decreases leaf expansion in plants treated with metal (
Gadallah and El-Enany, 1999). Decreased cytokinin contents also affect cell division and cell expansion (
Downes and Crowell, 1998). IAA when applied on plants increases net photosynthesis rate and synthesizes more C: N ratio which results in growth enhancement (
Sudadi, 2012).