Trichoderma spp. dual culture assay
Five putative
Trichoderma spp. isolates were examined in a dual culture experiment against a virulent isolate of
S.rolfsii (SrPWp). The isolate T2 considerably decreased pathogen radial growth (65.33%) when compared to the control. T1 (60.22) and T3 (60.88) isolates were revealed to be the best antagonists with equivalent activity against the pathogen. The pathogen was shown to be considerably less effective against T4 (55.77) and T5 (58.00) isolates (Table 2; Plate 1).
Paramasivan (2006) reported that
T. viride and
T. harzianum were particularly effective in inhibiting the radial growth of
S. rolfsii in dual culture
. Srinivasulu
et al. (2005)
and
Kotasthane et al., (2014) also observed in vitro reduction in
S. rolfsii radial mycelial growth
.
Metabolite assay of Trichoderma spp.
Five putative
Trichoderma spp. isolates were compared to a virulent isolate of
S. rolfsii (SrPWp) in a metabolite experiment. When compared to the control, isolate T2 had the highest percent of pathogen radial growth inhibition (63.33%). Furthermore, pathogen radial mycelial growth was suppressed much less (48.36%) by isolate T4 than by the control (Table 2; Plate 2).
The findings are comparable with those of
Fravel (1988) and
Kotasthane et al., (2014), who explored the influence of volatile metabolites from
Trichoderma spp. on
S. rolfsii.
T. harzianum, according to Fravel (1988), creates alkyl pyrones that suppress
S. cepivorum. Similarly,
Kotasthane et al., (2014) reported that
Trichoderma viride isolates had the strongest antagonistic activity against
Scelrotium rolfsii and
Rhizoctonia solani, two soil-borne plant pathogens.
Dual culture assay of Bacillus isolates against S. rolfsii
A dual culture study of 5 putative
Bacillus isolates against
S. rolfsii demonstrated that
Bacillus isolates were similarly effective as
Trichoderma spp. B5 was determined to be the most efficient against the test pathogen among the five possible isolates tested, with a significantly greater reduction in radial development (58.22 per cent) than the control, followed by B4 (56.32). Furthermore, isolate B3 performed the worst, with a 50.44 percent reduction in radial growth above control, comparable to isolates B2 (53.16) and B1 (55.32). (Plate 3; Table 3).
The results are comparable with the findings reported by Solanki
et al. (2012), who reported that
Bacillus spp. strain MB101 suppressed the radial growth of
R. solani. The
Bacillus subtilis strain (EU07) had the largest growth rate
in vitro decrease in
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
radicis-lycopersici, the causative organism of tomato fusarium wilt, according to
Baysal et al., (2008).
Metabolites assay of Bacillus spp
A similar pattern was found when 5 putative
Bacillus. isolates were tested in a metabolic assay for their efficiency against
S. rolfsii. The strain B5 was shown to be the most successful in reducing pathogen radial development by 55.40% more than the control. Isolates B1 (50.42), B2 (49.33) and B3 (49.11) were the subsequent best effective isolates, all of which were comparable. In addition, the B4 isolate performed the worst, with a 48.44 reduction in pathogen radial development (Table 3; Plate 4).
Knox et al., (2000) reported that two strains of
B. subtilis suppressed many plant pathogenic fungi on agar plates and they hypothesized that this was due to antifungal volatile substances (AFS) produced by them. Likewise,
Ashok et al., (2014) discovered that
Bacillus subtilis produces a bioactive chemical that inhibits the growth of
S. rolfsii.
Giorgio et al., (2015) discovered that eight Bacillus strains prevented the growth of
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum by creating volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Furthermore,
Li et al., (2015) discovered that a Bacillus strain produced VOCs that suppressed
Fusarium solani mycelial development
in vitro substantially.
Molecular characterization of potent isolates of Trichoderma and Bacillus
To test twenty three Trichoderma and twenty one Bacillus isolates biocontrol ability, isolates were pre-screened against SrPWp, the virulent isolate of
S. rolfsii. Fungal antagonist isolates demonstrated varying levels of biocontrol efficacy against virulent
S. rolfsii isolate. Furthermore, the five most promising antagonistic fungal isolates were chosen for further study and serially labeled from T1 to T5. Table 4 contains information about these isolates. ITS-rDNA amplification, sequencing and phylogeny were used to identify these promising antagonistic fungal isolates. The ITS-rDNA amplification was performed using primers ITS 1 and ITS 4, yielding a 600 bp amplicon (Fig 1). The NCBI databases was nucleotide blasted with the quality forward as well as reverse sequence data of 5 isolates’ amplified fragments and all isolates were confirmed as Trichoderma spp. MEGA7 software was used to create the phylogenetic tree.
In the phytogenic tree, isolates T1, T2 were clustered with
Trichoderma viride, isolate T3, isolate T5 with
Trichoderma harzianum and isolate T4 with
Trichoderma hamatum reference strains (Fig 2).
Antagonistic fungi, particularly
Trichoderma and
Gliocladium spp., have been employed more widely than bacteria (
Ganesan, 2004;
Ganesan and Sekar, 2004a).
Sclerotium rolfsii was controlled with
Trichoderma harzianum by (
Ganesan, 2004).
Muthamilan and Jeyarajan (1996) discovered that mixing
T. harzianum,
Rhizobium and carbendazim improved groundnut root rot management. Similarly,
Ekundayo et al., (2016) discovered
Trichoderma viride to be efficient in lowering the incidence of southern blight of tomato in pot culture tests. Five of the most promising Trichoderma spp. isolates were chosen and evaluated for biocontrol against a virulent
S. rolfsii isolate.
In the preliminary screening, the isolates of bacterial antagonists demonstrated various levels of biocontrol features against the virulent isolate of
S. rolfsii. Furthermore, the five most promising bacterial antagonist isolates were chosen for future testing and were labeled serially from B1 to B5. Table 5 contains details regarding the bacterial isolates. Using 16S rDNA amplification, sequencing and phylogeny, the researchers identified five potential antagonistic bacterial isolates. The 16S rDNA amplification was performed with 24 F and 1492 R primers, yielding amplicons of 1500 bp (Fig 3). Five isolates’ forward and reverse sequence data were nucleotide blasted in the NCBI data base and identified as
Bacillus spp. For phylogenetic analysis, the sequences were matched to reference
Bacillus spp. sequences from the NCBI database. The phylogenetic tree was created using the MEGA7 software.
Isolates B1, B3 and B4 have been linked with
Bacillus velezensis in the phylogenetic tree, whereas isolates B2 and B5 were grouped together with
Bacillus tequilensis and
Bacillus cereus reference strains, respectively (Fig 4).
Several
Bacillus spp. strains have been identified as bacterial antagonists capable of suppressing soil-borne plant diseases and improving plant growth
(Zhao et al., 2014; Shrestha et al., 2016). Suslow and Schroth (1982) observed that
Bacillus spp. efficiently inhibited
S. rolfsii infection in groundnut, chickpea and beans. Because of their rapid rhizosphere growth,
Bacillus spp. may have an advantage over fungal antagonists in controlling sclerotial fungus.
Furthermore,
Singh and Dwivedi (1987) reported that
Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, Pseudomonas aerginosa and
Streptomyces diastaticus strains considerably reduced
S. rolfsii-caused barley foot rot. Similarly, Abeysinghe (2009) discovered that
B. subtilis has an enhanced ability to reduce
S. rolfsii incidence in chilli via seed and root bacterization, leading to a greater number of bacteria at the collar region of chilli plants and protecting of the pathogen’s most vulnerable area, resulting in greater protection.
The five most promising
Bacillus spp. isolates from the previous investigation were chosen and tested for biocontrol characteristics against an aggressive isolate of
S. rolfsii.