Oviposition
The number of eggs laid ranged from 32.67 to 131.33 (Table 1). The cultivar
Manyhü Rhi (32.67) was substantially less preferred for oviposition while
Sipheghonu (131.33) was most preferred. The current study showed variation in oviposition preference on ricebean cultivars.
Chakraborty et al., (2015) also reported variation in oviposition preference by
C. chinensis on five pulses. The physical characteristics of the seeds as well as biochemical components may contribute to the oviposition preference of
C. chinensis (
Senthilraja and Patel, 2021;
Paikaray et al., 2021).
Adult emergence
The adult emergence was highest in the cultivar
Sipheghonu (73.60%) and it was the least in cultivar
Rhüjo (58.00%) (Table 1)
. The reduction in adult emergence could be due to non-preference of cultivar for oviposition. The results are in conformity with the findings of
Arpitha and Sagar (2011).
Development period
The mean duration of development of
C. chinensis ranged from 21.60 to 33.10 days (Table 1). The shortest development period was found in
Kurhi Rhide cultivar (21.60 days). The maximum of 33.10 days was found in
Mügo Rhi. The difference in the pest development period may be caused by certain physico-chemical characteristics of the seed.
Chakraborty et al., (2015) and
Bharathi et al., (2017) also reported similar findings in the developmental period of several pulses. The cultivars
Sipheghonu and
Kurhi Rhide, which were highly preferred for oviposition, showed a preference for development with less number of days. Similar finding was also reported by
Khokhar and Singh (1987) in pigeonpea.
Growth index
Among the 16 cultivars, the growth index ranged from 0.057 to 0.086 (Table 1). Based on the susceptibility index the cultivars were grouped into 4 categories. The cultivars
Rhüjo, Akixi Anila and
Manyhü Rhi were moderately resistant;
Pinchong Wethroi, Hera Ragei, Rhüluo, Ashei Nyakla, Hera Rahau, Kerhüand
Rhüse were moderately susceptible;
Kürhi Süre, Rhüdi and
Khueishuei Shumei were susceptible and the highly susceptible cultivars were
Sipheghonu, Mügo Rhi and
Kurhi Rhide. Researchers frequently use the growth index to determine whether legume crops are resistant to bruchid infestation. In the present study none of the cultivars was found resistant to
C. chinensis. The results are in tune with
Tripathi et al., (2015) and
Kavitha et al., (2018) who categorized pulses into resistant and susceptible varieties based on the growth index of pulse beetle.
Per cent infestation and weight loss
The per cent infestation by
C. chinensis on different ricebean cultivars varied from 7.10 to 63.67 (Table 1). Among the cultivars,
Sipheghonu had the highest percent infestation (63.67) and
Rhüjo had the lowest percent infestation (7.10). The results are comparable with
Khokhar and Singh (1987) who reported variation in per cent infestation by pulse beetle in pigeonpea varieties. The per cent weight loss varied from 3.73 to 11.07 (Table 1). The weight loss in cultivar
Sipheghonu (11.07%) was highest. The minimum weight loss was observed in cultivar
Rhüjo (3.73%). Similar findings were reported by
Jatav et al., (2022) in green gram varieties. In the present study, cultivar
Rhüjo had exhibited the lowest infestation and weight loss. In comparison to the other cultivars, the cultivar was less preferred for oviposition, adult emergence and delayed development period (days).
Physico-chemical parameters
The seed colour of ricebean cultivars varied from green to light green to yellowish-green, dark blue to creamy white, light yellow to light yellow with black spots and brown to light brown to light brown with black spots (Fig 1; Table 2). All the cultivars had smooth texture. The shape varied from nearly round to oblong. The seed coat thickness of the cultivars varied from 0.057±0.004mm (
Hera Rahau) to 0.103±0.011mm (
Pinchong wethroi). The seed size varied from 118.54±2.36mm
2 (
Sipheghonu) to 19.46±0.71 mm
2 (
Hera Rahau). The highest seed index was found in
Sipheghonu (47.840.014g) and the least was in
Rhüjo (5.280.008g).
The protein content among the cultivars ranged from 17.20 (
Pinchong Wethroi) to 21.12 %. (
Sipheghonu) (Table 3). The fat content of the cultivars varied from 0.51 (
Kurhi Rhide) to 1.23% (
Kurhi Süre). Phenol content showed significant variation among the cultivars. It varied from 80.06 (
Sipheghonu) to 747.19 mgGAE/100g (
Ashei Nyakla). Tannin content varied from 800.57 (
Sipheghonu) to 1181.67 mgTAE/100g (
Rhüjo). Starch content varied from 51.11 (
Rhüjo) to 57.89% (
Sipheghonu).
Correlation studies
The correlation studies (Table 4 and 5) showed that the biological parameters of the pest have a significant correlation with physico-chemical parameters of the ricebean cultivars. The present study revealed that the seed size and seed index have significant correlation with the biological parameters of pulse beetle (Table 4). The suitability of the pest increased by an increase in physical factors like seed size and seed index
. The findings suggest that the larger the seed area, the greater the rate of oviposition, which results in more adult emergence leading to increased infestation and weight loss. The preference for larger seeds may be due to the availability of more space for oviposition, growth and development. Similar results were reported by
Rathore and Chaturvedi (1997). In the present investigation, seed coat thickness did not show any significant correlation with biological parameters which is in conformity with
Neog and Singh (2011).
The Biochemical content (Table 5) such as protein and starch showed a positive significant correlation with oviposition, adult emergence, growth index, per cent infestation and per cent weight loss and a negative significant correlation with the development period
. The cultivars with higher protein and starch content were highly preferred by the pest for growth and development and were highly susceptible. However, phenol and tannin content showed a negative significant correlation. Cultivars having higher phenol and tannin content were less preferred by the pest and they exhibited resistance against
C. chinensis. The findings are similar to that of
Tripathi et al., (2013) who reported that the resistance observed in different cowpea accessions is due to biochemical factors such as protein and tannin.
Kavitha et al., (2021) also reported a positive correlation of biological parameters with protein, sugar and moisture content and a negative correlation with phenol content.