Among the three summer legumes, cluster bean produced the highest amount of total residue (haulm+pod residue) followed by groundnut. The nutrient content of cluster bean residue was also found higher which resulted in highest amount of nutrient addition to the soil (76.34 kg ha
-1 N, 19.42 kg ha
-1 P and 42.01 kg ha
-1 K) followed by groundnut crop when residue was incorporated (Table 1).
Effect on succeeding maize
Effect of cropping systems
Growth parameters
Two-year study revealed that plant height of maize at harvest was not affected due to different cropping systems however, significantly higher leaf area at 60 DAS (3505 cm
2), chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (24.18) and dry matter production at 60 DAS and at harvest (5659 and 14187 kg ha
-1, respectively) was observed with cluster bean-maize cropping sequence. Groundnut-maize (C
2) cropping sequence gave comparable results with cluster bean-maize (C
3) for leaf area and chlorophyll content (Table 2).
Yield parameters
Cropping systems had significant influence on various yield attributes and grain and straw yields of maize. Cluster bean-maize (C3) sequence provided significantly the highest cob length (16.80 cm) over rest of the sequences however, cob girth of maize was unaffected (Table 2). Cluster bean-maize (C
3) sequence recorded significantly the highest number of grains per cob (412.2), seed index (23.47 g), grain yield (3253 kg ha
-1) and straw yield of maize (5525 kg ha
-1) as compare to rest of the sequences. Harvest index remained unchanged in all sequences (Table 2).
The positive results of growing preceding legumes on maize growth and yield might be due to increased nitrogen and other nutrients availability in the soil for growing maize. The difference in growth and yield of maize observed between preceding legumes might be due to their different carry over capacity of nitrogen for the succeeding maize crop.
Adeleke and Haruna (2012),
Ammaji (2014) and
Ali et al., (2015) also reported similar effect of different preceding legume crops on succeeding maize.
Effect of residue management
Growth parameters
Incorporation of legume residues (R
1) significantly enhanced plant height of maize at harvest (177.8 cm), leaf area at 60 DAS (3498 cm
2), chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (24.20) and dry matter production of maize at 60 DAS and at harvest (5469 and 13939 kg ha
-1, respectively) as compare to residue removal (Table 2).
Yield parameters
Similar to growth parameters residue incorporation of different legumes on maize significantly benefitted the yield parameters
i.e. cob length of maize (16.53 cm), cob girth of maize (14.98 cm) number of grains per cob of maize (409.9), seed index (23.21 g), grain yield (3301 kg ha
-1) and straw yield of maize (5562 kg ha
-1) as compare to residue removal. However, it failed to influence harvest index of the crop (Table 2).
The findings are in corroboration with the reports of
Ammaji (2014),
Rajkumara et al., (2014) and
Ali et al., (2015) and it might be due to improved mineralization and of high amount of accumulated nitrogen in the legume residue which was returned to the soil slowly throughout the crop growing period. Addition of organic matter in form of crop residues also boosted availability of other nutrients which might have resulted in better crop growth of maize.
Effect of nitrogen management in maize
Growth parameters
Results indicated that full dose of nitrogen in maize significantly increased plant height at harvest (181.6 cm), leaf area at 60 DAS (3556 cm
2), chlorophyll content at 60 DAS (25.22) and dry matter production at 60 DAS and at harvest (6065 and 14537 kg ha
-1, respectively) (Table 2).
Yield parameters
Full dose of nitrogen (100%) in maize significantly influenced cob length (17.95 cm), cob girth (15.62 cm), number of grains per cob (451.5), grain yield (3693 kg ha
-1), straw yield (6138 kg ha
-1), harvest index (37.48) and seed index (25.70 g) of maize (Table 2).
Improved growth parameters with full dose of N might be due to role of nitrogen in increasing cell division, cell elongation and chlorophyll formation. Similar findings reported by
Rekha (2014) and
Singh et al., (2015).
Relation between growth and yield parameters
Study of relation between different parameters while experimentation is important. Beneficial effect of different treatments on growth of crop, will ultimately result to positive effect on yield parameters and yield of crop. Linear regressions between different maize growth parameters and grain yield and yield parameters and grain yield presented in Fig 1 and Fig 2. Fig 1 shows that maize growth parameters effectively contribute to the maize grain yield. Plant height at harvest and leaf area at 60 DAS contributes 89% and 83% to grain yield of maize respectively. Moreover, the influence of the chlorophyll content and dry matter production at 60 DAS on the grain yield of maize is greater than plant height and leaf area (90% and 93% respectively). Fig 2 shows that maize grain yield is highly dependent to different yield parameters of maize. Number of grains per cob, cob length, seed index and cob girth strongly influence grain yield of maize with regression coefficients of 0.97, 0.95, 0.94 and 0.92 respectively.
Interaction effect
It was observed that the interaction between residue management and nitrogen management in maize (R × N) found significant, in case of grain yield of maize. The data revealed that residue incorporation of legumes with application of 100% RDN (R1N1) resulted in significantly the highest grain yield of maize (4035 kg ha
-1) than rest of combinations (Fig 3). Even residue incorporation significantly increases grain yield of maize at all levels of nitrogen. It increased grain yield by 20%, 11% and 7% as compare to residue removal at 100%, 75% and 50% recommended dose of nitrogen application.
Study of all three-factor interaction
i.e. crping systems, residue management and nitrogen management in maize (C × R × N) revealed that in the second year (2018) interaction was found significant, in case of grain yield of maize. Cluster bean-maize cropping system with residue incorporation and 100% RDN (C3R1N1) recorded significantly higher grain yield of maize (4492 kg ha
-1), followed by groundnut-maize cropping system with similar treatment combination (C
2R
1N
1) (4130 kg ha
-1) (Fig 4).
Residue incorporation of cluster bean and groundnut with 75% RDN application in maize gave comparable results with residue removal with 100% RDN application for grain yield. This indicates 25% saving of fertilizer nitrogen application with residue incorporation of legume crops like cluster bean and groundnut. Further residue incorporation of cluster bean at 100% RDN application improve 25% yield increase over residue removal with similar nitrogen application level. However, the interaction was found significant only in second year it means more repetition of research needed for consistent result.