Weather parameters
The crop growing period of green gram lied between 15
th-26
th SMW in both the seasons
i.e. summer 2016 and 2017. The rainfall data of the green gram for the both seasons presented in Fig 1 and 2 revealed that a total of 102.00 mm and 251.40 mm of rainfall was received during summer 2016 2017, respectively. A large variation was recorded in the total rainfall received by green gram in both the seasons, wherein summer season of 2017 recorded higher rainfall than summer 2016. Green gram grown during summer 2016 received 25.11 per cent less rainfall than the seasonal normal rainfall (136.20), whereas green gram during summer 2017 received 84.58 per cent more rainfall than the seasonal normal rainfall (136.20 mm) during their respective crop growing periods.
Green gram during summer 2016 and 2017 recorded a maximum temperature of 40.9°C in the 20
th Standard meteorological week (SMW) and 39.9°C in the 19
th and 23
rd Standard meteorological week (SMW) and minimum temperature of 13.9°C and 11.9°C at sowing in the 15
th Standard meteorological week (SMW) during both the summer seasons, respectively. The average maximum temperature recorded for summer moong during summer 2016 was 37.4°C which was above the average normal maximum temperature (37.1°C) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of (+0.3°C) , whereas during summer 2017, the average maximum temperature was 36.8°C which was below the average normal maximum temperature (37.1°C) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of -0.35°C. The average minimum temperature recorded for summer moong during summer 2016 was 21.3°C which was below the average normal minimum temperature (21.59°C) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of -0.3°C, whereas during summer 2017,the average minimum temperature was 20.5°C which was below the average normal minimum temperature (21.6°C) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of -1.1°C. Meteorological data on relative humidity for green gram during 2016 revealed that, mean weekly maximum (morning) and minimum (after noon) relative humidity ranged from 77 to 89 per cent and 39 to 69 per cent whereas during
rabi 2017, mean weekly maximum (morning) and minimum (after noon) relative humidity ranged from 76 to 86 per cent and 41 to 58 per cent, respectively.
The average maximum relative humidity recorded for green gram during summer 2016 was 61.42 per cent which was above the average normal maximum relative humidity (59.39 per cent) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of +2.03, whereas during summer 2017, the average maximum relative humidity was 63.17 per cent which was above the average normal maximum relative humidity (59.39 per cent) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of +3.78. The average minimum relative humidity recorded for green gram during summer 2016 was 35.48 per cent which was above the average normal minimum relative humidity (33.01 per cent) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of +2.47, whereas during summer 2017, the average minimum relative humidity was 34.92 per cent which was below the average normal minimum relative humidity (33.01 per cent) and the extent of variation from the normal values was to the tune of +1.91. The analysis of weather parameters of green gram for the two years exhibit that there is a considerable variation in the amount of rainfall and relative humidity, whereas a marginal variation in temperature was recorded between the crops in both the crop growing seasons. Variation in amount in rainfall and its distribution influenced the vegetative growth of the green gram and indirectly its yield attributing characters. In nut shell, it can be deducted that of these two important weather parameters of rainfall and humidity, the impact of rainfall is quite considerate to influence the growth and yield.
Growth parameters
The pooled data of growth parameters of green gram presented in Table 1 revealed that plant height (cm) and dry matter accumulation (g/plant) in green gram at maturity was significantly affected by differential substitution of nutrients through organics. Significantly highest plant height (57.79 cm) and dry matter accumulation (12.93 g/plant) in green gram was recorded with treatment recommended dose of fertilizer which was found statistically at par with treatments 25% yearly replacement of RDF through vermicompost and Fym (1:1) on N basis with plant height and dry matter accumulation (56.81 cm and 12.85 g/plant), 75% NPK+25% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1) (57.49 cm and12.91 g/plant), 75% NPK+25% N through vermicompost (56.55cm and 12.78 g/plant), 25% yearly replacement of RDF through vermicompost on N basis (54.83 cm and 12.74 g/plant), 25% yearly replacement of RDF through Fym on N basis (54.30 cm and 12.65 g/plant) and 75% NPK+25% N through Fym (54.27 cm and 12.67 g/plant) at harvest in descending order whereas significantly lowest plant height (38.60 cm) and dry matter accumulation (9.43 g/plant) at harvest was recorded with treatments 100% N through Fym which was found statistically at par with treatments 100% N through Vermicompost, 100% N through Vermicompost and FYM (1:1), 25% NPK+75% N through Fym, 25% NPK+75% N through vermicompost and 25% NPK+75% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1) and with plant heights 38.89 cm, 39.07 cm, 39.15 cm, 39.25 cm and dry matter accumulation 9.56 g/plant, 9.67 g/plant, 9.74 g/plant, 9.80 g/plant in the increasing order respectively. Treatments 50% NPK+50% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1), 50% NPK+50% N through vermicompost and 50% NPK+50% N through Fym with plant height and dry matter accumulation (46.94 cm and 11.29 g/plant), (46.39 cm and 11.23 g/plant) and (46.19 cm and 11.20 g/plant) at harvest were found significantly different from all other treatments in these growth parameters. The highest growth parameters with treatment T
1, T
12, T
16, T
2, T
6, T
7 and T
11 was might be due to reason that initially application of more quantity of inorganic fertilizers improved availability of nutrients to green gram plants and in later phases by organic manures contributed for increase in plant height with these treatments. Increased in plant height might increase number of leaves in green gram which bring about more accumulation of photosynthates resulting in increase in dry matter accumulation in green gram. These results were in conformity with findings of
Kohler et al., (2008) and
Mannivannan et al., (2009).
Yield
It is evident from the pooled data of yield of green gram depicted in Table 2 that seed and stover yield of green gram were significantly affected with differential substitution of nutrients through organics. Significantly highest seed yield (10.00 q/ha) and stover yield (41.10 q/ha) of green gram was recorded with treatment 100% recommended dose of fertilizer which was found statistically at par with treatments 75% NPK+25% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1), 25% yearly replacement of RDF through vermicompost and Fym (1:1) on N basis, 75% NPK+25% N through vermicompost, 25% yearly replacement of RDF through vermicompost on N basis, 75% NPK+ 25% N through Fym and 25% yearly replacement of RDF through Fym on N basis with seed and stover yields (9.90 q/ha and 40.93 q/ha), (9.87 q/ha and 40.70 q/ha), (9.84 q/ha and 40.47 q/ha), (9.74 q/ha and 40.31 q/ha), (9.72 q/ha and 40.02 q/ha), (9.69 q/ha and 39.36 q/ha) in the descending order whereas significantly lowest (6.61 q/ha and 23.97 q/ha) seed and stover yield of green gram was recorded with treatment T10 which was also found statistically at par with treatments100% N through vermicompost,100% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1), 25% NPK+75% N through Fym, 25% NPK+75% N through vermicompost and 25% NPK+75% N through vermicompost and Fym (1:1) with seed and stover yields (6.64 q/ha and 25.41 q/ha),(6.66 q/ha and 26.11 q/ha), (6.68 q/ha and 26.47 q/ha),(6.71 q/ha and 26.67 q/ha) and (6.74 q/ha and 27.17 q/ha) in the ascending order respectively. Highest seed yield in green gram with recommended dose of fertilizer was might be due to higher yield attributes which eventually amplified the seed yield of green gram whereas significantly maximum straw yields in treatments T
1, T
12, T
16, T
2, T
6, T
7 and T
11was might be due to dynamic vegetative growth and maximum dry matter accumulation (g/plant) in these treatments. These results were in line with the findings of
Meena et al., (2015).
Nutrient content
The pooled data of nutrient content in presented in Table 3 depicts that highest nitrogen content (4.640 per cent and 2.098 per cent), phosphorus content (0.487 per cent and 0.262 per cent) and potassium content (1.400 per cent and 1.218 per cent) in seed and stover of green gram whereas lowest nitrogen content (4.640 per cent and 2.098 per cent), phosphorus content (0.487 per cent and 0.262 per cent) and potassium content (1.400 per cent and 1.218 per cent) in seed and stover of green gram was recorded with treatment 100% recommended dose of fertilizer followed by treatments T
12, T
16, T
2, T
6, T
7, T
11, T
13, T
3, T
8, T
14, T
4, T
9, T
15 and T
5 in nitrogen content, phosphorus content and potassium content in seed and stover of green gram the ascending order.
The highest N content concentration in treatment 100% N through Fym was might be due to increase in nitrate reductase which is a primary component of amino acids which aids in the synthesis of protein in grain. These results were comparable with the results of
Dadhich et al., (2001) whereas organic residue decomposition and also solubilise the fixed form of N and P in soil resulting in increased uptake of N and P by the crop. These results were in conformity with the findings of (Dhakal 2016).
Economics
The practicability and usefulness of a treatment is judged in terms of net returns. As it is evident from pooled data of cost of cultivation of green gram presented in Table 4 that highest cost of cultivation (Rs.19891/ha) of green gram was recorded with treatment 100% N through vermicompost whereas lowest cost of cultivation (Rs.14460/ha) was recorded with treatment 100% N through FYM. Variation in cost of cultivation in treatments was might be due to variation in cost of organic manures associated with these treatments. The pooled highest gross returns (Rs. 54077/ha), net returns (Rs.37815/ha) and benefit cost ratio (2.33) was recorded with treatment 100% recommended dose of fertilizers whereas lowest gross returns (Rs. 36161/ha) was recorded with treatment 25% NPK+75% N through Fym whereas lowest net returns (Rs.16656/ha) and benefit cost ratio (0.85) in green gram after two years was recorded with treatments 25% NPK+75% N through vermicompost. Difference in net returns and benefit ratio was might be due to collective effects of yield and price of green gram under these treatments. These results were in agreement with the findings of
Yadav et al., (2004).