Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 45 issue 7 (july 2022) : 834-838

Diversity Analysis in Horse Gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] Mutants

V. Pushpayazhini1, R. Sudhagar2, C. Vanniarajan1, S. Juliet Hepziba1, J. Souframanien3
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Madurai-625 104, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Sugarcane Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Melalathur, Vellore-635 806, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Apex Project Coordinator and Research Group Leader, Pulses Improvement Section, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, GOI, Trombay, Mumbai-400 085, Maharashtra, India.
  • Submitted12-07-2021|

  • Accepted16-09-2021|

  • First Online 11-10-2021|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-4726

Cite article:- Pushpayazhini V., Sudhagar R., Vanniarajan C., Hepziba Juliet S., Souframanien J. (2022). Diversity Analysis in Horse Gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] Mutants . Legume Research. 45(7): 834-838. doi: 10.18805/LR-4726.

Background: Horse gram is the potential rainfed legume in Indian farming. The major limitation in horse gram breeding is the narrow variability. Variability induction and its estimation would sustain food security. 

Methods: Variability was induced using gamma rays, electron beam and ethyl methanesulfonate and their combinations. The induced variation for the economic traits, their inheritance and genetic gain were ascertained. 

Result: The analysis of variance indicated the induction of significant variation for yield attributing traits. The population was grouped into 10 constellations by the virtue of induced variation. The groups I, II and V were the largest comprising of 38, 31 and 19 mutants respectively. The mutants exhibited significant intra and inter group variation. The mutagens induced the maximum variability for plant height (32.24%), 100 seed weight (25.42%) and number of pods per plant (19.18%). The mutants possessed high genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation for all the characters except flowering traits and duration. The induced variability for the yield attributing traits possessed significant breeding value as the heritability (86.66%-99.72%) and genetic advance as percent of mean (10.65-81.94) were high and the environmental influence was the minimum.

Horse gram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] is the lifesaving legume for resource poor and marginal land farmers of India. It is known for its nutritive and therapeutic values since millennia (Kumar, 2006). Owing to its genome re-silencing capacity to various biotic and abiotic stresses it helps to sustain the nutritional security in the rainfed farming (Purushottam et al., 2017). The potential yield of horse gram is challenged by few undesirable agronomic traits like photo-sensitivity, fairly long duration, after duration pod shattering at maturity and susceptibility to few foliar diseases like yellow mosaic virus and powdery mildew (Dutta et al., 2020). Identification and utilization of donor and /or resistant parents for these negative traits would help in realizing the potential yield. Presence of variability for yield attributing traits is limited in the horse gram germplasm (Chahota et al., 2013). The flower morphology, pollination behavior and flower shedding after hybridization limit the success of classical plant breeding. The horse gram varieties PAIYUR 2 and CRIDA 1-18 R are the promising cultivars in Southern India. The diploid and comparatively small genome size of horse gram favours the usage of induced mutagenesis for variability evolution. The success of induced mutagenesis in variability creation was witnessed in horse gram (Priyanka et al., 2021a). The breeding value of the mutants can be ascertained through estimating the induced variability for yield attributing traits and their genetic structure. Mahalonobis D2 statistic (Mahalanobis, 1936) is one such methodology that helps in drawing meaningful information and assists in predicting the breeding value including horse gram (Priyanka et al., 2019).Therefore, this experiment was framed with the objective of ascertaining the magnitude of variability and other associated genetic parameters in an induced mutant population.
Genetic material and data documentation
 
During rabi season 2017, the horse gram varieties PAIYUR 2 and CRIDA 1-18 R were mutated with gamma rays (G) (100, 200, 300 and 400 Gy), electron beam (EB) (100, 200, 300 and 400 Gy), G+EB (100, 200, 300 and 400 Gy) and combination of G and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) (G: 100-400 Gy + EMS: 0.3%). The potential M2 segregants were tagged during rabi 2018 and the homozygosity was checked during rabi 2019 in M3 for the promising mutant families. A total of 123 promising homozygous mutant families were forwarded to Mgeneration during rabi 2020 at Sugarcane Research Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Melalathur. The mutants were grown in the randomized block design (RBD) in three replications along with field fertility gradient. The crop was grown in an ideal cultivation condition. For estimating the breeding value, only 110 mutant families (TNAU-HG-001 to TNAU-HG-110) were considered as the other 13 mutants were suffered by inferior agronomical traits. Eleven biometrical traits viz., days to first lowering, days to fifty percent flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), number of primary branches per plant, number of clusters per plant, number of pods per cluster, number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, single plant yield (g) and 100 seed weight (g) were documented at appropriate growth stages. For data documentation twenty plants were randomly selected at each replication. The genotypic and phenotypic coefficients of variation were estimated according to Burton (1952) and classified as per SivaSubramanian and Menon (1973). Broad sense heritability (H2) was computed as suggested by Lush (1949) and the traits were grouped as per Johnson et al., (1955). The genetic advance as percent of mean was arrived and categorized (Johnson et al., 1955). The Mahalonobis Dstatistic (Mahalanobis, 1936) was done through Indostat software version 7.1. The D2 was calculated by squaring the generalized distance and thereon utilized for clustering the mutant families as suggested by Tocher method as advocated by Rao (1952).
Horse gram is the arid rabi legume provides ray of scope of nutrient sustainability in the Indian marginal lands. The yield of horse gram is hampered by few inherent agronomic traits linked to growth and duration. The tune of variability is the basic requirement of crop improvement program (Bhandari et al., 2017), horse gram is not an exception. Horse gram improvement is slowed by limited variability (Chahota et al., 2013). Induced mutagenesis widens the variability (Priyanka et al., 2021a and b). Ascertaining the breeding value of a mutant population would strengthen the breeding program. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to understand the divergence for traits in a population. In the current study it displayed statistically significant difference for all the eleven quantitative traits (Table 1) which indicated the presence of wide variability. Earlier Priyanka et al., (2019) also reported significant difference among the yield attributing traits and utility of D2 statistic. Significant variation due to replication was witnessed which was possibly due to variation in fertility gradient at blocks as the experiment was laid out along with field fertility gradient and large number of genotypes.
 

Table 1: Analysis of variance for quantitative traits in horse gram mutants.


       
The 110 mutants and two checks were grouped into ten clusters (Table 2). The cluster I was the largest with 38 mutants followed by II (31 mutants), V (19 mutants), IV (11 mutants) and III (7 mutants). The number of solitary clusters was quite high (Table 2) which indicating the potential of induced mutagenesis in evolving unique mutants as the study material were not collected from different geographical regions. An array of useful trait specific mutants was also identified for further utilization. Priyanka et al., (2021b) established the potential of induced mutagenesis in variability evolution and formation of solitary clusters by Varma et al., (2013).
 

Table 2: Clustering pattern and promising horse gram mutants.


       
The induced mutagenesis created the maximum variability for plant height (32.24%), 100 seed weight (25.42%) and number of pods per plant (19.18%) while it failed to induce variability for days to maturity (Fig 1). Therefore, the probability is high to improve the test traits except days to maturity by classical hybridization and selection thereon. This is in confirmatory with the earlier findings of Priyanka et al., (2021b).
       
The highest intra cluster distance exhibited by cluster V (19.94) and cluster IV (19.93) (Table 3) revealed the wide genetic base and thus could be utilized for genetic advancement (Puneet, 2004). Zero intra cluster distance was observed between the clusters VI, VII, VIII and IX, indicating the close relatedness. The measurements of inter cluster distance is an indicative selection tool for identification of promising clusters. The maximum inter cluster distance was noticed between the clusters X and VIII (67.18), followed by clusters X and IX (65.57) and clusters X and III (63.94) mooted the idea of hybridization between these diverse clusters to evolve heterotic segregants. On contrary, the minimum distance was observed between the clusters VII and II (20.60) followed by cluster VI and II (21.21) indicating the close relatedness of mutants (Durga Kanaka, 2012). The estimate of average cluster mean helps in selection of trait specific mutants (Table 4). Cluster X had the lowest cluster mean values for days to first flowering (32.50), days to fifty percent flowering (35.83) and days to maturity (90.50) and hence favorably be considered to evolve genotypes with early duration. Cluster III (75.04), cluster IX (69.26) and cluster VI (57.25) possessed the highest mean values pronounced their suitability to generate high yielding genotypes. The solitary cluster VI had the maximum mean value for plant height (197.63). The other solitary clusters VII, VIII and IX possessed the highest mean values for number of seeds per pod (6.33), number of pods per plant (578.67) and number of clusters per plant (245.83) respectively. These clusters shall be considered for specific trait improvement.
 

Table 3: Details of mean intra (bold) and inter cluster distance in horse gram mutants.


 

Table 4: Cluster mean values obtained by Tocher’s method for quantitative traits in horse gram mutants.


       
In the quest, high estimates of GCV and PCV were observed for all the experimented quantitative traits except days for flowering and maturity and that indicated the existence of adequate variability (Table 5).  Earlier, Priyanka et al., (2019) reported wide variability for these traits. However Alle et al., (2015) reported the lowest GCV and PCV for flowering and maturity. The PCV was found to be slightly higher than GCV indicating the less environmental influence and therefore phenotypic based selection could be relied upon for improvement.
 

Table 5: Estimates of genetic parameters for quantitative traits in horse gram mutants.


       
High H2 (86.66 % - 99.72%) was observed for all traits which indicated the non-significant influence of environment. Combined estimate of H2 and GAM provides an opportunity to predict genetic gain (Table 5). High heritability coupled with high GAM was observed for all traits indicating the preponderance of additive gene action. Therefore, these traits could be improved by phenotype based selection. High H2 and GAM were reported for yield attributing traits except flowering and maturity traits (Joshi et al., 2007). 
It can be concluded that the induced mutagenesis has the capacity to evolve significant variation in horse gram and it is highly heritable. The improved traits are governed by additive gene action and further they can be improved using phenotypic selection.
The authors are indebted to the BRNS, Mumbai for funding the project. The scientific help rendered by Dr. S. Priyanka, Dr. S. Rajkumar, Teaching Assistant (Plant Breeding and Genetics), Dr. K. Ramachandiran, Teaching Assistant (Agronomy) and Ms. M. Nisha, Assistant Agricultural Officer, Sugarcane Research Station, Melalathur are kindly acknowledged.

  1. Alle, R., Hemalatha, V., Eswari, K.B. and Swarnalatha, V. (2015). Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis for yield and its components in horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.]. Green Farming 7: 1-4.

  2. Bhandari, H.R., Bhanu, A.N., Srivastava K, Singh M.N., Shreya and Hemantaranjan, A. (2017). Assessment of genetic diversity in crop plants- An overview. Advances in Plants and Agricultural Research. 7: 279-286. 

  3. Burton, G.W. (1952). Quantitative Inheritance in Grasses. Proceedings of 6th International Grassland Congress 1: 277-283. 

  4. Chahota, R.K., Sharma, T.R., Sharma, S.K., Kumar, N. and Rana, J.C. (2013). Genetic and Genomic Resources of Grain Legume Improvement: 12. Horsegram. Elsevier Insights. 293-305.

  5. Durga Kanaka, K. (2012). Variability and divergence in horsegram (Dolichos uniflorus). Journal of Arid Land. 4(1): 71-76. 

  6. Dutta, U., Gupta, S., Jamwal, A. and Jamwal, S. (2020). Diseases of Field Crops: Diagnosis and Management. 1st Edn. Apple Academic Press. pp. 91-104.

  7. Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environment variability in soybean. Agronomy Journal. 47: 314-318.

  8. Joshi, S.N., Bhave, S.G., Bendale, V.W., Jadhav, B.B. and Sawant, S.S. (2007). Analysis of genetic variability and correlation in horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam) Verdc.].  Research on Crops. 8(3): 632-635.

  9. Kumar, D. (2006). Horsegram: An Introduction. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India. pp: 1-10.

  10. Lush, J.L. (1949). Intra - Size Correlation on Regression of Off Spring on Dams as a Method of Estimating Heritability of Character. Proceedings of American Society of Animal Production. 33: 293-301.

  11. Mahalanobis, P.C. (1936). On the Generalized Distance in Statistics. Proceedings of National Institute of Sciences (India) 2: 49-55.

  12. Priyanka, S., Sudhagar, R., Vanniarajan, C. and Ganesamurthy, K. (2019). Investigation on genetic variability parameters and association of traits in horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.]. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 8(2): 656-664.

  13. Priyanka, S., Sudhagar, R., Vanniarajan, C., Ganesamurthy, K. and Souframanien, J. (2021a). Induction of genetic variability for quantitative traits in horsegram (Macrotyloma uniflorum) through irradiation mutagenesis. Journal of Environmental Biology. 42: 597-608.

  14. Priyanka, S., Sudhagar, R., Vanniarajan, C. and Ganesamurthy, K. (2021b). Assessment of genetic divergence in horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.] using quantitative traits. Legume Research. 44: 261-267

  15. Puneet, D. (2004). Genetic divergence for yield and quality attributes in horsegram [Macrotyloma uniflorum (Lam.) Verdc.]. (Master’s Thesis). Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya. 

  16. Purushottam, Kumar, R., Barman, R. and Saren, B.K. (2017). Improvement of neglected horse gram production for benefit of mankind. International Journal of Bio-resource, Environment and Agricultural Sciences. 3(2): 521-527.

  17. Rao, C.R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. New York: John Wiley and Sons. American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 12: 268-270.

  18. SivaSubramanian, P. and Menon, P.M. (1973). Genotypic and phenotypic variability in rice. Madras Agricultural Journal. 60: 1093-1096.

  19. Varma, V., Sandeep, K., Durga, K. and Ankaiah, R. (2013). Research Note Assessment of genetic diversity in horsegram (Dolichos uniflorus). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding. 4(2): 1175-1179.

Editorial Board

View all (0)