The analysis of variance for all the eleven characters were carried out before proceeding for detailed statistical analysis and the results were presented in Table 1. It was cleared from the table that genotypes differ significantly for all character except number of primary branches per plant. This indicated the presence of inherent differences among the genotypes. Hence, it was proved that suitable experimental materials were chosen for present investigation. The analysis of variance for combining ability showed that both additive and non additive gene action were important for controlling the expression of traits under investigation.
The aim of estimating heterotic effects in present study is to find out the best combinations of parents giving high degree of heterobeltiosis and its exploitation to get better transgressive segregants and characterization of parents for their prospects for future use in chickpea breeding. The magnitude of heterosis, measured as per cent increase or decrease of F
1 value over mind parent (MPH) and better parent (heterobeltiosis) for all the characters under study are presented in Table 2.
Overall results on heterosis on eleven yield contributing traits showed that, none of the cross exhibited heterosis for all the traits. Based on per se performance and SCA, the superior crosses were ICC14815×ICC16348 and ICC14815×ICC16349 for days to 50% flowering, while PG5×ICC16348 for days to maturity based on SCA and heterosis, for number of secondary branches per plant the superior crosses were PG5×ICC14778 and ICC13124 ×ICC14778 based on per se and SCA. Based on SCA and heterosis, top crosses were PG5×PG170 and ICC13124 ×ICC16348 for number of pods per plant, while ICC14778 ×ICC16348 for number of seeds per pod, ICC13124 ×ICC14815 for 100 seed weight, ICC13124×ICC16348 for biological yield. However, ICC13124×ICC14815 and ICC13124×ICC16348 were superior for seed yield per plant based on per se performance and heterosis; while ICC13124×ICC14815 based on per se and SCA. For harvest index the promising crosses were PG5×PG170, ICC13124 ×ICC14778, ICC14778×ICC16348 based on SCA and heterosis. The cross PG170×ICC16349 was heterotic for seed yield per plant and 100 seed weight. Its heterotic performance was corresponded with its high SCA in 100 seed weight. The heterotic performance of ICC13124 ×ICC14778 for seed yield per plant was also compared with per se performance and high GCA of ICC13124 and high SCA (Fig 1 and 2). Crosses ICC13124×ICC14815 and ICC13124×ICC16348 exhibited heterotic performance over better and mid parent for seed yield per plant and harvest index. The cross ICC13124×ICC16348 showed heterosis for days to maturity over better parent and for number of seeds per plant over mid parent. However, cross ICC13124 ×ICC14815 showed heterosis over mid parent for 100 seed weight. Higher heterotic expression in the crosses was due to high SCA effect for most of the yield components. On the basis of cross combinations showing highest heterosis in desired direction and best SCA estimates for most of the characters, it is evident that crosses showing high extent of heterosis have high SCA estimates. This indicated that manifestation of heterosis depends upon high estimates of SCA. The studies pertaining to exploitation of heterosis for various yield related traits in chickpea have been conducted by several workers.
In agreement with above findings,
Arora and Jeena (2000) reported significant heterosis over mid parent and better parent for all yield and yield contributing traits.
Sarod et al., (2000) reported high heterosis for seed yield per plant, pods per plant and 100 seeds weight. The high heterotic effects for secondary branches, biological yield, number of pods/plant, seed yield and plant height observed by
Sharif et al., (2001); Bhatnagar et al., (2006) observed for days to flower, plant height, number of primary branches, number of secondary branches, number of pods per plant, 100 seed weight, seed yield per plant and harvest index.
Sarode et al., (2016) for seed yield per plant.
Babbar (2017) reported significant positive heterosis for days to 50% flowering, days to pod initiation, number of primary branches, effective pods per plant, number of seeds per plant and seed yield per plant.
Bakhsh et al., (2007) observed heterosis over mid parent for primary and secondary branches per plant, 100 seed weight, seed yield per plant and biological yield.
Gadekar and Dodiya (2013) reported high significant positive economic heterosis for seed yield per plant, biological yield per plant and number of pods per plant.
Bhardwaj et al., (2010) also reported heterosis for number of pods.
Parameshwarappa, et al., (2012) reported high positive significant mid parent heterosis for number of pods per plant. High heterosis for seed yield per plant, 100-seed weight over desi parent and for yield per plant alone over kabuli parent in desi×kabuli crosses was observed by
Gupta et al., 2003.