Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.32, CiteScore: 0.906

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 42 issue 3 (june 2019) : 308-313

Yield and Stability for agronomic and seed quality traits of common bean genotypes under Mediterranean conditions

A. Kargiotidou, F. Papathanasiou, D. Baxevanos, D.N. Vlachostergios, S. Stefanou, I. Papadopoulos
1Industrial and Forage Crops Institute, Hellenic Agricultural Organization-Demeter, Larissa, 41335, Greece.

  • Submitted05-06-2018|

  • Accepted06-09-2018|

  • First Online 13-03-2019|

  • doi 10.18805/LR-437

Cite article:- Kargiotidou A., Papathanasiou F., Baxevanos D., Vlachostergios D.N., Stefanou S., Papadopoulos I. (2019). Yield and Stability for agronomic and seed quality traits of common bean genotypes under Mediterranean conditions. Legume Research. 42(3): 308-313. doi: 10.18805/LR-437.

ABSTRACT

Common bean is the most significant pulse in Mediterranean countries and high yield performance is required to become commercially successful. Seven common bean genotypes were evaluated for yield and stability along with their interrelationship with agronomical, physicochemical and quality characteristics. An analysis of variance was conducted to test main effects and interactions between plant traits and environments. Significant variation among genotypes occurred for seed yield and a strong positive correlation was observed between seed yield and pods m-2. High Genetic Coefficient of Variation (GCV) values combined with high heritability for traits as seed yield, cooking time, hydration capacity and protein content were recorded. The GGE biplot analysis indicated two cultivars as superior genotypes that combine high yield, stability, short cooking time and high protein content. Furthermore, a local population assessed as promising genetic material for the selection of elite lines with high yield and short cooking time. 

REFERENCES

  1. Angioi, S.A., Rau, D., Attene,G., Nanni, L., Bellucci, E., Logozzo, G., Negri, V., Spagnoletti, Zeuli, P.L., Papa, R. (2010). Beans in Europe: origin and structure of the European landraces of Phaseolus vulgaris. Theor. App. Gen., 121: 829-843.
  2. AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis, 17th ed Association of Official Agicultural Chemists; Washington DC.
  3. Barros, M., Prudencio, S.H. (2016). Physical and chemical characteristics of common bean varieties. Ciências Agrárias. 37(2): 751-    762.
  4. Berrios, J.D.J., Swanson, B.G., Cheong, W.A. (1999). Physico-chemical characterization of stored black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Res. Int., 32: 669-676.
  5. Bishnoi, S., Khetarpaul, N. (1993).Variability in physico-chemical properties and nutrient composition of different pea cultivars. Food Chem., 47: 371-373.
  6. Del Valle, J.M., Stanley, D.W., Bourne, M.C. (1992).Water absorption and swelling in dry bean seeds. J. Food Process. Preserv., 16: 75-98.
  7. Devi, J., Sharma, A., Singh, Y., Katoch, V., Sharma, K.C. (2015). Genetic variability and character association studies in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under North-Western Himalayas. Legume Res., 38(2): 149-156.
  8. Elia, F.M., Hosfield, G.L., Uebersax, M.A. (1997). Genetic analysis and interrelationships between traits for cooking time, water absorption, and protein and tannin content of Andean dry beans. J. Am. Soc. Horti. Sci., 122: 512-518.
  9. González, A.M., Monteagudo, A.B., Casquero, P.A., De Ron, A.M., Santalla, M. (2006). Genetic variation and environmental effects on agronomical and commercial quality traits in the main European market classes of dry bean. Field Crops Res., 95: 336–    347.
  10. Graham, P.H., Ranalli, P. (1997). Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res., 53: 131-146.
  11. Iliadis, C. (2001). Effects of harvesting procedure, storage time and climatic conditions on cooking time of lentils (Lens culinaris Medicus). J. Sci. Food Agic., 81: 590-593.
  12. Kamboj, R., Nanda, V. (2018). Proximate composition, nutritional profile and health benefits of legumes-A review. Legume Res., 41(3):1-8.
  13. Kigel, J. (1999). Culinary and nutritional quality of Phaseolus vulgaris seeds as affected by environmental factors. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 3(4): 205-209.
  14. Mavromatis, A.G., Arvanitoyannis, I.S., Korkovelos, A.E., Giakountis, A., Chatzitheodorou, V.A. Goulas, C.K. (2010). Genetic diversity among common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Greek landraces and commercial cultivars: nutritional components RAPD and morphological markers. Span. J. Agric. Res., 8(4):986-994.
  15. McIntosh, M.S. (1983). Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J., 75: 153-155.
  16. Mekbib, F. (2003). Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Euphytica, 130: 147-153.
  17. Mkanda, A.V., Minnaar, A., de Kock, H.L. (2007). Relating consumer preferences to sensory and physicochemical properties of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Sci. Food Agric., 87:2868–2879.
  18. Osborn, T.C., Brown, J.W. (1988). Genetic control of bean seed protein. Crit. Rev. in Plant Sci., 7: 93-116.
  19. Razvi, S.M., Khan, M.N., Bhat M.A., Ahmad M., Ganaie S.A., Sheikh, F.A., Najeeb S. Parry, F.A. (2018). Morphological variability and phylogenetic analysis in Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Legume Res., 41(2): 1-5.
  20. SAS Institute Inc. (2009). JMP/Sales Department. Cary, NC, USA.
  21. Sneller, C.H, Kilgore-Norquest, L., Dombek, D. (1997). Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Sci., 37: 383-390.
  22. Sozen, O., Karadavut, U., Ozcelik, H., Bozoglu, H., Akcura, M. (2018). Genotype x environment interaction of some dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Legume Res., 41(2): 189-195.
  23. Tokatlidis, I., Vlachostergios, D. (2016). Sustainable stewardship of the landrace diversity. Diversity, 8(4): 29. 
  24. Vakali, C., Baxevanos, D., Vlachostergios, D., Tamoutsidis, E., Papathanasiou, F., Papadopoulos, I. (2017). Genetic characterization of agronomic, physiochemical, and quality parameters of dry bean landraces under low-input farming. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 19: 957-967.
  25. White, J.W., Gonzalez, A. (1990). Characterization of the negative association between seed yield and seed size among genotypes of common bean. Field Crops Res., 23: 159–175.
  26. Zeven, A.C. (1998). Landraces: A review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104: 127–139.
  27. Yan, W., Kang, M.S. (2003). GGEbiplot analysis: a graphical tool for breeders, geneticists and agronomists. CRC Press. Boca Raton FL. 
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)