Impact of Irrigation Methods, Irrigation Scheduling and Mulching on Seed Yield and Water Productivity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-4188    | Article Id: LR-4188 | Page : 1247-1253
Citation :- Impact of Irrigation Methods, Irrigation Scheduling and Mulching on Seed Yield and Water Productivity of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum).Legume Research.2021.(44):1247-1253
P.R. Kumar, Santosh S. Mali, A.K. Singh and B.P. Bhatt santosh.icar@gmail.com
Address : ICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Farming System Research Centre for Hill and Plateau Region, Ranchi-834 010, Jharkhand, India.
Submitted Date : 2-07-2019
Accepted Date : 21-10-2019


An experiment was conducted to test the efficacy of irrigation methods and mulching in seed production of chickpea. Irrigation methods included drip with mulch (DM), drip without mulch (DNM) and check basin (CB) irrigation. Drip irrigation was scheduled at 1-day, 2-day and 7 days interval, while farmers’ practice of check basin irrigation at 7-day interval was considered as control. Plant parameters like height, horizontal spread, dry matter, root length and root spread, and number of pods were significantly influenced by irrigation levels and mulch. Seed yield of 17.7 and 16.8 q/ha was recorded for DM having 1-day and 2-day interval, respectively, which was about 82 and 73% higher over the control. The harvest index increased with increasing irrigation interval and was highest (57.4) under treatments with longer irrigation interval (DM7, DNM7 and CB7). Drip irrigation at 1-day and 2-day interval recorded the water productivities of 0.54 and 0.52 kg/m3, respectively as against 0.30 kg/m3 recorded in farmers practice. Polythene mulch with drip irrigation at 2-day irrigation interval is recommended for improving the yields and water productivity of chickpea cultivated under eastern plateau and hill region of India. 


Chickpea Drip irrigation Harvest index Mulching Productivity Test weight


  1. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, K., Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy ISBN 92-5-    104219-5.
  2. Barragan, J., Cots, L., Monserrat, J., Lopez, R., Wu, I. P. (2010). Water distribution uniformity and scheduling in micro-irrigation systems for water saving and environmental protection. Biosystems Engineering. 107(3): 202-211.
  3. Benjamin, J.G., Nielsen, D.C. (2006). Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crops Research. 97 (2–3): 248-253.
  4. Birbal, V.S. Rathore, N.S., Bhardwaj, S. Yadava, N.D. (2013). Influence of irrigation methods and mulches on pea (Pisum sativum L.) in ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) based vegetable production system under tropical climate of Rajasthan. Legume Research. 36 (6): 557–562.
  5. Biswas, S.K., Akanda, A.R., Rahman, M.S., Hossain, M.A. (2015). Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on yield, water-use efficiency and economics of tomato. Plant Soil Environment. 61(3): 97–102.
  6. Camp, C. R. (1998). Sub-surface drip irrigation: A review. Transactions of the ASAE. 41(5):1353-1367.
  7. Chauhan, J.S., Singh, B.B., Gupta, S. (2016). Enhancing pulses production in India through improving seed and variety replacement rates. Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding. 76 (4): 1-10, DOI: 10.5958/0975-6906.2016.00060.2.
  8. Doorenbos, J., Pruitt, W. O. (1977). Crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO, Rome, Italy.
  9. Fang X.-W., Turner N. C., Li F.-M. Siddique K. H. M. (2011). An early transient water deficit reduces flower number and pod production but increases seed size in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Crop and Pasture Science. 62(6):481-487.
  10. FAOSTAT. (2018). World Food Organization of the United Nations, Online Agricultural Database, FAO Rome, available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/ (accessed 15/10/2018).
  11. Fernandez-Garcia, P., Lopez-Bellido, L., Munoz-Romero, V., Lopez-Bellido, R. J. (2013). Chickpea water use efficiency as affected by tillage in rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Agricultural Water Management. 129:194-199.
  12. Halagalimath, S.P., Rajkumara, S. (2018). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to irrigation and hydrogel application in Vertisols. Legume Research. 41:259-262.
  13. Jabow, M. K. A., Ibrahim, O. H., Adam, H. S. (2015). Yield and water productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by different irrigation regimes and varieties under semi desert climatic conditions of Sudan. Agricultural Sciences. 6:1299-1308.
  14. Kadam, C.S., Thanki, J. D., Gudadhe, N. N. (2014). Response of chickpea to irrigation methods, fertilisers and biofertiliser under south gujarat condition. Indian Journal of Fertilizer. 10(4):20-24.
  15. Kaloki, P., Trethowan, R., Daniel, K. Y. T. (2019). Genetic and environmental influences on chickpea water use efficiency. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, DOI:10.1111/jac.12338.
  16. Kanber, R., Yazar, A., Köksal, H., Oguzer, V. (1992). Evapotranspiration of grapefruit in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Horticultural Science. 52: 53–62.
  17. Kashiwagi, J., Krishnamurthy, L., Gaur, P. M., Upadhyay, H. D., Varshney, R. K., Tobita, S. (2013). Traits of relevance to improve yield under terminal drought stress in chickpea (C.arietinum L.) Field Crops Research. 145: 88–95.
  18. Khodadadi, M. (2013). Effect of drought stress on yield and water relative content in chickpea. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production. 4: 1168–1172.
  19. Kumar, Neeraj and Nandwal, A.S. and Devi, Sarita and Sharma, K.D.and Yadav, Ashok and Waldia, R. S. (2010). Root characteristics, plant water status and CO2 exchange in relation to drought tolerance in chickpea. Journal of SAT Agricultural Research. 8: 1-5.
  20. Lal, M., Gupta, P. C., Pandey, R. K. (1988). Response of lentil to different irrigation schedules (Lens culinaris). LENS Newsletter. 15 (1): 20-23.
  21. Mafakheri, A., Siosemardeh, A., Bahramnejad, B., Struik, P. C., Sohrabi, Y. (2010) Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 4(8): 580-585.
  22. Mali, S. S., Jha, B. K., Singh, R., Meena, M. (2017). Bitter gourd response to surface and subsurface drip irrigation under different fertigation levels. Irrigation and drainage. 66 (4):615-625. DOI: 10.1002/ird.2146.
  23. Mali, S. S., Naik, S. K., Jha, B.K, Singh, A.K., Bhatt, B.P. (2019). Planting geometry and growth stage linked fertigation patterns: Impact on yield, nutrient uptake and water productivity of Chilli pepper in hot and sub-humid climate. Scientia Horticulturae. 249: 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.003.
  24. Mambani, B., Lal, R. (1983). Response of upland rice varieties to drought stress. I. Relation between root system development and leaf water potential. Plant Soil. 73: 59-72.
  25. Moemeni, F, Ghobadi, M., Jalali-Honarmand, S., Shekaari, P. (2013). Effect of supplementary irrigation on growth analysis of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences. 5(14): 1595-1600.
  26. Muehlbauer, F. J., Sarker, A. (2017). Economic Importance of Chickpea: Production, Value, and World Trade. The Chickpea Genome, [R. K. Varshney et al. (eds.)], Compendium of Plant Genomes, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-66117-9_2, © Springer International Publishing AG.
  27. Muniyappa, Mudalagiriyappa, Halesh, G.K., Ramachandrappa, B.K., Nagaraju, Sathish A. (2017). Growth parameters, yield attributes, yield and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as influenced by depth and interval of drip irrigation. Global Journal .of Bio-Sciences and Biotechnology. 6 (2): 229-233.
  28. Pasandi, M., Janmohammadi, M., Karimizadeh, R. (2014). Evaluation of genotypic response of kabuli chickpea (Cicer Arietinum L.) cultivars to irrigation regimes in northwest of Iran. Agriculture. 60(1): 22-30.
  29. Purushothaman, R., Krishnamurthya, L., Upadhyaya, H. D., Vadez, V., Varshney, R. K. (2016). Shoot traits and their relevance in terminal drought tolerance of chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) Field Crops Research. 197: 10–27.
  30. Razzak, A., Bahadur, M. M., Hafiz, M. H. R., Bala, P. (2017). Yield and yield components of chickpea influenced by irrigation level. International Journal Business Social Science Research. 5(4): 137-142.
  31. Sarkar, S., Sarkar, A. (2019). Role of irrigation and mulch in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth, productivity and moisture extraction pattern in Alluvial Zone of West Bengal, India. Legume Research. 42: 77-83.
  32. Singh, G. , Sekhon, H. S., Sharma, P. (2011). Effect of irrigation and biofertilizer on water use, nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 57(7): 715-726.
  33. Singh, G., Ram, H., Aggarwal, N., Turner, N. C. (2015). Irrigation of chickpea increases yield but not water productivity. Experimental Agriculture. 52 (1): 1-13.
  34. Singh, K. B., Saxena, M. C. (1990). Problems and prospects of stress resistance breeding in lentil (Lens culinaris). ICARDA. Syria. P.7.
  35. Singh, R.P. (2014). Status paper on pulses, Directorate of Pulses Development, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India. Available at: http://farmer.gov.in/imagedefault/pestanddiseasescrops/pulses.pdf (accessed 4/02/2019)
  36. Tagar, A., Chandio, F.A., Mari, I.A., Wagan, B. (2012). Comparative study of drip and furrow irrigation methods at farmer’s field in Umarkot. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. 6: 785–789.
  37. Ucak, A. B., Erman, M., Oguz, A. (2018). Identification of chickpea (Cicer arietinum.) Genotypes Tolerant to Water Stress. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin. 27: 7634-7642.
  38. Wnuk, A., Gorny, A. G., Bocianowski, J., Kozak, M. (2013). Visualizing harvest index in crops, Communications in Biometry and Crop Science. International Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture and Biology. 8(2): 48–59. 

Global Footprints