Genetic analysis for yield and yield attributes in greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek)

DOI: 10.18805/LR-3768    | Article Id: LR-3768 | Page : 349-355
Citation :- Genetic analysis for yield and yield attributes in greengram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek).Legume Research-An International Journal.2018.(41):349-355
R. Narasimhulu, N.V. Naidu and K.H.P. Reddy
Address : Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Sri Venkateswara Agricultural College, Tirupati-517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
Submitted Date : 17-08-2016
Accepted Date : 5-10-2016


Six basic generations viz., P1, P2, F1, F2, B1 and B2 of five selected crosses viz., LGG-460 × WGG-37, TM-96-2 × WGG-37, TM-96-2 × PM-112, MGG-295 × PM-110 and MGG-351 × PM-115 were studied to assess the nature and mode of gene action for yield and its component traits through generation mean analysis. In general, magnitude of dominance effects (h) has greater value than additive effects (d) for majority of the traits in all the crosses. All the traits are under the influence of duplicate epistasis besides additive type of gene effects for which bi-parental mating or inter-se mating may be adopted followed by pedigree method of selection to modify the genetic architecture of greengram for attaining higher yields with desirable properties.


Bi-parental mating Gene effects Generation mean analysis Greengram Tolerance to MYMV.


  1. Alam, A. M., Somta P. and Srinives P. (2014). Generation mean and path analyses of reaction to Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV) and yield-related traits in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). SABRAO J. Breed. Genet., 46(1): 150-159.
  2. Chandra, N. and Tickoo. J.L. (1998). Genetic analysis of protein content in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian J. Genet., 58(4): 475-478.
  3. Hayman, B. I. (1958). The separation of epistasis from additive and dominance variation in generation means. Heredity., 12: 371-390.
  4. Inderjit, S.M.S., Gill. and T.S. Bains. (2006). Generation mean analysis for yield attributing traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Indian J. Genet., 66(1): 47-48.
  5. Kempthorne, O. (1957). An Introduction to Genetic Statistics. John Wiley and Sons., New York.
  6. Khattak, G. S. S., Ashrafi M., and khan M.S. (2004). Assessment of genetic variation for yield and yield components in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) using generation means analysis. Pak. J. Bot., 36(3): 583-588.
  7. Khattak, G. S. S., Haq, M.A., Ashraf M. and Hassan S. (2002). Detection of epistasis and estimation of additive and dominance components of genetic variation for determinate growth habit in mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). J. Genet., 56: 1-7.
  8. Mather, K. (1949). Biometrical Genetics. Dover publication, Inc., New York.
  9. Mather, K and J.L. Jinks. (1982). Biometrical genetics: the theory of continuous variation. 3rd edition, Chapman and Hall., London. 90.
  10. Patel, M.B., Vachhani, J.H., Jivani, L.L., Patel B. N., and Kelaiya D.S. (2012). Inheritance of quantitative traits and yellow mosaic virus in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Inter. J. Agri. Sci., 8(2): 400-402.
  11. Poehlman, J.M. (1991). The mungbean, 1st edition, pp: 27–29. Oxford and IBH Publication Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India.
  12. Ram, T. (1997). Gene action for certain quantitative characters in greengram (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Indian J. Genet., 57(2): 143-148.
  13. Singh, A and Singh K.P. (1996). Genetic analysis of three mungbean crosses involving parents with different photo-thermal response for grain yield and component traits. Indian J. Genet., 56: 329-334.
  14. Singh, R.K. and Chaudhary B.D.. (1985). Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi. 302 p.
  15. Singh, V.K., Tyagi, K., Tomer, A.K., Singh M.N., and Nandan R (2007). Gene action for yield and yield attributing traits in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Legume Res., 30(1): 29-32.

Global Footprints