Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Research Article

Legume Research, volume 40 issue 2 (april 2017) : 331-334

Effect of Genotypes and phosphorus levels on growth analysis parameters of greengram (Vigna rediata L.)

Beerbal Singh Rajput*, R.L. Rajput
1<p>Rajmata Vidhyaraje Scindia Vishyavidyalaya, Gwalior-474 001, India</p>
Cite article:- Rajput* Singh Beerbal, Rajput R.L. (2017). Effect of Genotypes and phosphorus levels on growth analysis parameters of greengram (Vigna rediata L.) . Legume Research. 40(2): 331-334. doi: 10.18805/lr.v0i0.7584.

ABSTRACT

Field experiments were conducted at RVSKVV – College Research Farm, Gwalior (M.P.) during two kharif and summer seasons of 2009 and 2010 to study the effect of genotypes and phosphorus levels on growth parameters of greengram (Vigna radiate L.). The LAI, LAR, LAD, NAR, CGR and RGR increased upto 60 DAS and then decreased due to senescence and aging of leaves. On the average of two years data, the verities and phosphorus levels exerted significant impact upon these parameters at every stage of observation. Amongst the genotypes, TM 99-50 and amongst phosphorus levels, 60 kg P2O5 /ha recorded almost significantly higher growth analysis parameters at both the stages and both the seasons (kharif and summer). The second best genotype was TM 98-50 and second best phosphorus level was 30 kg P2O5 /ha to augment these parameters.

REFERENCES


  1. Arya, M.P.S. and Singh, Raghuvir (1996). Effect of N,P & K on the nodulation, growth and yield characters of horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum L.) Legume Research, 19: 65-69.

  2. Buttery, B.S. (1969). Effect of plant population and fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybean. Can. J.Plant Sci. 49: 659-684.

  3. Bhattacharya, A and vijaylaxmi (2005). Genetic diversity in mung bean phonological, physiological and yield forming traits. Legume Research, 28: 10-1b.

  4. Dixit, L. and Swain (1987). Response of greengram genotypes to phosphorus fertilization. Indian Journal Agron. 32: 284-285.

  5. Fisher, R.A. (1929). Some remarks on the methods formulated in a recent article on the quantitative analysis of plant growth. Ann. Appl. Bio 7: 367-372.

  6. Goswami, R.K. (2000). Physiology indices for higher productivity in greengram (Vigna radiate L.) Ph.D. Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad.

  7. Kim, J.C. Hong, Y.K. and Park, Y.K. (1983). Studies on physio-ecological characteristic of mungbean (Vigna radiate L. Wilczek) as affected by N.P. and K application. Korean Journal of Crop Science (Korea R.) 28: 358-367. 

  8. Panwar, K.S., Singh, U.V. and Mishra, A.S. (1976). Response of mung to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus in central U.P. Indian Journal Agri. Res. 19: 53-56. 

  9. Prakash, M. Alayaraja, K, Allayaraja, R. Kumar, B.S. Saravanan, K and Ganesan, J (2004). Breeding for physiological traits in greengram (Vigna radiat L.), Legume Research 27: 205-208

  10. Rawat, G.S., Rajput, R.L. and Rawat, Upma (2010). Effect of different levels of organic fertilizers and PSB on productivity of clusterbean [cyanopsis tetragonoloba (L.)Taub] Bhartiya Krishi Anusandhan Patrika, 25: 71-73.

  11. Redford, P.J. (1967). Growth analysis formula, their use and abuse. Crop Science 7: 171-175.

  12. Singh, Raj, Singh, Bhagvan and Saxena, Anurag (2004). Response of clusterbean genotypes to nutrient management under arid condition of Rajasthan Journal of Arid Legumes 1: 32 -34. 

  13. Talwar, H.S., Soni, M.L. and Beniwal, B.K. (2004). Evaluation of crop physiological trails in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.) and moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia ja (q)), Proceedings of National Seminar of Plant Physiology held on Dec. 27-29, Pune 121. 

  14. Vijaylaxmi and Bhattacharya, A (2006). Mung bean seed yield. Effect of various physiological parameters during pre and post flowering periods. Legumes Research 29: 169-174.

  15. Watson, B.J. (1952). The physiological basis of variation in field. Advances in Agronomy 4: 101-145.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)