Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2023)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 38 issue 4 (august 2015) : 434-441

Yield and morphological traits in alfalfa varieties of different origin

Ratibor Strbanovic, Aleksandar Simic, Dobrivoj Postic, Tomislav Zivanovic, Savo Vuckovic, Erika Pfaf-Dolovac, Rade Stanisavljevic
1Institute for Plant Protection and Environment, 11040 Belgrade, Teodora Drajzera 9, Serbia.
Cite article:- Strbanovic Ratibor, Simic Aleksandar, Postic Dobrivoj, Zivanovic Tomislav, Vuckovic Savo, Pfaf-Dolovac Erika, Stanisavljevic Rade (2024). Yield and morphological traits in alfalfa varieties of different origin. Legume Research. 38(4): 434-441. doi: 10.5958/0976-0571.2015.00128.9.
The study was conducted to examine variability of green forage yield (GFY) and morphological traits (tiller length, internodes length, internodes-stem diameter, leaf width and length) in nine alfalfa varieties from USA and six varieties from Europe. The trials were carried out in Central Serbia during the second (2006-A1) and third year (2007-A2) of alfalfa exploitation. In unfavourable environmental conditions (A1), varieties from the USA had higher coefficient of variability (CV, %) in all cuttings (I CV=16.93, II CV=17.13, III CV=13.00, IV CV=21.29), as well as total yield variability (CV=14.33), compared to varieties from Europe (I CV=7.45, II CV=6.47, III CV=10.65, IV CV=19.51, for total yield CV=6.43). In the favourable agro-ecological conditions (A2) genetic potential of varieties was manifested, which caused similar yield variability. Variety origin (USA or Europe) had a low effect on variability of the morphological traits. The highest correlation (P £ 0.001) was achieved between yield and tiller length, regardless of variety origin.
  1. Altinok, S. and Karakaya, A. (2002). Forage yield of different alfalfa cultivars under Ankara conditions. Turk. J. Agric. For. 26:11-16.
  2. Annicchiarico P., Scotti, C., Carelli, M. and Pecetti, L. (2010). Question and avenues for lucerne improvement. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 46:1–13.
  3. Avci, M.A., Ozkose, A. and Tamkoc, A. (2013). Determination of yield and quality characteristics of alfalfa. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 12:487-490.
  4. Hall, M.H., Smiles, W.S. and Dickerson, R.A. (2000). Morphological development of alfalfa cultivars selected for higher quality. Agron. J. 92:1077–1080.
  5. Ivanov, I. (1988). Alfalfa. Published by Oxonian Press Pvt., New Delhi.
  6. Markovic, J.P., Strbanovic, R.T., Terzic, D.V., Ðokic, D.J., Simic, A.S., Vrvic, M.M. and Zivkovic, S.P. (2012). Changes in lignin structure with maturation of alfalfa leaf and stem in relation to ruminants nutrition. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 7:257–264.
  7. Radovic, J., Sokolovic, D. and Markovic, J. (2009). Alfalfa – most important perennial forage legume in animal husbandry. Biotech. Anim. Husbandry. 25:465-475.
  8. Rotili, P., Gnocchi, G., Scotti, C. and Kertikova, D. (2001). Breeding of the alfalfa plant morphology for quality. Proceedings of the XIV Eucarpia Medicago sp. Group Meeting. Zaragoza, 45:25-28.
  9. Sabanci, C.O., Ertus, M.M. and Celebi, S.Z. (2013). Collection, conservation and evaluation for forage yield of alfalfa landraces grown in East Anatolia. Turk. J. Field Crops. 18:46-51.
  10. Užik, M. 1992. The effect of water stress on the vegetative growth of lucerne varieties. Proceedings of the X International Conference of the EUCARPIA Medicago spp. Group Lodi, Istituto Sperimentale per le Colture Foraggere. 340-345.

Editorial Board

View all (0)