Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 35 issue 4 (december 2012) : 271-284

TOLERANCE TO SALINITY STRESS IN PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.)THROUGH OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT AND UNDAMAGED CHLOROPLAST

Mohammad Abul Kalam Azad*, Mohammad Mozammel Haque1, Mohammad Abdul Hamid, Fahmina Yasmine, Mohammad Abdul Wahab Golder2
1Plant Breeding Division, Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture Bangladesh Agricultural University Campus, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Azad* Kalam Abul Mohammad, Haque1 Mozammel Mohammad, Hamid Abdul Mohammad, Yasmine Fahmina, Golder2 Wahab Abdul Mohammad (2024). TOLERANCE TO SALINITY STRESS IN PEANUT (Arachis hypogaea L.)THROUGH OSMOTIC ADJUSTMENT AND UNDAMAGED CHLOROPLAST. Legume Research. 35(4): 271-284. doi: .

ABSTRACT

A pot experiment was conducted under glass house condition to study the mechanism of salt tolerance in peanut at Bangladesh Institute of Nuclear Agriculture, Mymensingh, during February to July 2006. Two Spanish type varieties, Dacca-1 and Binachinabadam-3, and 1 Valencia type variety, Zhingabadam with unknown tolerance were exposed to 0.4 (unstressed), 3, 5, 7 and 9 dS/m doses of salinity at vegetative and flowering stages. The experiment was laid out in a factorial completely randomized design. It appeared that Binachinabadam-3 allocated higher assimilate to kernel at both vegetative and  flowering stages through maintaining total sugar and chlorophyll ‘a’ contents close to unstressed treatment, particularly at 3-5 dS/m salinity doses.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashraf, M. (1999). Breeding for salinity tolerance proteins in plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 13: 17-42.
  2. Azad, M. A. K. (2006). Effect of salt stress on growth and some biochemical attributes in two peanut genotypes. M.S. Thesis, Dept. of Crop Botany, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 56p.
  3. Azad, M. A. K. (2008). Genetics of salt tolerance in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, 148p.
  4. BARC, (2005). Fertilizer Recommendation Guide-2005, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, Dhaka 324 pp.
  5. Bohnert, H.J. and Jensen, R.G.(1996). Strategies for engineering water-stress tolerance in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 14: 89–97.
  6. Bohnert, H.J., Nelson D.E. and Jensen, R.G.( 1995). Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7: 1099–1111.
  7. Cherian, S., Reddy, M.P. and Pandya, J.B. (1999). Studies on salt tolerance in Avicennia marina (Forstk.) Vierh. effect of NaCl salinity on growth, ion accumulation and enzyme activity. Indian J. Plant Physiol. 4: 266–270.
  8. Cramer, G.R. and Quarrie, S.A. (2002). Abscisic acid is correlated with leaf growth inhibition of four genotypes of maize differing in their response to salinity. Func. Plant. Biol. 29:111-115.
  9. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Robers, P.A. and Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356.
  10. Field, D.I. (1995). Land evaluation for crop diversification. Crop Diversification Program (CDP), Department of Agricultural Extension, Dhaka.
  11. Ford, C.W. (1984). Accumulation of low molecular solutes in water stress tropical legumes. Phytochem. 23: 1007–1015.
  12. Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. (1984). Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research. Second Edition. A Willey Inter- Science Publication, John Wiley and Sons, New York. p. 680.
  13. Gupta, I. C. and Yadav, J. S. P. (1986). Crop tolerance to saline irrigation waters. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 34 (2): 379-386.
  14. Hassegawa, P.M., Bressan, R.A., Zhu, J.K., and Bohnert, H.J. (2000). Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Ann. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 51: 463-499.
  15. Hernandez, J.A., Olmos, E., Corpas, F.J., Sevilla, F. and del Rio, L.A. (1995). Salt-induced oxidative stress in chloroplasts of pea plants. Plant Sci. 105:151–167.
  16. Islam, M.N., Islam, M.N. and Mowla, G. (1997). Importance of salinity management to protect environmental degradation in the coastal ecosystem of Bangladesh. Joint Intl. Conf. on Agril. Engg. & Tech. Exhibition’97, Bangladesh Institution of Engineers, Dhaka, pp. 663-669.
  17. Janila, P., Rao, T.N. and Kumar, A. A. (1999). Germination and early seedling growth of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under salt stress. Annals Agricul. Res. 20(2): 180-182.
  18. Joshi, Y.C., Ravindra, V., Nautiyal, P. C. and Zala, P. V. (1990). Screening for salt tolerance in peanut. Peanut News 2(1):4.
  19. Karim, Z. and Iqbal, A. (2001). Impact of land degradation in Bangladesh Changing Scenario in Agricultural Land Use, Bangladesh Agricultural Research Council, pp. 46-47.
  20. Kerepesi, I. and Galiba, G. (2000). Osmotic and salt stress-induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Sci. 40:482–487.
  21. Khan, M.A., Ungar, I.A. and Showalter, A.M. (2000). Effects of sodium chloride treatments on growth and ion accumulation of the halophyte Haloxylon recurvum. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 31: 2763–2774.
  22. Khatkar, D. and Kuhad, M.S. (2000). Short-term salinity induced changes in two wheat cultivars at different growth stages. Biol. Plant. 43: 629–632.
  23. Lauter, D., Meiri, A., Federman, A. and Plaut, Z. (1988). The growth and development of peanut pods in a saline pod zone. Hassadeh 68(9): 1689-1691.
  24. Munns, R. and Cramer, G.R. (1996). Is coordination of leaf and root growth mediated by abscisic acid? (Opinion) Plant and Soil 185: 33-49.
  25. Munns, R. and James, R.A. (2003). Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil 253: 201-218.
  26. Nelson, N. (1944). A photometric adaptation of the Somogyi method for determination of glucose. J. Biol. Chem. 153:375-380.
  27. Orthen, B., Popp, M. and Smirnoff, N. (1994). Hydroxyl radical scavenging properties of cyclitols. Proc. R. Soc. Edinburg Sect. B 102: 269–272.
  28. Patel, M.S., Gundalia, J.D., Polara, K.B. (1992). Evaluation of salt tolerance of different peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Gujarat Agricl. Univ. Res. J. 18(1): 17-23.
  29. Pilon-Smits, E.A.H., Ebskamp, M.J.M., Paul, M.J., Jeuken, M.J.W., Weisbeek, P.J. and Smeekens, S.C.M. (1995). Improved performance of transgenic fructan-accumulating tobacco under drought stress. Plant Physiol. 107: 125–130.
  30. Popp, M., Larther, F. and Weigel, P. (1985). Osmotic adaptation in Australian mangroves.Vegetation 61 : 247–254.
  31. Ren, H., Gao, Z., Chen, L., Wei, K. , Liu, J., Fan, Y., Davies, W.J., Jia, W. and Zhang, J.( 2006). Dynamics of ABA accumulation in relation to the rate of ABA catabolism in maize tissues under water deficit. J.Exp. Bot. 57: 1-9.
  32. Rhodes, D. and Hanson, A.D. (1993). Quaternary ammonium and tertiary sulphonium compounds in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:357–384.
  33. Sauter, A., Davies, W.J., and Hartung, W. (2001). The long distance abscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: the fate of the hormone in its way from root to shoot. J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1991-1997.
  34. Shabala, S.N., Shabala, S.I., Martynenko, A.I.Babourina, O. and Newman, I.A.(1998). Salinity effect on bioelectric activity, growth, Na+ accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize leaves: a comparative survey and prospects for screening. Aust. J. Plant Physiol.25:609-616.
  35. Silberbush, M. and Lips, S. H. (1988). Nitrogen concentration, ammonium nitrate ratio and NaCl interaction in vegetative and reproductive growth of peanuts. Physiologia Plantarum, 74 (3): 493-498.
  36. Singh, S.K., Sharma, H.C., Goswami, A.M., Datta, S.P. and Singh, S.P. (2000). In vitro growth and leaf composition of grapevine cultivars as affected by sodium chloride. Biol. Plant. 43: 283–286.
  37. SRDI (2003). Soil salinity in Bangladesh 2000. Soil Resources Development Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dhaka- 1215. pp. 90-91.
  38. Takemura, T., Hanagata, N., Sugihara, K., Baba, S., Karube, I. and Dubinsky, Z. (2000). Physiological and biochemical responses to salt stress in the mangrove, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Aquat. Bot. 68:15–28.
  39. Vadez, V., Srivastava, N., Krishnamurthy, L., Aruna, R. and Nigam, S. N.( 2005). Standardization of a protocol to screen for salinity tolerance in peanut. IAN 25: 42-47.
  40. Wang,Y.and Nil, N. (2000). Changes in chlorophyll, ribulose biphosphate carboxylase–oxygenase, glycine betaine content, photosynthesis and transpiration in Amaranthus tricolor leaves during salt stress. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 75: 623–627.
  41. Yancey, P., Clark, M.E., Had, S.C., Bowlus, R.D. and Somero, G.N. (1982). Living with water stress evolution of osmolyte system. Science 217:1214–1222.
  42. Yoshida, S., Forno, D.A., Cock, J.A. and Gomes, K.A. (1976). Lab. manual for physiological studies of rice. 3rd edition. IRRI, Los Banos, Phillippines. p.43-45.
Reviewed By

Download Article
In this Article
    Contact us
    Follow us

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)