Banner

Chief Editor:
J. S. Sandhu
Vice Chancellor, SKN Agriculture, University, Jobner, VC, NDUAT, Faizabad, Deputy Director General (Crop Science), Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), New Delhi
Frequency:Monthly
Indexing:
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Go...
Legume Research, volume 24 issue 1 (march 2001) :

SHOOT BUD INDUCTION IN NON-DIFFERENTIATING HYPOCOTYL EXPLANTS BY PHYSIOLOGICAL MANIPULATIONS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

Raj Anupam, Khetarpal Sangeeta, Chandra R., Polisetty Raghuveer
1Division of Plant Physiology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Anupam Raj, Sangeeta Khetarpal, R. Chandra, Raghuveer Polisetty (2025). SHOOT BUD INDUCTION IN NON-DIFFERENTIATING HYPOCOTYL EXPLANTS BY PHYSIOLOGICAL MANIPULATIONS IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 24(1): . doi: .
In the present study attempts were made to induce differentiation in hypocotyl (H) explants, which were observed to be non-differentiating in in-vitro culture. Several physiological factors influ. enced bud induction. Sucrose concentration in the medium was increased to 6% to obtain optimum bud induction. Similarly supplementing the media with amino acid, cysteine (50 mg I−1)and an ethylene action inhibitor AgNO3 (25 μM, enhanced shoot bud induction. Of the two treatments silver nitrate (AgNO3) treatment was found to produce more bud differentiation. Orientation of explant in in-vitro culture seems to play an important role in inducing shoot bud differentiation in hypocotyl explants..

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)