Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 28 issue 3 (september 2005) : 231 - 232

EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON YIELD OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM)

R.L. Rajput·, S.S. 'Kushwah
1J.N. Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Rajgarh Biaora (M.P.) - 465 661, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Rajput· R.L., 'Kushwah S.S. (2024). EFFECT OF INTEGRATED NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT ON YIELD OF PEA (PISUM SATIVUM). Legume Research. 28(3): 231 - 232. doi: .
An experiment was conducted during 1995–96 to 1997–98 to find out the effect of bio-fertilizers on production of pea. On the basis of three years pooled data, the highest yield was recorded with the application of recommended doses of fertilizer followed by soil application of bio-fertllizers mixed 25 kg FYM along with 50% recommended dose of fertilizers and were at par statistically. So the use of bio-fertilizer with 50% recommended dose of fertilizer saved 50% N, P (10 kg N. 25 kg P2O5. It also saved the financial resources as well as FYM.
    1. Brown, M.E. (1974). Annu. Rev. Phytopathology, 12: 181-197.
    2. Pandey, N. and Tripathi, R.S. (1993). Indian J. Agron., 32: 470-471.
    3. Shrivastava, T.K. and A:11awat. I.P.S. (1995). Indian J. Agron.. 40: 635

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)