Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 29 issue 2 (june 2006) : 126 - 129

REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS

M.S. Nalini, H.S. Prakash*, H.S. Shetty, M. Prabhakar**

Affiliations

¹Department of Studies in Applied Botany and Seed Pathology, University of Mysore, Manasagangothri, Mysore - 570 006, Karnataka, India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Nalini M.S., Prakash* H.S., Shetty H.S., Prabhakar** M. (2024). REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS. Legume Research. 29(2): 126 - 129. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Fifteen accessions and varieties of french bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) obtained from various sources were tested for their reaction to Bean common mosaic potyvirus (BCMV) by mechanical inoculations on the 10-day-old seedlings in the screenhouse. Three accessions among the fifteen viz., Arka Komal, IIHR 909 and MFB-2 were diagnosed as susceptible based on symptoms and were confirmed by ELISA. The remaining twelve, were ELISA-negative. Seeds collected from the infected plants of each accession/variety were analyzed for the seed transmission of BCMV by growing-on test, recording 39% transmission in Arka Komal. The infected seedlings manifested typical mosaic and leaf roll symptoms. Studies highlight the existence of resistant genotypes for breeding programmes.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Al-Fadhil, F.H. and Al- Ani, R.A. (1987). J. Agric. Water Resou. Res.-Plant Production, 6: 99-114.
Capoor, S.P. et al. (1985). Indian Phytopath., 38: 152-154.
Gupta, Y. and Chowfla, S.C. (1990). Indian Phytopath., 84: 434-436.
Hobbs, H.A. et al. (1987). Plant Dis., 71: 747-749.
Klein, R.E. et al. (1988). Plant Dis., 72: 301-302.
Khetarpal, R.K et al. (1994). Indian J. Virol., 10: 13-16.
Muniyappa, V. (1970). Madras Agric. J., 63: 69-70.
Omunyin, M. et al. (1988). Trop. Agric. (Trinidad), 65: 166-168.
Parthasarathy, V.A. (1993). In: Vegetable Crops: (T.K Bose et al., eds.). Naya Prakash Publishers, Calcutta, India, pp. 581-602.

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

REACTION OF FRENCH BEAN ACCESSIONS AND VARIETIES TO BEAN COMMON MOSAIC POTYVIRUS AND SEED TRANSMISSION OF THE VIRUS

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board