Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Submit

Legume Research, volume 29 issue 2 (june 2006) : 114 - 117

PATTERN OF VARIABILITY, CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND PATH ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN QUALITY IN MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK)

A. Ghosh, S. Panda
1Department of Genetics, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur - 741 252, Nadia, India

  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Ghosh A., Panda S. (2024). PATTERN OF VARIABILITY, CHARACTER ASSOCIATION AND PATH ANALYSIS FOR GRAIN QUALITY IN MUNGBEAN (VIGNA RADIATA L. WILCZEK). Legume Research. 29(2): 114 - 117. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Thirteen mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) genotypes were tested for 10 physical characters which determine seed quality. There was significant variation between genotypes for 100 seed weight and volume before and after soaking, hydration capacity, swelling capacity, hydration index and swelling index. The coefficient of variation for seed density before and after soaking was low. LM-114, PDM-54, A-83 and TM-96-2 had the best seed quality in respect of swelling index. Swelling capacity, hydration capacity, 100 seed weight and volume before and after soaking were positively inter correlated. Swelling capacity was positively correlated with swelling index while the reverse was true for soaked seed density. The path analysis showed high positive direct effect of swelling capacity on swelling index. The study suggested that swelling capacity must be given preference along with optimum soaked seed density to select superior types for good grain quality.

KEYWORDS

    REFERENCES

    1. Dewey, D.R. and Lu, K.H. (1959). Agron. J., 51: 515-518.
    2. Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme (1961). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers, ICAR, New Delhi.
    3. Ram Kumar et al. (1993). Legume Res., 21: 33-36,
    4. Waldia, R.S. et al. (1995). Int. Chickpea and Pigeonpea Newsl., 2(5): 40-42.
    5. Waldia, R.S. et al. (1996). J. Food Sci. Technol., 33: 397-402.
    6. Williams, P.C. et al. (1983). J. Sci. Food Agric., 34: 472-496.
    7. Zia-ur-Rehman and Saha, W.H. (1996). Pakistan J. Scientific and Industrial Res., 39:195-199.
    Reviewed By

    Download Article
    In this Article
      Contact us
      Follow us

      Editorial Board

      View all (0)