Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 30 issue 4 (december 2007) : 292 - 296

VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDIES FOR POD YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN F2 GENERATION OF SIX VIRGINIA X SPANISH CROSSES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.)

K. John, R. P. Vasanthi, O. Venkateswarlu
1Regional Agricultural Research Station, Tirupati – 517502, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- John K., Vasanthi P. R., Venkateswarlu O. (2024). VARIABILITY AND CORRELATION STUDIES FOR POD YIELD AND ITS ATTRIBUTES IN F2 GENERATION OF SIX VIRGINIA X SPANISH CROSSES OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.). Legume Research. 30(4): 292 - 296. doi: .
Significant differences were observed among F2population of six single crosses and parents for all characters. Plant height, number of secondary branches per plant, number of mature pods per plant, pod yield per plant, kernel yield per plant, haulms yield per plant and harvest index showed high estimates of GCV and PCV, heritability (broad sense) and GAM. The role of additive gene action seems to be significant in the inheritance of these traits. Pod yield showed highly significant positive association with number of mature pods per plant (0.541), SCMR (0.588), kernel yield per plant (0.981), pod width (0.682) and harvest index (0.832). Improvement in pod yield could be brought by selection for characters viz., number of mature pods, kernel yield, pod width, SCMR and harvest index.
    1. Choudhary, S.K. (1993). Indian J. Hill Farming., 6: 171-174.
    2. Mishra, L.K. and Yadav, R.K.(1992). Adv. Plant Sci., 5:106-110.
    3. Naik, K.S.S. et al. (2000). National Seminar on Oilseeds and Oil Research and Development needs in the Millenium., pp 2-4. 296 LEGUME RESEARCH
    4. Prasad, M.V.R. et al. (1984). Indian J. Genet., 44:25-34.
    5. Pushkaran, K.and Nair, V.G. (1993). J. Tropi. Agric., 31(2): 155-160.
    6. Ramesh Kumar, et al. (1998). J. Appl. Biol., 8(2) : 20-23.
    7. Raman, V.S. and Sreerangaswamy, S.R. (1970). Madras Agric. J., 57 (9):1.
    8. Sah, J.N. et al. (2000). J. Oilseeds Res., 17 (1): 23-28.
    9. Satnsfield, N.D. (1969).Theory and Problems of Genetics. Mc. Graw Hill, New York.
    10. Singh, R.K. and Choudhary, B.D. (1977). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis Kalyani Publishers.
    11. Sudarshanam, A. et al. (1989). J. Res. APAU., 17 : 329-332.
    12. Sumathi, R and Ramanathan, T. (1995). Madras Agric. J., 82: 6-8, 435-439.
    13. Venkataramana, P. (2000). Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 34 : 321-325.
    14. Vijayasekhar. (2002). M.Sc., (Ag.). Thesis Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)