Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu
Print ISSN 0250-5371
Online ISSN 0976-0571
NAAS Rating 6.80
SJR 0.391
Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :

Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)

Indexing Services :

BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus

Submit

Legume Research, volume 30 issue 1 (march 2007) : 41 - 44

CHANGES IN CERTAIN ORGANIC METABOLITES DURING SEEDLING GROWTH OF CHICKPEA UNDER SALT STRESS AND ALONGWITH EXOGENOUS PROLINE

Madhurendra, N. Prasad

Affiliations

¹Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Basic Science and Humanities, Rajendra Agricultural University. Pusa. Samastipur - 848 125. India

Submitted|
First Online |
doi

Cite article:- Madhurendra, Prasad N. (2024). CHANGES IN CERTAIN ORGANIC METABOLITES DURING SEEDLING GROWTH OF CHICKPEA UNDER SALT STRESS AND ALONGWITH EXOGENOUS PROLINE. Legume Research. 30(1): 41 - 44. doi: .

ABSTRACT

Salt tolerant (BG-372, KWR-108) and susceptible (C-235, H-208) chickpea genotypes were subjected to varied levels of salt stress (0.0, 4.0, 8.0 and 12.0 dS/m) to investigate certain biochemical parameters in 8-day old seedling under different level of salt stress alone and alongwith exogenous proline of 10−5M concentration. The salt stress decreased the total sugar, reducing and non-reducing sugar but increased starch, and proline content. The exogenous proline when applied with saIt stress reduced the adverse effect of salt stress. Lower soluble protein content was noticed in tolerant genotypes.

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Bal, A.R. (1976). BioI. Plant., 18: 227-229.
Bates, L.S. et a/. (1973). PI. Soil, 39: 205-208.
Brown, L.M. and Hellebust, JA (1978). Can. J. Bot., 56: 676-679.
Dubey, R.S. (1984). Oryza, 21: 213-217.
Gloux, K. and Rudulier, D. Le (1989). Archives Microbiol., 151(2): 143-148.
Khanna, S. and Rai, V,K. (1995). Indian J. Exp. BioI., 33: 766-770.
Lauter, D.J. and Munns, D.N. (1986). PI. Soil, 95: 271-279.
Lowry, O.H. etal. (1951). J. BioI. Chern., 193: 265-275.
Miller, G.L (1959). Anal. Chern., 31: 426-428.
Raggi, V. (1994). Physiol. Plant, 91: 427-434.
Singh, M. and Singh, S. (1995). Indian J. PI. Physiol., 38(2): 109-113.
Singh, G. etal. (1985). Experientia, 41: 40-41. .
Thakur, P.S. and Rai, V.K. (1985). Biol. Plant, 27: 438-461.
Trevelyan, W.E. and Harrison, J.S. (1952). Biochem. J.. 50: 299

Disclaimer :

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Copyright :

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reviewed By

Share options

Editorial Board

View all (0)

CHANGES IN CERTAIN ORGANIC METABOLITES DURING SEEDLING GROWTH OF CHICKPEA UNDER SALT STRESS AND ALONGWITH EXOGENOUS PROLINE

ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS

REFERENCES

Reviewed By

In this Article

APC

Publish With US

Become a Reviewer/Member

Open Access

Products and Services

Support and Policies

Editorial Board