Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 31 issue 4 (december 2008) : 268 - 271

YIELD OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM) AND GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) AS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT INTERCROPPING RATIOS AND SULPHUR LEVELS

M.M. Mahale, V.B. Nevase, P.G. Chavan
1Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli Dist. Ratnagiri - 415 712, India
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Mahale M.M., Nevase V.B., Chavan P.G. (2024). YIELD OF SESAME (SESAMUM INDICUM) AND GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA) AS INFLUENCED BY DIFFERENT INTERCROPPING RATIOS AND SULPHUR LEVELS. Legume Research. 31(4): 268 - 271. doi: .
A field experiment was conducted to study the performance of sesame (Sesamum indicum) +
groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) intercropping system under different levels of sulphur on the yield of component crops. The experiment was laid out in split plot design during Kharif season of 2005-06. The results indicated that the treatment sesame + groundnut in 3:1 ratio recorded significantly
higher yield, that was at par with sesame + groundnut in 1:2 ratio and sesame + groundnut in 1:3
ratio, whereas, the application of sulphur did not influence the yield attributes of both the crops
however, application of 30 kg S/ha registered higher grain yields of sesame, which was at par with
60 kg S/ha and significantly superior over the control
    1. Davang, S.P. (2004). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis Dr. B.S.K.K.V., Dapoli.
    2. Hari Krishna, M. and Reddy Pratap Kumar, A. (2005). J. Oilseeds Res. 22(1):201-203.
    3. Hedge, D.M. and Kiresur, V. (1999). The Hindu Survey of Indian Agriculture, pp. 67-70.
    4. Khistaria, M.K. et al., (1997). J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ. 14(2):243-244.
    5. Sarawgi, S.K. et al., (1995). Ann. Agric. Res. 16(1):101-103.
    6. Subramaniyan, K. et al., (1999). Indian J. Agron. 44(4):826-829.
    7. Sharma, H.R. (1999). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis Rajasthan Agric Univ., Bikaner, India.

    Editorial Board

    View all (0)