Legume Research

  • Chief EditorJ. S. Sandhu

  • Print ISSN 0250-5371

  • Online ISSN 0976-0571

  • NAAS Rating 6.80

  • SJR 0.391

  • Impact Factor 0.8 (2024)

Frequency :
Monthly (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August, September, October, November and December)
Indexing Services :
BIOSIS Preview, ISI Citation Index, Biological Abstracts, Elsevier (Scopus and Embase), AGRICOLA, Google Scholar, CrossRef, CAB Abstracting Journals, Chemical Abstracts, Indian Science Abstracts, EBSCO Indexing Services, Index Copernicus
Legume Research, volume 32 issue 4 (december 2009) : 309-310

IDENTIFICATION OF PROMISING GENOTYPES OF KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)

Pawan Singh Sisodia, M. Yasin
1Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, R.A.K. College of Agriculture, Sehore-466 001, India.
  • Submitted|

  • First Online |

  • doi

Cite article:- Sisodia Singh Pawan, Yasin M. (2024). IDENTIFICATION OF PROMISING GENOTYPES OF KABULI CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.). Legume Research. 32(4): 309-310. doi: .
Varietal indices and per se performance were calculated based on discriminant function for
seed yield and its attributing traits in 38 genotypes of kabuli chickpea. The results revealed that
genotypes GLK 22094, CSJK 21, Phule G 95333, BGD 1035 and HK 00304 exhibited high
index value for seed yield, where as an overall observations of selection criteria (both varietal
indices and mean performance basis) genotypes viz. GLK 22094, CSJK 21 and HK 00304 appeared
promising genotypes based on their phenotypic and genetic merits performance. Implication of
varietal indices and mean performance for seed yield in relation to kabuli chickpea breeding
programme have been discussed.
  1. Mishra, R. et al (1985). Legume Res. 8:63-67.
  2. Singh,R.K. and Choudhary B.D. (1979). Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publ. Ludhiana, India.
  3. Smith, H.F. (1936). Ann. Eugencis. 7:240-250

Editorial Board

View all (0)