Cadmium (Cd) concentrations in the gill tissues of the studied fish species are presented in Table 1 as mean values of composite samples. Values are presented as mean±SD of instrumental triplicate measurements for each composite sample. Statistical analyses were performed using the composite samples as independent observations. Clear differences were observed among species and, in some cases, between size classes.
Solea solea showed the highest Cd concentrations overall, whereas
Dicentrarchus labrax had the lowest values in the large-size class. Mugil cephalus showed intermediate concentrations.
Preliminary assumption checks indicated approximate normality of residuals according to the Shapiro-wilk test (Table 4; p= 0.240), whereas Levene’s test indicated significant heterogeneity of variances among groups (Table 3; p<0.001). Therefore, inferential analysis was based on a heteroskedasticity-robust linear model with HC3 standard errors. Robust Wald tests showed a significant effect of species on Cd concentrations and a significant species × size interaction, whereas the overall main effect of size was not significant (Table 2). To interpret the interaction, size classes were compared within each species using Welch’s t-tests. No significant size-related difference was detected for
Solea solea (p= 0.629), whereas Cd concentrations were lower in small than large
Mugil cephalus composites (p= 0.045) and higher in small than large
Dicentrarchus labrax composites (p= 0.008).
Among large fish, species differed significantly according to Welch’s ANOVA (F2,7.06 = 27.23, p= 0.00048). Games-Howell post hoc comparisons (Table 5) showed that
Solea solea had significantly higher Cd concentrations than
Mugil cephalus (p= 0.0176) and
Dicentrarchus labrax (p= 0.0030), whereas
Mugil cephalus also showed higher concentrations than
Dicentrarchus labrax (p= 0.0116).
The Q-Q plot (Fig 2) indicated approximate normality of residuals. The interaction between species and size is shown in Fig 3. The lines are not fully parallel, which is consistent with the significant species × size interaction detected in the robust model. This indicates that the direction and magnitude of size-related differences were not the same across the three species.
The distribution of Cd concentrations across species and size groups is illustrated in Fig 4. The boxplot highlights marked differences among species in the large-size class and considerable variability in small
Solea solea composites, which contributes to the lack of a clear overall size effect.
Environmental measurements are summarized in Table 6. Cadmium in seawater was below the limit of quantification (<0.07 µg/L), while marine sediments contained measurable levels of Cd (50±5.4 µg/kg dry weight). These findings confirm the presence of cadmium in the study area, primarily in the sediment fraction, but the limited number of environmental samples does not allow firm conclusions regarding exposure pathways.
The present data show that Cd concentrations in fish gill composites differed among species, but size-related patterns were not uniform. After accounting for heterogeneity of variances by using a heteroskedasticity-robust model, the species effect remained significant and the species × size interaction also reached significance, whereas the overall main effect of size was not significant. Accordingly, the dataset does not support a blanket statement that body size is irrelevant. Rather, it suggests that any size-related effect is species-dependent under the sampled conditions. Similar species-associated differences in metal accumulation have been reported previously in marine fish (
Luoma and Rainbow, 2005). Among the investigated species,
Solea solea showed the highest Cd concentrations overall. This pattern is consistent with, but does not by itself prove, an influence of benthic habitat use and closer contact with sediment-associated contaminants (
Birch, 2018;
Förstner and Salomons, 1980). The elevated Cd concentrations observed in
Solea solea may be related to its benthic lifestyle and closer association with bottom sediments, which frequently act as long-term reservoirs of trace metals. Benthic fish are generally more exposed to sediment-associated contaminants through direct contact with the substrate and through feeding activities occurring at the sediment-water interface. Although the present study was not designed to determine exposure pathways directly, the detection of measurable Cd concentrations in marine sediments supports the possibility that sediment-associated exposure contributed to the observed accumulation patterns (
Birch, 2018;
Chapman and Wang, 2001;
Förstner and Salomons, 1980;
Lee et al., 2024).
Mugil cephalus exhibited intermediate Cd concentrations and relatively low variability, particularly in the small-size class, whereas
Dicentrarchus labrax showed low concentrations in the large-size class but higher values in the small-size class. They may reflect differences in feeding ecology and habitat use, although the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. Because the data are based on composite samples rather than individual fish, the results should be interpreted as group-level differences in mean Cd burden rather than as evidence of individual biological responses.
Environmental measurements provide context but should not be overinterpreted. Cadmium was below the limit of quantification in seawater and measurable in marine sediment, which is compatible with sediment acting as a local reservoir of Cd (
Birch, 2018;
Förstner and Wittmann, 1981). However, the limited number of environmental samples precludes a robust assessment of transport, resuspension, or uptake pathways. Therefore, the present results support the use of gill tissue as a practical indicator of recent Cd exposure, but they do not establish the dominant source or mechanism of accumulation in this coastal system.
Several limitations should be acknowledged. First, the study relied on six composite samples per species and size class, which improves analytical representativeness but reduces information on individual variability. Second, the environmental component was limited and does not permit detailed source apportionment. Third, fish were collected over an extended period, so seasonal or temporal variability cannot be excluded. Future studies should include more extensive environmental sampling and individual-level fish measurements to clarify cadmium dynamics more precisely in this coastal ecosystem. In addition, information regarding fish age, sex and reproductive status was not available and therefore the potential influence of these biological factors on Cd accumulation could not be evaluated.