Effect of solvent polarity on phenolic extraction
The relationship between the extraction method, yield, total TPC and DPPH radical scavenging activity was analysed, uncovering significant patterns influenced by solvent polarity and composition (Table 1). The highest extraction yields were observed with methanol/water/acetic acid (M5) (2.52%) and methanol/acetic acid (M4) (2.43%), outperforming single solvents such as acetone (0.064%) and ethanol (0.59%), as well as solvent-water mixtures. The inclusion of water improved yields by enhancing compound solubility, while the addition of acetic acid facilitated cell wall disruption and solute release. These results underscore the superior efficiency of mixed solvent systems, which combine polar and non-polar components to optimise the extraction process. The recovery of phenolic compounds is significantly influenced by the choice of solvent and its polarity
(Alothman et al., 2009; Taghizadeh et al., 2018). This is demonstrated by the TPC results shown in Table 1. The polarity of the solvent had an impact on TPC values, with the highest TPC observed in methanol/water/acetic acid (M5) (23.9 mg GAE/g) and methanol/water (M2) (23.2 mg GAE/g). Solvent mixtures generally yielded higher TPC than single solvents, highlighting the importance of optimising solvent polarity. Methanol-based mixtures proved effective, likely due to methanol’s broad capacity to dissolve a wide range of phenolic compounds. The choice of solvent strongly influenced the antioxidant capacities of the extracts, as different solvents extract compounds with varying antioxidant potentials based on their polarity, solubility properties and ability to dissolve specific bioactive compounds
(Nawaz et al., 2020; Taghizadeh et al., 2018). Numerous studies have reported the use of various solvent combinations, including water, acetone, methanol, ethanol and their aqueous mixtures, with or without added acids, to extract antioxidants from vegetables, fruits and other foodstuffs
(Boeing et al., 2014; Michiels et al., 2012; Nawaz et al., 2020). Acetone/water (A2) was the most efficient solvent for extracting phenolic compounds, achieving the highest TPC values. Methanol/water/acetic acid (70/29.5/0.5) produced the best results for anthocyanin content. These findings are consistent with previous reports emphasizing the importance of solvent polarity in maximizing phenolic compound recovery.
Antioxidant activity
The antioxidant activity of plant extracts is highly dependent on the concentration and composition of their phytochemical constituents, which dictate their effectiveness in scavenging free radicals
(Kumar et al., 2023; Kumari et al., 2017; Choudhary et al., 2015).
In the present study, the highest DPPH activity was observed for acetone/water (50/50, v/v) (28.3%), followed by methanol/water/acetic acid (M5) (27.8%) and methanol/water (M3) (22.5%). These results highlight the importance of mixed solvent systems, especially those involving water, in maximising phytocompound extraction and antioxidant potential. When combined with solvents like acetone, methanol, or ethanol, water enhanced extraction efficiency by improving solubility. In contrast, single solvents such as acetone (TPC: 8.1 mg GAE/g; DPPH: not detected) and ethanol (TPC: 10.0 mg GAE/g; DPPH: 7.8%) exhibited significantly lower activity, further emphasising the superior antioxidant potential of mixed solvent systems. A prior study by
Alothman et al., (2009) identified acetone-water mixtures as the most effective solvent combination for antioxidant extraction.
The acidification of the extraction solvent showed no significant improvement in the yield of antioxidant compounds across all tested combinations, aligning with earlier findings
(Boeing et al., 2014; Michiels et al., 2012) except for methanol (Table 1).
Lipid content and fatty acid profile
Soxhlet extraction using hexane-ethanol mixtures yielded higher lipid recovery compared to hexane alone (Fig 1). Subsequent GC-MS analysis revealed diverse fatty acid profiles, demonstrating the potential of solvent mixtures to enhance lipid solubility and recovery. The Venn diagram (Fig 2) shows the distribution of elements across three extracts. n-hexane contributed the most unique elements (26.3%), followed by n-hexane: ethanol (21.1%) and chloroform: methanol (14%). Shared compounds included 19.3% expected to all three lists, with smaller overlaps between pairs of extracts. This highlights unique and shared contributions among the extracts (Fig 2). The solvent polarity was pivotal in determining the types of compounds extracted. Hexane, a non-polar solvent, primarily extracted non-polar compounds, such as hydrocarbons, fatty acids and short-chain alcohols (
e.g., 2-Heptanol and Octacosane). In contrast, the n-hexane-ethanol mixture, with intermediate polarity, facilitated the extraction of a broader range of compounds, including moderately polar phenols (2,4-Di-tert-butylphenol), aldehydes (2-Undecenal) and fatty alcohols (1-Hexadecanol). Chloroform-methanol, a more polar solvent system, demonstrated the highest capacity for dissolving different compounds. This system extracted sterols (Stigmast-7-en-3-ol), alkaloids (
e.g., Aspidospermidin-17-ol) and fatty acid esters, showcasing its ability to isolate diverse bioactive molecules. These patterns highlight that non-polar solvents effectively extract simple lipids and hydrocarbons, whereas polar solvents excel in isolating complex lipids and bioactive polar compounds (Table 1, 2 and 3). This further reinforces that selecting an optimal solvent or solvent mixture is critical for maximizing yields and targeting specific bioactive molecules. While Soxhlet extraction remains a popular technique for biological samples, its drawbacks, including its time-consuming nature and potential for thermal degradation of heat-sensitive compounds like ω-3 fatty acids, limit its applicability (
De Castro and Garcýa-Ayuso, 1998;
De Castro and Priego-Capote, 2010;
Farag et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2018). Alternative methods are necessary to balance extraction efficiency with compound integrity, especially for heat-sensitive compounds used in nutraceuticals, cosmetics and biopesticides. The chemical composition analysis revealed notable variations among the three extracts. n-hexnae was rich in carboxylic acids (48.71%), steroids (29.79%) and esters (12.56%), with minor contributions from alcohols, phenols, aldehydes, hydrocarbons and terpenes. n-hexane: ethanol showed steroids (34.06%) and carboxylic acids (32.36%) as dominant, along with esters (13.56%), alcohols (9.47%), vitamins (5.54%) and smaller amounts of other classes. Chloroform: methanol primarily contained carboxylic acids (47.44%), steroids (28.14%) and esters (15.31%), alongside minor classes such as alkaloids and alkenes, reflecting broader diversity (Table 4).