Gross morphological observations
Nostrils and operculum
Gross anatomical evaluation of the upper respiratory tract in the native Uttara fowl (
Gallus domesticus) revealed that external communication with the nasal cavity occured
via a pair of symmetrical, elliptical nostrils situated at the base of the upper beak. These external nares were covered and protected dorsally by a distinct cartilaginous operculum (Fig 1).
This specific structural configuration aligns with observations documented in the turkey (
Meleagris gallopavo), which also featured an operculum-covered nasal entry (
Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024). However, this architectural arrangement varied significantly from the narrow longitudinal nostrils paired with a reduced operculum seen in the Japanese quail (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007). It also differed from the circular nostrils covered by a dense tuft of feathers in the hooded crow and the elongated, slit-like nostrils bounded by a horny operculum typical of doves and common quails (
Madkour, 2019). Furthermore, the presence of an operculum differentiates the Uttara fowl from ostriches and geese, which exhibit oval nostrils entirely devoid of an opercular covering, as well as the Common Moorhen, which presents simple open holes or slit-like nares without any protective cartilaginous flap (
Jaifar, 2023;
Tadjalli et al., 2008).
A key physical marker identified during post-natal growth in the Uttara fowl was the development of a distinct black pigmentation on the surface of the operculum. This dark pigmentation was visible across all progressive age groups, except on day 0 (the day of hatching), where the opercular tissue remained completely unpigmented (Fig 2).
Biometrical mapping established that the absolute length of the nostrils expanded significantly from day 0 through day 112, whereas the nostril width increased at a gradual rate as age advanced. The specific post-natal morphometrical trajectories of the external nares were detailed in (Graph 1).
When compared to other adult avian models, the mature morphometric profile of the Uttara fowl represented a distinct breed index. The nostril length of the adult Uttara fowl (8.12±0.11 mm) was greater than that recorded for the domestic duck (6.93±0.03 mm) the dove (3.11±0.10 mm) and the quail (4.07±0.12 mm, while remaining highly comparable to the adult domestic goose (8.72±0.57 mm) (Madkour, 2019). Similarly, its mature nostril width (4.54±0.19 mm) surpassed that of the duck (2.75±0.06 mm), dove (0.88±0.08 mm) and quail (0.99±0.08 mm), though it scales below the Goose (3.79±0.57 mm) (Madkour, 2019). These values were smaller than those of the Broad-breasted white turkey, which exhibited a nostril length of 15.73±1.47 mm and a width of 5.73±1.27 mm, but were substantially larger than the dimensions noted in the Eurasian common moorhen, which measured 9.0 mm in length and 3.0 mm in width (
Jaifar, 2023).
Nasal cavity geometry and medial nasal septum
The internal nasal cavity of the Uttara fowl exhibited a cone-shaped geometry that stretched continuously from the external nostrils to the internal choanae. Anatomically, the apex of this cone pointed rostrally, while its wider, expanded base was positioned caudally. This architectural arrangement was found to be identical to the nasal geometry described in the ostrich and the Nandanam chicken
(Dharani et al., 2020; Tadjalli et al., 2008). Conversely, it was in contrast to the hooded crow, which displayed a short, narrow slit-like rostral segment paired with a wide, elongated triangular caudal chamber.
Mid-sagittal examinations demonstrated that the overall length and the three regional vertical heights (rostral, middle and caudal zones) of the nasal cavity underwent highly significant, continuous expansions as the birds matured. These age-dependent changes are systematically detailed in (Table 1).
The scaling patterns observed in the Uttara fowl followed the general trends reported across various avian species. The total length of the mature nasal cavity (18.13±0.16 mm) was longer than that of the adult quail (11.53±0.22 mm) and dove (13.02±0.67 mm), but was shorter than that of larger birds such as the duck (35.22±0.63 mm) and the Goose (44.63±3.02 mm) (
Madkour, 2019). Furthermore, the clear, progressive increase in vertical height from the rostral to the caudal zone observed in the Uttara fowl matched the widening patterns recorded in ducks and geese (
Madkour, 2019).
A complete, fully cartilaginous medial nasal septum cleanly divided the internal nasal cavity into symmetrical left and right chambers across all post-natal age cohorts (Fig 3). This architectural arrangement matched findings documented in non-aquatic birds, the Common Moorhen, the Nandanam chicken and the turkey
(Dharani et al., 2020; Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024). However, it differed fundamentally from the ostrich and the Eurasian common moorhen, where the nasal septum transitioned from a cartilaginous framework in its rostral zone into a solid bony framework within the caudal region (
Jaifar, 2023;
Tadjalli et al., 2008).
Architectural features of nasal conchae (Turbinates)
The mucosal landscape within each symmetrical chamber of the nasal cavity was expanded by three types of creamy-white cartilaginous conchae, arranged sequentially as the rostral, middle and caudal conchae. Among these structures, the middle nasal concha was consistently the largest structural component across all developmental stages. The rostral concha formed the second largest element, while the caudal concha remained the smallest.
This specific size distribution pattern matched anatomical descriptions of the goose, common quail, Nandanam chicken, Eurasian common moorhen and turkey
(Dharani et al., 2020; Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024;
Madkour, 2019). However, it differed from the hooded crow and the dove, both of which possessed an ill-developed rostral concha paired with a well-developed, dominant caudal concha (
Madkour, 2019).
The precise post-natal dimensions of these individual turbinates, measured
via high-precision transverse cross-sections, are compiled in Table 2.
Rostral nasal concha
In mid-sagittal sections, the lateral border of the rostral nasal concha was fixed directly to the lateral wall of the vestibule, extending caudally into the middle third of the nasal passage. The rostral tip was positioned so it could be seen from the exterior while viewing through the nostril opening. Morphologically, it displayed a characteristic outline similar to that of the kite (Fig 4). This shape matched the turkey, but differed from the triangular profile with a caudoventrally directed apex found in the Japanese quail and hooded crow, as well as the slightly involuted conical shape of the Nandanam chicken (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007;
Dharani et al., 2020; Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024). Transverse cross-sections revealed a distinct C-shaped configuration that projected directly from the lateral wall of the nasal cavity (Fig 6). matching the structural patterns seen in the Japanese quail, hooded crow, Common Moorhen and turkey (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007;
Jaifar, 2023). Conversely, this shape differed from the shelf-like projection found in ducks, the T-shaped concha characteristic of geese and the single ventrolateral half-turn present in the Eurasian common moorhen (
Jaifar, 2023;
Madkour, 2019). The significant post-natal growth recorded from day 0 to day 112 closely tracks the expansion trends documented across indigenous Galliformes.
Middle nasal concha
Situated obliquely within the sagittal plane between the rostral and caudal conchae, its rostral extremity attached firmly to the dorsal nasal wall while its caudal end projected down toward the choanal slit (Fig 5). This specific structural placement matched findings in the Japanese quail and the ostrich (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007;
Tadjalli et al., 2008). The concha exhibited an elongated shape that was widest at its rostral origin, constricted through its middle segment and tapered to its narrowest point caudally right above the level of the choanal slit. This morphological profile was consistent with the turkey, but differed from the spirally curved concha noted in the Nandanam chicken
(Dharani et al., 2020; Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024). Transverse sections revealed that the middle concha formed one and one-half full turns (Fig 6). This scroll-like curvature matches configurations described in ducks and turkeys (
Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024;
Madkour, 2019). However, it differed from the simpler, single ventrolateral half-turn seen in Japanese quails and the two full turns presented in geese (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007;
Madkour, 2019) and the two complete and one half-ring coiled towards lumen (
Harem, 2026). The dataset obtained for the Uttara fowl in the present study provided a far more comprehensive and extended developmental timeline up to full structural maturity at 112 days (attaining in height) compared to the restricted 45-day growth window previously documented for other native poultry lines.
Caudal nasal concha (olfactory concha)
The caudal concha represented the smallest turbinate element and was located in the caudo-dorsal region of the nasal cavity, resting directly above the dorsal surface of the middle concha. Sagittal cross-sections showed a roughly triangular profile (Fig 5) similar to the structures observed in the ostrich and Nandanam chicken
(Dharani et al., 2020; Tadjalli et al., 2008). This shape differed from the hemispherical concha typical of the Japanese quail, the oval structure found in the hooded crow and the inverted comma-shaped architecture seen in the turkey (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007;
Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024). In transverse profiles, the caudal concha exhibited a pear-shaped structure characterized by a shallow central depression (Fig 6). This conformation matches the hollow, pear-shaped concha described in doves, but stood in contrast to the single and a half turns seen in hooded crows and Eurasian common moorhens, as well as the hollow mould-shaped conformation typical of the turkey (
Jaifar, 2023;
Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024);
Madkour, 2019), (Fig 7).
Spatial organization of nasal meatuses
The internal airflow pathways of the nasal cavity were organized into four functional anatomical passages: the dorsal meatus, ventral meatus, common meatus and intermediate meatus.
Due to the oblique orientation and large size of the middle concha, the intermediate meatus was divided into two distinct structural chambers. The rostral section of the intermediate meatus was positioned between the rostral and middle conchae, whereas its caudal section occupied the space between the middle and caudal conchae. This intermediate pathway served as a central hub, communicating directly with the vestibule, the dorsal nasal meatus, the common nasal meatus and the ventral nasal meatus. The boundaries of the remaining pathways were organized as follows:
Dorsal nasal meatus
Positioned between the dorsal wall of the nasal cavity and the upper boundary of the conchae.
Ventral nasal meatus
Bounded dorsally by the lower surfaces of the middle and rostral conchae and ventrally by the solid floor of the nasal cavity.
Common nasal meatus
Formed by the central vertical clearance space between the medial face of the conchae and the medial nasal septum, communicating directly with all other regional meatuses.
This structural distribution slightly similar to other avian models; for example, the turkey exhibited up to five specialized meatuses (
Dharani and Kumaravel, 2024), whereas Japanese quails displayed a modified intermedio-dorsal and intermedio-caudal routing system (
Cevik-Demirkan et al., 2007), (Fig 5).