Assessment of Serum Interleukin-31 and Total Immunoglobulin E Concentrations and Their Correlation with Disease Severity in Canine Atopic Dermatitis

1Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
2Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
3Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
4Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
5Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.

Background: Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) often develops skin problems and produce immunoglobulin E (IgE) against environmental allergens. Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is an important itch-inducing cytokine in human atopic dermatitis (AD). The study aimed to quantify serum IL-31 and total IgE in CAD-affected dogs and to evaluate their correlation with disease severity.

Methods: Twelve client-owned dogs with CAD were enrolled after diagnosis based on favrot’s criteria. Six apparently healthy dogs were included as the healthy control group. The severity of cutaneous lesions was assessed using the canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index-04 (CADESI-04) scoring system. Pruritus intensity was evaluated using the pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS). Serum IL-31 and total IgE levels were assessed using canine-specific commercial sandwich ELISA kits (FineTest®, Wuhan, China).

Result: Dogs with CAD exhibited significantly increased serum IL-31 concentrations compared with healthy controls (p = 0.001). Likewise, total IgE levels were markedly higher in the CAD group than in the control group (p = 0.010). A strong positive association was observed between serum IL-31 levels and pVAS scores (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ = 0.804; p = 0.003). The study highlights the diagnostic and clinical relevance of serum IL-31 and total IgE as potential biomarkers in CAD.

The skin recognized as the body’s largest organ; constitutes 12 to 24% of a dog’s total body weight depending on the species and age (Moriello, 2011). The functions of skin include sensation, protection, heat regulation, excretion, secretion and Vitamin D synthesis (Garland, 2013). However, it is very sensitive to various inflammatory and allergic responses. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent skin disorder affecting both humans and animals (Marsella, 2021). The reported prevalence of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) in the canine population varies between 3 and 15% (Nodtvedt et al., 2006; Saridomichelakis and Olivry, 2016). As companion animals, dogs often share the same environment as their owners and naturally develop skin disorders that are clinically and immunologically similar to human AD (Ozmen and Marsella, 2014).
       
In recent years, the incidence of AD has notably increased in both species (Ricci et al., 2010; Nutten, 2015), likely due to greater exposure to indoor allergens and lifestyles that limit contact with parasites and beneficial microbes, often described as the “hygiene hypothesis” (Tarpataki et al., 2006; Favrot et al., 2010). In dogs, AD primarily presents with skin-related symptoms (Ozmen and Marsella, 2014; Patrizi et al., 2011; Bantz et al., 2014). CAD is a genetically predisposed, inflammatory and pruritic allergic skin disease directed against environmental allergens (Halliwell, 2006) and is triggered by an immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody reaction (Santoro, 2019).
       
The dynamics of CAD are multifactorial and complex interactions between genetics and environment are hypothesized, as in human AD (Nutten, 2015; Bizikova et al., 2015). Immune dysregulation is considered one of the major factors involved in the pathogenesis of CAD (Li et al., 2021). AD skin lesions are mainly driven by T helper 2 (TH2) immune responses. Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is produced by TH2 cells (Wolf and Wolf, 2012). Evidence suggested that IL-31 was a potent pruritogenic cytokine that played a key role in pruritic skin conditions in humans (Gonzales et al., 2013; Saleem et al., 2017). Administration of IL-31 induces scratching behaviour in rodents (Arai et al., 2013). It also induces scratching in dogs and monkeys (Gonzales et al., 2016; Lewis et al., 2017). Inflammation, pruritus and infection are all part of a vicious cycle that has an effect on dogs, their owners and veterinarians (Bizikova et al., 2015; Hensel et al., 2015). CAD has a considerable negative impact on the quality of life of their owners. The primary burden is the high cost of treatment and long-term therapy (Linek and Favrot, 2010).
       
However, the contribution of IL-31 to the immunopathogenesis of CAD is not yet fully elucidated. The relationship between serum concentrations of IL-31 and total IgE and disease severity remains unclear and is an area of research interest. Despite years of research, clinical and histological evaluation of CAD remains important for accurate diagnosis and understanding of disease dynamics. The study aimed to investigate the immunological alterations reflected by serum IL-31 and total IgE in CAD-affected dogs and explore their potential association with clinical severity indicators. Assessing these biomarkers may aid in improving diagnosis, evaluating disease severity, assessing treatment response and developing targeted therapies for better clinical management of affected dogs.
Place of work
 
The present study was conducted during the period from July 2025 to December 2025 at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora. Dogs presented to the OPD (Outpatient Department), of Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, DSVCKV, Durg (C.G.) with clinical signs suggestive of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD), were employed for the study.
 
Animal ethics
 
The study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) (Approval No. VMD-PG-5/2025).
 
Diagnostic work-up
 
A comprehensive diagnostic approach was adopted to identify cases of CAD. A Step-by-step diagnostic work-up was carried out. A detailed history was collected from the pet owners. Clinical signs and dermatological examinations of the suspected dogs were recorded separately; however, treated accordingly.
 
Inclusion criteria
 
The dogs with positive Favrot’s criteria were included in the study (Favrot et al., 2010). All dogs fulfilled ³5 of 8 Favrot’s criteria.
 
Exclusion criteria
 
Dogs with an age of more than 3 years, stray dogs and those infested with ectoparasites and endoparasites were excluded from the study. Dogs older than 3 years were excluded to maintain a relatively homogeneous young-adult study population and to minimize potential age-related variation in clinical presentation and concurrent conditions. Dogs <1 year old, pregnant females and animals with serious systemic diseases were excluded. Dogs with prior administration of glucocorticoids, Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibody therapy, antihistamines, fatty acid supplements, or otic preparations containing glucocorticoids within 30 days before clinical evaluation were excluded from the study. None of the participating dogs had a previous history of receiving allergen-specific immunotherapy. Food allergy was ruled out through an 8-week food elimination trial using Royal Canin Hypoallergenic diet. All dogs underwent cytological screening of skin impression smears for bacterial pyoderma and Malassezia overgrowth. Animals diagnosed with bacterial or yeast infections were excluded from the study.
 
Study design
 
A total of 12 client-owned dogs (n = 12) diagnosed with CAD based on favrot’s criteria were included in the study after excluding other dermatological conditions. Six apparently healthy dogs (n = 6) were enrolled as the control group. Dogs in both groups included males and females of different breeds.
 
Canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index-04 (CADESI-04)
 
A total of 20 body sites, three types of lesions and four grades of severity were assessed, thereby generating a maximum score of 20 x 3 x 3 = 180 (Olivry et al., 2014).
 
Pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS)
 
Pruritus intensity was assessed using pVAS, scored from 0 to 10 (0 = absent itching; 10 = maximum severity). The pVAS values were determined based on the history and evaluation provided by the owners (Olivry et al., 2007).
 
Collection of blood samples
 
A 5 mL blood sample was collected from each dog through the cephalic or lateral saphenous vein before commencement of therapy (day 0). The samples were placed in clot activator tubes and maintained at room temperature for 30 min. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, the serum fraction was carefully separated. Serum aliquots were stored at -20°C until analysis of IL-31 and total IgE concentrations.
 
In vitro quantitative determination of IL-31 and total IgE concentrations in serum
 
Circulating levels of canine interleukin-31 (IL-31) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) were assessed in confirmed cases of CAD using canine-specific ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. The IL-31 assay was performed using the kit (Catalogue No.: ECA0091; Batch No.: FN250929; Revision: V4.0) and total IgE assay using the kit (Catalogue No.: ECA0010; Batch No.: FN250929; Revision: V4.0;) supplied by FineTest®, Wuhan (China). Serum IL-31 levels were expressed in pg/mL, while serum total IgE concentrations were expressed in ng/mL.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data were initially checked for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Homogeneity of variances between the two groups was evaluated using the F-test. For data that were normally distributed with equal variances, an unpaired Student’s t-test was used for comparison between groups. For data that deviated from normality, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied. The relationship between two continuous variables was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for normally distributed data and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) for data not following a normal distribution. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 11. Values were reported as mean±standard error (SE) and a probability level of p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Serum IL-31 levels were significantly higher in dogs with CAD than in healthy dogs (Fig 1A). The mean (SE) IL-31 concentration was 165.76 (SE: 9.42) in healthy dogs and 237.86 (SE: 14.55) in CAD-affected dogs, which was statistically significant (p = 0.001) as presented in Table 1. Increased serum IL-31 levels in CAD-affected dogs indicated active pruritogenic signalling during disease progression. This finding was consistent with previous reports showing that administration of canine IL-31 directly induced pruritic behaviour in dogs (Gonzales et al., 2013). Similar evidence demonstrated a positive association between IL-31 levels and disease severity during active flares (Marsella et al., 2017). The elevated IL-31 observed in the present study may be attributed to increased production by TH2 cells and its action on sensory nerve fibres through the IL-31 receptor complex, ultimately triggering the itch sensation (Furue et al., 2018). A previous study failed to detect IL-31 mRNA in the skin of dogs with AD (Mizuno et al., 2009). Therefore, serum IL-31 estimation may be more informative than IL-31 mRNA expression analysis. Long-term caninized anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibody therapy was evaluated in a beagle with severe atopic dermatitis. This was the first clinical study of its kind reported from India. The antibody binds to and neutralizes IL-31. Treatment reduced pruritus, erythema and lesion severity (Sundararajan et al., 2026). The marked reduction in pruritus after IL-31 neutralization justifies the role of serum IL-31 as an important itch-inducing cytokine in dogs.
       
Serum total IgE levels were markedly increased in CAD-affected dogs compared with healthy controls, as illustrated in Fig 1B. The mean (SE) IgE concentration was 6.86 (SE: 0.20) in healthy dogs and 8.06 (SE: 0.27) in CAD-affected dogs. The findings presented in Table 1 showed that serum IgE concentrations were significantly increased in CAD dogs compared with controls (p = 0.010). Higher serum IgE levels in CAD-affected dogs reflected IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Previous findings also reported significantly increased serum IgE concentrations in clinically affected Pugs that were positive on intradermal testing compared with healthy and test-negative dogs, emphasizing the association between elevated IgE levels and true allergic sensitization (Bhagya et al., 2023). Damage to the skin barrier allows allergens to penetrate the skin more easily (van den Bogaard et al., 2023). This activates TH2 immune responses through antigen-presenting cells. Consequently, IgE production increases (Facheris et al., 2023; Wollenberg et al., 2021). Elevated IgE contributes to hypersensitivity reactions (Santoro, 2019; Wüthrich, 1978). Increased IgE levels are reported in both serum and skin of affected patients (Wüthrich, 1978). Therefore, IgE plays an important role in the development of atopic dermatitis (AD).

@figue1

Table 1: Serum IL-31 and total IgE levels in healthy control and CAD-affected dogs.


       
Clinical severity assessment revealed a mean CADESI-04 score of 64.25 (SE: 1.37; median: 62.5; range: 60-75) and a mean pVAS score of 8.16 (SE: 0.06; median: 8.15; range: 7.8-8.5) in CAD-affected dogs. Correlation analysis showed that serum IL-31 levels were strongly and positively related to pVAS scores (r = 0.804; p = 0.003) (Table 2 and Fig 2B). This means that dogs with higher IL-31 levels tended to have more severe itching. However, serum IL-31 levels were not significantly related to CADESI-04 scores (r = 0.327; p = 0.297) (Table 2 and Fig 2A). Serum total IgE levels showed a positive relationship with both CADESI-04 scores (r = 0.320; p = 0.308) and pVAS scores (r = 0.460; p = 0.132) (Table 2). However, these relationships were not statistically significant (Fig 2C and 2D). The strong positive correlation between IL-31 and pVAS scores indicated that higher IL-31 concentrations were closely associated with increased pruritus intensity. This observation was in agreement with earlier findings reporting significantly elevated IL-31 concentrations in atopic dogs and a significant positive correlation between IL-31 and pVAS scores. These findings further support the association between IL-31 and pruritic activity (Chaudhary et al., 2019). A significant positive correlation between serum IL-31 levels and disease severity during active flares was also reported in an experimental CAD model, suggesting IL-31 as a potential biomarker for pruritic activity and therapeutic response (Marsella et al., 2017). In contrast, total IgE showed weak and non-significant correlations with both CADESI-04 and pVAS, suggesting that circulating IgE levels were not directly associated with clinical severity of skin lesions or pruritus in the present study. This finding differed from previous observations that reported a significant positive correlation between IgE concentrations and CADESI scores (Lo et al., 2012). The lack of significant correlation between IgE and clinical indices in the present study indicates that IgE may reflect atopic status rather than the current severity of lesions or pruritus. One study reported that treatments such as selective Janus kinase inhibitor and corticosteroid improve clinical manifestations without significant changes in serum IgE levels (Aleo et al., 2023). Yet, there appear to be no reports on effect of caninized anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibodies on IgE level to compare the observations of the present findings. Therefore, serum IgE may have greater diagnostic value in CAD than its role in monitoring disease severity or treatment response. Furthermore, the small number of atopic dogs included in this study is an important limitation. Therefore, future studies with a larger number of dogs with naturally occurring CAD are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the relationship between serum IL-31and total IgE with disease severity and response to treatment in dogs with CAD.

Table 2: Correlation between serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations with CADESI-04 and pVAS scores in CAD-affected dogs.



Fig 2: Scatter plots illustrating the correlation of serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations with CADESI-04 and pVAS scores in dogs with atopic dermatitis (n = 12).

The present study demonstrated a significant elevation of serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations in dogs affected with AD, supporting their central role in the pathogenesis of CAD. In conclusion, the concurrent elevation of IL-31 and total IgE in the present study confirms the combined involvement of cytokine-mediated pruritus and IgE-driven allergic mechanisms in CAD and supports their diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. Higher IL-31 levels were closely associated with intense pruritus in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Targeted therapies against IL-31 may improve treatment outcomes and reduce itching in dogs with CAD.
The study was funded by the Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, DSVCKV, Durg,  Chhattisgarh, India. The funding support was provided for the procurement of ELISA kits used in the study.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal care and handling techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Aleo, M.M., Messamore, J., Nieto, B.A., Fleck, T.J., Humphrey, W.R., Coscarelli, E.M., Mahabir, S.P., McCall, R.B. and Gonzales, A.J. (2023). Lack of interference of oclacitinib with the results of intradermal testing or allergen-specific IgE serology in Dermatophagoides farinae-sensitized Beagle dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 256: 110537. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2022.110537.

  2. Arai, I., Tsuji, M., Takeda, H., Akiyama, N. and Saito, S. (2013). A single dose of interleukin-31 (IL-31) causes continuous itch-associated scratching behaviour in mice. Experimental Dermatology. 22(10): 669-671. doi: 10.1111/exd.12222.

  3. Bantz, S.K., Zhu, Z. and Zheng, T. (2014). The atopic march: progression from atopic dermatitis to allergic rhinitis and asthma. Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology. 5: 202. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000202.

  4. Bhagya, B.K., Kamran, C.A., Veeregowda, B.M. and Rao, S. (2023). Estimation of total serum IgE levels in atopic pugs. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(1): 2917-2918. doi: 10.22271/tpi.

  5. Bizikova, P., Santoro, D., Marsella, R., Nuttall, T., Eisenschenk, M.N.C. and Pucheu-Haston, C.M. (2015). Clinical and histological manifestations of canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 26: 79-e24. doi: 10.1111/vde. 12196.

  6. Chaudhary, S.K., Singh, S.K., Kumari, P., Kanwal, S., Soman, S.P., Choudhury, S. and Garg, S.K. (2019). Alterations in circulating concentrations of IL-17, IL-31 and total IgE in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 30: 383-e114. doi: 10.1111/vde.12762.

  7. Facheris, P., Jeffery, J., Del Duca, E. and Guttman-Yassky, E. (2023). The translational revolution in atopic dermatitis: The paradigm shift from pathogenesis to treatment. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 20(5): 448-474. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-00992-4.

  8. Favrot, C., Steffan, J., Seewald, W. and Picco, F. (2010). A prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis. Veterinary Dermatology. 21(1): 23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00758.x.

  9. Furue, M., Yamamura, K., Kido-Nakahara, M., Nakahara, T. and Fukui, Y. (2018). Emerging role of interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 73(1): 29-36. doi: 10.1111/all.13239.

  10. Garland, M. (2013). Introduction to canine skin and dermatology. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 28(4): 131-133. doi: 10.1111/ vnj.12025.

  11. Gonzales, A.J., Fleck, T.J., Humphrey, W.R., Galvan, B.A., Aleo, M.M., Mahabir, S.P., Tena, J.K., Greenwood, K.G. and McCall, R.B. (2016). IL-31-induced pruritus in dogs: A novel experimental model to evaluate anti-pruritic effects of canine therapeutics. Veterinary Dermatology. 27: 34- e10. doi: 10.1111/vde.12280

  12. Gonzales, A.J., Humphrey, W.R., Messamore, J.E., Fleck, T.J., Fici, G.J. and Shelly, J.A. (2013). Interleukin-31: Its role in canine pruritus and naturally occurring canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 24(1): 48-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01098.x.

  13. Halliwell, R. (2006). Revised nomenclature for veterinary allergy. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 114(3- 4): 207-208.  doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.08.013.

  14. Hensel, P., Santoro, D., Favrot, C., Hill, P. and Griffin, C. (2015). Canine atopic dermatitis: detailed guidelines for diagnosis and allergen identification. BMC Veterinary Research. 11: 196.  doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5.

  15. Lewis, K.E., Holdren, M.S., Maurer, M.F., Underwood, S., Meengs, B., Julien, S.H., Byrnes-Blake, K.A., Freeman, J.A., Bukowski, T.R., Wolf, A.C., Hamacher, N.B., Rixon, M.W. and Dillon, S.R. (2017). Interleukin (IL)-31 induces in cynomolgus monkeys a rapid and intense itch response that can be inhibited by an IL-31 neutralizing antibody. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 31: 142-150.  doi: 10.1111/jdv.13794.

  16. Li, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Guo, Y. and Yao, Z. (2021). Update on the pathogenesis and therapy of atopic dermatitis. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. 61(3): 324-338.  doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3.

  17. Linek, M. and Favrot, C. (2010). Impact of canine atopic dermatitis on the health-related quality of life of affected dogs and quality of life of their owners. Veterinary Dermatology. 21(5): 456-462.  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2010.00899.x.

  18. Lo, P.Y., Chen, K.H. and Huang, H.P. (2012). Comparison of intradermal tests, total serum IgE concentrations and allergen-specific IgE using an arrayed protein chip in atopic dogs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 10: 3298-3303.  doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.3298.3303.

  19. Marsella, R. (2021). Advances in our understanding of canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 32: 547-e151.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12965.

  20. Marsella, R., Ahrens, K. and Sanford, R. (2017). Investigation of the correlation of serum IL-31 with severity of dermatitis in an experimental model of canine atopic dermatitis using beagle dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 28: 441-442.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12500.

  21. Mizuno, T., Kanbayashi, S., Okawa, T., Maeda, S. and Okuda, M. (2009). Molecular cloning of canine interleukin-31 and its expression in various tissues. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 131(1-2): 140-143.  doi: 10.1016/ j.vetimm.2009.03.014.

  22. Moriello, K. (2011). Small Animal Dermatology, Revised: Self-Assessment Color Review. 1st edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9780429068447.

  23. Nodtvedt, A., Egenvall, A., Bergvall, K. and Hedhammar, A. (2006). Incidence of and risk factors for atopic dermatitis in a swedish population of insured dogs. Veterinary Record. 159(8): 241-246.  doi: 10.1136/vr.159.8.241.

  24. Nutten, S. (2015). Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 66(Suppl 1): 8-16.  doi: 10.1159/000370220.

  25. Olivry, T., Marsella, R., Iwasaki, T. and Mueller, R. (2007). Validation of CADESI-03, a severity scale for clinical trials enrolling dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 18(2): 78-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00569.x.

  26. Olivry, T., Saridomichelakis, M., Nuttall, T., Bensignor, E., Griffin, C.E. and Hill, P.B. (2014). Validation of CADESI-4, a simplified severity scale for assessing skin lesions of atopic dermatitis in dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 25(2): 77-e25.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12107.

  27. Ozmen, I. and Marsella, R. (2014). Sublingual immunotherapy in human and canine atopic dermatitis: A mini review. Veterinary Sciences. 1(3): 136-149. doi: 10.3390/ vetsci1030136.

  28. Patrizi, A., Pileri, A., Bellini, F., Raone, B., Neri, I. and Ricci, G. (2011). Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march: What is new? Journal of Allergy. 2011: 279425. doi: 10.1155/ 2011/279425.

  29. Ricci, G., Patrizi, A., Giannetti, A., Dondi, A., Bendandi, B. and Masi, M. (2010). Does improvement management of atopic dermatitis influence the appearance of respiratory allergic diseases? A follow-up study. Clinical and Molecular Allergy. 8: 8.  doi: 10.1186/1476-7961-8-8.

  30. Saleem, M.D., Oussedik, E., D’Amber, V. and Feldman, S.R. (2017). Interleukin 31 pathway and its role in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review. Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 28(7): 591-599.  doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1290205.

  31. Santoro, D. (2019). Therapies in canine atopic dermatitis: An update. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 49(1): 9-26.  doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.08.002.

  32. Saridomichelakis, M.N. and Olivry, T. (2016). An update on the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. The Veterinary Journal. 207: 29-37.  doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.09.016.

  33. Sundararajan, R.C., Ambily, V.R., George, A., Unny, N.M., Thomas, M.K., Divya, P.D. and Priya, M.N. (2026). Long term use of lokivetmab monotherapy and its expression in a beagle with severe atopic dermatitis: First clinical study from India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-8.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5661. 

  34. Tarpataki, N., Pápa, K., Reiczigel, J., Vajdovich, P. and Vörös, K. (2006). Prevalence and features of canine atopic dermatitis in hungary. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 54(3): 353-366.  doi: 10.1556/avet.54.2006.3.6.

  35. van den Bogaard, E.H., Elias, P.M., Goleva, E., Berdyshev, E., Smits, J.P.H., Danby, S.G., Cork, M.J. and Leung, D.Y.M. (2023). Targeting skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in Practice. 11(5): 1335-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.005.

  36. Wolf, R. and Wolf, D. (2012). Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology. 30(3): 329-334.  doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.023.

  37. Wollenberg, A., Thomsen, S.F., Lacour, J.P., Jaumont, X. and Lazarewicz, S. (2021). Targeting immunoglobulin E in atopic dermatitis: a review of the existing evidence. World Allergy Organization Journal. 14(3): 100519.  doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100519.

  38. Wüthrich, B. (1978). Serum IgE in atopic dermatitis: relationship to severity of cutaneous involvement and course of disease as well as coexistence of atopic respiratory diseases. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 8(3): 241-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb03220.x.

Assessment of Serum Interleukin-31 and Total Immunoglobulin E Concentrations and Their Correlation with Disease Severity in Canine Atopic Dermatitis

1Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
2Department of Veterinary Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
3Department of Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
4Department of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.
5Department of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DSVCKV, Anjora, Durg-491 001, Chhattisgarh, India.

Background: Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) often develops skin problems and produce immunoglobulin E (IgE) against environmental allergens. Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is an important itch-inducing cytokine in human atopic dermatitis (AD). The study aimed to quantify serum IL-31 and total IgE in CAD-affected dogs and to evaluate their correlation with disease severity.

Methods: Twelve client-owned dogs with CAD were enrolled after diagnosis based on favrot’s criteria. Six apparently healthy dogs were included as the healthy control group. The severity of cutaneous lesions was assessed using the canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index-04 (CADESI-04) scoring system. Pruritus intensity was evaluated using the pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS). Serum IL-31 and total IgE levels were assessed using canine-specific commercial sandwich ELISA kits (FineTest®, Wuhan, China).

Result: Dogs with CAD exhibited significantly increased serum IL-31 concentrations compared with healthy controls (p = 0.001). Likewise, total IgE levels were markedly higher in the CAD group than in the control group (p = 0.010). A strong positive association was observed between serum IL-31 levels and pVAS scores (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ = 0.804; p = 0.003). The study highlights the diagnostic and clinical relevance of serum IL-31 and total IgE as potential biomarkers in CAD.

The skin recognized as the body’s largest organ; constitutes 12 to 24% of a dog’s total body weight depending on the species and age (Moriello, 2011). The functions of skin include sensation, protection, heat regulation, excretion, secretion and Vitamin D synthesis (Garland, 2013). However, it is very sensitive to various inflammatory and allergic responses. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent skin disorder affecting both humans and animals (Marsella, 2021). The reported prevalence of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) in the canine population varies between 3 and 15% (Nodtvedt et al., 2006; Saridomichelakis and Olivry, 2016). As companion animals, dogs often share the same environment as their owners and naturally develop skin disorders that are clinically and immunologically similar to human AD (Ozmen and Marsella, 2014).
       
In recent years, the incidence of AD has notably increased in both species (Ricci et al., 2010; Nutten, 2015), likely due to greater exposure to indoor allergens and lifestyles that limit contact with parasites and beneficial microbes, often described as the “hygiene hypothesis” (Tarpataki et al., 2006; Favrot et al., 2010). In dogs, AD primarily presents with skin-related symptoms (Ozmen and Marsella, 2014; Patrizi et al., 2011; Bantz et al., 2014). CAD is a genetically predisposed, inflammatory and pruritic allergic skin disease directed against environmental allergens (Halliwell, 2006) and is triggered by an immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody reaction (Santoro, 2019).
       
The dynamics of CAD are multifactorial and complex interactions between genetics and environment are hypothesized, as in human AD (Nutten, 2015; Bizikova et al., 2015). Immune dysregulation is considered one of the major factors involved in the pathogenesis of CAD (Li et al., 2021). AD skin lesions are mainly driven by T helper 2 (TH2) immune responses. Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is produced by TH2 cells (Wolf and Wolf, 2012). Evidence suggested that IL-31 was a potent pruritogenic cytokine that played a key role in pruritic skin conditions in humans (Gonzales et al., 2013; Saleem et al., 2017). Administration of IL-31 induces scratching behaviour in rodents (Arai et al., 2013). It also induces scratching in dogs and monkeys (Gonzales et al., 2016; Lewis et al., 2017). Inflammation, pruritus and infection are all part of a vicious cycle that has an effect on dogs, their owners and veterinarians (Bizikova et al., 2015; Hensel et al., 2015). CAD has a considerable negative impact on the quality of life of their owners. The primary burden is the high cost of treatment and long-term therapy (Linek and Favrot, 2010).
       
However, the contribution of IL-31 to the immunopathogenesis of CAD is not yet fully elucidated. The relationship between serum concentrations of IL-31 and total IgE and disease severity remains unclear and is an area of research interest. Despite years of research, clinical and histological evaluation of CAD remains important for accurate diagnosis and understanding of disease dynamics. The study aimed to investigate the immunological alterations reflected by serum IL-31 and total IgE in CAD-affected dogs and explore their potential association with clinical severity indicators. Assessing these biomarkers may aid in improving diagnosis, evaluating disease severity, assessing treatment response and developing targeted therapies for better clinical management of affected dogs.
Place of work
 
The present study was conducted during the period from July 2025 to December 2025 at the Department of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora. Dogs presented to the OPD (Outpatient Department), of Teaching Veterinary Clinical Complex, DSVCKV, Durg (C.G.) with clinical signs suggestive of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD), were employed for the study.
 
Animal ethics
 
The study was conducted after obtaining ethical clearance from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) (Approval No. VMD-PG-5/2025).
 
Diagnostic work-up
 
A comprehensive diagnostic approach was adopted to identify cases of CAD. A Step-by-step diagnostic work-up was carried out. A detailed history was collected from the pet owners. Clinical signs and dermatological examinations of the suspected dogs were recorded separately; however, treated accordingly.
 
Inclusion criteria
 
The dogs with positive Favrot’s criteria were included in the study (Favrot et al., 2010). All dogs fulfilled ³5 of 8 Favrot’s criteria.
 
Exclusion criteria
 
Dogs with an age of more than 3 years, stray dogs and those infested with ectoparasites and endoparasites were excluded from the study. Dogs older than 3 years were excluded to maintain a relatively homogeneous young-adult study population and to minimize potential age-related variation in clinical presentation and concurrent conditions. Dogs <1 year old, pregnant females and animals with serious systemic diseases were excluded. Dogs with prior administration of glucocorticoids, Janus kinase inhibitors, anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibody therapy, antihistamines, fatty acid supplements, or otic preparations containing glucocorticoids within 30 days before clinical evaluation were excluded from the study. None of the participating dogs had a previous history of receiving allergen-specific immunotherapy. Food allergy was ruled out through an 8-week food elimination trial using Royal Canin Hypoallergenic diet. All dogs underwent cytological screening of skin impression smears for bacterial pyoderma and Malassezia overgrowth. Animals diagnosed with bacterial or yeast infections were excluded from the study.
 
Study design
 
A total of 12 client-owned dogs (n = 12) diagnosed with CAD based on favrot’s criteria were included in the study after excluding other dermatological conditions. Six apparently healthy dogs (n = 6) were enrolled as the control group. Dogs in both groups included males and females of different breeds.
 
Canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index-04 (CADESI-04)
 
A total of 20 body sites, three types of lesions and four grades of severity were assessed, thereby generating a maximum score of 20 x 3 x 3 = 180 (Olivry et al., 2014).
 
Pruritus visual analog scale (pVAS)
 
Pruritus intensity was assessed using pVAS, scored from 0 to 10 (0 = absent itching; 10 = maximum severity). The pVAS values were determined based on the history and evaluation provided by the owners (Olivry et al., 2007).
 
Collection of blood samples
 
A 5 mL blood sample was collected from each dog through the cephalic or lateral saphenous vein before commencement of therapy (day 0). The samples were placed in clot activator tubes and maintained at room temperature for 30 min. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, the serum fraction was carefully separated. Serum aliquots were stored at -20°C until analysis of IL-31 and total IgE concentrations.
 
In vitro quantitative determination of IL-31 and total IgE concentrations in serum
 
Circulating levels of canine interleukin-31 (IL-31) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE) were assessed in confirmed cases of CAD using canine-specific ELISA kits following the manufacturer’s instructions. The IL-31 assay was performed using the kit (Catalogue No.: ECA0091; Batch No.: FN250929; Revision: V4.0) and total IgE assay using the kit (Catalogue No.: ECA0010; Batch No.: FN250929; Revision: V4.0;) supplied by FineTest®, Wuhan (China). Serum IL-31 levels were expressed in pg/mL, while serum total IgE concentrations were expressed in ng/mL.
 
Statistical analysis
 
The data were initially checked for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Homogeneity of variances between the two groups was evaluated using the F-test. For data that were normally distributed with equal variances, an unpaired Student’s t-test was used for comparison between groups. For data that deviated from normality, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was applied. The relationship between two continuous variables was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) for normally distributed data and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ) for data not following a normal distribution. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism version 11. Values were reported as mean±standard error (SE) and a probability level of p<0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
Serum IL-31 levels were significantly higher in dogs with CAD than in healthy dogs (Fig 1A). The mean (SE) IL-31 concentration was 165.76 (SE: 9.42) in healthy dogs and 237.86 (SE: 14.55) in CAD-affected dogs, which was statistically significant (p = 0.001) as presented in Table 1. Increased serum IL-31 levels in CAD-affected dogs indicated active pruritogenic signalling during disease progression. This finding was consistent with previous reports showing that administration of canine IL-31 directly induced pruritic behaviour in dogs (Gonzales et al., 2013). Similar evidence demonstrated a positive association between IL-31 levels and disease severity during active flares (Marsella et al., 2017). The elevated IL-31 observed in the present study may be attributed to increased production by TH2 cells and its action on sensory nerve fibres through the IL-31 receptor complex, ultimately triggering the itch sensation (Furue et al., 2018). A previous study failed to detect IL-31 mRNA in the skin of dogs with AD (Mizuno et al., 2009). Therefore, serum IL-31 estimation may be more informative than IL-31 mRNA expression analysis. Long-term caninized anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibody therapy was evaluated in a beagle with severe atopic dermatitis. This was the first clinical study of its kind reported from India. The antibody binds to and neutralizes IL-31. Treatment reduced pruritus, erythema and lesion severity (Sundararajan et al., 2026). The marked reduction in pruritus after IL-31 neutralization justifies the role of serum IL-31 as an important itch-inducing cytokine in dogs.
       
Serum total IgE levels were markedly increased in CAD-affected dogs compared with healthy controls, as illustrated in Fig 1B. The mean (SE) IgE concentration was 6.86 (SE: 0.20) in healthy dogs and 8.06 (SE: 0.27) in CAD-affected dogs. The findings presented in Table 1 showed that serum IgE concentrations were significantly increased in CAD dogs compared with controls (p = 0.010). Higher serum IgE levels in CAD-affected dogs reflected IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions. Previous findings also reported significantly increased serum IgE concentrations in clinically affected Pugs that were positive on intradermal testing compared with healthy and test-negative dogs, emphasizing the association between elevated IgE levels and true allergic sensitization (Bhagya et al., 2023). Damage to the skin barrier allows allergens to penetrate the skin more easily (van den Bogaard et al., 2023). This activates TH2 immune responses through antigen-presenting cells. Consequently, IgE production increases (Facheris et al., 2023; Wollenberg et al., 2021). Elevated IgE contributes to hypersensitivity reactions (Santoro, 2019; Wüthrich, 1978). Increased IgE levels are reported in both serum and skin of affected patients (Wüthrich, 1978). Therefore, IgE plays an important role in the development of atopic dermatitis (AD).

@figue1

Table 1: Serum IL-31 and total IgE levels in healthy control and CAD-affected dogs.


       
Clinical severity assessment revealed a mean CADESI-04 score of 64.25 (SE: 1.37; median: 62.5; range: 60-75) and a mean pVAS score of 8.16 (SE: 0.06; median: 8.15; range: 7.8-8.5) in CAD-affected dogs. Correlation analysis showed that serum IL-31 levels were strongly and positively related to pVAS scores (r = 0.804; p = 0.003) (Table 2 and Fig 2B). This means that dogs with higher IL-31 levels tended to have more severe itching. However, serum IL-31 levels were not significantly related to CADESI-04 scores (r = 0.327; p = 0.297) (Table 2 and Fig 2A). Serum total IgE levels showed a positive relationship with both CADESI-04 scores (r = 0.320; p = 0.308) and pVAS scores (r = 0.460; p = 0.132) (Table 2). However, these relationships were not statistically significant (Fig 2C and 2D). The strong positive correlation between IL-31 and pVAS scores indicated that higher IL-31 concentrations were closely associated with increased pruritus intensity. This observation was in agreement with earlier findings reporting significantly elevated IL-31 concentrations in atopic dogs and a significant positive correlation between IL-31 and pVAS scores. These findings further support the association between IL-31 and pruritic activity (Chaudhary et al., 2019). A significant positive correlation between serum IL-31 levels and disease severity during active flares was also reported in an experimental CAD model, suggesting IL-31 as a potential biomarker for pruritic activity and therapeutic response (Marsella et al., 2017). In contrast, total IgE showed weak and non-significant correlations with both CADESI-04 and pVAS, suggesting that circulating IgE levels were not directly associated with clinical severity of skin lesions or pruritus in the present study. This finding differed from previous observations that reported a significant positive correlation between IgE concentrations and CADESI scores (Lo et al., 2012). The lack of significant correlation between IgE and clinical indices in the present study indicates that IgE may reflect atopic status rather than the current severity of lesions or pruritus. One study reported that treatments such as selective Janus kinase inhibitor and corticosteroid improve clinical manifestations without significant changes in serum IgE levels (Aleo et al., 2023). Yet, there appear to be no reports on effect of caninized anti-IL-31 monoclonal antibodies on IgE level to compare the observations of the present findings. Therefore, serum IgE may have greater diagnostic value in CAD than its role in monitoring disease severity or treatment response. Furthermore, the small number of atopic dogs included in this study is an important limitation. Therefore, future studies with a larger number of dogs with naturally occurring CAD are needed to confirm these findings and better understand the relationship between serum IL-31and total IgE with disease severity and response to treatment in dogs with CAD.

Table 2: Correlation between serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations with CADESI-04 and pVAS scores in CAD-affected dogs.



Fig 2: Scatter plots illustrating the correlation of serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations with CADESI-04 and pVAS scores in dogs with atopic dermatitis (n = 12).

The present study demonstrated a significant elevation of serum IL-31 and total IgE concentrations in dogs affected with AD, supporting their central role in the pathogenesis of CAD. In conclusion, the concurrent elevation of IL-31 and total IgE in the present study confirms the combined involvement of cytokine-mediated pruritus and IgE-driven allergic mechanisms in CAD and supports their diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. Higher IL-31 levels were closely associated with intense pruritus in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Targeted therapies against IL-31 may improve treatment outcomes and reduce itching in dogs with CAD.
The study was funded by the Dean, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, Anjora, DSVCKV, Durg,  Chhattisgarh, India. The funding support was provided for the procurement of ELISA kits used in the study.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
All animal procedures for experiments were approved by the Committee of Experimental Animal care and handling techniques were approved by the University of Animal Care Committee.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Aleo, M.M., Messamore, J., Nieto, B.A., Fleck, T.J., Humphrey, W.R., Coscarelli, E.M., Mahabir, S.P., McCall, R.B. and Gonzales, A.J. (2023). Lack of interference of oclacitinib with the results of intradermal testing or allergen-specific IgE serology in Dermatophagoides farinae-sensitized Beagle dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 256: 110537. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2022.110537.

  2. Arai, I., Tsuji, M., Takeda, H., Akiyama, N. and Saito, S. (2013). A single dose of interleukin-31 (IL-31) causes continuous itch-associated scratching behaviour in mice. Experimental Dermatology. 22(10): 669-671. doi: 10.1111/exd.12222.

  3. Bantz, S.K., Zhu, Z. and Zheng, T. (2014). The atopic march: progression from atopic dermatitis to allergic rhinitis and asthma. Journal of Clinical and Cellular Immunology. 5: 202. doi: 10.4172/2155-9899.1000202.

  4. Bhagya, B.K., Kamran, C.A., Veeregowda, B.M. and Rao, S. (2023). Estimation of total serum IgE levels in atopic pugs. The Pharma Innovation Journal. 12(1): 2917-2918. doi: 10.22271/tpi.

  5. Bizikova, P., Santoro, D., Marsella, R., Nuttall, T., Eisenschenk, M.N.C. and Pucheu-Haston, C.M. (2015). Clinical and histological manifestations of canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 26: 79-e24. doi: 10.1111/vde. 12196.

  6. Chaudhary, S.K., Singh, S.K., Kumari, P., Kanwal, S., Soman, S.P., Choudhury, S. and Garg, S.K. (2019). Alterations in circulating concentrations of IL-17, IL-31 and total IgE in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 30: 383-e114. doi: 10.1111/vde.12762.

  7. Facheris, P., Jeffery, J., Del Duca, E. and Guttman-Yassky, E. (2023). The translational revolution in atopic dermatitis: The paradigm shift from pathogenesis to treatment. Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 20(5): 448-474. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-00992-4.

  8. Favrot, C., Steffan, J., Seewald, W. and Picco, F. (2010). A prospective study on the clinical features of chronic canine atopic dermatitis and its diagnosis. Veterinary Dermatology. 21(1): 23-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00758.x.

  9. Furue, M., Yamamura, K., Kido-Nakahara, M., Nakahara, T. and Fukui, Y. (2018). Emerging role of interleukin-31 and interleukin-31 receptor in pruritus in atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 73(1): 29-36. doi: 10.1111/all.13239.

  10. Garland, M. (2013). Introduction to canine skin and dermatology. Veterinary Nursing Journal. 28(4): 131-133. doi: 10.1111/ vnj.12025.

  11. Gonzales, A.J., Fleck, T.J., Humphrey, W.R., Galvan, B.A., Aleo, M.M., Mahabir, S.P., Tena, J.K., Greenwood, K.G. and McCall, R.B. (2016). IL-31-induced pruritus in dogs: A novel experimental model to evaluate anti-pruritic effects of canine therapeutics. Veterinary Dermatology. 27: 34- e10. doi: 10.1111/vde.12280

  12. Gonzales, A.J., Humphrey, W.R., Messamore, J.E., Fleck, T.J., Fici, G.J. and Shelly, J.A. (2013). Interleukin-31: Its role in canine pruritus and naturally occurring canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 24(1): 48-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01098.x.

  13. Halliwell, R. (2006). Revised nomenclature for veterinary allergy. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 114(3- 4): 207-208.  doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2006.08.013.

  14. Hensel, P., Santoro, D., Favrot, C., Hill, P. and Griffin, C. (2015). Canine atopic dermatitis: detailed guidelines for diagnosis and allergen identification. BMC Veterinary Research. 11: 196.  doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0515-5.

  15. Lewis, K.E., Holdren, M.S., Maurer, M.F., Underwood, S., Meengs, B., Julien, S.H., Byrnes-Blake, K.A., Freeman, J.A., Bukowski, T.R., Wolf, A.C., Hamacher, N.B., Rixon, M.W. and Dillon, S.R. (2017). Interleukin (IL)-31 induces in cynomolgus monkeys a rapid and intense itch response that can be inhibited by an IL-31 neutralizing antibody. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 31: 142-150.  doi: 10.1111/jdv.13794.

  16. Li, H., Zhang, Z., Zhang, H., Guo, Y. and Yao, Z. (2021). Update on the pathogenesis and therapy of atopic dermatitis. Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology. 61(3): 324-338.  doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3.

  17. Linek, M. and Favrot, C. (2010). Impact of canine atopic dermatitis on the health-related quality of life of affected dogs and quality of life of their owners. Veterinary Dermatology. 21(5): 456-462.  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2010.00899.x.

  18. Lo, P.Y., Chen, K.H. and Huang, H.P. (2012). Comparison of intradermal tests, total serum IgE concentrations and allergen-specific IgE using an arrayed protein chip in atopic dogs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 10: 3298-3303.  doi: 10.3923/javaa.2012.3298.3303.

  19. Marsella, R. (2021). Advances in our understanding of canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 32: 547-e151.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12965.

  20. Marsella, R., Ahrens, K. and Sanford, R. (2017). Investigation of the correlation of serum IL-31 with severity of dermatitis in an experimental model of canine atopic dermatitis using beagle dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 28: 441-442.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12500.

  21. Mizuno, T., Kanbayashi, S., Okawa, T., Maeda, S. and Okuda, M. (2009). Molecular cloning of canine interleukin-31 and its expression in various tissues. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 131(1-2): 140-143.  doi: 10.1016/ j.vetimm.2009.03.014.

  22. Moriello, K. (2011). Small Animal Dermatology, Revised: Self-Assessment Color Review. 1st edn. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi: 10.1201/9780429068447.

  23. Nodtvedt, A., Egenvall, A., Bergvall, K. and Hedhammar, A. (2006). Incidence of and risk factors for atopic dermatitis in a swedish population of insured dogs. Veterinary Record. 159(8): 241-246.  doi: 10.1136/vr.159.8.241.

  24. Nutten, S. (2015). Atopic dermatitis: global epidemiology and risk factors. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 66(Suppl 1): 8-16.  doi: 10.1159/000370220.

  25. Olivry, T., Marsella, R., Iwasaki, T. and Mueller, R. (2007). Validation of CADESI-03, a severity scale for clinical trials enrolling dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 18(2): 78-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2007.00569.x.

  26. Olivry, T., Saridomichelakis, M., Nuttall, T., Bensignor, E., Griffin, C.E. and Hill, P.B. (2014). Validation of CADESI-4, a simplified severity scale for assessing skin lesions of atopic dermatitis in dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 25(2): 77-e25.  doi: 10.1111/vde.12107.

  27. Ozmen, I. and Marsella, R. (2014). Sublingual immunotherapy in human and canine atopic dermatitis: A mini review. Veterinary Sciences. 1(3): 136-149. doi: 10.3390/ vetsci1030136.

  28. Patrizi, A., Pileri, A., Bellini, F., Raone, B., Neri, I. and Ricci, G. (2011). Atopic dermatitis and the atopic march: What is new? Journal of Allergy. 2011: 279425. doi: 10.1155/ 2011/279425.

  29. Ricci, G., Patrizi, A., Giannetti, A., Dondi, A., Bendandi, B. and Masi, M. (2010). Does improvement management of atopic dermatitis influence the appearance of respiratory allergic diseases? A follow-up study. Clinical and Molecular Allergy. 8: 8.  doi: 10.1186/1476-7961-8-8.

  30. Saleem, M.D., Oussedik, E., D’Amber, V. and Feldman, S.R. (2017). Interleukin 31 pathway and its role in atopic dermatitis: A systematic review. Journal of Dermatological Treatment. 28(7): 591-599.  doi: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1290205.

  31. Santoro, D. (2019). Therapies in canine atopic dermatitis: An update. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice. 49(1): 9-26.  doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2018.08.002.

  32. Saridomichelakis, M.N. and Olivry, T. (2016). An update on the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. The Veterinary Journal. 207: 29-37.  doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.09.016.

  33. Sundararajan, R.C., Ambily, V.R., George, A., Unny, N.M., Thomas, M.K., Divya, P.D. and Priya, M.N. (2026). Long term use of lokivetmab monotherapy and its expression in a beagle with severe atopic dermatitis: First clinical study from India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-8.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5661. 

  34. Tarpataki, N., Pápa, K., Reiczigel, J., Vajdovich, P. and Vörös, K. (2006). Prevalence and features of canine atopic dermatitis in hungary. Acta Veterinaria Hungarica. 54(3): 353-366.  doi: 10.1556/avet.54.2006.3.6.

  35. van den Bogaard, E.H., Elias, P.M., Goleva, E., Berdyshev, E., Smits, J.P.H., Danby, S.G., Cork, M.J. and Leung, D.Y.M. (2023). Targeting skin barrier function in atopic dermatitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology in Practice. 11(5): 1335-1346. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.02.005.

  36. Wolf, R. and Wolf, D. (2012). Abnormal epidermal barrier in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology. 30(3): 329-334.  doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.08.023.

  37. Wollenberg, A., Thomsen, S.F., Lacour, J.P., Jaumont, X. and Lazarewicz, S. (2021). Targeting immunoglobulin E in atopic dermatitis: a review of the existing evidence. World Allergy Organization Journal. 14(3): 100519.  doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100519.

  38. Wüthrich, B. (1978). Serum IgE in atopic dermatitis: relationship to severity of cutaneous involvement and course of disease as well as coexistence of atopic respiratory diseases. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 8(3): 241-248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1978.tb03220.x.
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)