Long Term Use of Lokivetmab Monotherapy and its Expression in a Beagle with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: First Clinical Study from India

R
R.C. Sundararajan1
V
V.R. Ambily1,*
A
Arun George1
N
N. Madhavan Unny1
M
Mary Kutty Thomas2
P
P.D. Divya3
M
M.N. Priya4
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Ethics and Jurisprudence, Mumbai Veterinary College, Parel, Mumbai-400 012, Maharashtra, India. 
2Centre for Advanced Studies in Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680 651, Kerala, India.
3Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad-673 576, Kerala, India.
4Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680 651, Kerala, India.

Background: This study details the long-term management of severe case of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) in an eight-year-old male Beagle dog with a three-year history of recurrent pruritus responsive to corticosteroids. Diagnosis was based on clinical presentation, fulfillment of all eight Favrot’s criteria and exclusion of other differentials.

Methods: Lokivetmab was administered subcutaneously at 2 mg/kg every 30 days over 12 months following a test dose with no adverse effects. Disease severity was assessed at 30-day intervals using CADESI-04, Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS), Erythema Severity Score (ESS), dermatoscopic erythema index (EIRGB) and hemato-biochemical analysis.

Result: Pruritus resolved within the first 30 days but re-emerged thereafter, necessitating monthly dosing. CADESI-04 scores decreased from 91 at baseline to 59 by Day 120 and remained stable through Day 360. There was a drastic reduction in erythema with partial or complete lesion resolution in most sites. PVAS scores declined by ≥50% and ESS reduced from 3 to 1. Dermatoscopy supported these findings. Hematological and biochemical parameters remained within normal limits throughout.

Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a common, chronic and pruritic inflammatory skin disease that affects approximately 10-15% of the canine population (Brar et al., 2017; Ambily et al., 2022). Breeds such as Labrador Retrievers, Beagles, Pomeranians and Shih Tzus are more frequently affected. CAD is a multifactorial condition involving a complex interaction between genetic predisposition, epidermal barrier dysfunction, allergen sensitization and microbial dysbiosis (Marsella et al., 2012). Regarding the latter, secondary infections such as staphylococcal pyoderma can further complicate the disease by triggering a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine response, necessitating effective pathogen clearance alongside inflammation control (Varughese et al., 2019). Clinically, it is characterized by erythema, excoriation, lichenification and persistent pruritus, which negatively impacts the quality of life of both the affected dog and its owner (Rybníček et al., 2009).
       
Interleukin-31 (IL-31), a cytokine released by Th2 cells, plays a pivotal role in the pruritic and inflammatory pathways of CAD by activating sensory neurons in the skin and promoting further release of inflammatory mediators (Gonzales et al., 2013; Kanwal et al., 2021). Targeting IL-31 has emerged as a novel and promising therapeutic approach.
               
Lokivetmab (Cytopoint ®) is a caninised monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes IL-31, offering targeted suppression of pruritus without generalized immunosuppression (Michels et al., 2016; Saridomichelakis and Olivry, 2016). Monthly subcutaneous injections have shown effective control of clinical signs with minimal adverse effects and improved compliance compared to traditional therapies such as corticosteroids or cyclosporine (Moyaert et al., 2017; Kasper et al., 2024; Gober et al., 2025). While research continues into alternative herbal formulations for dermatological conditions (Shridhar, 2026), targeted biological therapies remain central to managing severe pruritus. This study presents the first case of severe CAD managed with long-term Lokivetmab therapy, contributing to the limited literature on extended treatment durations under Indian conditions.
Signalment and history
 
An eight-year-old male Beagle weighing 19.6 kg was presented to the Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University during the research period from November 2023 to June 2025, with a history of recurrent pruritus persisting for three years. The owner reported that the pruritus was responsive to corticosteroids and frequently associated with secondary bacterial and fungal skin infections. Food and contact allergies were clinically ruled out.
 
Clinical examination and scoring
 
Clinical evaluation was performed using multiple scoring systems to assess and monitor disease severity. Favrot’s criteria were applied to support the diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD). The Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-4) was used to classify lesion distribution and grade disease severity. Pruritus severity was assessed using the pruritus visual analogue scale (PVAS), while erythema was evaluated using the erythema severity score (ESS). These clinical parameters were recorded at 30-day intervals up to one year to monitor treatment response over time. In addition, dermatoscopic examination was performed on lesional skin of the forelimbs and hind limbs which was then compared to non-lesional (healthy) skin to quantify erythema using the erythema index (EIRGB).
 
Diagnostic workup
 
Complete blood count and serum biochemistry analyses were performed to monitor systemic health and identify treatment-associated abnormalities, if any. The diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) was confirmed after ruling out other differentials including Sarcoptic mange, Bacterial pyoderma, Malassezia dermatitis, contact allergy and food-induced hypersensitivity, together with satisfying 8 out of 8 favrot’s criteria. Clinical confirmation was further supported by the application of Favrot’s criteria and the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-04) scores was recorded periodically.
 
Treatment protocol
 
The selected case underwent pre-treatment monitoring for four weeks in June 2024 to enable the tapering and complete discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. During this period, secondary bacterial and Malassezia infections were ruled out through clinical examination and cytological evaluation. Hemato-biochemical parameters were also assessed, with no abnormalities detected. On Day 0, a patch test (Fig 1) with Lokivetmab was conducted and monitored for 40 minutes to confirm the absence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Lokivetmab (Cytopoint®, Zoetis India) was subsequently administered subcutaneously at a dose of 2 mg/kg once every 30 days, beginning in July 2024 and continuing through July 2025, for a total of 11 doses. Following each administration, the case was observed for an additional 40 minutes and monitored over telephone conversation at 24 and 48 hours to detect any delayed adverse reactions. Supportive therapy included a topical Piroctone olamine -containing shampoo (Allermyl®, Virbac India)  and a nutritional supplement (Vitabestderm® syrup, Virbac India), both of which were continued throughout the treatment period. No systemic corticosteroids or other antipruritic medications were administered during the course of therapy.

Fig 1: Lokivetmab patch test on day 0.


 
Monitoring
 
Clinical parameters, including theCADESI-04, PVAS and ESS were evaluated at 30-day intervals up to Day 360. Hemato-biochemical analyses were performed at three-month intervals to monitor overall health of the animal. In addition, owner-reported observations regarding pruritus intensity, lesion recurrence and general health status and were documented throughout the monitoring period to support clinical assessments.
 
Ethical considerations
 
The pet owners were fully informed about the treatment protocol, including the use of monoclonal antibody therapy and a written informed consent was obtained prior to each Lokivetmab administration.
The present case fulfilled all the eight favrot’s criteria including history of leisonal pruritus and positive response to glucocorticoids with ruling out of other differential diagnosis, leading to the diagnosis of CAD. A test dose of Lokivetmab (0.1 ml subcutaneously) was administered and no adverse responses were observed. Following confirmation, Lokivetmab was administered monthly at 2 mg/kg SC. The administered dose of 2 mg is in agreement with Fleck et al. (2021) who demonstrated that a single subcutaneous injection of 2 mg/kg lokivetmab produced a significant suppression of pruritus starting 3 hours post-treatment and lasting upto 42 days.
       
Clinical monitoring was conducted at regular intervals using the validated clinical severity scores. Pruritus were fully resolved during the therapeutic window of first 30 days. However, the pruritus and the dermatologic signs recurred after 30 days. Therefore, it was advised to administer the lokivetmab every four weeks in order to manage the clinical signs sufficiently. Hence, the lokivetmab was administered at regular intervals upon concurrence. The long term therapeutic strategy followed in the present case aligns with Gober et al., (2025) who optimized Cytopoint treatment protocols for canine atopic dermatitis and recommended re-evaluation at 30 days, with additional doses administered as needed to achieve optimal outcomes. This long term therapy followed were in agreement with earlier pivotal studies Gober et al. (2022); Kasper et al., (2024), where 65 per cent of dogs showed a clinical response by Day 30 and 93 per cent of partial responders achieved treatment success after a second or third injection.
       
During this period, the clinical lesion scores demonstrated a progressive reduction, with the total CADESI-04 score decreasing from 91 at baseline to 59 by Day 120 and remaining stable through Day 360. The most evident clinical improvement was observed in erythema, followed by excoriation/alopecia, whereas lichenification remained unchanged after an initial decline. Visible clinical improvement was documented with resolution of erythematous lesions on the medial pinnae (Fig 2a-c), improvement of chronic papular lesions on the hind legs (Fig 3a, b) and hair regrowth above papular areas (Fig 4a, b). Complete hair regrowth was also noted at the oral commissures and elbow region by Day/ 360 (Fig 5, 6). These results indicate a sustained and steady clinical response to Lokivetmab over the 12-month treatment period (Fig 7). The reduction in lesional score are consistent with Pinto et al., (2022) who studied the efficacy for 3 months on which they reported a reduction in CADESI-04 scores following Lokivetmab treatment, which decreased to 12 from 23.5 by Day 28 (after the second injection) and remained relatively stable at 12.5 by Day 56.

Fig 2a, 2b, 2c: Erythematous medial pinnae at before and after therapy.



Fig 3a, 3b: Chronic papular leison in hind legs at before and after therapy.



Fig 4a, 4b: Regrowth of hairs above the papular leison in hind legs after therapy.



Fig 5: Regrowth of hairs at oral commissures on day 360.



Fig 6: Hair growth at elbow region on day 360.



Fig 7: CADESI-04 score across time points during lokivetmab.


       
In addition, site-wise lesion scoring revealed marked improvement across most affected regions between Day 0 and Day 360. The percentage improvement in lesional scores across the evaluated anatomical sites is presented in Table 1. Hundred percent resolution of erythema, lichenification and excoriation were observed in multiple sites, including the periorbital area, medial pinnae, front paws, inguinal area and abdomen. Fifty to sixty seven per cent lesion in the hind paws and palmar metacarpals resolved. Other regions, including the axillae, flanks, perineum and ventral tail, showed no lesions at baseline and thus recorded no change. The plateau effect observed after Day 120 corresponds with Gober et al., (2025), who documented a CADESI-04 reduction from 38.3 to 17.7 in the initial phase, with stability thereafter (17.9 at Day 180 and 18.5 at Day 365) (Fig 7).

Table 1: Per cent Improvement in leisonal score in 20 sites during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Pruritus, measured by the PVAS, showed a gradual reduction over the treatment period. Scores decreased from 8 at baseline and remained stable until Day 30, followed by a consistent reduction to 4 from Day 60 to 150 and maintained through Day 360 (Fig 8). A PVAS score reduction by ≥50 per cent after initial treatment with lokivetmab occurred in this case is in agreement with Kasper et al. (2024) who observed similar responses in 79 per cent of treated dogs.

Fig 8: PVAS score across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Erythema Severity Score (ESS) decreased from 3 at baseline to 2 by Day 30 and remained stable until Day 210, followed by a further reduction to 1, which was maintained through Day 360 (Fig 9). These findings correlate with Zajac et al. (2015) who reported strong associations between erythema intensity and total CADESI scores.

Fig 9: ESS score across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Dermatoscopic assessment revealed increased EIRGB scores in both lesions compared to normal skin (Fig 10). This finding is consistent with (Cugmas and Olivry 2021), who demonstrated that smartphone-based dermatoscopy provides a convenient and reliable way to quantify erythema severity of skin erythema in dogs with AD. Such objective diagnostic tools are rapidly evolving; notably, recent advancements in deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNN) have demonstrated high precision in lesion classification, promising reduced observer bias in future diagnostics (Alanazi, 2025; Cho, 2025).

Fig 10: Dermatoscopic image of leison 2 (Hind limb).


       
The haematological parameters observed in the case were within normal physiological ranges throughout the 12-month treatment period. Hemoglobin, Packed cell volume and Red blood cell levels recorded a gradual increase, peaking at Day 180 and remained stable till day 360. White blood cells counts, including granulocytes, lymphocytes and monocytes, fluctuated slightly but does not shown any clinical significance. Platelet counts remained stable across all time points (Table 2). Biochemical parameters in this case maintained within normal physiological ranges over the 12-month treatment period. Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels fluctuated mildly without clinical relevance. Liver enzymes (Alanine amino transferase and Alkaline Phosphatase) showed a declining trend from baseline. Total protein and globulin levels increased at Day 180, while albumin levels remained stable (Table 3). The hematobiochemical findings were in agreement with Krautmann et al., (2023), who reported no treatment or dose-related changes in hematology or serum chemistry following Lokivetmab administration. Similarly, the trends observed in the present case-including changes in erythrocyte mass, lymphocyte counts, serum proteins, urea, creatinine and alkaline phosphatase-were considered part of normal physiological maturation.

Table 2: Hematology values across time points during lokivetmab therapy.



Table 3: Serum biochemistry values across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
For the last one year, the patient is managed at the same dose of lokivetmab injections every month with home made diet and regular hypoallergenic shampoo baths every five days.
       
From the owner’s perspective, the long-term protocol offered practical disease management, emphasizing how easily proactive care can lapse without structured follow-up. This case also highlights the benefit of pre-scheduling monthly Lokivetmab doses to improve compliance. During the 12-month study, this case does not required any rescue treatment with systemic products like Oclacitinib (Apoquel) or oral steroids. The dog maintained pruritus levels consistently below a PVAS of 4, reflecting substantial and durable relief from CAD-associated discomfort. Furthermore, reductions in CADESI-04, PVAS and ESS scores collectively confirmed ongoing control of inflammation and lesion severity throughout the 12-month course.
This case report highlights the sustained therapeutic efficacy and safety of monthly Lokivetmab administration in managing chronic canine atopic dermatitis over a 12-month period. Significant reductions in pruritus, erythema and overall lesion severity were observed, as evidenced by improvements in CADESI-04, PVAS and ESS scores. The therapy was well-tolerated, with no adverse hemato-biochemical changes or injection-related side effects.The findings underscore Lokivetmab’s role as a viable long-term monoclonal antibody therapy for CAD, particularly in cases with corticosteroid-responsive pruritus. This case supports its integration into chronic atopic management protocols, especially when regular monitoring and individualized adjustments are ensured.
This case report is part of the Ph.D. dissertation research conducted at Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, focusing on the clinic-therapeutic studies in the management of moderate to severe canine atopic dermatitis.
 
Authors’ contributions
 
R.C. Sundararajan designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. V.R. Ambily, N. Madhavan Unny and  Arun George managed the analyses of the study. R.C. Sundararajan identified and diagnosed the cases. V.R. Ambily, P.D. Divya, Mary Kutty Thomas and N. Madhavan Unny’ assisted the manuscript writing, Corrections, Proof Reading and submissions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
 
Consent (Where ever applicable)
 
All authors declare that ‘written informed consent was obtained from the patient (or other approved parties) for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editorial office/Chief Editor/Editorial Board members of this journal.
 
Ethical approval (Where ever applicable)
 
Not applicable.
Authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.

  1. Alanazi, J.M. (2025). Detection of skin lesions in dogs using advanced convolutional neural network technology. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 59(12): 2108-2115.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1820.

  2. Ambily, V.R., Usha, N.P., Ajithkumar, S., Deepa, C., David, P.V., Aravindakshan, T.V., Maya, S. and  Krishna, B.D. (2022). Occurrence of allergic dermatitis in dogs with special reference to canine atopic dermatitis in Kerala. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 53: 767-771.

  3. Brar, R.K., Dhaliwal, P.S., Kumar, A., Chhabra, S. and Uppal, S.K. (2017). Clinico-pathological studies on atopic dermatitis in dogs. Journal of Animal Research. 7(3): 507-513.

  4. Cho, H.O. (2025). Sequential convolutional neural network techniques to improve detection of lesions in dogs. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 59(6): 926-933. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1821.

  5. Cugmas, B. and Olivry, T. (2021). Evaluation of skin erythema severity by dermatoscopy in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 32(2): 183-e46.

  6. Fleck, T.J., Norris, L.R., Mahabir, S., Walters, R.R., Martinon, O., Dunham, S.A. and Gonzales, A.J. (2021). Onset and duration of action of lokivetmab in a canine model of IL 31 induced pruritus. Veterinary Dermatology. 32(6): 681-e182.

  7. Gober, M., Amodie, D., Mellencamp, M. and Hillier, A. (2025). Long term use of lokivetmab (Cytopoint®) in atopic dogs. BMC Veterinary Research. 21(1): 203.

  8. Gober, M., Hillier, A., Vasquez-Hidalgo, M.A., Amodie, D. and Mellencamp, M.A. (2022). Use of cytopoint in the allergic dog. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 9: 909776. 

  9. Gonzales, A.J., Humphrey, W.R., Messamore, J.E., Fleck, T.J., Fici, G.J., Shelly, J.A. and McCall, R.B. (2013). Interleukin 31: Its role in canine pruritus and naturally occurring canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 24(1): 48-e12.

  10. Kanwal, S., Singh, S.K., Soman, S.P., Choudhury, S., Kumari, P., Ram, P.K. and Garg, S.K. (2021). Expression of barrier proteins in the skin lesions and inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of atopic dogs. Scientific Reports. 11(1): 11418.

  11. Kasper, B., Zablotski, Y. and Mueller, R.S. (2024). Long term use of lokivetmab in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 35(6): 683-693.

  12. Krautmann, M., Walters, R.R., King, V.L., Esch, K., Mahabir, S.P., Gonzales, A. and Martinon, O.M. (2023). Laboratory safety evaluation of lokivetmab, a canine anti-interleukin- 31 monoclonal antibody, in dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 258: 110574.

  13. Marsella, R., Sousa, C.A., Gonzales, A.J. and Fadok, V.A. (2012). Current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of canine atopic dermatitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 241(2): 194-207.

  14. Michels, G.M., Ramsey, D.S., Walsh, K.F., Martinon, O.M., Mahabir, S.P., Hoevers, J.D. and Dunham, S.A. (2016). A blinded, randomized, placebo controlled, dose determination trial of lokivetmab (ZTS 00103289), a caninized, anti canine IL 31 monoclonal antibody in client owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 27(6): 478- e129.

  15. Moyaert, H., Van Brussel, L., Borowski, S., Escalada, M., Mahabir, S.P., Walters, R.R. and Stegemann, M.R. (2017). A blinded, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to ciclosporin in client owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 28(6): 593-e145.

  16. Pinto, M., Silva, M.A., Fernandes, B., Bizarro, A.F., Pereira, H. and Lourenço, A.M. (2022). Efficacy and safety of lokivetmab (Cytopoint®) for the control of pruritus and skin lesions in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Rev. Port. Imunoalergol. 30: 21-30.

  17. Rybníček, J., Lau Gillard, P.J., Harvey, R. and Hill, P.B. (2009). Further validation of a pruritus severity scale for use in dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 20: 115-122.

  18. Saridomichelakis, M.N. and Thierry, O. (2016):  An update on the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. The Veterinary Journal. 207: 29-37.

  19. Shridhar, N.B. (2026). Effect of dermovet ointment in treating dermatitis of domestic animals. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(3): 211-212.

  20. Varughese, H.S., Chitra, M.A., Rajasekaran, R., Rajalakshmi, S. and Raj, G.D. (2019). Cytokine response to killed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius antigen in dogs with skin diseases.  Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1509-1513. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3714.

  21. Zajac, M., Szczepanik, M.P., Wilkołek, P.M., Adamek, Ł.R., Pomorski, Z.J., Sitkowski, W. and Gołyński, M. (2015). Assessment of a correlation between canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI-03) and selected biophysical skin measures (Skin hydration, pH and erythema intensity) in dogs with naturally occurring atopic dermatitis. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 79(2): 136-140.

Long Term Use of Lokivetmab Monotherapy and its Expression in a Beagle with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: First Clinical Study from India

R
R.C. Sundararajan1
V
V.R. Ambily1,*
A
Arun George1
N
N. Madhavan Unny1
M
Mary Kutty Thomas2
P
P.D. Divya3
M
M.N. Priya4
1Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, Ethics and Jurisprudence, Mumbai Veterinary College, Parel, Mumbai-400 012, Maharashtra, India. 
2Centre for Advanced Studies in Animal Genetics and Breeding, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680 651, Kerala, India.
3Department of Veterinary Biochemistry, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Pookode, Wayanad-673 576, Kerala, India.
4Department of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680 651, Kerala, India.

Background: This study details the long-term management of severe case of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) in an eight-year-old male Beagle dog with a three-year history of recurrent pruritus responsive to corticosteroids. Diagnosis was based on clinical presentation, fulfillment of all eight Favrot’s criteria and exclusion of other differentials.

Methods: Lokivetmab was administered subcutaneously at 2 mg/kg every 30 days over 12 months following a test dose with no adverse effects. Disease severity was assessed at 30-day intervals using CADESI-04, Pruritus Visual Analogue Scale (PVAS), Erythema Severity Score (ESS), dermatoscopic erythema index (EIRGB) and hemato-biochemical analysis.

Result: Pruritus resolved within the first 30 days but re-emerged thereafter, necessitating monthly dosing. CADESI-04 scores decreased from 91 at baseline to 59 by Day 120 and remained stable through Day 360. There was a drastic reduction in erythema with partial or complete lesion resolution in most sites. PVAS scores declined by ≥50% and ESS reduced from 3 to 1. Dermatoscopy supported these findings. Hematological and biochemical parameters remained within normal limits throughout.

Canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) is a common, chronic and pruritic inflammatory skin disease that affects approximately 10-15% of the canine population (Brar et al., 2017; Ambily et al., 2022). Breeds such as Labrador Retrievers, Beagles, Pomeranians and Shih Tzus are more frequently affected. CAD is a multifactorial condition involving a complex interaction between genetic predisposition, epidermal barrier dysfunction, allergen sensitization and microbial dysbiosis (Marsella et al., 2012). Regarding the latter, secondary infections such as staphylococcal pyoderma can further complicate the disease by triggering a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine response, necessitating effective pathogen clearance alongside inflammation control (Varughese et al., 2019). Clinically, it is characterized by erythema, excoriation, lichenification and persistent pruritus, which negatively impacts the quality of life of both the affected dog and its owner (Rybníček et al., 2009).
       
Interleukin-31 (IL-31), a cytokine released by Th2 cells, plays a pivotal role in the pruritic and inflammatory pathways of CAD by activating sensory neurons in the skin and promoting further release of inflammatory mediators (Gonzales et al., 2013; Kanwal et al., 2021). Targeting IL-31 has emerged as a novel and promising therapeutic approach.
               
Lokivetmab (Cytopoint ®) is a caninised monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes IL-31, offering targeted suppression of pruritus without generalized immunosuppression (Michels et al., 2016; Saridomichelakis and Olivry, 2016). Monthly subcutaneous injections have shown effective control of clinical signs with minimal adverse effects and improved compliance compared to traditional therapies such as corticosteroids or cyclosporine (Moyaert et al., 2017; Kasper et al., 2024; Gober et al., 2025). While research continues into alternative herbal formulations for dermatological conditions (Shridhar, 2026), targeted biological therapies remain central to managing severe pruritus. This study presents the first case of severe CAD managed with long-term Lokivetmab therapy, contributing to the limited literature on extended treatment durations under Indian conditions.
Signalment and history
 
An eight-year-old male Beagle weighing 19.6 kg was presented to the Veterinary Clinical Complex, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University during the research period from November 2023 to June 2025, with a history of recurrent pruritus persisting for three years. The owner reported that the pruritus was responsive to corticosteroids and frequently associated with secondary bacterial and fungal skin infections. Food and contact allergies were clinically ruled out.
 
Clinical examination and scoring
 
Clinical evaluation was performed using multiple scoring systems to assess and monitor disease severity. Favrot’s criteria were applied to support the diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD). The Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-4) was used to classify lesion distribution and grade disease severity. Pruritus severity was assessed using the pruritus visual analogue scale (PVAS), while erythema was evaluated using the erythema severity score (ESS). These clinical parameters were recorded at 30-day intervals up to one year to monitor treatment response over time. In addition, dermatoscopic examination was performed on lesional skin of the forelimbs and hind limbs which was then compared to non-lesional (healthy) skin to quantify erythema using the erythema index (EIRGB).
 
Diagnostic workup
 
Complete blood count and serum biochemistry analyses were performed to monitor systemic health and identify treatment-associated abnormalities, if any. The diagnosis of canine atopic dermatitis (CAD) was confirmed after ruling out other differentials including Sarcoptic mange, Bacterial pyoderma, Malassezia dermatitis, contact allergy and food-induced hypersensitivity, together with satisfying 8 out of 8 favrot’s criteria. Clinical confirmation was further supported by the application of Favrot’s criteria and the Canine Atopic Dermatitis Extent and Severity Index (CADESI-04) scores was recorded periodically.
 
Treatment protocol
 
The selected case underwent pre-treatment monitoring for four weeks in June 2024 to enable the tapering and complete discontinuation of corticosteroid therapy. During this period, secondary bacterial and Malassezia infections were ruled out through clinical examination and cytological evaluation. Hemato-biochemical parameters were also assessed, with no abnormalities detected. On Day 0, a patch test (Fig 1) with Lokivetmab was conducted and monitored for 40 minutes to confirm the absence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Lokivetmab (Cytopoint®, Zoetis India) was subsequently administered subcutaneously at a dose of 2 mg/kg once every 30 days, beginning in July 2024 and continuing through July 2025, for a total of 11 doses. Following each administration, the case was observed for an additional 40 minutes and monitored over telephone conversation at 24 and 48 hours to detect any delayed adverse reactions. Supportive therapy included a topical Piroctone olamine -containing shampoo (Allermyl®, Virbac India)  and a nutritional supplement (Vitabestderm® syrup, Virbac India), both of which were continued throughout the treatment period. No systemic corticosteroids or other antipruritic medications were administered during the course of therapy.

Fig 1: Lokivetmab patch test on day 0.


 
Monitoring
 
Clinical parameters, including theCADESI-04, PVAS and ESS were evaluated at 30-day intervals up to Day 360. Hemato-biochemical analyses were performed at three-month intervals to monitor overall health of the animal. In addition, owner-reported observations regarding pruritus intensity, lesion recurrence and general health status and were documented throughout the monitoring period to support clinical assessments.
 
Ethical considerations
 
The pet owners were fully informed about the treatment protocol, including the use of monoclonal antibody therapy and a written informed consent was obtained prior to each Lokivetmab administration.
The present case fulfilled all the eight favrot’s criteria including history of leisonal pruritus and positive response to glucocorticoids with ruling out of other differential diagnosis, leading to the diagnosis of CAD. A test dose of Lokivetmab (0.1 ml subcutaneously) was administered and no adverse responses were observed. Following confirmation, Lokivetmab was administered monthly at 2 mg/kg SC. The administered dose of 2 mg is in agreement with Fleck et al. (2021) who demonstrated that a single subcutaneous injection of 2 mg/kg lokivetmab produced a significant suppression of pruritus starting 3 hours post-treatment and lasting upto 42 days.
       
Clinical monitoring was conducted at regular intervals using the validated clinical severity scores. Pruritus were fully resolved during the therapeutic window of first 30 days. However, the pruritus and the dermatologic signs recurred after 30 days. Therefore, it was advised to administer the lokivetmab every four weeks in order to manage the clinical signs sufficiently. Hence, the lokivetmab was administered at regular intervals upon concurrence. The long term therapeutic strategy followed in the present case aligns with Gober et al., (2025) who optimized Cytopoint treatment protocols for canine atopic dermatitis and recommended re-evaluation at 30 days, with additional doses administered as needed to achieve optimal outcomes. This long term therapy followed were in agreement with earlier pivotal studies Gober et al. (2022); Kasper et al., (2024), where 65 per cent of dogs showed a clinical response by Day 30 and 93 per cent of partial responders achieved treatment success after a second or third injection.
       
During this period, the clinical lesion scores demonstrated a progressive reduction, with the total CADESI-04 score decreasing from 91 at baseline to 59 by Day 120 and remaining stable through Day 360. The most evident clinical improvement was observed in erythema, followed by excoriation/alopecia, whereas lichenification remained unchanged after an initial decline. Visible clinical improvement was documented with resolution of erythematous lesions on the medial pinnae (Fig 2a-c), improvement of chronic papular lesions on the hind legs (Fig 3a, b) and hair regrowth above papular areas (Fig 4a, b). Complete hair regrowth was also noted at the oral commissures and elbow region by Day/ 360 (Fig 5, 6). These results indicate a sustained and steady clinical response to Lokivetmab over the 12-month treatment period (Fig 7). The reduction in lesional score are consistent with Pinto et al., (2022) who studied the efficacy for 3 months on which they reported a reduction in CADESI-04 scores following Lokivetmab treatment, which decreased to 12 from 23.5 by Day 28 (after the second injection) and remained relatively stable at 12.5 by Day 56.

Fig 2a, 2b, 2c: Erythematous medial pinnae at before and after therapy.



Fig 3a, 3b: Chronic papular leison in hind legs at before and after therapy.



Fig 4a, 4b: Regrowth of hairs above the papular leison in hind legs after therapy.



Fig 5: Regrowth of hairs at oral commissures on day 360.



Fig 6: Hair growth at elbow region on day 360.



Fig 7: CADESI-04 score across time points during lokivetmab.


       
In addition, site-wise lesion scoring revealed marked improvement across most affected regions between Day 0 and Day 360. The percentage improvement in lesional scores across the evaluated anatomical sites is presented in Table 1. Hundred percent resolution of erythema, lichenification and excoriation were observed in multiple sites, including the periorbital area, medial pinnae, front paws, inguinal area and abdomen. Fifty to sixty seven per cent lesion in the hind paws and palmar metacarpals resolved. Other regions, including the axillae, flanks, perineum and ventral tail, showed no lesions at baseline and thus recorded no change. The plateau effect observed after Day 120 corresponds with Gober et al., (2025), who documented a CADESI-04 reduction from 38.3 to 17.7 in the initial phase, with stability thereafter (17.9 at Day 180 and 18.5 at Day 365) (Fig 7).

Table 1: Per cent Improvement in leisonal score in 20 sites during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Pruritus, measured by the PVAS, showed a gradual reduction over the treatment period. Scores decreased from 8 at baseline and remained stable until Day 30, followed by a consistent reduction to 4 from Day 60 to 150 and maintained through Day 360 (Fig 8). A PVAS score reduction by ≥50 per cent after initial treatment with lokivetmab occurred in this case is in agreement with Kasper et al. (2024) who observed similar responses in 79 per cent of treated dogs.

Fig 8: PVAS score across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Erythema Severity Score (ESS) decreased from 3 at baseline to 2 by Day 30 and remained stable until Day 210, followed by a further reduction to 1, which was maintained through Day 360 (Fig 9). These findings correlate with Zajac et al. (2015) who reported strong associations between erythema intensity and total CADESI scores.

Fig 9: ESS score across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
Dermatoscopic assessment revealed increased EIRGB scores in both lesions compared to normal skin (Fig 10). This finding is consistent with (Cugmas and Olivry 2021), who demonstrated that smartphone-based dermatoscopy provides a convenient and reliable way to quantify erythema severity of skin erythema in dogs with AD. Such objective diagnostic tools are rapidly evolving; notably, recent advancements in deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNN) have demonstrated high precision in lesion classification, promising reduced observer bias in future diagnostics (Alanazi, 2025; Cho, 2025).

Fig 10: Dermatoscopic image of leison 2 (Hind limb).


       
The haematological parameters observed in the case were within normal physiological ranges throughout the 12-month treatment period. Hemoglobin, Packed cell volume and Red blood cell levels recorded a gradual increase, peaking at Day 180 and remained stable till day 360. White blood cells counts, including granulocytes, lymphocytes and monocytes, fluctuated slightly but does not shown any clinical significance. Platelet counts remained stable across all time points (Table 2). Biochemical parameters in this case maintained within normal physiological ranges over the 12-month treatment period. Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels fluctuated mildly without clinical relevance. Liver enzymes (Alanine amino transferase and Alkaline Phosphatase) showed a declining trend from baseline. Total protein and globulin levels increased at Day 180, while albumin levels remained stable (Table 3). The hematobiochemical findings were in agreement with Krautmann et al., (2023), who reported no treatment or dose-related changes in hematology or serum chemistry following Lokivetmab administration. Similarly, the trends observed in the present case-including changes in erythrocyte mass, lymphocyte counts, serum proteins, urea, creatinine and alkaline phosphatase-were considered part of normal physiological maturation.

Table 2: Hematology values across time points during lokivetmab therapy.



Table 3: Serum biochemistry values across time points during lokivetmab therapy.


       
For the last one year, the patient is managed at the same dose of lokivetmab injections every month with home made diet and regular hypoallergenic shampoo baths every five days.
       
From the owner’s perspective, the long-term protocol offered practical disease management, emphasizing how easily proactive care can lapse without structured follow-up. This case also highlights the benefit of pre-scheduling monthly Lokivetmab doses to improve compliance. During the 12-month study, this case does not required any rescue treatment with systemic products like Oclacitinib (Apoquel) or oral steroids. The dog maintained pruritus levels consistently below a PVAS of 4, reflecting substantial and durable relief from CAD-associated discomfort. Furthermore, reductions in CADESI-04, PVAS and ESS scores collectively confirmed ongoing control of inflammation and lesion severity throughout the 12-month course.
This case report highlights the sustained therapeutic efficacy and safety of monthly Lokivetmab administration in managing chronic canine atopic dermatitis over a 12-month period. Significant reductions in pruritus, erythema and overall lesion severity were observed, as evidenced by improvements in CADESI-04, PVAS and ESS scores. The therapy was well-tolerated, with no adverse hemato-biochemical changes or injection-related side effects.The findings underscore Lokivetmab’s role as a viable long-term monoclonal antibody therapy for CAD, particularly in cases with corticosteroid-responsive pruritus. This case supports its integration into chronic atopic management protocols, especially when regular monitoring and individualized adjustments are ensured.
This case report is part of the Ph.D. dissertation research conducted at Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, focusing on the clinic-therapeutic studies in the management of moderate to severe canine atopic dermatitis.
 
Authors’ contributions
 
R.C. Sundararajan designed the study, performed the statistical analysis, wrote the protocol and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. V.R. Ambily, N. Madhavan Unny and  Arun George managed the analyses of the study. R.C. Sundararajan identified and diagnosed the cases. V.R. Ambily, P.D. Divya, Mary Kutty Thomas and N. Madhavan Unny’ assisted the manuscript writing, Corrections, Proof Reading and submissions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
 
Consent (Where ever applicable)
 
All authors declare that ‘written informed consent was obtained from the patient (or other approved parties) for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editorial office/Chief Editor/Editorial Board members of this journal.
 
Ethical approval (Where ever applicable)
 
Not applicable.
Authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.

  1. Alanazi, J.M. (2025). Detection of skin lesions in dogs using advanced convolutional neural network technology. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 59(12): 2108-2115.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1820.

  2. Ambily, V.R., Usha, N.P., Ajithkumar, S., Deepa, C., David, P.V., Aravindakshan, T.V., Maya, S. and  Krishna, B.D. (2022). Occurrence of allergic dermatitis in dogs with special reference to canine atopic dermatitis in Kerala. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences. 53: 767-771.

  3. Brar, R.K., Dhaliwal, P.S., Kumar, A., Chhabra, S. and Uppal, S.K. (2017). Clinico-pathological studies on atopic dermatitis in dogs. Journal of Animal Research. 7(3): 507-513.

  4. Cho, H.O. (2025). Sequential convolutional neural network techniques to improve detection of lesions in dogs. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 59(6): 926-933. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.BF-1821.

  5. Cugmas, B. and Olivry, T. (2021). Evaluation of skin erythema severity by dermatoscopy in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 32(2): 183-e46.

  6. Fleck, T.J., Norris, L.R., Mahabir, S., Walters, R.R., Martinon, O., Dunham, S.A. and Gonzales, A.J. (2021). Onset and duration of action of lokivetmab in a canine model of IL 31 induced pruritus. Veterinary Dermatology. 32(6): 681-e182.

  7. Gober, M., Amodie, D., Mellencamp, M. and Hillier, A. (2025). Long term use of lokivetmab (Cytopoint®) in atopic dogs. BMC Veterinary Research. 21(1): 203.

  8. Gober, M., Hillier, A., Vasquez-Hidalgo, M.A., Amodie, D. and Mellencamp, M.A. (2022). Use of cytopoint in the allergic dog. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 9: 909776. 

  9. Gonzales, A.J., Humphrey, W.R., Messamore, J.E., Fleck, T.J., Fici, G.J., Shelly, J.A. and McCall, R.B. (2013). Interleukin 31: Its role in canine pruritus and naturally occurring canine atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 24(1): 48-e12.

  10. Kanwal, S., Singh, S.K., Soman, S.P., Choudhury, S., Kumari, P., Ram, P.K. and Garg, S.K. (2021). Expression of barrier proteins in the skin lesions and inflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of atopic dogs. Scientific Reports. 11(1): 11418.

  11. Kasper, B., Zablotski, Y. and Mueller, R.S. (2024). Long term use of lokivetmab in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 35(6): 683-693.

  12. Krautmann, M., Walters, R.R., King, V.L., Esch, K., Mahabir, S.P., Gonzales, A. and Martinon, O.M. (2023). Laboratory safety evaluation of lokivetmab, a canine anti-interleukin- 31 monoclonal antibody, in dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology. 258: 110574.

  13. Marsella, R., Sousa, C.A., Gonzales, A.J. and Fadok, V.A. (2012). Current understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of canine atopic dermatitis. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 241(2): 194-207.

  14. Michels, G.M., Ramsey, D.S., Walsh, K.F., Martinon, O.M., Mahabir, S.P., Hoevers, J.D. and Dunham, S.A. (2016). A blinded, randomized, placebo controlled, dose determination trial of lokivetmab (ZTS 00103289), a caninized, anti canine IL 31 monoclonal antibody in client owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 27(6): 478- e129.

  15. Moyaert, H., Van Brussel, L., Borowski, S., Escalada, M., Mahabir, S.P., Walters, R.R. and Stegemann, M.R. (2017). A blinded, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of lokivetmab compared to ciclosporin in client owned dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology. 28(6): 593-e145.

  16. Pinto, M., Silva, M.A., Fernandes, B., Bizarro, A.F., Pereira, H. and Lourenço, A.M. (2022). Efficacy and safety of lokivetmab (Cytopoint®) for the control of pruritus and skin lesions in dogs with atopic dermatitis. Rev. Port. Imunoalergol. 30: 21-30.

  17. Rybníček, J., Lau Gillard, P.J., Harvey, R. and Hill, P.B. (2009). Further validation of a pruritus severity scale for use in dogs. Veterinary Dermatology. 20: 115-122.

  18. Saridomichelakis, M.N. and Thierry, O. (2016):  An update on the treatment of canine atopic dermatitis. The Veterinary Journal. 207: 29-37.

  19. Shridhar, N.B. (2026). Effect of dermovet ointment in treating dermatitis of domestic animals. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 43(3): 211-212.

  20. Varughese, H.S., Chitra, M.A., Rajasekaran, R., Rajalakshmi, S. and Raj, G.D. (2019). Cytokine response to killed Staphylococcus pseudintermedius antigen in dogs with skin diseases.  Indian Journal of Animal Research. 53(11): 1509-1513. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3714.

  21. Zajac, M., Szczepanik, M.P., Wilkołek, P.M., Adamek, Ł.R., Pomorski, Z.J., Sitkowski, W. and Gołyński, M. (2015). Assessment of a correlation between canine atopic dermatitis extent and severity index (CADESI-03) and selected biophysical skin measures (Skin hydration, pH and erythema intensity) in dogs with naturally occurring atopic dermatitis. Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. 79(2): 136-140.
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)