volume 60 advancing animal health and productivity for a sustainable one health ecosystem : 68-76,   Doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5861

A Simplified and Robust Approach for Recombinant Lysostaphin Production in Buffalo Fibroblast Cells

S
Shubham Loat1,2,*
M
Mohan Krishna2
J
Jyoti Yadav2
M
Manoj Kumar2
A
Atrayee Dutta1
A
Ankur Verma2
S
Sacchidananda Bera2
M
Maharana Pratap Diwakar2
M
Mihir Sarkar1
S
Satish Kumar2,*
1Animal Biotechnology, ICAR-National Research Centre on Yak, Dirang-790 101, West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
2Animal Biotechnology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.
Cite article:- Loat Shubham, Krishna Mohan, Yadav Jyoti, Kumar Manoj, Dutta Atrayee, Verma Ankur, Bera Sacchidananda, Diwakar Pratap Maharana, Sarkar Mihir, Kumar Satish (2026). A Simplified and Robust Approach for Recombinant Lysostaphin Production in Buffalo Fibroblast Cells . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 60: 68-76. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5861.
Background: Mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus remains a significant challenge in dairy livestock due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains and the limited effectiveness of conventional therapeutic approaches. Lysostaphin, a staphylolytic enzyme with high specificity against Staphylococcus species, has emerged as a promising alternative antimicrobial agent. In this study, we aimed to establish a preliminary mammalian expression strategy for production of biologically active recombinant lysostaphin in buffalo fibroblast cells.

Methods: A modified lysostaphin gene, designed to eliminate predicted N-glycosylation sites, was synthesized and initially cloned into the pUC57 vector followed by subcloning into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector. Recombinant constructs were confirmed by colony PCR and Sanger sequencing before transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells. Recombinant expression was qualitatively assessed using GFP fluorescence and antibacterial activity was evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus.

Result: The lysostaphin gene (~798 bp) was successfully amplified and cloned into the mammalian expression vector. Screening and sequencing confirmed the correct insertion and orientation without mutations. Transfected buffalo fibroblast cells exhibited GFP fluorescence, indicating successful expression of the recombinant construct. Lysates from transfected cells produced visible zones of inhibition against S. aureus, indicating antibacterial activity of the expressed lysostaphin.
Mastitis occurs in both clinical and subclinical forms and is mainly caused by pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae and Escherichia coli, with S. aureus being strongly associated with persistent and recurrent infections (Sekhri et al., 2021; Srujana et al., 2022). Although antibiotics, chemotherapeutics and vaccines are commonly used for disease control, their effectiveness is limited due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, vaccine-associated side effects and inadequate immune responses (Sekhri et al., 2021). Consequently, alternative antimicrobial strategies are being explored, among which lysostaphin has emerged as a promising staphylococcal bacteriolysin with significant therapeutic potential against MDR S. aureus (Wall et al., 2005). Lysostaphin was first discovered by Schindler and Schuhardt in 1964 from bacterial strain K-6-WI, which exhibited lytic activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Bastos et al., 2010). It was later isolated from Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus and identified as a 493-amino acid preproenzyme encoded by the plasmid pACK1 (Schindler and Schuhardt, 1964; Sloan et al., 1982). The structural organization of lysostaphin includes a leader sequence, tandem-repeat region, catalytic domain, linker region and cell wall-targeting domain, as shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Schematic diagram of the ~53-kDa full length pre-proLss showing leading sequence (LS), proregion (PRO), catalytic domain (CAT), linker (LK) and cell wall targeting domain (CWT).


       
Lysostaphin is a 25 kDa zinc metalloenzyme that exhibits glycylglycine endopeptidase activity, hydrolyzing the polyglycine interpeptide bridges of the Staphylococcus aureus cell wall and causing bacterial lysis (Heath et al., 1989). Due to its highly specific antibacterial mechanism, lysostaphin has gained attention as a potential therapeutic agent against multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus infections (Huang et al., 2013). Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy in different experimental models (Kokai-Kun et al., 2003; Dajcs et al., 2000). Lysostaphin, either alone or in combination with vancomycin, was found to be more effective than vancomycin alone in treating experimental MRSA-induced aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits without inducing significant immune reactions (Heinrich et al., 1987). Its ability to eradicate S. aureus from infected tissues and blood in mice has also been reported (Climo et al., 1998). Moreover, lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels have shown promise in reducing S. aureus infection while promoting bone regeneration in infected radial defects in mice (Kokai-Kun et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2019). However, despite its promising therapeutic potential, recombinant expression of biologically active lysostaphin in mammalian expression systems remains challenging due to possible post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, which may affect protein structure and function. To address this, the lysostaphin gene was modified by substituting predicted N-glycosylation-associated residues to improve compatibility with mammalian expression. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept assessment of modified lysostaphin expression in buffalo fibroblast cells and to evaluate whether biologically active lysostaphin could be expressed in this mammalian host system.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and reagents
 
The experimental work was conducted during the period 2023-2025 at the ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (ICAR-NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, India, in association with the ICAR-National Research Centre on Yak (ICAR-NRCY), Dirang, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Chemically competent Escherichia coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen, USA) were used for cloning and propagation of recombinant plasmids. The mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO was used for cloning and expression of the lysostaphin gene (Fig 2). Plasmid purification and gel extraction were performed using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The synthesized lysostaphin gene in the pUC57 cloning vector was first propagated in competent E. coli TOP10 cells to obtain sufficient plasmid DNA for downstream cloning experiments and transformed colonies were selected on LB agar plates containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL).

Fig 2: Map of the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector.


 
Preparation of competent E. coli cells
 
Chemically competent E. coli TOP10 cells were prepared using the calcium chloride method based on the protocol described by Sambrook and Russell (2001) with minor modifications. An overnight culture of TOP10 E. coli cells was inoculated into fresh SOB medium and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm until the optical density reached approximately O.D. 600 ≈0.6, corresponding to the mid-logarithmic phase of bacterial growth. The culture was chilled on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting bacterial pellet was resuspended in 0.1 M CaCl2‚ containing 15% glycerol and incubated on ice for 1 h to enhance competency. Aliquots of 250 µL were prepared and stored at -80°C until further use.
 
Primer design
 
Primers specific for amplification of the lysostaphin gene were designed using Primer3 software (Untergasser et al., 2012) based on the published lysostaphin gene sequence. The primers were synthesized commercially (Sigma-Aldrich, Bengaluru, India). The sequences of primers used in this study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Primers used for amplification of the lysostaphin gene.


 
PCR amplification of lysostaphin gene
 
Amplification of the lysostaphin gene was performed using DreamTaq 2× PCR master mix (Thermo scientific) following standard PCR protocols (Saiki et al., 1988). Each PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 20 µL, containing 10 µL of DreamTaq master mix, 0.4 µL of forward primer (10 µM), 0.4 µL of reverse primer (10 µM), 1 µL of template DNA and 8.2 µL of nuclease-free water. PCR amplification was performed in a Bio-Rad S1000 thermal cycler under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 45 s. A final extension step was carried out at 72°C for 5 min, after which the reactions were held at 4°C until further analysis. The amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) and DNA bands were visualized under ultraviolet illumination using a Bio-Rad gel doc XR imaging system. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified DNA was quantified using a NanoQuant spectrophotometer and stored at -20°C until further use.
 
Cloning of lysostaphin gene into pcDNA3.1 vector
 
The purified PCR product containing the lysostaphin gene was cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cloning reaction was prepared in a total volume of 6 µL, consisting of 2 µL purified PCR product (~150 ng DNA), 1 µL salt solution, 1 µL pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector and 2 µL nuclease-free water. The reaction mixture was gently mixed and incubated at room temperature to facilitate insertion of the lysostaphin gene into the vector.
 
Transformation of recombinant plasmid
 
The recombinant plasmid was introduced into competent E. coli TOP10 cells using the heat-shock transformation method (Froger and Hall, 2007). Competent cells were mixed with the ligation mixture and incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by heat shock at 42°C for 90 s and immediate cooling on ice for 2 min. Subsequently, 500 µL SOC medium was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with shaking at 200 rpm. The transformed cells were plated onto LB agar containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL) and incubated overnight at 37°C.
 
Screening of recombinant clones by colony PCR
 
Transformant colonies were screened using colony PCR to confirm the presence of the lysostaphin gene. Individual colonies were suspended in 10 µl of nuclease-free water in PCR tubes and heated at 95°C for 10 min to lyse the cells. The tubes were then centrifuged and 3 µl of the supernatant containing plasmid DNA was used as template for PCR amplification using lysostaphin-specific primers. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 20 µl reaction mixture containing 10 µl of 2× DreamTaq buffer, 0.5 µl of forward primer, 0.5 µl of reverse primer, 3 µl of bacterial lysate and 6 µl of nuclease-free water. The amplified PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis along with a 100 bp DNA ladder and a negative control to confirm the presence of the expected lysostaphin gene amplicon.
 
Isolation of recombinant plasmid DNA
 
Positive clones identified by colony PCR were cultured overnight in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) at 37°C with shaking. Plasmid DNA was isolated using the QIAprep spin miniprep Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified plasmids were quantified using NanoQuant spectrophotometry and stored at -20°C.
 
Sequence verification
 
The integrity and correct orientation of the cloned lysostaphin gene were then verified by Sanger sequencing using the T7 forward primer (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG). Sequence data were analyzed to confirm the correct reading frame and insertion of the gene construct.
 
Transfection of recombinant constructs into buffalo fibroblast cells
 
Recombinant pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO plasmids containing the lysostaphin gene were transfected into buffalo fibroblast cells as a preliminary qualitative assessment of recombinant expression in a mammalian host system. Transfection was performed using lipofectamine-mediated chemical transfection following standard mammalian cell transfection protocols (Strauss, 1996). The pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector contains a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene, allowing qualitative visualization of transgene expression by fluorescence microscopy. As the present work was designed as a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept study, quantitative transfection efficiency determination was not included.
 
Qualitative antibacterial activity assay
 
The antibacterial activity of lysostaphin produced in transfected buffalo fibroblast cells was preliminarily evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus. Agar plates seeded with a bacterial lawn of S. aureus were prepared and aliquots of lysates obtained from transfected fibroblast cells were spotted onto the plates. Purified lysostaphin was included as a positive control for comparison. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18-24 h. The appearance of visible zones of inhibition around the lysate spots was considered indicative of staphylolytic activity of the expressed lysostaphin protein (Bastos et al., 2010). Since this study was intended as an initial qualitative feasibility assessment, quantitative inhibition zone measurements and replicate-based statistical analysis were not included.
Synthesis and verification of the modified lysostaphin gene
 
For the expression of lysostaphin in mammalian cells, the lysostaphin gene was modified by replacing two predicted N-glycosylation sites located at amino acid positions 125 and 232. At these positions, the original asparagine (ASn) residues were substituted with glutamine (Gln) in order to prevent glycosylation during expression in eukaryotic cells while maintaining the antibacterial activity of the enzyme. Following the modification, the lysostaphin gene was synthesized commercially and delivered in the pUC57 cloning vector. The newly synthesized fragment had a length of 798 bp, corresponding to the complete coding sequence of the modified lysostaphin gene. After that, the obtained sequence was aligned with the reference lysostaphin gene sequence for ensuring the accuracy of the synthesized construct. The alignment confirmed that the intended nucleotide substitutions were correctly incorporated into the gene. The sequence comparison revealed expected agreement with the modified lysostaphin sequence (Fig 3), thereby confirming the successful synthesis of the gene construct.

Fig 3: Alignment of the modified lysostaphin gene matching exactly with the reference sequence.


 
Propagation of the pUC57 plasmid containing the modified lysostaphin gene
 
To obtain sufficient plasmid DNA for downstream molecular analysis, the synthesized pUC57 plasmid carrying the modified lysostaphin gene was propagated within chemically competent TOP10 Escherichia coli cells. Following transformation, the bacterial suspension was spread onto LB agar plates supplemented with ampicillin to facilitate the selective growth of the transformed cells. After overnight incubation, multiple colonies were observed on the cultured agar plates which indicated successful uptake and propagation of the plasmid within the host cells. Individual colonies were subsequently selected and inoculated into LB broth containing ampicillin to allow further amplification of the plasmid prior to the DNA isolation.
 
Isolation and quantification of pUC57 plasmid DNA
 
Plasmid DNA was isolated from overnight grown bacterial cultures using a standard plasmid extraction protocol. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA were measured using a NanoQuant spectrophotometer. The obtained concentrations of the plasmid DNA were 245.35 ng/µL and 235.41 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios of 1.90 and 1.91, respectively. These values indicate good quality plasmid DNA with minimum protein contamination. Therefore, the isolated plasmid DNA was considered suitable for subsequent PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene.
 
PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene
 
The modified lysostaphin gene was amplified from the synthesized pUC57 plasmid by using four primer combinations (Set A, Set B, Set C and Set D) that were designed to facilitate the cloning of the gene into the mammalian expression vector. PCR amplification produced a clear DNA fragment of approximately 798 bp, which corresponds to the expected size of the lysostaphin gene. The agarose gel electrophoresis results clearly showed distinct amplification bands for the different primer sets; these bands can be observed in Fig 4, confirming successful amplification of the target gene.

Fig 4: Gel image of modified lysostaphin amplified from the synthesized pUC57 vector.


 
Purification of amplified PCR products
 
After the amplification, the lysostaphin PCR products were run on 0.8% agarose gel and the specific bands corresponding to the expected gene fragment further were excised for purification. Removal of excess primers, nucleotides and enzymes ensured that the DNA fragments were suitable for downstream cloning experiments. After the purification, the concentrations of the samples were quantified using NanoQuant spectrophotometry. The purified PCR products showed concentrations ranging from 85.10 ng/µL to 163.63 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.87 and 1.90, confirming that the DNA fragments were sufficiently pure for insertion into the expression vector.
 
Cloning of the lysostaphin gene into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector
 
The purified lysostaphin PCR products were ligated into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector to generate recombinant constructs. The ligation mixture was subsequently introduced into competent TOP10 E. coli cells using the heat-shock transformation method. After transformation, the cells were plated onto LB agar plates containing ampicillin. Numerous colonies appeared on the plates after overnight incubation, indicating successful uptake of recombinant plasmids. These colonies, visible in Fig 5, represent bacterial clones potentially carrying the lysostaphin gene insert.

Fig 5: Agar plates of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having the different sets of amplified PCR products.


       
To obtain pure colonies for further screening, selected colonies were streaked onto fresh antibiotic-containing agar plates. The streaked colonies shown in Fig 6 demonstrate successful isolation of individual recombinant clones.

Fig 6: Streaked agar plates of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having the different sets of amplified PCR products.


 
Screening of recombinant clones by colony PCR
 
To verify that the lysostaphin gene had been successfully inserted into the vector, bacterial colonies were screened using colony PCR. Lysostaphin-specific primers were used to amplify the gene directly from bacterial lysates. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products revealed the presence of the expected gene fragment in several clones. The gel image shown in Fig 7 demonstrates clear amplification of the lysostaphin gene in multiple colonies. Among the screened clones, six clones from Set A, one clone from Set B, three clones from Set C and two clones from Set D were confirmed to contain the recombinant plasmid.

Fig 7: Colony PCR showing six isolated clones from set-A (A1-A6), one clone from set-B (B1), three clones from set-C (C1-C3) and two clones from set-D (D1 and D2) have recombinant plasmid containing lysostaphin.


 
Isolation and quantification of recombinant plasmids
 
Colonies that tested positive in colony PCR were cultured overnight in LB broth containing ampicillin for plasmid isolation. Recombinant plasmids were extracted using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. Spectrophotometric analysis showed plasmid DNA concentrations ranging from 323.97 ng/µL to 547.67 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.73 and 1.85, indicating acceptable purity of the plasmid preparations for sequencing and further analysis.
 
Verification of gene orientation in recombinant constructs
 
Correct orientation of the lysostaphin insert within the expression vector was verified by PCR amplification using the T7 forward primer together with a lysostaphin-specific reverse primer. Successful amplification of the expected DNA fragment confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted into the vector in the correct orientation. The PCR products confirming the orientation of the insert are clearly visible in Fig 8.

Fig 8: PCR amplification showing seven isolated clones (A1, A6, B1, C1, C3, D1, D2) of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vectors containing modified LST gene in correct orientation as amplified by T7 forward primer and LST reverse primer.


 
Sequence validation of recombinant plasmids
 
To further confirm the accuracy of the cloned constructs, selected recombinant plasmids were subjected to sanger sequencing. Sequencing was performed using vector-specific primers to read across the inserted lysostaphin gene. Sequence analysis confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted correctly into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector without any mutations and that the reading frame was preserved. Representative sequencing chromatograms and alignment results are presented in Fig 9, illustrating the correct nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene.

Fig 9: Sequence alignment of the plasmid Set A_Topo_Clone 1 (Tube 3) with bacterial lysostaphin gene carrying buffalo âLG signal sequence (sequencing done by T7 forward primer).


 
Transfection of recombinant plasmids into buffalo fibroblast cells
 
To evaluate expression of the lysostaphin gene in mammalian cells, the confirmed recombinant plasmids were transfected into buffalo fibroblast cells. The pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector contains a GFP reporter gene, which allows visual detection of transfected cells. After transfection, clear green fluorescence signals were observed in the fibroblast cells, indicating successful uptake and expression of the recombinant plasmids. The fluorescence observed in the transfected cells is shown in Fig 10.

Fig 10: Expression of the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having GFP as screening marker in the transfected buffalo fibroblast cells.


 
Antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in fibroblast cells
 
The antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in transfected fibroblast cells was evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus. Lysates prepared from the transfected cells were applied onto agar plates containing a bacterial lawn of S. aureus, with purified lysostaphin used as a positive control for comparison. After incubation, visible zones of inhibition were observed around the lysate spots, indicating antibacterial activity of the expressed lysostaphin. The inhibition patterns observed are presented in Fig 11.                            

Fig 11: Inhibition of staphylococcal strains by lysostaphin-producing cell lysate.



Mammary gland infections are a major economic burden in the dairy industry due to reduced milk production, treatment costs and compromised animal health. Among the pathogens involved, Staphylococcus aureus is a key contagious mastitis agent causing about 15-30% of infections and its intracellular survival, immune evasion and biofilm formation make treatment particularly challenging (Barkema et al., 2006; Bradley, 2002). The therapeutic potential of lysostaphin against S. aureus-associated infections has been demonstrated in several experimental models. Earlier studies showed that lysostaphin effectively reduced S. aureus burden in murine mastitis models, highlighting its promise as an alternative anti-staphylococcal therapeutic (Kerr et al., 2001). In addition, lysostaphin has demonstrated efficacy against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), biofilm-associated infections, keratitis and experimental endocarditis, supporting its broader translational relevance (Kokai-Kun et al., 2003; Climo et al., 1998; Hole et al., 2026). Previous researchers have also explored recombinant expression of lysostaphin in eukaryotic systems by replacing the native bacterial translational elements with eukaryotic-compatible expression components. Successful expression in COS-7 cells and cell-free eukaryotic systems demonstrated that lysostaphin could be produced in a mammalian-compatible environment while retaining biological activity (Williamson et al., 1994). However, mammalian expression systems may introduce post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, which can potentially affect protein folding, secretion, stability and enzymatic activity. To overcome this limitation, the present study employed a modified lysostaphin construct in which two predicted N-linked glycosylation-associated asparagine residues (N125 and N232) were substituted with glutamine to improve compatibility with mammalian expression while preserving antibacterial functionality. Similar approaches have been explored previously, where control of glycosylation-associated modifications was shown to be important for maintaining lysostaphin activity (Huang et al., 2013). The modified lysostaphin gene was successfully cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO mammalian expression vector and following transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells, observable GFP fluorescence suggested successful uptake and expression of the recombinant construct.
       
The antibacterial assay further demonstrated visible inhibition of S. aureus growth by lysates obtained from transfected buffalo fibroblast cells, while purified lysostaphin served as a positive control for comparison. These findings suggest that the expressed recombinant lysostaphin retained antibacterial activity following mammalian expression. Compared with bacterial expression systems such as Escherichia coli, which are often associated with endotoxin contamination, inclusion body formation and complex downstream purification requirements (Rosano and Ceccarelli, 2014), mammalian systems may offer a more physiologically relevant environment for recombinant therapeutic protein production. Yeast-based expression systems such as Pichia pastoris provide an alternative eukaryotic platform, but issues related to hyperglycosylation and heterogeneous post-translational modifications remain potential concerns (Ahmad et al., 2014). From a translational perspective, recombinant lysostaphin expressed in mammalian systems may have potential applications in both veterinary and human medicine. In dairy animals, such an approach may contribute toward the development of alternative therapeutic interventions against S. aureus-associated mastitis, potentially reducing dependence on conventional antibiotics and helping address antimicrobial resistance. Previous studies involving transgenic expression of lysostaphin in mammary tissue have also demonstrated protective effects against staphylococcal mastitis, further supporting its veterinary relevance (Wall et al., 2005).
       
However, the findings of the present study should be interpreted within the scope of its design. This investigation was intended as a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept assessment; therefore, quantitative transfection efficiency analysis, replicate-based statistical validation, recombinant protein purification and detailed enzymatic characterization were not performed. Further studies focusing on expression optimization, quantitative antimicrobial evaluation, protein purification and validation in relevant animal infection models will be necessary to establish reproducibility and therapeutic feasibility more robustly.
A preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept for the expression of modified lysostaphin in a mammalian expression system using buffalo fibroblast cells was demonstrated successfully. The modified lysostaphin construct, generated by substituting two predicted N-glycosylation-associated asparagine residues with glutamine, was successfully cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector and confirmed through PCR-based orientation analysis and Sanger sequencing. Following transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells, green fluorescence indicated successful uptake and expression of the recombinant construct. In addition, lysates obtained from the transfected cells showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a qualitative plate inhibition assay, suggesting functional expression of the modified lysostaphin protein. These findings provide initial support for the feasibility of expressing biologically active lysostaphin in a mammalian host system and offer a basis for future quantitative optimization and further exploration of its therapeutic potential against staphylococcal infections, including mastitis-associated pathogens.
The authors are grateful to ICAR-NDRI and ICAR-NRC on Yak for providing all the necessary support required for this study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Ahmad, M., Hirz, M., Pichler, H. and Schwab, H. (2014). Protein expression in pichia pastoris: Recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 98(12): 5301-5317. 

  2. Barkema, H.W., Schukken, Y. H. and Zadoks, R.N. (2006). Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(6): 1877- 1895. 

  3. Bastos, M.D.C.D.F., Coutinho, B.G. and Coelho, M.L.V. (2010). Lysostaphin: A staphylococcal bacteriolysin with potential clinical applications. Pharmaceuticals. 3: 1139-1161. 

  4. Bradley, A. (2002). Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Veterinary Journal (London, England: 1997). 164(2): 116-128. 

  5. Climo, M.W., Patron, R.L., Goldstein, B.P. and Archer, G.L. (1998). Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 42: 1355-1360. 

  6. Dajcs, J.J., Hume, E.B., Moreau, J.M., Caballero, A.R., Cannon, B.M. and O’Callaghan, R.J. (2000). Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41(6): 1432-1437.

  7. Froger, A. and Hall, J.E. (2007). Transformation of plasmid DNA into E. coli using the heat shock method. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 6: 253. 

  8. Heath, H.E., Heath, L.S., Nitterauer, J.D., Rose, K.E. and Sloan, G.L. (1989). Plasmid-encoded lysostaphin endopeptidase resistance of Staphylococcus simulans biovar Staphylolyticus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications160: 1106-1109. 

  9. Heinrich, P., Rosenstein, R., Böhmer, M., Sonner, P. and Götz, F. (1987). The molecular organization of the lysostaphin gene and its sequences repeated in tandem. Molecular and General Genetics. 209: 563-569. 

  10. Hole, J.P., Putty, K., Jemmigumpula, S. and Alapati, K.S. (2026). Therapeutic evaluation of reserpine against biofilm- forming Staphylococcus aureus of bovine mastitis in a murine model. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-8. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5802.

  11. Huang, C.Y., Hsu, J.T., Chung, P.H., Cheng, W.T.K., Jiang, Y.N. and Ju, Y.T. (2013). Site-specific N-glycosylation of caprine lysostaphin restricts its bacteriolytic activity toward Staphylococcus aureus. Animal Biotechnology. 24: 129- 147. 

  12. Johnson, C.T., Sok, M.C.P., Martin, K.E., Kalelkar, P.P., Caplin, J.D., Botchwey, E.A. and García, A.J. (2019). Lysostaphin and BMP-2 co-delivery reduces Staphylococcus aureus infection and regenerates critical-sized segmental bone defects. Science Advances. 5: eaaw1228. 

  13. Kerr, D., Plaut, K., Bramley, A., Williamson, C., Lax, A., Moore, K., Wells, K. and Wall, R. (2001). Lysostaphin expression in mammary glands confers protection against staphylococcal infection in transgenic mice. Nature biotechnology. 19: 66-70.

  14. Kokai-Kun, J. F., Walsh, S. M., Chanturiya, T. and Mond, J.J. (2003). Lysostaphin cream eradicates Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a cotton rat model. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 47(5): 1589-1597. https:// doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.5.1589-1597.2003.

  15. Kokai-Kun, J.F., Chanturiya, T. and Mond, J.J. (2007). Lysostaphin as a treatment for systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a mouse model. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 60: 1051-1059. 

  16. Rosano, G.L. and Ceccarelli, E.A. (2014). Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology: 5: 172. 

  17. Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G.T., Mullis, K.B. and Erlich, H.A. (1988). Primer- directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 239: 487-491. 

  18. Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. 

  19. Schindler, C.A. and Schuhardt, V. (1964). Lysostaphin: A new bacteriolytic agent for Staphylococcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 51: 414-421. 

  20. Sekhri, I., Chandra, M., Kaur, G., Narang, D., Gupta, D.K. and Arora, A.K. (2021). Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other microorganisms from mastitis milk and their antimicrobial resistance pattern. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(6): 716-721. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4112.

  21. Sloan, G.L., Robinson, J.M. and Kloos, W.E. (1982). Identification of Staphylococcus staphylolyticus NRRL B-2628 as a biovar of Staphylococcus simulans. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 32: 170-174. 

  22. Srujana, A.S., Sonalika, J., Akhila, D.S., Juliet, M.R. and Sheela, P. (2022). Isolation of phages and study of their in vitro efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus isolates originating from bovine subclinical mastitis. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(6): 754-758.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4331.

  23. Strauss, W.M. (1996). Transfection of mammalian cells via lipofection. Methods in Molecular Biology. 54: 307-327. 

  24. Untergasser, A., Cutcutache, I., Koressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B.C., Remm, M. and Rozen, S.G. (2012). Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research. 40: e115. 

  25. Wall, R.J., Powell, A.M., Paape, M.J., Kerr, D.E., Bannerman, D.D., Pursel, V.G. and Hawk, H.W. (2005). Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nature Biotechnology. 23: 445-451. 

  26. Williamson, C.M., Bramley, A.J. and Lax, A.J. (1994). Expression of the lysostaphin gene of Staphylococcus simulans in a eukaryotic system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 771-776. 

A Simplified and Robust Approach for Recombinant Lysostaphin Production in Buffalo Fibroblast Cells

S
Shubham Loat1,2,*
M
Mohan Krishna2
J
Jyoti Yadav2
M
Manoj Kumar2
A
Atrayee Dutta1
A
Ankur Verma2
S
Sacchidananda Bera2
M
Maharana Pratap Diwakar2
M
Mihir Sarkar1
S
Satish Kumar2,*
1Animal Biotechnology, ICAR-National Research Centre on Yak, Dirang-790 101, West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh, India.
2Animal Biotechnology Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132 001, Haryana, India.
Cite article:- Loat Shubham, Krishna Mohan, Yadav Jyoti, Kumar Manoj, Dutta Atrayee, Verma Ankur, Bera Sacchidananda, Diwakar Pratap Maharana, Sarkar Mihir, Kumar Satish (2026). A Simplified and Robust Approach for Recombinant Lysostaphin Production in Buffalo Fibroblast Cells . Indian Journal of Animal Research. 60: 68-76. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5861.
Background: Mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus remains a significant challenge in dairy livestock due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains and the limited effectiveness of conventional therapeutic approaches. Lysostaphin, a staphylolytic enzyme with high specificity against Staphylococcus species, has emerged as a promising alternative antimicrobial agent. In this study, we aimed to establish a preliminary mammalian expression strategy for production of biologically active recombinant lysostaphin in buffalo fibroblast cells.

Methods: A modified lysostaphin gene, designed to eliminate predicted N-glycosylation sites, was synthesized and initially cloned into the pUC57 vector followed by subcloning into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector. Recombinant constructs were confirmed by colony PCR and Sanger sequencing before transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells. Recombinant expression was qualitatively assessed using GFP fluorescence and antibacterial activity was evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus.

Result: The lysostaphin gene (~798 bp) was successfully amplified and cloned into the mammalian expression vector. Screening and sequencing confirmed the correct insertion and orientation without mutations. Transfected buffalo fibroblast cells exhibited GFP fluorescence, indicating successful expression of the recombinant construct. Lysates from transfected cells produced visible zones of inhibition against S. aureus, indicating antibacterial activity of the expressed lysostaphin.
Mastitis occurs in both clinical and subclinical forms and is mainly caused by pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae and Escherichia coli, with S. aureus being strongly associated with persistent and recurrent infections (Sekhri et al., 2021; Srujana et al., 2022). Although antibiotics, chemotherapeutics and vaccines are commonly used for disease control, their effectiveness is limited due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains, vaccine-associated side effects and inadequate immune responses (Sekhri et al., 2021). Consequently, alternative antimicrobial strategies are being explored, among which lysostaphin has emerged as a promising staphylococcal bacteriolysin with significant therapeutic potential against MDR S. aureus (Wall et al., 2005). Lysostaphin was first discovered by Schindler and Schuhardt in 1964 from bacterial strain K-6-WI, which exhibited lytic activity against S. aureus and S. epidermidis (Bastos et al., 2010). It was later isolated from Staphylococcus simulans biovar staphylolyticus and identified as a 493-amino acid preproenzyme encoded by the plasmid pACK1 (Schindler and Schuhardt, 1964; Sloan et al., 1982). The structural organization of lysostaphin includes a leader sequence, tandem-repeat region, catalytic domain, linker region and cell wall-targeting domain, as shown in Fig 1.

Fig 1: Schematic diagram of the ~53-kDa full length pre-proLss showing leading sequence (LS), proregion (PRO), catalytic domain (CAT), linker (LK) and cell wall targeting domain (CWT).


       
Lysostaphin is a 25 kDa zinc metalloenzyme that exhibits glycylglycine endopeptidase activity, hydrolyzing the polyglycine interpeptide bridges of the Staphylococcus aureus cell wall and causing bacterial lysis (Heath et al., 1989). Due to its highly specific antibacterial mechanism, lysostaphin has gained attention as a potential therapeutic agent against multidrug-resistant (MDR) S. aureus infections (Huang et al., 2013). Several studies have demonstrated its efficacy in different experimental models (Kokai-Kun et al., 2003; Dajcs et al., 2000). Lysostaphin, either alone or in combination with vancomycin, was found to be more effective than vancomycin alone in treating experimental MRSA-induced aortic valve endocarditis in rabbits without inducing significant immune reactions (Heinrich et al., 1987). Its ability to eradicate S. aureus from infected tissues and blood in mice has also been reported (Climo et al., 1998). Moreover, lysostaphin-delivering hydrogels have shown promise in reducing S. aureus infection while promoting bone regeneration in infected radial defects in mice (Kokai-Kun et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2019). However, despite its promising therapeutic potential, recombinant expression of biologically active lysostaphin in mammalian expression systems remains challenging due to possible post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, which may affect protein structure and function. To address this, the lysostaphin gene was modified by substituting predicted N-glycosylation-associated residues to improve compatibility with mammalian expression. Therefore, this study aimed to perform a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept assessment of modified lysostaphin expression in buffalo fibroblast cells and to evaluate whether biologically active lysostaphin could be expressed in this mammalian host system.
Bacterial strains, plasmids and reagents
 
The experimental work was conducted during the period 2023-2025 at the ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute (ICAR-NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, India, in association with the ICAR-National Research Centre on Yak (ICAR-NRCY), Dirang, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Chemically competent Escherichia coli TOP10 cells (Invitrogen, USA) were used for cloning and propagation of recombinant plasmids. The mammalian expression vector pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO was used for cloning and expression of the lysostaphin gene (Fig 2). Plasmid purification and gel extraction were performed using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany). The synthesized lysostaphin gene in the pUC57 cloning vector was first propagated in competent E. coli TOP10 cells to obtain sufficient plasmid DNA for downstream cloning experiments and transformed colonies were selected on LB agar plates containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL).

Fig 2: Map of the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector.


 
Preparation of competent E. coli cells
 
Chemically competent E. coli TOP10 cells were prepared using the calcium chloride method based on the protocol described by Sambrook and Russell (2001) with minor modifications. An overnight culture of TOP10 E. coli cells was inoculated into fresh SOB medium and incubated at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm until the optical density reached approximately O.D. 600 ≈0.6, corresponding to the mid-logarithmic phase of bacterial growth. The culture was chilled on ice for 5 min and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The resulting bacterial pellet was resuspended in 0.1 M CaCl2‚ containing 15% glycerol and incubated on ice for 1 h to enhance competency. Aliquots of 250 µL were prepared and stored at -80°C until further use.
 
Primer design
 
Primers specific for amplification of the lysostaphin gene were designed using Primer3 software (Untergasser et al., 2012) based on the published lysostaphin gene sequence. The primers were synthesized commercially (Sigma-Aldrich, Bengaluru, India). The sequences of primers used in this study are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Primers used for amplification of the lysostaphin gene.


 
PCR amplification of lysostaphin gene
 
Amplification of the lysostaphin gene was performed using DreamTaq 2× PCR master mix (Thermo scientific) following standard PCR protocols (Saiki et al., 1988). Each PCR reaction was carried out in a final volume of 20 µL, containing 10 µL of DreamTaq master mix, 0.4 µL of forward primer (10 µM), 0.4 µL of reverse primer (10 µM), 1 µL of template DNA and 8.2 µL of nuclease-free water. PCR amplification was performed in a Bio-Rad S1000 thermal cycler under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 60°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 45 s. A final extension step was carried out at 72°C for 5 min, after which the reactions were held at 4°C until further analysis. The amplified PCR products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/mL) and DNA bands were visualized under ultraviolet illumination using a Bio-Rad gel doc XR imaging system. The PCR products were purified using QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified DNA was quantified using a NanoQuant spectrophotometer and stored at -20°C until further use.
 
Cloning of lysostaphin gene into pcDNA3.1 vector
 
The purified PCR product containing the lysostaphin gene was cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cloning reaction was prepared in a total volume of 6 µL, consisting of 2 µL purified PCR product (~150 ng DNA), 1 µL salt solution, 1 µL pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector and 2 µL nuclease-free water. The reaction mixture was gently mixed and incubated at room temperature to facilitate insertion of the lysostaphin gene into the vector.
 
Transformation of recombinant plasmid
 
The recombinant plasmid was introduced into competent E. coli TOP10 cells using the heat-shock transformation method (Froger and Hall, 2007). Competent cells were mixed with the ligation mixture and incubated on ice for 30 min, followed by heat shock at 42°C for 90 s and immediate cooling on ice for 2 min. Subsequently, 500 µL SOC medium was added and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with shaking at 200 rpm. The transformed cells were plated onto LB agar containing ampicillin (100 µg/mL) and incubated overnight at 37°C.
 
Screening of recombinant clones by colony PCR
 
Transformant colonies were screened using colony PCR to confirm the presence of the lysostaphin gene. Individual colonies were suspended in 10 µl of nuclease-free water in PCR tubes and heated at 95°C for 10 min to lyse the cells. The tubes were then centrifuged and 3 µl of the supernatant containing plasmid DNA was used as template for PCR amplification using lysostaphin-specific primers. The PCR reaction was carried out in a 20 µl reaction mixture containing 10 µl of 2× DreamTaq buffer, 0.5 µl of forward primer, 0.5 µl of reverse primer, 3 µl of bacterial lysate and 6 µl of nuclease-free water. The amplified PCR products were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis along with a 100 bp DNA ladder and a negative control to confirm the presence of the expected lysostaphin gene amplicon.
 
Isolation of recombinant plasmid DNA
 
Positive clones identified by colony PCR were cultured overnight in LB medium supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) at 37°C with shaking. Plasmid DNA was isolated using the QIAprep spin miniprep Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified plasmids were quantified using NanoQuant spectrophotometry and stored at -20°C.
 
Sequence verification
 
The integrity and correct orientation of the cloned lysostaphin gene were then verified by Sanger sequencing using the T7 forward primer (TAATACGACTCACTATAGGG). Sequence data were analyzed to confirm the correct reading frame and insertion of the gene construct.
 
Transfection of recombinant constructs into buffalo fibroblast cells
 
Recombinant pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO plasmids containing the lysostaphin gene were transfected into buffalo fibroblast cells as a preliminary qualitative assessment of recombinant expression in a mammalian host system. Transfection was performed using lipofectamine-mediated chemical transfection following standard mammalian cell transfection protocols (Strauss, 1996). The pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector contains a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene, allowing qualitative visualization of transgene expression by fluorescence microscopy. As the present work was designed as a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept study, quantitative transfection efficiency determination was not included.
 
Qualitative antibacterial activity assay
 
The antibacterial activity of lysostaphin produced in transfected buffalo fibroblast cells was preliminarily evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus. Agar plates seeded with a bacterial lawn of S. aureus were prepared and aliquots of lysates obtained from transfected fibroblast cells were spotted onto the plates. Purified lysostaphin was included as a positive control for comparison. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 18-24 h. The appearance of visible zones of inhibition around the lysate spots was considered indicative of staphylolytic activity of the expressed lysostaphin protein (Bastos et al., 2010). Since this study was intended as an initial qualitative feasibility assessment, quantitative inhibition zone measurements and replicate-based statistical analysis were not included.
Synthesis and verification of the modified lysostaphin gene
 
For the expression of lysostaphin in mammalian cells, the lysostaphin gene was modified by replacing two predicted N-glycosylation sites located at amino acid positions 125 and 232. At these positions, the original asparagine (ASn) residues were substituted with glutamine (Gln) in order to prevent glycosylation during expression in eukaryotic cells while maintaining the antibacterial activity of the enzyme. Following the modification, the lysostaphin gene was synthesized commercially and delivered in the pUC57 cloning vector. The newly synthesized fragment had a length of 798 bp, corresponding to the complete coding sequence of the modified lysostaphin gene. After that, the obtained sequence was aligned with the reference lysostaphin gene sequence for ensuring the accuracy of the synthesized construct. The alignment confirmed that the intended nucleotide substitutions were correctly incorporated into the gene. The sequence comparison revealed expected agreement with the modified lysostaphin sequence (Fig 3), thereby confirming the successful synthesis of the gene construct.

Fig 3: Alignment of the modified lysostaphin gene matching exactly with the reference sequence.


 
Propagation of the pUC57 plasmid containing the modified lysostaphin gene
 
To obtain sufficient plasmid DNA for downstream molecular analysis, the synthesized pUC57 plasmid carrying the modified lysostaphin gene was propagated within chemically competent TOP10 Escherichia coli cells. Following transformation, the bacterial suspension was spread onto LB agar plates supplemented with ampicillin to facilitate the selective growth of the transformed cells. After overnight incubation, multiple colonies were observed on the cultured agar plates which indicated successful uptake and propagation of the plasmid within the host cells. Individual colonies were subsequently selected and inoculated into LB broth containing ampicillin to allow further amplification of the plasmid prior to the DNA isolation.
 
Isolation and quantification of pUC57 plasmid DNA
 
Plasmid DNA was isolated from overnight grown bacterial cultures using a standard plasmid extraction protocol. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA were measured using a NanoQuant spectrophotometer. The obtained concentrations of the plasmid DNA were 245.35 ng/µL and 235.41 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios of 1.90 and 1.91, respectively. These values indicate good quality plasmid DNA with minimum protein contamination. Therefore, the isolated plasmid DNA was considered suitable for subsequent PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene.
 
PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene
 
The modified lysostaphin gene was amplified from the synthesized pUC57 plasmid by using four primer combinations (Set A, Set B, Set C and Set D) that were designed to facilitate the cloning of the gene into the mammalian expression vector. PCR amplification produced a clear DNA fragment of approximately 798 bp, which corresponds to the expected size of the lysostaphin gene. The agarose gel electrophoresis results clearly showed distinct amplification bands for the different primer sets; these bands can be observed in Fig 4, confirming successful amplification of the target gene.

Fig 4: Gel image of modified lysostaphin amplified from the synthesized pUC57 vector.


 
Purification of amplified PCR products
 
After the amplification, the lysostaphin PCR products were run on 0.8% agarose gel and the specific bands corresponding to the expected gene fragment further were excised for purification. Removal of excess primers, nucleotides and enzymes ensured that the DNA fragments were suitable for downstream cloning experiments. After the purification, the concentrations of the samples were quantified using NanoQuant spectrophotometry. The purified PCR products showed concentrations ranging from 85.10 ng/µL to 163.63 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.87 and 1.90, confirming that the DNA fragments were sufficiently pure for insertion into the expression vector.
 
Cloning of the lysostaphin gene into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector
 
The purified lysostaphin PCR products were ligated into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector to generate recombinant constructs. The ligation mixture was subsequently introduced into competent TOP10 E. coli cells using the heat-shock transformation method. After transformation, the cells were plated onto LB agar plates containing ampicillin. Numerous colonies appeared on the plates after overnight incubation, indicating successful uptake of recombinant plasmids. These colonies, visible in Fig 5, represent bacterial clones potentially carrying the lysostaphin gene insert.

Fig 5: Agar plates of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having the different sets of amplified PCR products.


       
To obtain pure colonies for further screening, selected colonies were streaked onto fresh antibiotic-containing agar plates. The streaked colonies shown in Fig 6 demonstrate successful isolation of individual recombinant clones.

Fig 6: Streaked agar plates of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having the different sets of amplified PCR products.


 
Screening of recombinant clones by colony PCR
 
To verify that the lysostaphin gene had been successfully inserted into the vector, bacterial colonies were screened using colony PCR. Lysostaphin-specific primers were used to amplify the gene directly from bacterial lysates. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products revealed the presence of the expected gene fragment in several clones. The gel image shown in Fig 7 demonstrates clear amplification of the lysostaphin gene in multiple colonies. Among the screened clones, six clones from Set A, one clone from Set B, three clones from Set C and two clones from Set D were confirmed to contain the recombinant plasmid.

Fig 7: Colony PCR showing six isolated clones from set-A (A1-A6), one clone from set-B (B1), three clones from set-C (C1-C3) and two clones from set-D (D1 and D2) have recombinant plasmid containing lysostaphin.


 
Isolation and quantification of recombinant plasmids
 
Colonies that tested positive in colony PCR were cultured overnight in LB broth containing ampicillin for plasmid isolation. Recombinant plasmids were extracted using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. Spectrophotometric analysis showed plasmid DNA concentrations ranging from 323.97 ng/µL to 547.67 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.73 and 1.85, indicating acceptable purity of the plasmid preparations for sequencing and further analysis.
 
Verification of gene orientation in recombinant constructs
 
Correct orientation of the lysostaphin insert within the expression vector was verified by PCR amplification using the T7 forward primer together with a lysostaphin-specific reverse primer. Successful amplification of the expected DNA fragment confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted into the vector in the correct orientation. The PCR products confirming the orientation of the insert are clearly visible in Fig 8.

Fig 8: PCR amplification showing seven isolated clones (A1, A6, B1, C1, C3, D1, D2) of pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vectors containing modified LST gene in correct orientation as amplified by T7 forward primer and LST reverse primer.


 
Sequence validation of recombinant plasmids
 
To further confirm the accuracy of the cloned constructs, selected recombinant plasmids were subjected to sanger sequencing. Sequencing was performed using vector-specific primers to read across the inserted lysostaphin gene. Sequence analysis confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted correctly into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector without any mutations and that the reading frame was preserved. Representative sequencing chromatograms and alignment results are presented in Fig 9, illustrating the correct nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene.

Fig 9: Sequence alignment of the plasmid Set A_Topo_Clone 1 (Tube 3) with bacterial lysostaphin gene carrying buffalo âLG signal sequence (sequencing done by T7 forward primer).


 
Transfection of recombinant plasmids into buffalo fibroblast cells
 
To evaluate expression of the lysostaphin gene in mammalian cells, the confirmed recombinant plasmids were transfected into buffalo fibroblast cells. The pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector contains a GFP reporter gene, which allows visual detection of transfected cells. After transfection, clear green fluorescence signals were observed in the fibroblast cells, indicating successful uptake and expression of the recombinant plasmids. The fluorescence observed in the transfected cells is shown in Fig 10.

Fig 10: Expression of the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO fusion vector having GFP as screening marker in the transfected buffalo fibroblast cells.


 
Antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in fibroblast cells
 
The antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in transfected fibroblast cells was evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against Staphylococcus aureus. Lysates prepared from the transfected cells were applied onto agar plates containing a bacterial lawn of S. aureus, with purified lysostaphin used as a positive control for comparison. After incubation, visible zones of inhibition were observed around the lysate spots, indicating antibacterial activity of the expressed lysostaphin. The inhibition patterns observed are presented in Fig 11.                            

Fig 11: Inhibition of staphylococcal strains by lysostaphin-producing cell lysate.



Mammary gland infections are a major economic burden in the dairy industry due to reduced milk production, treatment costs and compromised animal health. Among the pathogens involved, Staphylococcus aureus is a key contagious mastitis agent causing about 15-30% of infections and its intracellular survival, immune evasion and biofilm formation make treatment particularly challenging (Barkema et al., 2006; Bradley, 2002). The therapeutic potential of lysostaphin against S. aureus-associated infections has been demonstrated in several experimental models. Earlier studies showed that lysostaphin effectively reduced S. aureus burden in murine mastitis models, highlighting its promise as an alternative anti-staphylococcal therapeutic (Kerr et al., 2001). In addition, lysostaphin has demonstrated efficacy against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), biofilm-associated infections, keratitis and experimental endocarditis, supporting its broader translational relevance (Kokai-Kun et al., 2003; Climo et al., 1998; Hole et al., 2026). Previous researchers have also explored recombinant expression of lysostaphin in eukaryotic systems by replacing the native bacterial translational elements with eukaryotic-compatible expression components. Successful expression in COS-7 cells and cell-free eukaryotic systems demonstrated that lysostaphin could be produced in a mammalian-compatible environment while retaining biological activity (Williamson et al., 1994). However, mammalian expression systems may introduce post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, which can potentially affect protein folding, secretion, stability and enzymatic activity. To overcome this limitation, the present study employed a modified lysostaphin construct in which two predicted N-linked glycosylation-associated asparagine residues (N125 and N232) were substituted with glutamine to improve compatibility with mammalian expression while preserving antibacterial functionality. Similar approaches have been explored previously, where control of glycosylation-associated modifications was shown to be important for maintaining lysostaphin activity (Huang et al., 2013). The modified lysostaphin gene was successfully cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO mammalian expression vector and following transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells, observable GFP fluorescence suggested successful uptake and expression of the recombinant construct.
       
The antibacterial assay further demonstrated visible inhibition of S. aureus growth by lysates obtained from transfected buffalo fibroblast cells, while purified lysostaphin served as a positive control for comparison. These findings suggest that the expressed recombinant lysostaphin retained antibacterial activity following mammalian expression. Compared with bacterial expression systems such as Escherichia coli, which are often associated with endotoxin contamination, inclusion body formation and complex downstream purification requirements (Rosano and Ceccarelli, 2014), mammalian systems may offer a more physiologically relevant environment for recombinant therapeutic protein production. Yeast-based expression systems such as Pichia pastoris provide an alternative eukaryotic platform, but issues related to hyperglycosylation and heterogeneous post-translational modifications remain potential concerns (Ahmad et al., 2014). From a translational perspective, recombinant lysostaphin expressed in mammalian systems may have potential applications in both veterinary and human medicine. In dairy animals, such an approach may contribute toward the development of alternative therapeutic interventions against S. aureus-associated mastitis, potentially reducing dependence on conventional antibiotics and helping address antimicrobial resistance. Previous studies involving transgenic expression of lysostaphin in mammary tissue have also demonstrated protective effects against staphylococcal mastitis, further supporting its veterinary relevance (Wall et al., 2005).
       
However, the findings of the present study should be interpreted within the scope of its design. This investigation was intended as a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept assessment; therefore, quantitative transfection efficiency analysis, replicate-based statistical validation, recombinant protein purification and detailed enzymatic characterization were not performed. Further studies focusing on expression optimization, quantitative antimicrobial evaluation, protein purification and validation in relevant animal infection models will be necessary to establish reproducibility and therapeutic feasibility more robustly.
A preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept for the expression of modified lysostaphin in a mammalian expression system using buffalo fibroblast cells was demonstrated successfully. The modified lysostaphin construct, generated by substituting two predicted N-glycosylation-associated asparagine residues with glutamine, was successfully cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector and confirmed through PCR-based orientation analysis and Sanger sequencing. Following transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells, green fluorescence indicated successful uptake and expression of the recombinant construct. In addition, lysates obtained from the transfected cells showed antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus in a qualitative plate inhibition assay, suggesting functional expression of the modified lysostaphin protein. These findings provide initial support for the feasibility of expressing biologically active lysostaphin in a mammalian host system and offer a basis for future quantitative optimization and further exploration of its therapeutic potential against staphylococcal infections, including mastitis-associated pathogens.
The authors are grateful to ICAR-NDRI and ICAR-NRC on Yak for providing all the necessary support required for this study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  1. Ahmad, M., Hirz, M., Pichler, H. and Schwab, H. (2014). Protein expression in pichia pastoris: Recent achievements and perspectives for heterologous protein production. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 98(12): 5301-5317. 

  2. Barkema, H.W., Schukken, Y. H. and Zadoks, R.N. (2006). Invited review: The role of cow, pathogen and treatment regimen in the therapeutic success of bovine Staphylococcus aureus mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science. 89(6): 1877- 1895. 

  3. Bastos, M.D.C.D.F., Coutinho, B.G. and Coelho, M.L.V. (2010). Lysostaphin: A staphylococcal bacteriolysin with potential clinical applications. Pharmaceuticals. 3: 1139-1161. 

  4. Bradley, A. (2002). Bovine mastitis: An evolving disease. Veterinary Journal (London, England: 1997). 164(2): 116-128. 

  5. Climo, M.W., Patron, R.L., Goldstein, B.P. and Archer, G.L. (1998). Lysostaphin treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus aortic valve endocarditis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 42: 1355-1360. 

  6. Dajcs, J.J., Hume, E.B., Moreau, J.M., Caballero, A.R., Cannon, B.M. and O’Callaghan, R.J. (2000). Lysostaphin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus keratitis in the rabbit. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 41(6): 1432-1437.

  7. Froger, A. and Hall, J.E. (2007). Transformation of plasmid DNA into E. coli using the heat shock method. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 6: 253. 

  8. Heath, H.E., Heath, L.S., Nitterauer, J.D., Rose, K.E. and Sloan, G.L. (1989). Plasmid-encoded lysostaphin endopeptidase resistance of Staphylococcus simulans biovar Staphylolyticus. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications160: 1106-1109. 

  9. Heinrich, P., Rosenstein, R., Böhmer, M., Sonner, P. and Götz, F. (1987). The molecular organization of the lysostaphin gene and its sequences repeated in tandem. Molecular and General Genetics. 209: 563-569. 

  10. Hole, J.P., Putty, K., Jemmigumpula, S. and Alapati, K.S. (2026). Therapeutic evaluation of reserpine against biofilm- forming Staphylococcus aureus of bovine mastitis in a murine model. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-8. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5802.

  11. Huang, C.Y., Hsu, J.T., Chung, P.H., Cheng, W.T.K., Jiang, Y.N. and Ju, Y.T. (2013). Site-specific N-glycosylation of caprine lysostaphin restricts its bacteriolytic activity toward Staphylococcus aureus. Animal Biotechnology. 24: 129- 147. 

  12. Johnson, C.T., Sok, M.C.P., Martin, K.E., Kalelkar, P.P., Caplin, J.D., Botchwey, E.A. and García, A.J. (2019). Lysostaphin and BMP-2 co-delivery reduces Staphylococcus aureus infection and regenerates critical-sized segmental bone defects. Science Advances. 5: eaaw1228. 

  13. Kerr, D., Plaut, K., Bramley, A., Williamson, C., Lax, A., Moore, K., Wells, K. and Wall, R. (2001). Lysostaphin expression in mammary glands confers protection against staphylococcal infection in transgenic mice. Nature biotechnology. 19: 66-70.

  14. Kokai-Kun, J. F., Walsh, S. M., Chanturiya, T. and Mond, J.J. (2003). Lysostaphin cream eradicates Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in a cotton rat model. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy. 47(5): 1589-1597. https:// doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.5.1589-1597.2003.

  15. Kokai-Kun, J.F., Chanturiya, T. and Mond, J.J. (2007). Lysostaphin as a treatment for systemic Staphylococcus aureus infection in a mouse model. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 60: 1051-1059. 

  16. Rosano, G.L. and Ceccarelli, E.A. (2014). Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Frontiers in Microbiology: 5: 172. 

  17. Saiki, R.K., Gelfand, D.H., Stoffel, S., Scharf, S.J., Higuchi, R., Horn, G.T., Mullis, K.B. and Erlich, H.A. (1988). Primer- directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 239: 487-491. 

  18. Sambrook, J. and Russell, D. (2001). Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York. 

  19. Schindler, C.A. and Schuhardt, V. (1964). Lysostaphin: A new bacteriolytic agent for Staphylococcus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 51: 414-421. 

  20. Sekhri, I., Chandra, M., Kaur, G., Narang, D., Gupta, D.K. and Arora, A.K. (2021). Prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other microorganisms from mastitis milk and their antimicrobial resistance pattern. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 55(6): 716-721. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4112.

  21. Sloan, G.L., Robinson, J.M. and Kloos, W.E. (1982). Identification of Staphylococcus staphylolyticus NRRL B-2628 as a biovar of Staphylococcus simulans. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 32: 170-174. 

  22. Srujana, A.S., Sonalika, J., Akhila, D.S., Juliet, M.R. and Sheela, P. (2022). Isolation of phages and study of their in vitro efficacy on Staphylococcus aureus isolates originating from bovine subclinical mastitis. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 56(6): 754-758.  doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-4331.

  23. Strauss, W.M. (1996). Transfection of mammalian cells via lipofection. Methods in Molecular Biology. 54: 307-327. 

  24. Untergasser, A., Cutcutache, I., Koressaar, T., Ye, J., Faircloth, B.C., Remm, M. and Rozen, S.G. (2012). Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research. 40: e115. 

  25. Wall, R.J., Powell, A.M., Paape, M.J., Kerr, D.E., Bannerman, D.D., Pursel, V.G. and Hawk, H.W. (2005). Genetically enhanced cows resist intramammary Staphylococcus aureus infection. Nature Biotechnology. 23: 445-451. 

  26. Williamson, C.M., Bramley, A.J. and Lax, A.J. (1994). Expression of the lysostaphin gene of Staphylococcus simulans in a eukaryotic system. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60: 771-776. 
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)