Synthesis and verification of the modified lysostaphin gene
For the expression of lysostaphin in mammalian cells, the lysostaphin gene was modified by replacing two predicted N-glycosylation sites located at amino acid positions 125 and 232. At these positions, the original asparagine (ASn) residues were substituted with glutamine (Gln) in order to prevent glycosylation during expression in eukaryotic cells while maintaining the antibacterial activity of the enzyme. Following the modification, the lysostaphin gene was synthesized commercially and delivered in the pUC57 cloning vector. The newly synthesized fragment had a length of 798 bp, corresponding to the complete coding sequence of the modified lysostaphin gene. After that, the obtained sequence was aligned with the reference lysostaphin gene sequence for ensuring the accuracy of the synthesized construct. The alignment confirmed that the intended nucleotide substitutions were correctly incorporated into the gene. The sequence comparison revealed expected agreement with the modified lysostaphin sequence (Fig 3), thereby confirming the successful synthesis of the gene construct.
Propagation of the pUC57 plasmid containing the modified lysostaphin gene
To obtain sufficient plasmid DNA for downstream molecular analysis, the synthesized pUC57 plasmid carrying the modified lysostaphin gene was propagated within chemically competent TOP10
Escherichia coli cells. Following transformation, the bacterial suspension was spread onto LB agar plates supplemented with ampicillin to facilitate the selective growth of the transformed cells. After overnight incubation, multiple colonies were observed on the cultured agar plates which indicated successful uptake and propagation of the plasmid within the host cells. Individual colonies were subsequently selected and inoculated into LB broth containing ampicillin to allow further amplification of the plasmid prior to the DNA isolation.
Isolation and quantification of pUC57 plasmid DNA
Plasmid DNA was isolated from overnight grown bacterial cultures using a standard plasmid extraction protocol. The quality and concentration of the extracted DNA were measured using a NanoQuant spectrophotometer. The obtained concentrations of the plasmid DNA were 245.35 ng/µL and 235.41 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios of 1.90 and 1.91, respectively. These values indicate good quality plasmid DNA with minimum protein contamination. Therefore, the isolated plasmid DNA was considered suitable for subsequent PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene.
PCR amplification of the lysostaphin gene
The modified lysostaphin gene was amplified from the synthesized pUC57 plasmid by using four primer combinations (Set A, Set B, Set C and Set D) that were designed to facilitate the cloning of the gene into the mammalian expression vector. PCR amplification produced a clear DNA fragment of approximately 798 bp, which corresponds to the expected size of the lysostaphin gene. The agarose gel electrophoresis results clearly showed distinct amplification bands for the different primer sets; these bands can be observed in Fig 4, confirming successful amplification of the target gene.
Purification of amplified PCR products
After the amplification, the lysostaphin PCR products were run on 0.8% agarose gel and the specific bands corresponding to the expected gene fragment further were excised for purification. Removal of excess primers, nucleotides and enzymes ensured that the DNA fragments were suitable for downstream cloning experiments. After the purification, the concentrations of the samples were quantified using NanoQuant spectrophotometry. The purified PCR products showed concentrations ranging from 85.10 ng/µL to 163.63 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.87 and 1.90, confirming that the DNA fragments were sufficiently pure for insertion into the expression vector.
Cloning of the lysostaphin gene into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector
The purified lysostaphin PCR products were ligated into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO expression vector to generate recombinant constructs. The ligation mixture was subsequently introduced into competent TOP10
E. coli cells using the heat-shock transformation method. After transformation, the cells were plated onto LB agar plates containing ampicillin. Numerous colonies appeared on the plates after overnight incubation, indicating successful uptake of recombinant plasmids. These colonies, visible in Fig 5, represent bacterial clones potentially carrying the lysostaphin gene insert.
To obtain pure colonies for further screening, selected colonies were streaked onto fresh antibiotic-containing agar plates. The streaked colonies shown in Fig 6 demonstrate successful isolation of individual recombinant clones.
Screening of recombinant clones by colony PCR
To verify that the lysostaphin gene had been successfully inserted into the vector, bacterial colonies were screened using colony PCR. Lysostaphin-specific primers were used to amplify the gene directly from bacterial lysates. Agarose gel electrophoresis of the colony PCR products revealed the presence of the expected gene fragment in several clones. The gel image shown in Fig 7 demonstrates clear amplification of the lysostaphin gene in multiple colonies. Among the screened clones, six clones from Set A, one clone from Set B, three clones from Set C and two clones from Set D were confirmed to contain the recombinant plasmid.
Isolation and quantification of recombinant plasmids
Colonies that tested positive in colony PCR were cultured overnight in LB broth containing ampicillin for plasmid isolation. Recombinant plasmids were extracted using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit. Spectrophotometric analysis showed plasmid DNA concentrations ranging from 323.97 ng/µL to 547.67 ng/µL, with A260/A280 ratios between 1.73 and 1.85, indicating acceptable purity of the plasmid preparations for sequencing and further analysis.
Verification of gene orientation in recombinant constructs
Correct orientation of the lysostaphin insert within the expression vector was verified by PCR amplification using the T7 forward primer together with a lysostaphin-specific reverse primer. Successful amplification of the expected DNA fragment confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted into the vector in the correct orientation. The PCR products confirming the orientation of the insert are clearly visible in Fig 8.
Sequence validation of recombinant plasmids
To further confirm the accuracy of the cloned constructs, selected recombinant plasmids were subjected to sanger sequencing. Sequencing was performed using vector-specific primers to read across the inserted lysostaphin gene. Sequence analysis confirmed that the lysostaphin gene had been inserted correctly into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector without any mutations and that the reading frame was preserved. Representative sequencing chromatograms and alignment results are presented in Fig 9, illustrating the correct nucleotide sequence of the cloned gene.
Transfection of recombinant plasmids into buffalo fibroblast cells
To evaluate expression of the lysostaphin gene in mammalian cells, the confirmed recombinant plasmids were transfected into buffalo fibroblast cells. The pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO vector contains a GFP reporter gene, which allows visual detection of transfected cells. After transfection, clear green fluorescence signals were observed in the fibroblast cells, indicating successful uptake and expression of the recombinant plasmids. The fluorescence observed in the transfected cells is shown in Fig 10.
Antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in fibroblast cells
The antibacterial activity of lysostaphin expressed in transfected fibroblast cells was evaluated using a qualitative plate inhibition assay against
Staphylococcus aureus. Lysates prepared from the transfected cells were applied onto agar plates containing a bacterial lawn of
S.
aureus, with purified lysostaphin used as a positive control for comparison. After incubation, visible zones of inhibition were observed around the lysate spots, indicating antibacterial activity of the expressed lysostaphin. The inhibition patterns observed are presented in Fig 11.
Mammary gland infections are a major economic burden in the dairy industry due to reduced milk production, treatment costs and compromised animal health. Among the pathogens involved,
Staphylococcus aureus is a key contagious mastitis agent causing about 15-30% of infections and its intracellular survival, immune evasion and biofilm formation make treatment particularly challenging
(Barkema et al., 2006; Bradley, 2002). The therapeutic potential of lysostaphin against
S.
aureus-associated infections has been demonstrated in several experimental models. Earlier studies showed that lysostaphin effectively reduced
S.
aureus burden in murine mastitis models, highlighting its promise as an alternative anti-staphylococcal therapeutic
(Kerr et al., 2001). In addition, lysostaphin has demonstrated efficacy against methicillin-resistant
S.
aureus (MRSA), biofilm-associated infections, keratitis and experimental endocarditis, supporting its broader translational relevance (
Kokai-Kun et al., 2003;
Climo et al., 1998; Hole et al., 2026). Previous researchers have also explored recombinant expression of lysostaphin in eukaryotic systems by replacing the native bacterial translational elements with eukaryotic-compatible expression components. Successful expression in COS-7 cells and cell-free eukaryotic systems demonstrated that lysostaphin could be produced in a mammalian-compatible environment while retaining biological activity
(Williamson et al., 1994). However, mammalian expression systems may introduce post-translational modifications such as glycosylation, which can potentially affect protein folding, secretion, stability and enzymatic activity. To overcome this limitation, the present study employed a modified lysostaphin construct in which two predicted N-linked glycosylation-associated asparagine residues (N125 and N232) were substituted with glutamine to improve compatibility with mammalian expression while preserving antibacterial functionality. Similar approaches have been explored previously, where control of glycosylation-associated modifications was shown to be important for maintaining lysostaphin activity
(Huang et al., 2013). The modified lysostaphin gene was successfully cloned into the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-TOPO mammalian expression vector and following transfection into buffalo fibroblast cells, observable GFP fluorescence suggested successful uptake and expression of the recombinant construct.
The antibacterial assay further demonstrated visible inhibition of
S.
aureus growth by lysates obtained from transfected buffalo fibroblast cells, while purified lysostaphin served as a positive control for comparison. These findings suggest that the expressed recombinant lysostaphin retained antibacterial activity following mammalian expression. Compared with bacterial expression systems such as
Escherichia coli, which are often associated with endotoxin contamination, inclusion body formation and complex downstream purification requirements (
Rosano and Ceccarelli, 2014), mammalian systems may offer a more physiologically relevant environment for recombinant therapeutic protein production. Yeast-based expression systems such as
Pichia pastoris provide an alternative eukaryotic platform, but issues related to hyperglycosylation and heterogeneous post-translational modifications remain potential concerns
(Ahmad et al., 2014). From a translational perspective, recombinant lysostaphin expressed in mammalian systems may have potential applications in both veterinary and human medicine. In dairy animals, such an approach may contribute toward the development of alternative therapeutic interventions against
S.
aureus-associated mastitis, potentially reducing dependence on conventional antibiotics and helping address antimicrobial resistance. Previous studies involving transgenic expression of lysostaphin in mammary tissue have also demonstrated protective effects against staphylococcal mastitis, further supporting its veterinary relevance
(Wall et al., 2005).
However, the findings of the present study should be interpreted within the scope of its design. This investigation was intended as a preliminary qualitative proof-of-concept assessment; therefore, quantitative transfection efficiency analysis, replicate-based statistical validation, recombinant protein purification and detailed enzymatic characterization were not performed. Further studies focusing on expression optimization, quantitative antimicrobial evaluation, protein purification and validation in relevant animal infection models will be necessary to establish reproducibility and therapeutic feasibility more robustly.