The goal of the current research was to identify the respiratory infection-causing pathogens in goats and to undertake a thorough molecular and pathological analysis of the PPR virus.
Prevalence of PPR virus in eastern districts of Uttar Pradesh
PPR is a highly contagious viral disease affecting goats. Analysing the prevalence and risk factor data for PPR is crucial given the serious economic impacts of the disease in the Eastern Districts of Uttar Pradesh. To effectively manage, control and eradicate the disease, it is important to understand PPR epidemiology.
The clinical signs and symptoms observed (history-based) during the current study matched those reported in cases of PPR in goats from different geographic locations
(Kumar et al., 2001; Pawaiya et al., 2004; Rath et al., 2024). When the disease was developed, PPRV-specific antibody titers were present in all serum samples from confirmed PPR outbreaks, especially if the goat survived for more than 10 days after the onset of clinical symptoms
(Begum et al., 2018). A total of 71 samples were from the goats that were vaccinated in the past, whereas 20 samples were collected from goats that had not received PPR vaccinations and 29 samples were taken from goats whose vaccination status was not clear. The samples were collected and stored at -20°C until analysis. The study aimed at determining the combined or overall sero-prevalence of PPR in goats in the Eastern Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh. By using c-ELISA to test 120 serum samples for the presence of PPRV antibodies, it was found that 106 (88.33%) of the 120 samples were positive for PPR antibodies (Fig 1).
Acharya et al., (2018) found the actual sero-prevalence of PPR was 87.65%, which simulated the present findings.
Seropositivity levels of 33.33% in South Gujarat (
Tiwari, 2004) and 37.09% in Gujarat state
(Ranaware et al., 2013) were lower than the present findings. Likewise, 47.14%
(Patel et al., 2017) and 25.70%
(Thakor et al., 2016) of goats in south Gujarat showed an overall seroprevalence. According to
Chandrahas et al., (2011), the overall seroprevalence of PPRV infection in sheep and goats in North Gujarat was 46.26% and
Balamurugan et al., (2011) observed a 43.56% overall prevalence across various Indian states between 2003 and 2009.
The overall sero-prevalence was found to be 47.5% (114/240) and 35.23% (2500/7096) in the Southern Tigray Region of Ethiopia
(Afera et al., 2014) and Sindh province of Pakistan
(Nizamani et al., 2015), respectively. Slightly higher (62.40%) prevalence was noticed by
Sakhare et al., (2019). However, the higher seroprevalence observed in the present findings may be related to vaccination status or to animal exposure to PPR during life.
Sero-prevalence of PPR in the eastern district of Uttar Pradesh
A total of 120 blood samples were collected for the study on the prevalence of PPR in the eastern plain zone of Uttar Pradesh. Higher sero-prevalence was observed in Bhadohi, while Mau and Azamgarh showed nearly identical positivity rates. Bhadohi had the highest prevalence (100%), followed by Mau (94.44%), Azamgarh (93.33%), Ghazipur (90%) and Ballia (73.33%) (Table 1). No significant correlation in prevalence was found between the districts of the Eastern Plain Zone of Uttar Pradesh (P> 0.05). Similar findings were also reported in epidemic samples from the Nepali districts of Kaski and Syangja, with PPR prevalence ranging from 75 to 100 per cent
(Acharya et al., 2018). Higher sero-prevalence reported in Eastern Uttar Pradesh might be due to the sampling procedure and sample size. Also, the farmers’ unawareness of vaccination and some vaccinated goats showed positive titers by c-ELISA. Positivity per cent in Ballia district was higher than that reported by
Thakor et al., (2016) but was almost at the same level as that reported by
Patel et al., (2017) when compared with other districts.
No study reports are available from Eastern Uttar Pradesh to compare the present observations. According to
Khan et al., (2007), sero-prevalence was determined to be 43.33% in 24 districts of Punjab Province and 45.5% in various villages throughout 27 randomly chosen districts in Pakistan. Small ruminant outbreaks happened often across the nation and the overall prevalence of PPRV was calculated between 20 and 60%
(Singh et al., 2004).
Detection of PPR virus using RT-PCR
RT- PCR has grown to be the most widely used tool for molecular epidemiological investigations and diagnosis
(Shaila et al., 1996). For a particular PPRV, the NP gene fragment was amplified using the primers NP3 and NP4. RT-PCR was used to analyze the extracted RNA from the suspicious samples and the results were read on a gel. According to
Couacy-Hymann et al. (2002), the anticipated band size is 351 bp, while the fragment size of the amplified products is 350 bp. For efficient amplification and detection of viruses in field samples, it is desirable to have multiple primer sets for diagnosis. The primer against the NP gene (np3/np4) was specific and sensitive for detecting PPRV in field samples.
The c-ELISA positive cases were subjected to RT-PCR. Out of 104 isolated materials, 29 showed positive results for NP gene-specific primers NP3 and NP4 by RT-PCR, which were demonstrated by the amplification of a 351-bp genome fragment. According to estimates, the positive rates were 24% (6/25), 32% (8/25), 24% (6/25), 35.29% (6/17) and 25% (3/12) in various districts of the eastern plain zone of Uttar Pradesh, including Azamgarh, Ghazipur, Mau, Ballia and Bhadohi (Table 2 and Fig 2).
Pathology of postmortem examinations in goats
One hundred fifty (150) goats, 62 young and 88 adults, died for postmortem assessment during the course of the investigation (including ELISA positive cases).
All of the goats suspected of having a natural PPR virus infection had revealed carcasses that were severely malnourished and dehydrated, as well as congested and consolidated pneumonic lungs. Trachea filled with frothy fluid. These necropsy findings were almost identical to those previously described by
Dhand et al., (2003) and
Pawaiya et al., (2004) in both natural and experimental cases, with the exception of a few unusual findings.
Bronchioles showed hyperplasia with intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusion bodies in bronchial epithelial cell. The bronchiolar lumen contains inflammatory cells, especially mononuclear cells (Fig 3). The presence of syncytial cells and eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies in bronchial epithelial cells, reported by
Saglam and Temur (2009) and
Singh et al., (2021), is similar to the present findings. Although
Kumar et al., (2004) and
Kul et al., (2007) reported the presence of interstitial pneumonia, their results were only partially in agreement with the present findings. In the current study, exudate was found in the bronchi and the bronchial epithelium was hyperplastic, which was also similar to the findings of
Aktas et al., (2011); Maina et al., (2015) and
Patel et al., (2017).
Microscopically, lungs contain numerous multinucleated giant cells with intracytoplasmic eosinophilic inclusion bodies (Fig 4). Alveolar lumen contains predominantly mononuclear cells, especially alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes and a few neutrophils. These findings were consistent with earlier observations by various researchers
(Aktas et al., 2011; Maina et al., 2015; Patel et al., 2017). In the cortex and medullary cords of the spleen, lymphoid cell depletion was observed, as reported by
Islam et al., (2001); Kul et al., (2007); Maina et al., (2015) and
Patel et al., (2015). Lymphocytolysis of lymphoid tissues might be caused by the PPR virus
(Kul et al., 2007).
Immunohistochemical staining of PPR virus
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used in this investigation to identify the PPRV antigen in the formalin-fixed tissue sections of PPR-infected goats. The IHC revealed the PPRV antigen’s location in many organs.
A total of one hundred four (104) samples were processed for IHC and RT-PCR, although IHC had a higher positivity rate, at 45.19% (47/104) compared to RT-PCR’s 27.88% (29/104), which was lower (Table 3). In general, IHC can be a substitute for molecular testing in field cases, given the simplicity of sample collection and storage. Greater positivity in IHC and lesser positivity in RT-PCR may vary depending on the method of sample collection and storage.
PPRV antigen is immunolabeled in the intestinal glands and infiltrating macrophages, as shown in Fig 5a and Fig 5 b, whereas the intestinal glands used as a control showed no immunolabeling of PPRV antigen.
Pope et al., (2013) reported a similar observation in black Bengal goats that had been experimentally infected with PPRV. A similar viral antigen distribution has been reported in goats infected with PPR virus by
Begam et al., (2021) and
Kumar et al., (2004). In the present finding, the lymphocytes in the spleen exhibited positive immunolabelling for PPRV antigen and a negative control. When goats were infected with the PPR virus, a comparable viral antigen distribution was seen by
Pope et al., (2013).