A total of 1131 crabs were sampled during the study period, comprising 677 females and 454 males. The carapace width of crabs ranged from 43 to 192 mm, while the weight varied between 28 and 474 g and carapace length ranged from 19 to 84 mm. Female crabs exhibited a broader size range (CW: 43-192 mm; W: 28-474 g; CL: 19-84 mm) compared to males (CW: 49-185 mm; W: 32–381 g; CL: 22-83 mm). The observed sex ratio was 1.49:1 (F:M), significantly deviating from the expected 1:1 ratio (χ² = 49.21, P<0.001), indicating a female-biased population (Table 1). These measurements show broader size ranges than those reported by
Vidhya et al., (2016) in the Gulf of Mannar (females: 24-460 g, 45-200 mm CW; males: 34-340 g, 74-182 mm CW) and substantially exceed the size ranges documented in Thai populations (Tina, 2015: 83.8-122 mm CW). The observed female-biased sex ratio recorded in this study contrasts with the 1:1 ratio reported by
Josileen and Menon (2007) in Mandapam, potentially indicating regional variations in reproductive behavior or fishing pressure. The predominance of females in the catch may be related to factors such as seasonal migration, reproductive behaviour, habitat preference and gear selectivity, which can influence the capture probability of each sex. In many portunid crabs, females migrate to specific areas for feeding and spawning, increasing their susceptibility to fishing gears (
Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Variations in sex ratio may also result from differences in growth, mortality and exploitation between sexes (
King, 2007). However, these factors were not directly examined in the present study and should be considered as possible explanations rather than definitive causes.
Growth pattern analysis revealed females were heavier than males below 110-113 mm CW, beyond which males showed significantly faster weight gain pattern consistent with findings by
Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) along the Mangalore coast but occurring at smaller size thresholds in our population. This transition size is notably smaller than the 115-125 mm CW reported by
Josileen (2011), suggesting possible environmental influences on growth dynamics. The male-dominant growth pattern at larger sizes aligns with observations by
Potter et al., (1983) in Australian waters and
Thomas (1984) along the Cochin coast, though contrasts sharply with
Dhawan et al. (1976) findings of consistently heavier females in Goan waters. The observed differences in the b values between males and females may be related to sex-specific biological processes. In many portunid crabs, females allocate significant energy to gonadal development and egg production, which can influence body weight relative to size and lead to differences in growth patterns between sexes. Similar sex-based differences in LWR parameters have been reported in previous studies on swimming crabs (
Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997;
Josileen, 2011).
The regression analysis of carapace width and body weight (Table 2A) revealed a negative allometric growth pattern in both sexes as well as in the combined population. For females (
n = 677), the equation was W = 0.00042 × CW
2.874 with a coefficient of determination (r² = 0.96), indicating a strong correlation. Males (
n = 454) also exhibited a negative allometric growth (W = 0.00051 × CW
2.712; r² = 0.95). The combined population (
n = 1131) followed the equation W = 0.00046 × CW
2.803 with the highest correlation (r² = 0.97). In all cases, the slope (
b) was significantly different from the isometric value of 3, as indicated by t-test values ranging from -4.38 to -8.71 (P<0.001), confirming the prevalence of negative allometric growth. Similarly, the carapace length–weight relationship also indicated negative allometric growth in all groups (Table 2B). The regression equation for females was W = 0.018 × CL
2.891 (
r² = 0.97) and for males, it was W = 0.021 × CL
2.763 (
r² = 0.96). The combined data yielded the equation W = 0.019 × CL
2.834 with a very high coefficient of determination (
r² = 0.98). All
b values significantly deviated from 3 (isometric value), as confirmed by t-test values ranging from -4.217 to -9.000 (P<0.001), reaffirming the negative allometric growth pattern across sexes and pooled data. Although
Kumar et al., (2019) reported negative allometric growth commonly in less exploited populations, the pattern observed in the present study may also be influenced by local environmental conditions, resource availability and fishing pressure in the Ramanathapuram waters.
The regression analysis of weight against carapace dimensions revealed strong morphometric relationships in
Portunus pelagicus, with tight clustering of data points following clear parabolic trends. Weight-carapace regressions in
Portunus pelagicus showed negative allometry
(Vidhya et al., 2016; Anjum et al., 2024), whereas positive allometry was reported in Mandapam and Karnataka (
Josileen, 2011;
Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1996) (Table 3). The variation in growth patterns may be due to differences in habitat, food availability and environmental conditions. Overall, the present estimates fall within the reported range for the species across different regions.
The monthly variations in the growth exponent (
b) and condition factor (
K) of
Portunus pelagicus revealed that females consistently showed higher
b values than males, with significant positive allometric growth observed in May (2.98±0.03) and October (3.01±0.02). The condition factor was also higher in females throughout the year, peaking in October (K = 1.96±0.03), indicating better well-being compared to males (Table 4). These findings suggest that females tend to invest more in body mass, possibly linked to reproductive cycles. Compared to earlier studies, the seasonal patterns align with
Vidhya et al., (2016) and
Josileen (2011), who also reported sex-specific growth and better condition in females during pre-spawning months. The lower
b values observed during the monsoon months (June-July) in both sexes may reflect reduced feeding activity or physiological stress due to environmental fluctuations, as noted by
Sukumaran and Neelakandan (1996). Similar growth patterns have been reported in other studies on
P. pelagicus. For instance, negative allometric growth has been documented in populations from the northern Arabian Sea and other coastal waters, indicating that environmental variability and regional ecological conditions can influence the growth dynamics of this species (
Chandravanshi et al., 2024). However, the near-isometric growth observed in females during October (b = 3.01±0.02) suggests a temporary shift in growth pattern during that period. Such seasonal deviations from the general growth trend have been reported in crustaceans and are often associated with reproductive activity, gonadal maturation, or improved feeding conditions. Seasonal variations in growth parameters have also been documented in blue swimming crab populations from Sri Lanka and other Indo-Pacific regions, where growth patterns varied between sexes and seasons
(Haputhantri et al., 2021). Overall, the present results highlight seasonal shifts in growth dynamics and body condition, emphasizing the influence of reproductive and environmental factors.