Length-weight and Carapace Width-weight Relationships of Portunus pelagicus  (Linnaeus, 1758) in Gillnet Fisheries along the Ramanathapuram Coast (Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar), India

J
J. Amalashajeeva1,*
N
N. Neethiselvan1
M
M. Kalaiarasan1
N
N. Jayakumar2
R
R. Shalini3
K
K. Karuppasamy2
S
S. Archana1
1Department of Fishing Technology and Fisheries Engineering, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Fisheries Resource and Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Fish Quality Assurance and Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: The blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), supports an important export-oriented fishery along the Ramanathapuram coast, covering the Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar. Information on sex-specific and seasonal growth patterns is essential for stock assessment and sustainable management of this commercially valuable species.

Methods: A total of 1,131 specimens of P. pelagicus (677 females and 454 males) were collected from two major landing centers along the Ramanathapuram coast. Carapace length-weight (CL-W) and carapace width-weight (CW-W) relationships were estimated using regression analysis. Deviation in sex ratio was tested using the chi-square (χ2) test. Growth patterns were assessed through allometric coefficients and monthly variations in growth parameters and condition factor were analyzed.

Result: The overall sex ratio was significantly female-biased (1:1.49; χ2 = 49.21, p<.001). Strong morphometric relationships were observed in both sexes and pooled samples, exhibiting negative allometric growth. The CW-W relationship showed b values of 2.874 in females and 2.712 in males, while the CL-W relationship yielded b values of 2.891 in females and 2.763 in males; all values differed significantly from the isometric coefficient (p<.001). Monthly analysis revealed consistently higher growth exponents and condition factors in females, with peak values during May and October, likely linked to reproductive activity.

The blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), is a commercially valuable portunid species widely distributed across the Indo-pacific region (Keenan et al., 1998). In India, it plays a dominant role in marine crab fisheries, especially along the southeast coast, including Tamil Nadu’s Ramanathapuram district, where it supports vibrant artisanal fisheries using gillnets, traps and trawl nets (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Saroj et al., (2020) reported that the Gulf of Mannar is one of the most productive marine regions. Kanaga et al. (2025) identified Ramanathapuram as the most vulnerable district in the Gulf of Mannar region, primarily due to intense overfishing and significant habitat degradation.
       
As the second most important marine crustacean group after penaeid shrimps, crabs contributed 62,696 tonnes-14.08% of India’s marine crustacean landings in 2023-with the east coast alone accounting for 56.7% of this catch (CMFRI, 2024; Josileen et al., 2019). In Ramanathapuram, P. pelagicus constitutes 95% of the crab landings in the Gulf of Mannar and is the sole species harvested from Palk Bay (Rajamani and Palanichamy, 2010), mirroring its dominance in adjacent Sri Lankan waters (Haputhantri et al., 2021). This region includes the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay, which are characterized by diverse habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass beds and mangroves that support rich marine biodiversity and productive fisheries. Globally, the species contributes approximately 298,000 tonnes annually, representing 5% of total crustacean fisheries (FAO, 2020).
       
Despite its economic importance, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the growth dynamics and population structure of P. pelagicus along the Ramanathapuram coast. While several studies have investigated the length-weight relationships (LWR) of this species in other Indian regions-including negative allometric growth in Kerala (Josileen, 2011), isometric growth in Gujarat (Kumar et al., 2019) and sex-specific growth patterns in Andhra Pradesh (Sajeevan and Ramachandran, 2016)-the biologically distinct Palk Bay-gulf of Mannar region remains underexplored. This lack of region-specific morphometric data hampers accurate stock assessments and hinders sustainable management of a fishery increasingly threatened by high exploitation pressure (Pillai and Thirumilu, 2011). Moreover, rising export demand, intensified fishing and reports of declining crab sizes (CMFRI, 2022) underscore the urgent need to establish baseline biological parameters for evidence-based management interventions, such as size limits and seasonal closures.
       
This study addresses this critical knowledge gap by providing the first comprehensive analysis of the carapace length–weight and carapace width-weight relationships of P. pelagicus from the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay regions of Ramanathapuram district. Using standardized methods (Le Cren, 1951; Pauly, 1993), the study evaluates sex-specific and seasonal growth patterns, providing vital reference data for regional comparisons and stock monitoring. The present study investigates the carapace length–weight relationship of the blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus with the aim of informing conservation efforts. The study quantified the relationships between carapace length, carapace width, body weight and condition factor of P. pelagicus collected from the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay regions of Ramanathapuram District.The outcomes are expected to support science-based conservation strategies and enhance the long-term sustainability of this economically and ecologically significant fishery.
The study was conducted across two primary blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) landing centres along the Ramanathapuram district - Thirupalaikudi (09o32.764'N 78o55.033'E) in Palk Bay and Vedhalai (09o27.23'N 79o10.40'E) in the Gulf of Mannar - from April 2023 to March 2024 (Fig 1). These sites were selected based on their ecological distinctiveness and importance in regional crab fisheries as established in previous studies (Rajamani and Palanichamy, 2010; CMFRI, 2024). Sampling was conducted for five days each month using a random sampling approach from the selected landing centres during peak landing times to ensure representative coverage of seasonal variations in crab populations (Pillai and Thirumilu, 2011).             

Fig 1: Map showing study area.

      

The bottom set gillnet dominates the crab fishery throughout the entire Gulf of Mannar region (Sahu et al., 2025). In the Ramanathapuram district crab fishery, crab gill nets account for the majority of the catch (approximately 95%). Accordingly, samples of Portunus pelagicus were collected from crab gill net operations conducted 5-10 nautical miles offshore along the Ramanathapuram coast and specimens were obtained directly from fishing vessels at the time of landing. A total of 1,131 Portunus pelagicus specimens (677 females, 454 males) were sampled, reflecting the natural sex ratio observed in the fishery. Each specimen was immediately processed to record carapace width (CW), defined as the distance between the tips of the posterior-most lateral spines and carapace length (CL), measured dorsally along the midline from the frontal notch to the posterior carapace margin, using Vernier calipers with 0.5 mm precision. Total weight was measured to the nearest gram using an electronic balance after blotting excess moisture.
       
The length-weight and width-weight relationships were analyzed using the power function:
 
W = aLb
 
Where
W = Represents expected weight (g).
L = Denotes either carapace length or width (mm).
‘a’ = Y-intercept (initial growth coefficient).
‘b’ = Slope (growth coefficient).
       
Parameters were calculated through least squares regression after logarithmic transformation of the data to linearize the relationship, following standard crustacean biometric protocols (Hartnoll, 1982). The strength of each morphometric relationship was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Sexual dimorphism in growth patterns was evaluated through one-way ANOVA comparing the carapace width-weight relationships between sexes, with statistical significance set at 5% level (P<0.05) using SPSS software (v.25). The body weight (W) is identified as the dependent variable, while sex is specified as the grouping factor for the comparison of carapace width-weight relationships. In addition, the normality assumption was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test prior to conducting the ANOVA. This analytical approach allowed for direct comparison with established growth parameters from other regional populations while accounting for potential sex-specific growth variations characteristic of portunid crabs (Keenan et al., 1998).
       
The condition factor (K) of Portunus pelagicus was calculated to assess the general health, robustness and physiological status of individuals across sexes and seasons. The condition factor was determined using the formula:

 
Where
W = Total body weight (g),
L = Carapace length (mm) and
b = Exponent obtained from the length-weight relationship regression equation
 
W = aLb
 
This method accounts for allometric growth and provides a standardized measure of well-being relative to body size (Le Cren, 1951). The condition factor was computed separately for males and females on a monthly basis to evaluate seasonal variation.
A total of 1131 crabs were sampled during the study period, comprising 677 females and 454 males. The carapace width of crabs ranged from 43 to 192 mm, while the weight varied between 28 and 474 g and carapace length ranged from 19 to 84 mm. Female crabs exhibited a broader size range (CW: 43-192 mm; W: 28-474 g; CL: 19-84 mm) compared to males (CW: 49-185 mm; W: 32–381 g; CL: 22-83 mm). The observed sex ratio was 1.49:1 (F:M), significantly deviating from the expected 1:1 ratio (χ² = 49.21, P<0.001), indicating a female-biased population (Table 1). These measurements show broader size ranges than those reported by Vidhya et al., (2016) in the Gulf of Mannar (females: 24-460 g, 45-200 mm CW; males: 34-340 g, 74-182 mm CW) and substantially exceed the size ranges documented in Thai populations (Tina, 2015: 83.8-122 mm CW). The observed female-biased sex ratio recorded in this study contrasts with the 1:1 ratio reported by Josileen and Menon (2007) in Mandapam, potentially indicating regional variations in reproductive behavior or fishing pressure. The predominance of females in the catch may be related to factors such as seasonal migration, reproductive behaviour, habitat preference and gear selectivity, which can influence the capture probability of each sex. In many portunid crabs, females migrate to specific areas for feeding and spawning, increasing their susceptibility to fishing gears (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Variations in sex ratio may also result from differences in growth, mortality and exploitation between sexes (King, 2007). However, these factors were not directly examined in the present study and should be considered as possible explanations rather than definitive causes.

Table 1: Descriptive summary of carapace width, weight and carapace length of P. pelagicus.


       
Growth pattern analysis revealed females were heavier than males below 110-113 mm CW, beyond which males showed significantly faster weight gain pattern consistent with findings by Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) along the Mangalore coast but occurring at smaller size thresholds in our population. This transition size is notably smaller than the 115-125 mm CW reported by Josileen (2011), suggesting  possible environmental influences on growth dynamics. The male-dominant growth pattern at larger sizes aligns with observations by Potter et al., (1983) in Australian waters and Thomas (1984) along the Cochin coast, though contrasts sharply with Dhawan et al. (1976) findings of consistently heavier females in Goan waters. The observed differences in the b values between males and females may be related to sex-specific biological processes. In many portunid crabs, females allocate significant energy to gonadal development and egg production, which can influence body weight relative to size and lead to differences in growth patterns between sexes. Similar sex-based differences in LWR parameters have been reported in previous studies on swimming crabs (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997; Josileen, 2011).         
       
The regression analysis of carapace width and body weight (Table 2A) revealed a negative allometric growth pattern in both sexes as well as in the combined population. For females (n = 677), the equation was W = 0.00042 × CW2.874 with a coefficient of determination (r² = 0.96), indicating a strong correlation. Males (n = 454) also exhibited a negative allometric growth (W = 0.00051 × CW2.712; r² = 0.95). The combined population (n = 1131) followed the equation W = 0.00046 × CW2.803  with the highest correlation (r² = 0.97). In all cases, the slope (b) was significantly different from the isometric value of 3, as indicated by t-test values ranging from -4.38 to -8.71 (P<0.001), confirming the prevalence of negative allometric growth. Similarly, the carapace length–weight relationship also indicated negative allometric growth in all groups (Table 2B). The regression equation for females was W = 0.018 × CL2.891 (r² = 0.97) and for males, it was W = 0.021 × CL2.763 (r² = 0.96). The combined data yielded the equation W = 0.019 × CL2.834 with a very high coefficient of determination (r² = 0.98). All b values significantly deviated from 3 (isometric value), as confirmed by t-test values ranging from -4.217 to -9.000 (P<0.001), reaffirming the negative allometric growth pattern across sexes and pooled data. Although Kumar et al., (2019) reported negative allometric growth commonly in less exploited populations, the pattern observed in the present study may also be influenced by local environmental conditions, resource availability and fishing pressure in the Ramanathapuram waters.

Table 2: Estimated parameters of Width-weight and Length-weight relationships for the P. pelagicus sampled.


       
The regression analysis of weight against carapace dimensions revealed strong morphometric relationships in Portunus pelagicus, with tight clustering of data points following clear parabolic trends. Weight-carapace regressions in Portunus pelagicus showed negative allometry (Vidhya et al., 2016; Anjum et al., 2024), whereas positive allometry was reported in Mandapam and Karnataka (Josileen, 2011; Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1996) (Table 3). The variation in growth patterns may be due to differences in habitat, food availability and environmental conditions. Overall, the present estimates fall within the reported range for the species across different regions.

Table 3: Comparative Length-weight relationship parameters of P. pelagicus from different localities.


       
The monthly variations in the growth exponent (b) and condition factor (K) of Portunus pelagicus revealed that females consistently showed higher b values than males, with significant positive allometric growth observed in May (2.98±0.03) and October (3.01±0.02). The condition factor was also higher in females throughout the year, peaking in October (K = 1.96±0.03), indicating better well-being compared to males (Table 4). These findings suggest that females tend to invest more in body mass, possibly linked to reproductive cycles. Compared to earlier studies, the seasonal patterns align with Vidhya et al., (2016) and Josileen (2011), who also reported sex-specific growth and better condition in females during pre-spawning months. The lower b values observed during the monsoon months (June-July) in both sexes may reflect reduced feeding activity or physiological stress due to environmental fluctuations, as noted by Sukumaran and Neelakandan (1996). Similar growth patterns have been reported in other studies on P. pelagicus. For instance, negative allometric growth has been documented in populations from the northern Arabian Sea and other coastal waters, indicating that environmental variability and regional ecological conditions can influence the growth dynamics of this species (Chandravanshi et al., 2024). However, the near-isometric growth observed in females during October (b = 3.01±0.02) suggests a temporary shift in growth pattern during that period. Such seasonal deviations from the general growth trend have been reported in crustaceans and are often associated with reproductive activity, gonadal maturation, or improved feeding conditions. Seasonal variations in growth parameters have also been documented in blue swimming crab populations from Sri Lanka and other Indo-Pacific regions, where growth patterns varied between sexes and seasons (Haputhantri et al., 2021). Overall, the present results highlight seasonal shifts in growth dynamics and body condition, emphasizing the influence of reproductive and environmental factors.

Table 4: Monthly variation in allometric coefficient (b) and condition factor (K) of female ♀ and male (♂) of P. pelagicus.

The present study highlights clear seasonal and sex-specific variations in the growth patterns and condition factor of Portunus pelagicus along the Ramanathapuram coast. Females consistently exhibited higher growth exponents and better condition factors compared to males, particularly during the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon months, suggesting a strong link to reproductive and environmental cycles. The observed variations reflect the influence of seasonal factors on energy allocation and growth dynamics in this species. These findings can contribute to improved biological understanding and inform sustainable management strategies for P. pelagicus in the Gulf of Mannar region. The findings from highlight the urgent need for immediate and region-specific fisheries management measures.
       
Implementing minimum landing sizes and regulating fishing during peak breeding periods could help protect reproductive individuals and maintain stock productivity. Fishers can be encouraged to use crab traps instead gill nets, which are more selective and help reduce the capture of undersized and berried crabs. These measures would contribute to the long-term sustainability of crab fisheries along the Ramanathapuram coast near the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay.
The authors express sincere gratitude to Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University for providing facilities and thank the fishermen of Ramanathapuram district for their support in carrying out this work.
 
Funding Declaration
 
This research work was carried out with the financial support of the TNFU Merit Scholarship provided by Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Not applicable. This study did not involve any live specimen.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abdallah, M.H., Hasanin, G.D.I., ElSayed, H.B. and ElAiatt, A.A.O. (2022). Length-weight relationship, sex ratio and condition factor of blue swimmer crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Bardawil Lagoon, Egypt. SINAI Journal of Applied Sciences. 11: 739-754.

  2. Anjum, N.M., Somashekara, S.R., Sheethal, K.U., Suryawanshi, U.A., Anjanayappa, H.N., Shelke, S.T., Telvekar, P.A. and Pathan, J.G.K. (2024). Assessment of carapace dimensions, condition factor and sex ratio of Portunus pelagicus along the Mangaluru coast, Karnataka, India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology. 45: 197-206.

  3. CMFRI (2022). Annual Report 2021. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi. 300 p.

  4. CMFRI (2024). Annual Report 2023. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi. 286 p.

  5. Chandravanshi, S., Mogalekar, H.S., Sahu, A., Kashyap, N., Narsale, S., Kadam, R. and Debbarma, S. (2024). Carapace length- weight, carapace width-weight relationships, condition factor and sex ratio of freshwater crab Sartoriana spinigera (Wood-Mason, 1971) from the River Burhi Gandak, North Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5232.

  6. Dhawan, R.M., Dwivedi, S.N. and Rajamanickam, G.V. (1976). Ecology of the blue crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus) and its potential fishery in Zuari Estuary. Indian Journal of Fisheries23: 57-64.

  7. FAO (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action. FAO, Rome.

  8. Haputhantri, S.S.K., Weerasekera, S.J.W.W.M.M.P. and Bandaranayake, K.H.K. (2021). Morphometric relationships in the blue swimming crabs, (Portunus pelagicus) (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Palk Bay, Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research. 11(2): 29-38.

  9. Hartnoll, R.G. (1982). Growth. In: Bliss, D.E. (Ed.), The Biology of Crustacea, Volume 2: Embryology, Morphology and Genetics. Academic Press, New York. pp. 111-196.

  10. Josileen, J. and Menon, N.G. (2007). Fishery and growth parameters of the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus along the Mandapam coast, India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 49: 159-165.

  11. Josileen, J. (2011). Morphometrics and length-weight relationships in the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus. Crustaceana84: 1665-1681.

  12. Josileen, J., Maheswarudu, G., Padua, S., Sasikumar, G., Varghese, E. and Mohamed, K.S. (2019). Fishery management plan for palk bay blue swimming crab. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series No. 15. CMFRI, Kochi.

  13. Kanaga, V., Rajakumar, M., Jawahar, P. and Britanicy, A. (2025). Estimation of Marine Resource Vulnerability Index for the Gulf of Mannar Coast, Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-6. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5498.

  14. Keenan, C.P., Davie, P.J.F. and Mann, D.L. (1998). A revision of the genus Portunus based on morphometric and genetic analyses. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 46: 217-245.

  15. King, M.G. (2007). Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1-4051-5831-2.

  16. Kumar, M., Reddy, A.A. and Maheswarudu, G. (2019). Morphometric studies of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus from Gujarat coast. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 66: 140-144.

  17. Le Cren, E.D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology. 20: 201-219.

  18. Pauly, D. (1993). Fishbyte section: A new growth performance index based on length-weight relationship. ICLARM Fishbyte. 11(1): 12-14.

  19. Pillai, S.L. and Thirumilu, P. (2011). Fishery and biology of Portunus pelagicus along Tamil Nadu coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 53: 59-65.

  20. Potter, I.C., Chrystal, P.J. and Loneragan, N.R. (1983). The biology of the blue manna crab Portunus pelagicus in an Australian estuary. Marine Biology. 78: 75-85.

  21. Pramithasari, F.A., Butet, N.A. and Wardiatno, Y. (2017). Variation in morphometric characters in four sand crab (Albunea symmysta) populations from Indonesia. Tropical Life Sciences Research. 28: 103-115.

  22. Rajamani, M. and Palanichamy, A. (2010). Current status of crab fishery in the artisanal sector along Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay coasts. In: Coastal Fishery Resources of India - Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation. Society of Fisheries Technologists, Cochin. pp. 90-97.

  23. Sahu, A., Venkataramani, V.K., Chandravanshi, S., Chandran, S., Ram, R.K., Kashyap, N. and Lavkush. (2025). Carapace length/ width-weight relationships and relative condition factor of two commercially important Charybdis species of the gulf of mannar, southeast coast of India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5370.

  24. Sajeevan, M.K. and Ramachandran, C. (2016). Population dynamics of the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Malabar Coast, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 63(2): 27-33.

  25. Saroj, J., Jawahar, P., Srinivasan, A., Neethiselvan, N. and Jayakumar, N. (2020). Pelagic fish eggs diversity in the nearshore waters of gulf of mannar, south east coast of India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(10): 1296-1303. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3889.

  26. Sukumaran, K.K. and Neelakantan, B. (1996). Relative growth and sexual maturity in Portunus sanguinolentus and Portunus pelagicus along the southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 43: 215-223.

  27. Sukumaran, K.K. and Neelakantan, B. (1997). Length-weight relationship in two marine portunid crabs from the Karnataka coast. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences. 26: 39-42.

  28. Thomas, M. (1984) Studies on portunid crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). PhD thesis. University of Cochin.

  29. Tina, F.W. (2015) Body weight-carapace length and body weight- carapace width relationships of blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from Phuket, Thailand. Multidisciplinary Education Global Quest. 4: 31-40.

  30. Vidhya, V., Jawahar, P., Padmavathy, P. and Karuppasamy, K. (2016). Morphometric and length-weight relationship of Portunus pelagicus from the Gulf of Mannar coast. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research. 45: 756-768.

Length-weight and Carapace Width-weight Relationships of Portunus pelagicus  (Linnaeus, 1758) in Gillnet Fisheries along the Ramanathapuram Coast (Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar), India

J
J. Amalashajeeva1,*
N
N. Neethiselvan1
M
M. Kalaiarasan1
N
N. Jayakumar2
R
R. Shalini3
K
K. Karuppasamy2
S
S. Archana1
1Department of Fishing Technology and Fisheries Engineering, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.
2Department of Fisheries Resource and Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.
3Department of Fish Quality Assurance and Management, Fisheries College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University, Thoothukudi-628 008, Tamil Nadu, India.

Background: The blue swimming crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), supports an important export-oriented fishery along the Ramanathapuram coast, covering the Palk Bay and Gulf of Mannar. Information on sex-specific and seasonal growth patterns is essential for stock assessment and sustainable management of this commercially valuable species.

Methods: A total of 1,131 specimens of P. pelagicus (677 females and 454 males) were collected from two major landing centers along the Ramanathapuram coast. Carapace length-weight (CL-W) and carapace width-weight (CW-W) relationships were estimated using regression analysis. Deviation in sex ratio was tested using the chi-square (χ2) test. Growth patterns were assessed through allometric coefficients and monthly variations in growth parameters and condition factor were analyzed.

Result: The overall sex ratio was significantly female-biased (1:1.49; χ2 = 49.21, p<.001). Strong morphometric relationships were observed in both sexes and pooled samples, exhibiting negative allometric growth. The CW-W relationship showed b values of 2.874 in females and 2.712 in males, while the CL-W relationship yielded b values of 2.891 in females and 2.763 in males; all values differed significantly from the isometric coefficient (p<.001). Monthly analysis revealed consistently higher growth exponents and condition factors in females, with peak values during May and October, likely linked to reproductive activity.

The blue swimmer crab, Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758), is a commercially valuable portunid species widely distributed across the Indo-pacific region (Keenan et al., 1998). In India, it plays a dominant role in marine crab fisheries, especially along the southeast coast, including Tamil Nadu’s Ramanathapuram district, where it supports vibrant artisanal fisheries using gillnets, traps and trawl nets (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Saroj et al., (2020) reported that the Gulf of Mannar is one of the most productive marine regions. Kanaga et al. (2025) identified Ramanathapuram as the most vulnerable district in the Gulf of Mannar region, primarily due to intense overfishing and significant habitat degradation.
       
As the second most important marine crustacean group after penaeid shrimps, crabs contributed 62,696 tonnes-14.08% of India’s marine crustacean landings in 2023-with the east coast alone accounting for 56.7% of this catch (CMFRI, 2024; Josileen et al., 2019). In Ramanathapuram, P. pelagicus constitutes 95% of the crab landings in the Gulf of Mannar and is the sole species harvested from Palk Bay (Rajamani and Palanichamy, 2010), mirroring its dominance in adjacent Sri Lankan waters (Haputhantri et al., 2021). This region includes the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay, which are characterized by diverse habitats such as coral reefs, seagrass beds and mangroves that support rich marine biodiversity and productive fisheries. Globally, the species contributes approximately 298,000 tonnes annually, representing 5% of total crustacean fisheries (FAO, 2020).
       
Despite its economic importance, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the growth dynamics and population structure of P. pelagicus along the Ramanathapuram coast. While several studies have investigated the length-weight relationships (LWR) of this species in other Indian regions-including negative allometric growth in Kerala (Josileen, 2011), isometric growth in Gujarat (Kumar et al., 2019) and sex-specific growth patterns in Andhra Pradesh (Sajeevan and Ramachandran, 2016)-the biologically distinct Palk Bay-gulf of Mannar region remains underexplored. This lack of region-specific morphometric data hampers accurate stock assessments and hinders sustainable management of a fishery increasingly threatened by high exploitation pressure (Pillai and Thirumilu, 2011). Moreover, rising export demand, intensified fishing and reports of declining crab sizes (CMFRI, 2022) underscore the urgent need to establish baseline biological parameters for evidence-based management interventions, such as size limits and seasonal closures.
       
This study addresses this critical knowledge gap by providing the first comprehensive analysis of the carapace length–weight and carapace width-weight relationships of P. pelagicus from the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay regions of Ramanathapuram district. Using standardized methods (Le Cren, 1951; Pauly, 1993), the study evaluates sex-specific and seasonal growth patterns, providing vital reference data for regional comparisons and stock monitoring. The present study investigates the carapace length–weight relationship of the blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus with the aim of informing conservation efforts. The study quantified the relationships between carapace length, carapace width, body weight and condition factor of P. pelagicus collected from the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay regions of Ramanathapuram District.The outcomes are expected to support science-based conservation strategies and enhance the long-term sustainability of this economically and ecologically significant fishery.
The study was conducted across two primary blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) landing centres along the Ramanathapuram district - Thirupalaikudi (09o32.764'N 78o55.033'E) in Palk Bay and Vedhalai (09o27.23'N 79o10.40'E) in the Gulf of Mannar - from April 2023 to March 2024 (Fig 1). These sites were selected based on their ecological distinctiveness and importance in regional crab fisheries as established in previous studies (Rajamani and Palanichamy, 2010; CMFRI, 2024). Sampling was conducted for five days each month using a random sampling approach from the selected landing centres during peak landing times to ensure representative coverage of seasonal variations in crab populations (Pillai and Thirumilu, 2011).             

Fig 1: Map showing study area.

      

The bottom set gillnet dominates the crab fishery throughout the entire Gulf of Mannar region (Sahu et al., 2025). In the Ramanathapuram district crab fishery, crab gill nets account for the majority of the catch (approximately 95%). Accordingly, samples of Portunus pelagicus were collected from crab gill net operations conducted 5-10 nautical miles offshore along the Ramanathapuram coast and specimens were obtained directly from fishing vessels at the time of landing. A total of 1,131 Portunus pelagicus specimens (677 females, 454 males) were sampled, reflecting the natural sex ratio observed in the fishery. Each specimen was immediately processed to record carapace width (CW), defined as the distance between the tips of the posterior-most lateral spines and carapace length (CL), measured dorsally along the midline from the frontal notch to the posterior carapace margin, using Vernier calipers with 0.5 mm precision. Total weight was measured to the nearest gram using an electronic balance after blotting excess moisture.
       
The length-weight and width-weight relationships were analyzed using the power function:
 
W = aLb
 
Where
W = Represents expected weight (g).
L = Denotes either carapace length or width (mm).
‘a’ = Y-intercept (initial growth coefficient).
‘b’ = Slope (growth coefficient).
       
Parameters were calculated through least squares regression after logarithmic transformation of the data to linearize the relationship, following standard crustacean biometric protocols (Hartnoll, 1982). The strength of each morphometric relationship was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r). Sexual dimorphism in growth patterns was evaluated through one-way ANOVA comparing the carapace width-weight relationships between sexes, with statistical significance set at 5% level (P<0.05) using SPSS software (v.25). The body weight (W) is identified as the dependent variable, while sex is specified as the grouping factor for the comparison of carapace width-weight relationships. In addition, the normality assumption was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test prior to conducting the ANOVA. This analytical approach allowed for direct comparison with established growth parameters from other regional populations while accounting for potential sex-specific growth variations characteristic of portunid crabs (Keenan et al., 1998).
       
The condition factor (K) of Portunus pelagicus was calculated to assess the general health, robustness and physiological status of individuals across sexes and seasons. The condition factor was determined using the formula:

 
Where
W = Total body weight (g),
L = Carapace length (mm) and
b = Exponent obtained from the length-weight relationship regression equation
 
W = aLb
 
This method accounts for allometric growth and provides a standardized measure of well-being relative to body size (Le Cren, 1951). The condition factor was computed separately for males and females on a monthly basis to evaluate seasonal variation.
A total of 1131 crabs were sampled during the study period, comprising 677 females and 454 males. The carapace width of crabs ranged from 43 to 192 mm, while the weight varied between 28 and 474 g and carapace length ranged from 19 to 84 mm. Female crabs exhibited a broader size range (CW: 43-192 mm; W: 28-474 g; CL: 19-84 mm) compared to males (CW: 49-185 mm; W: 32–381 g; CL: 22-83 mm). The observed sex ratio was 1.49:1 (F:M), significantly deviating from the expected 1:1 ratio (χ² = 49.21, P<0.001), indicating a female-biased population (Table 1). These measurements show broader size ranges than those reported by Vidhya et al., (2016) in the Gulf of Mannar (females: 24-460 g, 45-200 mm CW; males: 34-340 g, 74-182 mm CW) and substantially exceed the size ranges documented in Thai populations (Tina, 2015: 83.8-122 mm CW). The observed female-biased sex ratio recorded in this study contrasts with the 1:1 ratio reported by Josileen and Menon (2007) in Mandapam, potentially indicating regional variations in reproductive behavior or fishing pressure. The predominance of females in the catch may be related to factors such as seasonal migration, reproductive behaviour, habitat preference and gear selectivity, which can influence the capture probability of each sex. In many portunid crabs, females migrate to specific areas for feeding and spawning, increasing their susceptibility to fishing gears (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997). Variations in sex ratio may also result from differences in growth, mortality and exploitation between sexes (King, 2007). However, these factors were not directly examined in the present study and should be considered as possible explanations rather than definitive causes.

Table 1: Descriptive summary of carapace width, weight and carapace length of P. pelagicus.


       
Growth pattern analysis revealed females were heavier than males below 110-113 mm CW, beyond which males showed significantly faster weight gain pattern consistent with findings by Sukumaran and Neelakantan (1997) along the Mangalore coast but occurring at smaller size thresholds in our population. This transition size is notably smaller than the 115-125 mm CW reported by Josileen (2011), suggesting  possible environmental influences on growth dynamics. The male-dominant growth pattern at larger sizes aligns with observations by Potter et al., (1983) in Australian waters and Thomas (1984) along the Cochin coast, though contrasts sharply with Dhawan et al. (1976) findings of consistently heavier females in Goan waters. The observed differences in the b values between males and females may be related to sex-specific biological processes. In many portunid crabs, females allocate significant energy to gonadal development and egg production, which can influence body weight relative to size and lead to differences in growth patterns between sexes. Similar sex-based differences in LWR parameters have been reported in previous studies on swimming crabs (Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1997; Josileen, 2011).         
       
The regression analysis of carapace width and body weight (Table 2A) revealed a negative allometric growth pattern in both sexes as well as in the combined population. For females (n = 677), the equation was W = 0.00042 × CW2.874 with a coefficient of determination (r² = 0.96), indicating a strong correlation. Males (n = 454) also exhibited a negative allometric growth (W = 0.00051 × CW2.712; r² = 0.95). The combined population (n = 1131) followed the equation W = 0.00046 × CW2.803  with the highest correlation (r² = 0.97). In all cases, the slope (b) was significantly different from the isometric value of 3, as indicated by t-test values ranging from -4.38 to -8.71 (P<0.001), confirming the prevalence of negative allometric growth. Similarly, the carapace length–weight relationship also indicated negative allometric growth in all groups (Table 2B). The regression equation for females was W = 0.018 × CL2.891 (r² = 0.97) and for males, it was W = 0.021 × CL2.763 (r² = 0.96). The combined data yielded the equation W = 0.019 × CL2.834 with a very high coefficient of determination (r² = 0.98). All b values significantly deviated from 3 (isometric value), as confirmed by t-test values ranging from -4.217 to -9.000 (P<0.001), reaffirming the negative allometric growth pattern across sexes and pooled data. Although Kumar et al., (2019) reported negative allometric growth commonly in less exploited populations, the pattern observed in the present study may also be influenced by local environmental conditions, resource availability and fishing pressure in the Ramanathapuram waters.

Table 2: Estimated parameters of Width-weight and Length-weight relationships for the P. pelagicus sampled.


       
The regression analysis of weight against carapace dimensions revealed strong morphometric relationships in Portunus pelagicus, with tight clustering of data points following clear parabolic trends. Weight-carapace regressions in Portunus pelagicus showed negative allometry (Vidhya et al., 2016; Anjum et al., 2024), whereas positive allometry was reported in Mandapam and Karnataka (Josileen, 2011; Sukumaran and Neelakantan, 1996) (Table 3). The variation in growth patterns may be due to differences in habitat, food availability and environmental conditions. Overall, the present estimates fall within the reported range for the species across different regions.

Table 3: Comparative Length-weight relationship parameters of P. pelagicus from different localities.


       
The monthly variations in the growth exponent (b) and condition factor (K) of Portunus pelagicus revealed that females consistently showed higher b values than males, with significant positive allometric growth observed in May (2.98±0.03) and October (3.01±0.02). The condition factor was also higher in females throughout the year, peaking in October (K = 1.96±0.03), indicating better well-being compared to males (Table 4). These findings suggest that females tend to invest more in body mass, possibly linked to reproductive cycles. Compared to earlier studies, the seasonal patterns align with Vidhya et al., (2016) and Josileen (2011), who also reported sex-specific growth and better condition in females during pre-spawning months. The lower b values observed during the monsoon months (June-July) in both sexes may reflect reduced feeding activity or physiological stress due to environmental fluctuations, as noted by Sukumaran and Neelakandan (1996). Similar growth patterns have been reported in other studies on P. pelagicus. For instance, negative allometric growth has been documented in populations from the northern Arabian Sea and other coastal waters, indicating that environmental variability and regional ecological conditions can influence the growth dynamics of this species (Chandravanshi et al., 2024). However, the near-isometric growth observed in females during October (b = 3.01±0.02) suggests a temporary shift in growth pattern during that period. Such seasonal deviations from the general growth trend have been reported in crustaceans and are often associated with reproductive activity, gonadal maturation, or improved feeding conditions. Seasonal variations in growth parameters have also been documented in blue swimming crab populations from Sri Lanka and other Indo-Pacific regions, where growth patterns varied between sexes and seasons (Haputhantri et al., 2021). Overall, the present results highlight seasonal shifts in growth dynamics and body condition, emphasizing the influence of reproductive and environmental factors.

Table 4: Monthly variation in allometric coefficient (b) and condition factor (K) of female ♀ and male (♂) of P. pelagicus.

The present study highlights clear seasonal and sex-specific variations in the growth patterns and condition factor of Portunus pelagicus along the Ramanathapuram coast. Females consistently exhibited higher growth exponents and better condition factors compared to males, particularly during the pre-monsoon and post-monsoon months, suggesting a strong link to reproductive and environmental cycles. The observed variations reflect the influence of seasonal factors on energy allocation and growth dynamics in this species. These findings can contribute to improved biological understanding and inform sustainable management strategies for P. pelagicus in the Gulf of Mannar region. The findings from highlight the urgent need for immediate and region-specific fisheries management measures.
       
Implementing minimum landing sizes and regulating fishing during peak breeding periods could help protect reproductive individuals and maintain stock productivity. Fishers can be encouraged to use crab traps instead gill nets, which are more selective and help reduce the capture of undersized and berried crabs. These measures would contribute to the long-term sustainability of crab fisheries along the Ramanathapuram coast near the Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay.
The authors express sincere gratitude to Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University for providing facilities and thank the fishermen of Ramanathapuram district for their support in carrying out this work.
 
Funding Declaration
 
This research work was carried out with the financial support of the TNFU Merit Scholarship provided by Tamil Nadu Dr.J.Jayalalithaa Fisheries University.
 
Disclaimers
 
The views and conclusions expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of their affiliated institutions. The authors are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, but do not accept any liability for any direct or indirect losses resulting from the use of this content.
 
Informed consent
 
Not applicable. This study did not involve any live specimen.
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. No funding or sponsorship influenced the design of the study, data collection, analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

  1. Abdallah, M.H., Hasanin, G.D.I., ElSayed, H.B. and ElAiatt, A.A.O. (2022). Length-weight relationship, sex ratio and condition factor of blue swimmer crab (Portunus pelagicus) in Bardawil Lagoon, Egypt. SINAI Journal of Applied Sciences. 11: 739-754.

  2. Anjum, N.M., Somashekara, S.R., Sheethal, K.U., Suryawanshi, U.A., Anjanayappa, H.N., Shelke, S.T., Telvekar, P.A. and Pathan, J.G.K. (2024). Assessment of carapace dimensions, condition factor and sex ratio of Portunus pelagicus along the Mangaluru coast, Karnataka, India. Uttar Pradesh Journal of Zoology. 45: 197-206.

  3. CMFRI (2022). Annual Report 2021. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi. 300 p.

  4. CMFRI (2024). Annual Report 2023. Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi. 286 p.

  5. Chandravanshi, S., Mogalekar, H.S., Sahu, A., Kashyap, N., Narsale, S., Kadam, R. and Debbarma, S. (2024). Carapace length- weight, carapace width-weight relationships, condition factor and sex ratio of freshwater crab Sartoriana spinigera (Wood-Mason, 1971) from the River Burhi Gandak, North Bihar, India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5232.

  6. Dhawan, R.M., Dwivedi, S.N. and Rajamanickam, G.V. (1976). Ecology of the blue crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus) and its potential fishery in Zuari Estuary. Indian Journal of Fisheries23: 57-64.

  7. FAO (2020). The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2020: Sustainability in Action. FAO, Rome.

  8. Haputhantri, S.S.K., Weerasekera, S.J.W.W.M.M.P. and Bandaranayake, K.H.K. (2021). Morphometric relationships in the blue swimming crabs, (Portunus pelagicus) (Linnaeus, 1758) from the Palk Bay, Sri Lanka. Asian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Research. 11(2): 29-38.

  9. Hartnoll, R.G. (1982). Growth. In: Bliss, D.E. (Ed.), The Biology of Crustacea, Volume 2: Embryology, Morphology and Genetics. Academic Press, New York. pp. 111-196.

  10. Josileen, J. and Menon, N.G. (2007). Fishery and growth parameters of the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus along the Mandapam coast, India. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 49: 159-165.

  11. Josileen, J. (2011). Morphometrics and length-weight relationships in the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus. Crustaceana84: 1665-1681.

  12. Josileen, J., Maheswarudu, G., Padua, S., Sasikumar, G., Varghese, E. and Mohamed, K.S. (2019). Fishery management plan for palk bay blue swimming crab. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy Series No. 15. CMFRI, Kochi.

  13. Kanaga, V., Rajakumar, M., Jawahar, P. and Britanicy, A. (2025). Estimation of Marine Resource Vulnerability Index for the Gulf of Mannar Coast, Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-6. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5498.

  14. Keenan, C.P., Davie, P.J.F. and Mann, D.L. (1998). A revision of the genus Portunus based on morphometric and genetic analyses. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. 46: 217-245.

  15. King, M.G. (2007). Fisheries Biology, Assessment and Management (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1-4051-5831-2.

  16. Kumar, M., Reddy, A.A. and Maheswarudu, G. (2019). Morphometric studies of blue swimming crab Portunus pelagicus from Gujarat coast. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 66: 140-144.

  17. Le Cren, E.D. (1951). The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in perch (Perca fluviatilis). Journal of Animal Ecology. 20: 201-219.

  18. Pauly, D. (1993). Fishbyte section: A new growth performance index based on length-weight relationship. ICLARM Fishbyte. 11(1): 12-14.

  19. Pillai, S.L. and Thirumilu, P. (2011). Fishery and biology of Portunus pelagicus along Tamil Nadu coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of India. 53: 59-65.

  20. Potter, I.C., Chrystal, P.J. and Loneragan, N.R. (1983). The biology of the blue manna crab Portunus pelagicus in an Australian estuary. Marine Biology. 78: 75-85.

  21. Pramithasari, F.A., Butet, N.A. and Wardiatno, Y. (2017). Variation in morphometric characters in four sand crab (Albunea symmysta) populations from Indonesia. Tropical Life Sciences Research. 28: 103-115.

  22. Rajamani, M. and Palanichamy, A. (2010). Current status of crab fishery in the artisanal sector along Gulf of Mannar and Palk Bay coasts. In: Coastal Fishery Resources of India - Conservation and Sustainable Utilisation. Society of Fisheries Technologists, Cochin. pp. 90-97.

  23. Sahu, A., Venkataramani, V.K., Chandravanshi, S., Chandran, S., Ram, R.K., Kashyap, N. and Lavkush. (2025). Carapace length/ width-weight relationships and relative condition factor of two commercially important Charybdis species of the gulf of mannar, southeast coast of India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 1-7. doi: 10.18805/IJAR.B-5370.

  24. Sajeevan, M.K. and Ramachandran, C. (2016). Population dynamics of the blue swimmer crab Portunus pelagicus (Linnaeus, 1758) along the Malabar Coast, India. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 63(2): 27-33.

  25. Saroj, J., Jawahar, P., Srinivasan, A., Neethiselvan, N. and Jayakumar, N. (2020). Pelagic fish eggs diversity in the nearshore waters of gulf of mannar, south east coast of India. Indian Journal of Animal Research. 54(10): 1296-1303. doi: 10.18805/ijar.B-3889.

  26. Sukumaran, K.K. and Neelakantan, B. (1996). Relative growth and sexual maturity in Portunus sanguinolentus and Portunus pelagicus along the southwest coast of India. Indian Journal of Fisheries. 43: 215-223.

  27. Sukumaran, K.K. and Neelakantan, B. (1997). Length-weight relationship in two marine portunid crabs from the Karnataka coast. Indian Journal of Marine Sciences. 26: 39-42.

  28. Thomas, M. (1984) Studies on portunid crabs (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura). PhD thesis. University of Cochin.

  29. Tina, F.W. (2015) Body weight-carapace length and body weight- carapace width relationships of blue swimming crab (Portunus pelagicus) from Phuket, Thailand. Multidisciplinary Education Global Quest. 4: 31-40.

  30. Vidhya, V., Jawahar, P., Padmavathy, P. and Karuppasamy, K. (2016). Morphometric and length-weight relationship of Portunus pelagicus from the Gulf of Mannar coast. Indian Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences Research. 45: 756-768.
In this Article
Published In
Indian Journal of Animal Research

Editorial Board

View all (0)